DemoRATS have now declared political civil war....

[Billiejeens]

for 150 years they opposed civil rights

but today they claim that they ALWAYS SUPPORTED civil rights and it was those RACIST DEMS who opposed it

Fact Check: ‘More Republicans Voted for the Civil Rights Act as a Percentage Than Democrats Did’

Yes, the Northern liberal Republicans voted for civil rights, while the racist right wing Democrats of the South opposed it.

And?

Our school system failed you so badly

 

[g5000]

for 150 years they opposed civil rights

but today they claim that they ALWAYS SUPPORTED civil rights and it was those RACIST DEMS who opposed it

Fact Check: ‘More Republicans Voted for the Civil Rights Act as a Percentage Than Democrats Did’

Yes, the Northern liberal Republicans voted for civil rights, while the racist right wing Democrats of the South opposed it.

And?

Our school system failed you so badly

Your propagandists have made you mentally ill. In a very real Orwellian sense.

 

[Faun]

for 150 years they opposed civil rights

but today they claim that they ALWAYS SUPPORTED civil rights and it was those RACIST DEMS who opposed it

Fact Check: ‘More Republicans Voted for the Civil Rights Act as a Percentage Than Democrats Did’

That's only because the north had lots of Republicans AND Democrats while the racist conservative south was almost all Democrats.

In the south, 92% of Democrats (112) voted against along with 100% of Republicans (12).

All total by north/south

Aye

North: 353 (90%)
South: 9 (7%)

Nay

North: 38 (10%)
South: 115 (93%)

The split was north/south, not Republican/Democrat.

 

[g5000]

for 150 years they opposed civil rights

but today they claim that they ALWAYS SUPPORTED civil rights and it was those RACIST DEMS who opposed it

Fact Check: ‘More Republicans Voted for the Civil Rights Act as a Percentage Than Democrats Did’

That's only because the north had lots of Republicans AND Democrats while the racist conservative south was almost all Democrats.

In the south, 92% of Democrats (112) voted against along with 100% of Republicans (12).

All total by north/south

Aye

North: 353 (90%)
South: 9 (7%)

Nay

North: 38 (10%)
South: 115 (93%)

The split was north/south, not Republican/Democrat.

Exactly.

The split was liberal/conservative.

 

[Faun]

Nothing will be undone

Pence will become President

The Senate does the impeaching.
That is not going to happen.

Keep dreaming.

Which won't bode well for the 23 Republican seats up for grabs next year if the public largely believes he should have been convicted.

They already don't
Overwhelmingly.

I've seen polls ranging from high 40's to high 50's. And the public hearings are just getting started.

At this point in Nixon's impeachment proceedings, not a single Republican voted to proceed either and public support was lower.

These impeachment proceeding should be done by the Judiciary committee.
In the House Judiciary Committee;
The vote was 27 to 11, with 6 of the committee's 17 Republicans joining all 21 Democrats in voting to send the article to the House.
The correct way to this.

Chillax, we haven't gotten to drafting articles of impeachment yet. We just entered the open hearings phase yesterday.

 

[Billiejeens]

They already don't
Overwhelmingly.

I've seen polls ranging from high 40's to high 50's. And the public hearings are just getting started.

At this point in Nixon's impeachment proceedings, not a single Republican voted to proceed either and public support was lower.

Do you have rebuttal other than a smiley face?

LOL

Laughing at your drivel wasn't enough?

If that's all you have

LOL

That's all I need.

So there were no FISA warrants issued?

 

[Faun]

Total political war has been joined. On the floor of the United Sates House of Representatives on Thursday, the battle lines were drawn — and they could not be more clear or decisive. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “Every member should support allowing the American people to hear the facts for themselves. That is really what this vote is about. It is about the truth, and what is at stake in all of this is nothing less than our democracy.”

Stirring stuff, but not to be outdone, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan fired back, calling into question the origins of the Ukraine investigation that began with a whistleblower’s meeting with Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s staff.

Chiding the chairman, Jordan said, “One member of this body knows who this person is who started this whole darn, crazy process: Chairman Schiff. And what’s this resolution do? Gives him even more power to run this secret proceeding in a bunker in the basement of the Capitol.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

Reading through the resolution sounds exactly like a manifest from Soviet Russia....Schitt for brains has been given the power to approve witnesses, limit their testimony, and may or may NOT allow the president to have legal council in attendance for ALL proceedings...if the Republicans did this the ABNORMALS of the left and their slavish co conspirators in the MSM would go nuts!!!!!

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “Every member should support allowing the American people to hear the facts for themselves."

You don't support that, Zippy?

Cherry picked facts.
No one should support.

Cherry picked facts? Republicans will get to call their own witnesses in the open hearings. So what's cherry picked?

Any wittnesess brought up by R's can be refused by Schiff.
The whole bill gives more power to Schiff.
Read the bill at Thomas.gov

Of course Schiff has more power. He's the committee chairman. That's how these things work. This is how they've always worked. But now the hearings will be open. If Schiff abuses that power, it will reflect negatively on him and this process. Attention Schiff doesn't want since public support is crucial in impeaching Trump.

 

[peach174]

Total political war has been joined. On the floor of the United Sates House of Representatives on Thursday, the battle lines were drawn — and they could not be more clear or decisive. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “Every member should support allowing the American people to hear the facts for themselves. That is really what this vote is about. It is about the truth, and what is at stake in all of this is nothing less than our democracy.”

Stirring stuff, but not to be outdone, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan fired back, calling into question the origins of the Ukraine investigation that began with a whistleblower’s meeting with Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s staff.

Chiding the chairman, Jordan said, “One member of this body knows who this person is who started this whole darn, crazy process: Chairman Schiff. And what’s this resolution do? Gives him even more power to run this secret proceeding in a bunker in the basement of the Capitol.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

Reading through the resolution sounds exactly like a manifest from Soviet Russia....Schitt for brains has been given the power to approve witnesses, limit their testimony, and may or may NOT allow the president to have legal council in attendance for ALL proceedings...if the Republicans did this the ABNORMALS of the left and their slavish co conspirators in the MSM would go nuts!!!!!

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “Every member should support allowing the American people to hear the facts for themselves."

You don't support that, Zippy?

Cherry picked facts.
No one should support.

Cherry picked facts? Republicans will get to call their own witnesses in the open hearings. So what's cherry picked?

Any wittnesess brought up by R's can be refused by Schiff.
The whole bill gives more power to Schiff.
Read the bill at Thomas.gov

Of course Schiff has more power. He's the committee chairman. That's how these things work. This is how they've always worked. But now the hearings will be open. If Schiff abuses that power, it will reflect negatively on him and this process. Attention Schiff doesn't want since public support is crucial in impeaching Trump.

This is suppose to be handled in the Judiciary Committee.
By Nadler not Schiff.
They are pulling the wool over people's eyes because too many are ignorant on how our republic works.
Most do not know how our government is suppose to work.

 

[rightwinger]

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “Every member should support allowing the American people to hear the facts for themselves."

You don't support that, Zippy?

Cherry picked facts.
No one should support.

Cherry picked facts? Republicans will get to call their own witnesses in the open hearings. So what's cherry picked?

Any wittnesess brought up by R's can be refused by Schiff.
The whole bill gives more power to Schiff.
Read the bill at Thomas.gov

Of course Schiff has more power. He's the committee chairman. That's how these things work. This is how they've always worked. But now the hearings will be open. If Schiff abuses that power, it will reflect negatively on him and this process. Attention Schiff doesn't want since public support is crucial in impeaching Trump.

This is suppose to be handled in the Judiciary Committee.
By Nadler not Schiff.
They are pulling the wool over people's eyes because too many are ignorant on how our republic works.
Most do not know how our government is suppose to work.

Where does it say that?

If Nadler was leading instead of Schiff, you would still be bitching

 

[Faun]

for 150 years they opposed civil rights

but today they claim that they ALWAYS SUPPORTED civil rights and it was those RACIST DEMS who opposed it

Fact Check: ‘More Republicans Voted for the Civil Rights Act as a Percentage Than Democrats Did’

That's only because the north had lots of Republicans AND Democrats while the racist conservative south was almost all Democrats.

In the south, 92% of Democrats (112) voted against along with 100% of Republicans (12).

All total by north/south

Aye

North: 353 (90%)
South: 9 (7%)

Nay

North: 38 (10%)
South: 115 (93%)

The split was north/south, not Republican/Democrat.

Exactly.

The split was liberal/conservative.

Yup.

And the Bible-thumping south has always been conservative, even before they were called conservatives. And they've always been more racist, even seceding and starting a civil war to keep their slaves. All that's changed is their political party.

 

[g5000]

for 150 years they opposed civil rights

but today they claim that they ALWAYS SUPPORTED civil rights and it was those RACIST DEMS who opposed it

Fact Check: ‘More Republicans Voted for the Civil Rights Act as a Percentage Than Democrats Did’

That's only because the north had lots of Republicans AND Democrats while the racist conservative south was almost all Democrats.

In the south, 92% of Democrats (112) voted against along with 100% of Republicans (12).

All total by north/south

Aye

North: 353 (90%)
South: 9 (7%)

Nay

North: 38 (10%)
South: 115 (93%)

The split was north/south, not Republican/Democrat.

Exactly.

The split was liberal/conservative.

Yup.

And the Bible-thumping south has always been conservative, even before they were called conservatives. And they've always been more racist, even seceding and starting a civil war to keep their slaves. All that's changed is their political party.

Precisely.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Total political war has been joined. On the floor of the United Sates House of Representatives on Thursday, the battle lines were drawn — and they could not be more clear or decisive. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “Every member should support allowing the American people to hear the facts for themselves. That is really what this vote is about. It is about the truth, and what is at stake in all of this is nothing less than our democracy.”

Stirring stuff, but not to be outdone, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan fired back, calling into question the origins of the Ukraine investigation that began with a whistleblower’s meeting with Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s staff.

Chiding the chairman, Jordan said, “One member of this body knows who this person is who started this whole darn, crazy process: Chairman Schiff. And what’s this resolution do? Gives him even more power to run this secret proceeding in a bunker in the basement of the Capitol.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

Reading through the resolution sounds exactly like a manifest from Soviet Russia....Schitt for brains has been given the power to approve witnesses, limit their testimony, and may or may NOT allow the president to have legal council in attendance for ALL proceedings...if the Republicans did this the ABNORMALS of the left and their slavish co conspirators in the MSM would go nuts!!!!!

Why shouldn't the Democrats declare war. It's sort of like the US declaring War on Japan the day after Pearl Harbor and Japan's declaration of War on the US. The Republicans have declared war on everyone so why not respond in kind.

 

[Faun]

I've seen polls ranging from high 40's to high 50's. And the public hearings are just getting started.

At this point in Nixon's impeachment proceedings, not a single Republican voted to proceed either and public support was lower.

Do you have rebuttal other than a smiley face?

LOL

Laughing at your drivel wasn't enough?

If that's all you have

LOL

That's all I need.

So there were no FISA warrants issued?

Not involving Trump soliciting foreign aid for his campaign, there wasn't.

 

[peach174]

The Senate does the impeaching.
That is not going to happen.

Keep dreaming.

Which won't bode well for the 23 Republican seats up for grabs next year if the public largely believes he should have been convicted.

They already don't
Overwhelmingly.

I've seen polls ranging from high 40's to high 50's. And the public hearings are just getting started.

At this point in Nixon's impeachment proceedings, not a single Republican voted to proceed either and public support was lower.

These impeachment proceeding should be done by the Judiciary committee.
In the House Judiciary Committee;
The vote was 27 to 11, with 6 of the committee's 17 Republicans joining all 21 Democrats in voting to send the article to the House.
The correct way to this.

Chillax, we haven't gotten to drafting articles of impeachment yet. We just entered the open hearings phase yesterday.

Open hearings? Where have you been for 3 yrs. like this is something new started.
What do you think we have been watching on c-span?
It was a bipartisan vote on the committee for Nixon.
It was bipartisan for Clinton.
This one has always been one sided.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Trump got himself into the mess and the Dems have been very patient since he started violating the Constitution just six days after taking office.
Banning Muslims on January 27, 2017.
After several district federal courts said it was against the law, he had to revise it down to specific countries.

He's been pulling shit ever since.
So let the dumb fuck pull himself up by his Big Boy pants and get himself out of it with the facts, which are against him.
Stop protecting this fucking traitor.

What the fuck is this revisionist bullshit history?


So now the left claims Trumped banned muslims?


Link?


.

You're kidding right?
You can't be this stupid or have this kind of shitty recall of facts.

Executive Order Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States | The White House

Nothing about muslims, idiot

 

[anynameyouwish]

Total political war has been joined. On the floor of the United Sates House of Representatives on Thursday, the battle lines were drawn — and they could not be more clear or decisive. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “Every member should support allowing the American people to hear the facts for themselves. That is really what this vote is about. It is about the truth, and what is at stake in all of this is nothing less than our democracy.”

Stirring stuff, but not to be outdone, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan fired back, calling into question the origins of the Ukraine investigation that began with a whistleblower’s meeting with Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s staff.

Chiding the chairman, Jordan said, “One member of this body knows who this person is who started this whole darn, crazy process: Chairman Schiff. And what’s this resolution do? Gives him even more power to run this secret proceeding in a bunker in the basement of the Capitol.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

Reading through the resolution sounds exactly like a manifest from Soviet Russia....Schitt for brains has been given the power to approve witnesses, limit their testimony, and may or may NOT allow the president to have legal council in attendance for ALL proceedings...if the Republicans did this the ABNORMALS of the left and their slavish co conspirators in the MSM would go nuts!!!!!

Why shouldn't the Democrats declare war. It's sort of like the US declaring War on Japan the day after Pearl Harbor and Japan's declaration of War on the US. The Republicans have declared war on everyone so why not respond in kind.

The funny (or ironic) thing about conservatives saying "democrats have just declared war on us!".....

is that conservatives started that war 30 years ago.....

Conservatives have been fighting the CULTURE WAR ever since rush limbaugh declared it back in the early 1990's

The odd thing about aggressive fascists is their tendency to blame the aggression on the people they are attacking.....

kinda like the bully who pushes you
and pushes you again
and then pushes you again
so you raise your fist and he says "oh..so YOU WANT TO FIGHT?"

in the early stages of 1930's nazi germany the common fascist nazi refrain was that THEY were under attack by the unscrupulous jew-scum......

sounding ever so much like todays' conservative.

 

[Faun]

Which won't bode well for the 23 Republican seats up for grabs next year if the public largely believes he should have been convicted.

They already don't
Overwhelmingly.

I've seen polls ranging from high 40's to high 50's. And the public hearings are just getting started.

At this point in Nixon's impeachment proceedings, not a single Republican voted to proceed either and public support was lower.

These impeachment proceeding should be done by the Judiciary committee.
In the House Judiciary Committee;
The vote was 27 to 11, with 6 of the committee's 17 Republicans joining all 21 Democrats in voting to send the article to the House.
The correct way to this.

Chillax, we haven't gotten to drafting articles of impeachment yet. We just entered the open hearings phase yesterday.

Open hearings? Where have you been for 3 yrs. like this is something new started.
What do you think we have been watching on c-span?
It was a bipartisan vote on the committee for Nixon.
It was bipartisan for Clinton.
This one has always been one sided.

The open hearings just passed yesterday. WTF is wrong with you?

 

[Billiejeens]

Do you have rebuttal other than a smiley face?

LOL

Laughing at your drivel wasn't enough?

If that's all you have

LOL

That's all I need.

So there were no FISA warrants issued?

Not involving Trump soliciting foreign aid for his campaign, there wasn't.

Focus

 

[peach174]

Trump got himself into the mess and the Dems have been very patient since he started violating the Constitution just six days after taking office.
Banning Muslims on January 27, 2017.
After several district federal courts said it was against the law, he had to revise it down to specific countries.

He's been pulling shit ever since.
So let the dumb fuck pull himself up by his Big Boy pants and get himself out of it with the facts, which are against him.
Stop protecting this fucking traitor.

What the fuck is this revisionist bullshit history?


So now the left claims Trumped banned muslims?


Link?


.

You're kidding right?
You can't be this stupid or have this kind of shitty recall of facts.

Executive Order Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States | The White House

Nothing about muslims, idiot

They don't seem to be able to distinguish that there are Muslim terrorist's and peaceful Muslim's.
Two totally different yet same Islam religion.
He banned those countries because they support and or harbor terrorist's.
Left had a fit over trying to keep the USA citizens safer.

 

[peach174]

They already don't
Overwhelmingly.

I've seen polls ranging from high 40's to high 50's. And the public hearings are just getting started.

At this point in Nixon's impeachment proceedings, not a single Republican voted to proceed either and public support was lower.

These impeachment proceeding should be done by the Judiciary committee.
In the House Judiciary Committee;
The vote was 27 to 11, with 6 of the committee's 17 Republicans joining all 21 Democrats in voting to send the article to the House.
The correct way to this.

Chillax, we haven't gotten to drafting articles of impeachment yet. We just entered the open hearings phase yesterday.

Open hearings? Where have you been for 3 yrs. like this is something new started.
What do you think we have been watching on c-span?
It was a bipartisan vote on the committee for Nixon.
It was bipartisan for Clinton.
This one has always been one sided.

The open hearings just passed yesterday. WTF is wrong with you?

The hearings have all been on c span.
Pelosi - I open a formal inquiry (without floor vote)
Parisian

The closed door was a continuation of the same BS .
Don't act like this is something new.
It isn't.