Dems of the board, was impeachment a good idea?

[bripat9643]

Haha! Yeah, guilty people turn over transcripts all the time....

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

It carefully notes it is not a verbatim transcript. In fact it is the sort of document guilty people would turn over.

This claim has been discussed ad nauseum and thoroughly debunked.

^^^ fake news ^^^

CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

you can't get any more plainly written than that.

They left out the word "uh" and repetitions of the same word and a cough. So it's not an exact copy of what was said. They only way you could have an exact copy is to have an electronic recording.

You morons keep harping on this nothing because you have no evidence. None.

It' just an excuse....There was no way they were going to accept anything other than removal by the Senate.

You gotta give it to them though, even when they have no power to inflict their will, they believe that the party in power should do it for them...That takes real arrogance.

The sad part is that there are always gullible Republicans who are willing to do it for them.

 

[j-mac]

It carefully notes it is not a verbatim transcript. In fact it is the sort of document guilty people would turn over.

This claim has been discussed ad nauseum and thoroughly debunked.

^^^ fake news ^^^

CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

you can't get any more plainly written than that.

They left out the word "uh" and repetitions of the same word and a cough. So it's not an exact copy of what was said. They only way you could have an exact copy is to have an electronic recording.

You morons keep harping on this nothing because you have no evidence. None.

It' just an excuse....There was no way they were going to accept anything other than removal by the Senate.

You gotta give it to them though, even when they have no power to inflict their will, they believe that the party in power should do it for them...That takes real arrogance.

The sad part is that there are always gullible Republicans who are willing to do it for them.

OH yeah...RINO's have plagued the party for decades...

Thing is that currently Trump has shown them that the way to win against Democrats is to fight them on their own terms...

1. They can't handle it

2. They get irrationally mad when they lose at their own games...

 

[Norman]

This claim has been discussed ad nauseum and thoroughly debunked.

^^^ fake news ^^^

CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

you can't get any more plainly written than that.

They left out the word "uh" and repetitions of the same word and a cough. So it's not an exact copy of what was said. They only way you could have an exact copy is to have an electronic recording.

You morons keep harping on this nothing because you have no evidence. None.

It' just an excuse....There was no way they were going to accept anything other than removal by the Senate.

You gotta give it to them though, even when they have no power to inflict their will, they believe that the party in power should do it for them...That takes real arrogance.

The sad part is that there are always gullible Republicans who are willing to do it for them.

OH yeah...RINO's have plagued the party for decades...

Thing is that currently Trump has shown them that the way to win against Democrats is to fight them on their own terms...

1. They can't handle it

2. They get irrationally mad when they lose at their own games...

Republicans being democrats just two years later instead of being Americans sure did get tiring.

 

[playtime]

Open up the New York Times. You can smell the desperation and defeat.

To me it smells like winning.

because 'winning' is more important to you than jesus.

Poor baby you're losing hard, huh?

Who is losing?

You guys don't see what's going on in front of your face. Just as long as you think liberals aren't getting their way, its a win. This man is hell bent on being a dictator and you simple minded motherfuckers are helping him do it. So if you give him a second term and watch him erode your freedoms as he expands his power, you will learn that you lost.

MAGATs gonna do what MAGATs do best.

Is that the economy that is in fire?

sure the economy is doing good - but since the unemployment rate started out @ 10% in 2009, was about 5% by 2016 & it's now about 3.5% - you know donny is riding obama's coat tails.

you can't possibly fall for donny wanting to take credit for it all, do you? lol... who am i kidding? i'm sure you do.

the dude who had several bankruptcies - that were casinos - where the house is designed to win - who wall st had to put on an allowance - who proudly proclaimed to be the 'king of debt' - created a good economy allllllll by himself....

god damn - that methane you've been breathingin yer bubble became combustable.

 

[playtime]

Correction. Trump is guilty as hell. That's why he blocked witnesses and documents.

Haha! Yeah, guilty people turn over transcripts all the time....

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

It carefully notes it is not a verbatim transcript. In fact it is the sort of document guilty people would turn over.

This claim has been discussed ad nauseum and thoroughly debunked.

^^^ fake news ^^^

CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

you can't get any more plainly written than that.

They left out the word "uh" and repetitions of the same word and a cough. So it's not an exact copy of what was said. They only way you could have an exact copy is to have an electronic recording.

You morons keep harping on this nothing because you have no evidence. None.

noooooooooooooo............... the only way you could have an exact copy is to get it from the uber secure server where the most classified docs are held - where it supposedly was 'uploaded by mistake' yet is still there even though that type of call would never have made the cut to be. why is it there? why hasn't it been removed? LOL.... ya, we know why.

 

[playtime]

From the Russia gate to the Kavanaugh false accusations and then to the shampeachment. What is next?

To those who are not yet participating in an American party, do you believe the impeachment was a good idea? President Trump won again, didn't he?

What is the thought process behind the choices the party is making? Hate is going to defeat president Trump, no good candidates required?

On the assumption that you are capable of a nuanced debate.

Impeachment is the only remedy our system has for a law breaking president. It's a flawed one, since no Senator before Mitt Romney has ever voted to remove a president of his own party.

No, we never thought we could remove Trump, not because most of the REpublicans really thought he was innocent, but because they are too terrified of their own voters. But we did put it on the historical record that he broke the law.

No you didn't, douchebag. There were no actual laws listed in the impeachment articles.

1) no 'actual' laws need to be broken for impeachment.

2) when the framers wrote the constitution - there were no federal crimes 'on the books', so they worded it in such a way that 'breaking the public trust' is a pathway to impeachment.

 

[Norman]

From the Russia gate to the Kavanaugh false accusations and then to the shampeachment. What is next?

To those who are not yet participating in an American party, do you believe the impeachment was a good idea? President Trump won again, didn't he?

What is the thought process behind the choices the party is making? Hate is going to defeat president Trump, no good candidates required?

On the assumption that you are capable of a nuanced debate.

Impeachment is the only remedy our system has for a law breaking president. It's a flawed one, since no Senator before Mitt Romney has ever voted to remove a president of his own party.

No, we never thought we could remove Trump, not because most of the REpublicans really thought he was innocent, but because they are too terrified of their own voters. But we did put it on the historical record that he broke the law.

No you didn't, douchebag. There were no actual laws listed in the impeachment articles.

1) no 'actual' laws need to be broken for impeachment.

2) when the framers wrote the constitution - there were no federal crimes 'on the books', so they worded it in such a way that 'breaking the public trust' is a pathway to impeachment.

Did you hear the real news yet?

 

[playtime]

From the Russia gate to the Kavanaugh false accusations and then to the shampeachment. What is next?

To those who are not yet participating in an American party, do you believe the impeachment was a good idea? President Trump won again, didn't he?

What is the thought process behind the choices the party is making? Hate is going to defeat president Trump, no good candidates required?

On the assumption that you are capable of a nuanced debate.

Impeachment is the only remedy our system has for a law breaking president. It's a flawed one, since no Senator before Mitt Romney has ever voted to remove a president of his own party.

No, we never thought we could remove Trump, not because most of the REpublicans really thought he was innocent, but because they are too terrified of their own voters. But we did put it on the historical record that he broke the law.

Yeah? What laws exactly did he break? I'd like to see just one of you libs cite the US Code when you level these regurgitations from the Maddow show the night before.

impeachment does not demand a federal code nor were there any to cite anyway.

 

[playtime]

From the Russia gate to the Kavanaugh false accusations and then to the shampeachment. What is next?

To those who are not yet participating in an American party, do you believe the impeachment was a good idea? President Trump won again, didn't he?

What is the thought process behind the choices the party is making? Hate is going to defeat president Trump, no good candidates required?

On the assumption that you are capable of a nuanced debate.

Impeachment is the only remedy our system has for a law breaking president. It's a flawed one, since no Senator before Mitt Romney has ever voted to remove a president of his own party.

No, we never thought we could remove Trump, not because most of the REpublicans really thought he was innocent, but because they are too terrified of their own voters. But we did put it on the historical record that he broke the law.

No you didn't, douchebag. There were no actual laws listed in the impeachment articles.

1) no 'actual' laws need to be broken for impeachment.

2) when the framers wrote the constitution - there were no federal crimes 'on the books', so they worded it in such a way that 'breaking the public trust' is a pathway to impeachment.

Did you hear the real news yet?

acquitted in a kangaroo court. but not by the court of public opinion. donny still has NYS breathing down his mango hued neck & that's why he's really scared to leave office. it will catch up to him sooner or later. the best part is the slow drip drip drip of info that will be leaked as the election cycle goes on & how will he handle it & how much will y'all still bend over & grab yer ankles for his lies?

 

[playtime]

This claim has been discussed ad nauseum and thoroughly debunked.

^^^ fake news ^^^

CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

you can't get any more plainly written than that.

They left out the word "uh" and repetitions of the same word and a cough. So it's not an exact copy of what was said. They only way you could have an exact copy is to have an electronic recording.

You morons keep harping on this nothing because you have no evidence. None.

It' just an excuse....There was no way they were going to accept anything other than removal by the Senate.

You gotta give it to them though, even when they have no power to inflict their will, they believe that the party in power should do it for them...That takes real arrogance.

The sad part is that there are always gullible Republicans who are willing to do it for them.

OH yeah...RINO's have plagued the party for decades...

Thing is that currently Trump has shown them that the way to win against Democrats is to fight them on their own terms...

1. They can't handle it

2. They get irrationally mad when they lose at their own games...

' RINO ' to basket dwelling deplorables means 'country & conscience over party'.

 

[Norman]

From the Russia gate to the Kavanaugh false accusations and then to the shampeachment. What is next?

To those who are not yet participating in an American party, do you believe the impeachment was a good idea? President Trump won again, didn't he?

What is the thought process behind the choices the party is making? Hate is going to defeat president Trump, no good candidates required?

On the assumption that you are capable of a nuanced debate.

Impeachment is the only remedy our system has for a law breaking president. It's a flawed one, since no Senator before Mitt Romney has ever voted to remove a president of his own party.

No, we never thought we could remove Trump, not because most of the REpublicans really thought he was innocent, but because they are too terrified of their own voters. But we did put it on the historical record that he broke the law.

No you didn't, douchebag. There were no actual laws listed in the impeachment articles.

1) no 'actual' laws need to be broken for impeachment.

2) when the framers wrote the constitution - there were no federal crimes 'on the books', so they worded it in such a way that 'breaking the public trust' is a pathway to impeachment.

Did you hear the real news yet?

acquitted in a kangaroo court. but not by the court of public opinion. donny still has NYS breathing down his mango hued neck & that's why he's really scared to leave office. it will catch up to him sooner or later. the best part is the slow drip drip drip of info that will be leaked as the election cycle goes on & how will he handle it & how much will y'all still bend over & grab yer ankles for his lies?

Trump won again...

You lost...

And he will win the election as well, we will make sure of that. Enough nonsense...

 

[IM2]

 

[SweetSue92]

^^^ fake news ^^^

CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

you can't get any more plainly written than that.

They left out the word "uh" and repetitions of the same word and a cough. So it's not an exact copy of what was said. They only way you could have an exact copy is to have an electronic recording.

You morons keep harping on this nothing because you have no evidence. None.

It' just an excuse....There was no way they were going to accept anything other than removal by the Senate.

You gotta give it to them though, even when they have no power to inflict their will, they believe that the party in power should do it for them...That takes real arrogance.

The sad part is that there are always gullible Republicans who are willing to do it for them.

OH yeah...RINO's have plagued the party for decades...

Thing is that currently Trump has shown them that the way to win against Democrats is to fight them on their own terms...

1. They can't handle it

2. They get irrationally mad when they lose at their own games...

' RINO ' to basket dwelling deplorables means 'country & conscience over party'.

You're too old to be this stupid. But here we are

 

[Norman]

Oh yet a other "He is a billionaire, but bad at business".

Who actually swallows this nonsense?

 

[DBA]

So if you give him a second term and watch him erode your freedoms as he expands his power, you will learn that you lost.

This mad me laugh. "Erode [our] freedoms"? He has deregulated. Do you know what that means? He DOESN'T want government in control of our healthcare. He DOESN'T want to disarm us. He is in favor of tax cuts, meaning people keep more of THEIR money. Just some examples...there are many more.

You are very, very confused. The Democrats want complete control and they prey on the gullible, poor and least informed. Democrats have proven to be less politically informed in every single study I have ever seen.

 

[Care4all]

Trump didn't win. He got impeached. Democrats have excellent candidates and when its time, you will understand how weak the republican candidate really is.

Excellent candidates? Oboe is backing blumberg. Ha. Good luck, sore losers. [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obama has backed no one. trump is about to lose. He's a very weak candidate with a failed presidency.

I don't think the famlies now making $5k more a year would say it was "failed"...

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

So the families who aren't making 5 k more a year do have the right to complain?

Your family is making 5K more a year, isn't it?

if you don't count what we have invested in 401k's, heck no!

 

[DBA]

How many times did Obama's businesses file for bankruptcy? Oh that's right, the guy couldn't even run a lemonade stand before being elected into Congress. He was a smooth talker though and it doesn't take much more than that to trick the ignorant folks, which is the Democrats main demographic.

 

[JoeB131]

This mad me laugh. "Erode [our] freedoms"? He has deregulated. Do you know what that means? He DOESN'T want government in control of our healthcare. He DOESN'T want to disarm us. He is in favor of tax cuts, meaning people keep more of THEIR money. Just some examples...there are many more.

Yeah, there are, but these are usually examples of people with money and power fucking over the rest of us.

I personally don't feel more "Free" because my insurance company can fuck me over on a pre-existing condition.

How many times did Obama's businesses file for bankruptcy? Oh that's right, the guy couldn't even run a lemonade stand before being elected into Congress. He was a smooth talker though and it doesn't take much more than that to trick the ignorant folks, which is the Democrats main demographic.

Running a business isn't like running a government, buddy. Our two worst presidents - Hoover and Bush - were businessmen.

Trump says, "Hold my Beer."

 

[DBA]

the dude who had several bankruptcies - that were casinos - where the house is designed to win - who wall st had to put on an allowance - who proudly proclaimed to be the 'king of debt' - created a good economy allllllll by himself....

I don't know who is calling the shots, but I do know that the steps he has taken has made the economy thrive. We would NOT be where we are had Hillary won the election. She would have created more regulations and increased taxes. Trump has done the opposite. If a Democrat wins and implements those policies, along with the Green New Deal, our economy will absolutely tank(worse than 2008) but ignorant folks will blame it in Trump.

 

[Care4all]

There was not much of a choice.... they were left with no choice when the DOJ refused to investigate the complaints of staffers who reported the CHEATING, and lawlessness.....

Trump was always going to get off, for his high crimes.... but History, facts, what was done by him, needed to be recorded..... And it was.....

READ:

Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...Orange man bad... blah blah...

He is a very bad person.... I'm not gonna lie about it, or cover my eyes, and cover my ears, and pretend he's some kind of hero or messiah..... he's not. He's an awful, disgraceful, disgusting, lowlife of a person from head to toe. I don't think anyone can argue otherwise.