Democrats SUE to stop Arizona Senate from forensic audit of 2020 election

[Lastamender]

because the media has lost all credibility and not welcome anywhere,,,

If they have no credibility then why not just let them in? There’s no reason not to.

to let them in would be more stupid,,

what is it you think they will do if they get in?? they cant see anything other than people looking at ballots from a distance,,

Not letting them in is cowardly. No reason not to if you want to have a legitimate audit.

Why don’t you want to have a legitimate audit?

Again, why didn't Maricopa county when they hired an un-certified company? You are losing badly.

 

[colfax_m]

I know the courts are corrupt, but thanks for affirming it.

They’re not corrupt. They just don’t believe the lies you like to believe.

Not corrupt? Trump showed just how corrupt this government is. No cigar they are as corrupt as the day is long.

Trump didn’t show anything of the sort. He just lied a lot.

 

[colfax_m]

because the media has lost all credibility and not welcome anywhere,,,

If they have no credibility then why not just let them in? There’s no reason not to.

to let them in would be more stupid,,

what is it you think they will do if they get in?? they cant see anything other than people looking at ballots from a distance,,

Not letting them in is cowardly. No reason not to if you want to have a legitimate audit.

Why don’t you want to have a legitimate audit?

having them in there doesnt make it legit,,

Totally necessary. Countries that don’t allow media in their vote counting process are immediately suspicious.

No reason not to.

Unless you’re trying to hide something.

 

[colfax_m]

Again, why didn't Maricopa county when they hired an un-certified company? You are losing badly.

Maricopa county didn’t hire an uncertified company. The Republicans did.

 

[progressive hunter]

because the media has lost all credibility and not welcome anywhere,,,

If they have no credibility then why not just let them in? There’s no reason not to.

to let them in would be more stupid,,

what is it you think they will do if they get in?? they cant see anything other than people looking at ballots from a distance,,

Not letting them in is cowardly. No reason not to if you want to have a legitimate audit.

Why don’t you want to have a legitimate audit?

having them in there doesnt make it legit,,

Totally necessary. Countries that don’t allow media in their vote counting process are immediately suspicious.

No reason not to.

Unless you’re trying to hide something.

what would they do if they were in there??

 

[busybee01]

The audit is showing a shit,oad of inconsistencies. What a shock.

And it is all fake inconsistencies.

What about illegal colored pens (they are NOT using RED) which is the authorized color for audits when they find errors or mistakes NOT the blue or black ones which CAN be used to change votes since it's color voters used when they first cast their votes ....

What a slimy stunt.

That was FAKE NEWS.

 

[Lastamender]

I know the courts are corrupt, but thanks for affirming it.

They’re not corrupt. They just don’t believe the lies you like to believe.

Not corrupt? Trump showed just how corrupt this government is. No cigar they are as corrupt as the day is long.

Trump didn’t show anything of the sort. He just lied a lot.

Really? When he exposed the Russia hoax with documents that say they proceeded to investigate despite credible evidence? And kept the bogus claim alive for two years after admitting that. That is big time corruption and sedition. The DOJ and the FBI refusing to investigate fraud is the icing on the cake. Judges refusing to hear evidence. All due to bone deep corruption in every branch of government.

 

[colfax_m]

what would they do if they were in there??

Report.

 

[progressive hunter]

what would they do if they were in there??

Report.

they can do that from the outside since they cant see anything other than people looking at ballots from a distance,,

 

[Lastamender]

Again, why didn't Maricopa county when they hired an un-certified company? You are losing badly.

Maricopa county didn’t hire an uncertified company. The Republicans did.

I posted a link that says the first audit was done by a company not certified to do it. That is a fact, I do not care who hired them.

 

[schmidlap]

"Of course, "Cyber Ninjas" is legit! Just look at the
swanky mail-drop Fast Dougie rents here in Philly!"​

 

[skye]

I hear the ballots and machines are already in place and the auditing begins tomorrow.

If this is all on the up-and-up, why wouldn't the commiecrats want to rub everyone's noses in it?

I agree. If the election were fair and they won the Dems should be crowing about it. Not trying to stop the audit.

The election was the biggest fraudulent election in this countries history and there was plenty of proof to back that up. Trump won that election and it was stolen.

I absolutely agree!

 

[colfax_m]

what would they do if they were in there??

Report.

they can do that from the outside since they cant see anything other than people looking at ballots from a distance,,

Clearly you know nothing about reporting.

Can’t do it from outside. You need access.

They’re afraid of allowing people to report on what they’re doing.

 

[skye]

What are the Dems scared of? Why are they fighting to simply do an audit? Geez...God forbid that the State of Arizona wants to ensure they have a secure and free election

The DemRats are scared of the truth.

The truth that Trump won this election.

 

[progressive hunter]

what would they do if they were in there??

Report.

they can do that from the outside since they cant see anything other than people looking at ballots from a distance,,

Clearly you know nothing about reporting.

Can’t do it from outside. You need access.

They’re afraid of allowing people to report on what they’re doing.

they do it all the time with their anonymous sources,,

and did you know all the counters have several cameras on them at all times,, and there are live feed cameras too,,

 

[busybee01]

Anything that goes against the party line and their agenda is deemed a conspiracy theory and then twisted and spun to a point where it appears crazy

Except a lot of you are crazy. Some of y’all think that the election was stolen and that special forces and the CIA had a firefight in Frankfurt Germany where a server that did the election fraud was seized.

I mean, sorry, but some of y’all are straight up nuts.

I know nothing about the CIA firefight situation, but coupling that with the idea that this election was not on the up and up seems disingenuous and demonstrates exactly my point. There were quite a few anomalies in this election that were never investigated and the Democrats don’t seem interested in pursuing. On top of that, they are introducing legislation in an attempt to emulate this past election with some additional goodies like no voter id. Acknowledging that all of this is suspicious is not nuts, it is pragmatic. Not acknowledging that it is suspicous is much more damaging for the long term success of our country.

It’s a theory that was referenced by none other than Sydney Powell herself. The problem with trying to marginalize these theories is that people who were highly connected to the con are part of them.

The crazy went all the way to the top here.

If its "all crazy" as you are inferring, what's wrong with investing a little bit of money to investigate and audit the election procedures in 2020? A lot of people have doubts about the electoral validity of the election, and Sleepy Joe should be working to eliminate the taint over his supposed election so he can have the legitimacy to rule over us.

Your guy lost the popular vote twice and must have cheated the first time. Let's audit the 2016 results.

Go for it. Audit as far back as you like. I’m pretty certain what they find and I can guarantee you won’t like it.

Like right wingers don't like the current results?

we just want the accusations announced looked into. Many county electoral reps. claimed foul, and the judges in those counties refused them their right to challenge. That implies foul play. sorry. Why would a judge not allow them to bring in their evidence?

The ballots are the people's

Because the plaintiffs presented no evidence. Judges do not find evidence. They are not a grand jury.

dude, no way to respond to that much stupid.

Because you can't respond to a fact.

 

[busybee01]

The judges refused to hear the evidence.

Judges heard all properly submitted evidence. Don’t lie. But you also just said they never had the evidence until now. Try to be a little more consistent

How is a ballot proven to be illegal not evidence?

When you claim it’s proven but in reality it’s fine and you just don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yeah, that was the very problem. Courts would dismiss cases before adequate time for discovery.

Why are the Democrats trying so hard to hide the audit results?

The courts do not function as grand juries. Why are Republicans trying to hide the methods?

 

[struth]

The judges refused to hear the evidence.

Judges heard all properly submitted evidence. Don’t lie. But you also just said they never had the evidence until now. Try to be a little more consistent

How is a ballot proven to be illegal not evidence?

When you claim it’s proven but in reality it’s fine and you just don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yeah, that was the very problem. Courts would dismiss cases before adequate time for discovery.

Why are the Democrats trying so hard to hide the audit results?

The courts do not function as grand juries. Why are Republicans trying to hide the methods?

we don’t use grand juries in civil cases. Geez

 

[busybee01]

Actually it had a lot to do with this case. It was cited by the SCOTUS judges that wanted to hear the the case bought by the Texas AG. The same rights were violated.

The case brought by the Texas AG is also irrelevant to this discussion.

Well, what is relevant is the ballots. Those ballots are the evidence if they are illegal. That can be proven. That is why Democrats are desperate.

Then why are Republicans only looking at ballots in Maricopa county? If they were truly interested in validating their election, they would audit the entire state. Clearly, they are Republicans whose only interest is flipping the election for the Republican candidate.

Because Maricopa’s voting rules were different than the rest of the state, thanks to the corrupt Dems they were in charge of it.

Anymore stupid questions?

The Republicans were in charge. They refused to participate in this farce.

 

[busybee01]

The judges refused to hear the evidence.

Judges heard all properly submitted evidence. Don’t lie. But you also just said they never had the evidence until now. Try to be a little more consistent

How is a ballot proven to be illegal not evidence?

When you claim it’s proven but in reality it’s fine and you just don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yeah, that was the very problem. Courts would dismiss cases before adequate time for discovery.

Why are the Democrats trying so hard to hide the audit results?

The courts do not function as grand juries. Why are Republicans trying to hide the methods?

we don’t use grand juries in civil cases. Geez

That is what you are asking these judges to do.