Did the creation of the universe violate the laws of conservation?

[ding]

 

[ding]

According to the laws of quantum mechanics a closed universe will spontaneously nucleate and will do so without violating the laws of conservation.

 

[abu afak]

Three more in row by Ding in his usual blitz attempt: a Youtube (bad sign), a meme (another), and a one-liner. (yet another)
All part of his effort to prove/deduce a god... and grab the page top.
Illogical.

Just googling His thread title! First up:

"AI Overview

"According to current scientific understanding, the creation of the universe, as described by the Big Bang theory, does NOT Violate the laws of conservation because the total energy of the universe is considered to be constant, even though it may have been concentrated in a very small space at the beginning; essentially, energy is not created or destroyed, just transformed into different forms."


EDlT: then below the embarrassed one-line, Boobtube bury-em-with-BS, ldiot continues doing same with FOUR MORE POSTS! Including several repeats.
Ding the Inadequate OCD last-worder Oft double/triple/quadruple posts!

`

 

[ding]

Three more in row by Ding in his usual blitz attempt: a Youtube (bad sign), a meme (another), and a one-liner. (yet another)
All part of his effort to prove/deduce a god... and grab the page top.
Illogical.

Just googling His thread title! First up:

"AI Overview

"According to current scientific understanding, the creation of the universe, as described by the Big Bang theory, does NOT Violate the laws of conservation because the total energy of the universe is considered to be constant, even though it may have been concentrated in a very small space at the beginning; essentially, energy is not created or destroyed, just transformed into different forms."

`

According to the laws of quantum mechanics a closed universe will spontaneously nucleate and will do so without violating the laws of conservation.



#winning

 

[ding]

the Big Bang theory, does NOT Violate the laws of conservation

That's what I said.

 

[ding]

So happy that Apu agrees with me that the universe beginning did not violate the law of conservation but was in accordance with the law of conservation.

 

[ding]

Which means the laws of nature were in place before the creation of space and time.

#winning

 

[fncceo]

If the universe popped into existence 14 billion years ago in what is known as the Big Bang, how did the Big Bang not violate the laws of conservation?

According to the Big Bang Theory, no.

Apparently, at the time The Universe exploded into existence, all the matter and energy in our present Universe existed in the form of a singularity.

How that singularity came into existence is another question.

 

[ding]

According to the Big Bang Theory, no.

Apparently, at the time The Universe exploded into existence, all the matter and energy in our present Universe existed in the form of a singularity.

How that singularity came into existence is another question.

There is much misunderstanding about what a singularity is. It's not a physical phenomenon. It's the mathematical limit of the solutions of Einstein's field equations. It's where the equations yield infinite density which isn't real. But here are two short videos which explain why the creation of the universe did not violate the laws of conservation.

 

[ding]

the Big Bang theory, does NOT Violate the laws of conservation

I know. That's the premise of this thread.

 

[Wuwei]

Same for dark matter. Something is interacting with matter that we cannot directly observe. Plug our observations into the current theory, and the idea of dark matter emerges.

The MOND theory obviates dark matter. There are many successes in both theories and a few failures. While dark matter requires new stuff, MOND is a modification of known theory.

I wonder why leptons and baryons were formed in equal number. If there were an slight excess of electrons, that would provide an extra inverse square law attractive force that the galactic fringe stars would see, but would have less effect on inner stars.

Gravitational lensing currently requires dark matter. However an electric field can bend light by Delbrück scattering, but it's a small effect. As small as gravitational lensing? Most sources say that galaxies are mostly electrically neutral. What does "mostly" mean.