Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes....and you can find their official testimony at the Daily Kos.
Weird how you say the flood happened in 2348 BC but yet there's no evidence of it happening then. How strange.
I think taking what one person says about the flood and ignoring all others is normally what libs like to do.
Christians have so distorted Israel's scriptures, no wonder they're so confused.No, the evidence totally supports what I believe. The Bible clearly teaches that the human race is depraved. It is you who disregards the obvious.
So God created us in his image and made us depraved??? LOLOL.. You sure you don't want to rethink that?
Do you know who first translated the Tanakh? I'll give you a hint: the Hebrews themselves.Hahahahahah. LOL@!!!!!The distortion comes from saying that man is both depraved and made in God's image. It comes from saying that God literally made man from a clump of dirt. It comes from saying the impossible can happen, like a worldwide flood and a giant city nearly the size of the moon descending on Palestine.Hogwash. The Old Testament is what it is.Christians have so distorted Israel's scriptures, no wonder they're so confused.No, the evidence totally supports what I believe. The Bible clearly teaches that the human race is depraved. It is you who disregards the obvious.
So God created us in his image and made us depraved??? LOLOL.. You sure you don't want to rethink that?
The focus of most Christians is the New Testament.
The distortion comes from atheists and Muslim sympathizers.
The distortion comes from Christians injecting their 21st-century Western worldviews into ancient Near East culture.
Christians aren't the first folks to translate the words of the Bible. Christianity didn't form until thousands of years after it was written.....so stop trying to blame all of the world's evils on them.
Then why are you posting links that support that "allegory?"The creation account was allegory, dummy.Why wasnt creation an allegory?Ancient man knew 6,000 years before science that the universe was created, what we see was the result of stages and that man arose from that creation.Allegories is something the religious cling to when science provers their hand-me-down, cherry picked fables written by desert savages, are proven wrong.I would assume all atheists are fucked. Do some atheists get a "get out of hell" free card? Is it like the immigration lottery?Sort of like most atheists are fucked because they read allegorical texts literally?Then most Christians are fucked, as they created the "allegory" nonsense, to keep up with reality.Jesus said it did.Did the Great Flood really happen? - Living Faith - Home & Family - News - Catholic Online
Many Christians today argue the flood story is only a myth. It is a cautionary tale, not intended for literal interpretation. What's important, they say, is that we accept the lessons in the story rather than the story itself. There is merit to this approach. The story has no value if we ignore the lessons it teaches.
I'm a Christian. I believe Him over today's "christian" teachers whom Christ said would be judged HARSHLY for teaching false doctrine
Or is that something else you just made up like the "allegories?"
Allegories explain things humans don't know or understand. Perhaps the tale of Adam and Eve is about the time period when humans stopped trusting o God's providence and began to cultivate crops and tend livestock.
Of course that took place 14,000 years earlier, but the story is still an explanation.
Of you weren't such a militant atheist who was intellectually dishonest, you'd have seen it too.
New Big Bang evidence supports Biblical creation, says Orthodox physicist
Counters nonreligious professor: The Genesis account of the formation of the heavens and the earth has nothing to do with sciencewww.timesofisrael.com
Genesis and the Big Bang: Both contain truth
In 2014, Pope Francis told a group of scientists that both the biblical stories of Genesis and the Big Bang theory are consistent with Catholic faith. Secular mwww.catholicsentinel.org
Creatio ex nihilo - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
What was remarkable about him?Christians have so distorted Israel's scriptures, no wonder they're so confused.No, the evidence totally supports what I believe. The Bible clearly teaches that the human race is depraved. It is you who disregards the obvious.
So God created us in his image and made us depraved??? LOLOL.. You sure you don't want to rethink that?
I am afraid that's true. Christians have fiddled with Isaiah and Hosea among others. Creates a lot of confusion. IMO they were so eager to prove that Jesus was the messiah expected by the Jews that they were compelled to gild the lily. I don't think it was necessary. Jesus seems to have been quite remarkable without the meddling.
A fundamental mistake Christians make is to call Jesus their Messiah. He was not. He was Israel's Messiah.Christians have so distorted Israel's scriptures, no wonder they're so confused.No, the evidence totally supports what I believe. The Bible clearly teaches that the human race is depraved. It is you who disregards the obvious.
So God created us in his image and made us depraved??? LOLOL.. You sure you don't want to rethink that?
I am afraid that's true. Christians have fiddled with Isaiah and Hosea among others. Creates a lot of confusion. IMO they were so eager to prove that Jesus was the messiah expected by the Jews that they were compelled to gild the lily. I don't think it was necessary. Jesus seems to have been quite remarkable without the meddling.
You must be the dumbest motherfucker on this board, TN. Apparently you believe allegory means not true.Then why are you posting links that support that "allegory?"The creation account was allegory, dummy.Why wasnt creation an allegory?Ancient man knew 6,000 years before science that the universe was created, what we see was the result of stages and that man arose from that creation.Allegories is something the religious cling to when science provers their hand-me-down, cherry picked fables written by desert savages, are proven wrong.I would assume all atheists are fucked. Do some atheists get a "get out of hell" free card? Is it like the immigration lottery?Sort of like most atheists are fucked because they read allegorical texts literally?Then most Christians are fucked, as they created the "allegory" nonsense, to keep up with reality.Jesus said it did.Did the Great Flood really happen? - Living Faith - Home & Family - News - Catholic Online
Many Christians today argue the flood story is only a myth. It is a cautionary tale, not intended for literal interpretation. What's important, they say, is that we accept the lessons in the story rather than the story itself. There is merit to this approach. The story has no value if we ignore the lessons it teaches.
I'm a Christian. I believe Him over today's "christian" teachers whom Christ said would be judged HARSHLY for teaching false doctrine
Or is that something else you just made up like the "allegories?"
Allegories explain things humans don't know or understand. Perhaps the tale of Adam and Eve is about the time period when humans stopped trusting o God's providence and began to cultivate crops and tend livestock.
Of course that took place 14,000 years earlier, but the story is still an explanation.
Of you weren't such a militant atheist who was intellectually dishonest, you'd have seen it too.
New Big Bang evidence supports Biblical creation, says Orthodox physicist
Counters nonreligious professor: The Genesis account of the formation of the heavens and the earth has nothing to do with science
Genesis and the Big Bang: Both contain truth
In 2014, Pope Francis told a group of scientists that both the biblical stories of Genesis and the Big Bang theory are consistent with Catholic faith. Secular mwww.catholicsentinel.org
Creatio ex nihilo - Wikipedia
You make this so easy
Then why are you posting links that support that "allegory?"The creation account was allegory, dummy.Why wasnt creation an allegory?Ancient man knew 6,000 years before science that the universe was created, what we see was the result of stages and that man arose from that creation.Allegories is something the religious cling to when science provers their hand-me-down, cherry picked fables written by desert savages, are proven wrong.I would assume all atheists are fucked. Do some atheists get a "get out of hell" free card? Is it like the immigration lottery?Sort of like most atheists are fucked because they read allegorical texts literally?Then most Christians are fucked, as they created the "allegory" nonsense, to keep up with reality.Jesus said it did.Did the Great Flood really happen? - Living Faith - Home & Family - News - Catholic Online
Many Christians today argue the flood story is only a myth. It is a cautionary tale, not intended for literal interpretation. What's important, they say, is that we accept the lessons in the story rather than the story itself. There is merit to this approach. The story has no value if we ignore the lessons it teaches.
I'm a Christian. I believe Him over today's "christian" teachers whom Christ said would be judged HARSHLY for teaching false doctrine
Or is that something else you just made up like the "allegories?"
Allegories explain things humans don't know or understand. Perhaps the tale of Adam and Eve is about the time period when humans stopped trusting o God's providence and began to cultivate crops and tend livestock.
Of course that took place 14,000 years earlier, but the story is still an explanation.
Of you weren't such a militant atheist who was intellectually dishonest, you'd have seen it too.
New Big Bang evidence supports Biblical creation, says Orthodox physicist
Counters nonreligious professor: The Genesis account of the formation of the heavens and the earth has nothing to do with science
Genesis and the Big Bang: Both contain truth
In 2014, Pope Francis told a group of scientists that both the biblical stories of Genesis and the Big Bang theory are consistent with Catholic faith. Secular mwww.catholicsentinel.org
Creatio ex nihilo - Wikipedia
You make this so easy
A fundamental mistake Christians make is to call Jesus their Messiah. He was not. He was Israel's Messiah.Christians have so distorted Israel's scriptures, no wonder they're so confused.No, the evidence totally supports what I believe. The Bible clearly teaches that the human race is depraved. It is you who disregards the obvious.
So God created us in his image and made us depraved??? LOLOL.. You sure you don't want to rethink that?
I am afraid that's true. Christians have fiddled with Isaiah and Hosea among others. Creates a lot of confusion. IMO they were so eager to prove that Jesus was the messiah expected by the Jews that they were compelled to gild the lily. I don't think it was necessary. Jesus seems to have been quite remarkable without the meddling.
The remarkable thing, of course, is that he turned out also to be the world's savior.
For God so loved the WORLD that He sent His only begotten Son....A fundamental mistake Christians make is to call Jesus their Messiah. He was not. He was Israel's Messiah.Christians have so distorted Israel's scriptures, no wonder they're so confused.No, the evidence totally supports what I believe. The Bible clearly teaches that the human race is depraved. It is you who disregards the obvious.
So God created us in his image and made us depraved??? LOLOL.. You sure you don't want to rethink that?
I am afraid that's true. Christians have fiddled with Isaiah and Hosea among others. Creates a lot of confusion. IMO they were so eager to prove that Jesus was the messiah expected by the Jews that they were compelled to gild the lily. I don't think it was necessary. Jesus seems to have been quite remarkable without the meddling.
The remarkable thing, of course, is that he turned out also to be the world's savior.
You must be the dumbest motherfucker on this board, TN. Apparently you believe allegory means not true.Then why are you posting links that support that "allegory?"The creation account was allegory, dummy.Why wasnt creation an allegory?Ancient man knew 6,000 years before science that the universe was created, what we see was the result of stages and that man arose from that creation.Allegories is something the religious cling to when science provers their hand-me-down, cherry picked fables written by desert savages, are proven wrong.I would assume all atheists are fucked. Do some atheists get a "get out of hell" free card? Is it like the immigration lottery?Sort of like most atheists are fucked because they read allegorical texts literally?Then most Christians are fucked, as they created the "allegory" nonsense, to keep up with reality.Jesus said it did.Did the Great Flood really happen? - Living Faith - Home & Family - News - Catholic Online
Many Christians today argue the flood story is only a myth. It is a cautionary tale, not intended for literal interpretation. What's important, they say, is that we accept the lessons in the story rather than the story itself. There is merit to this approach. The story has no value if we ignore the lessons it teaches.
I'm a Christian. I believe Him over today's "christian" teachers whom Christ said would be judged HARSHLY for teaching false doctrine
Or is that something else you just made up like the "allegories?"
Allegories explain things humans don't know or understand. Perhaps the tale of Adam and Eve is about the time period when humans stopped trusting o God's providence and began to cultivate crops and tend livestock.
Of course that took place 14,000 years earlier, but the story is still an explanation.
Of you weren't such a militant atheist who was intellectually dishonest, you'd have seen it too.
New Big Bang evidence supports Biblical creation, says Orthodox physicist
Counters nonreligious professor: The Genesis account of the formation of the heavens and the earth has nothing to do with science
Genesis and the Big Bang: Both contain truth
In 2014, Pope Francis told a group of scientists that both the biblical stories of Genesis and the Big Bang theory are consistent with Catholic faith. Secular mwww.catholicsentinel.org
Creatio ex nihilo - Wikipedia
You make this so easy
Allegory describes a truth but in an allegorical fashion. It's not a science book.
For God so loved the WORLD that He sent His only begotten Son....A fundamental mistake Christians make is to call Jesus their Messiah. He was not. He was Israel's Messiah.Christians have so distorted Israel's scriptures, no wonder they're so confused.No, the evidence totally supports what I believe. The Bible clearly teaches that the human race is depraved. It is you who disregards the obvious.
So God created us in his image and made us depraved??? LOLOL.. You sure you don't want to rethink that?
I am afraid that's true. Christians have fiddled with Isaiah and Hosea among others. Creates a lot of confusion. IMO they were so eager to prove that Jesus was the messiah expected by the Jews that they were compelled to gild the lily. I don't think it was necessary. Jesus seems to have been quite remarkable without the meddling.
The remarkable thing, of course, is that he turned out also to be the world's savior.
Jesus turned upside-down the expectation of Israel's Messiah. The traditional kingdom that the Israelites expected was the one that even the Baptist expected, who expressed disappointment with Jesus when he supposed that God’s dominion had not arrived in a timely enough fashion (Mt 11:2-3; Lk 7:20). Like his countrymen, the Baptist expected to see a political empire of his people with Jerusalem as its capital. Instead, he saw that Jesus had been spending his time preaching and healing while he himself was in jail (Mt 11:4-6; Lk 7:21-23), while Rome was still occupying Judea and Galilee, and while the temple and the Old Covenant remained in place.A fundamental mistake Christians make is to call Jesus their Messiah. He was not. He was Israel's Messiah.Christians have so distorted Israel's scriptures, no wonder they're so confused.No, the evidence totally supports what I believe. The Bible clearly teaches that the human race is depraved. It is you who disregards the obvious.
So God created us in his image and made us depraved??? LOLOL.. You sure you don't want to rethink that?
I am afraid that's true. Christians have fiddled with Isaiah and Hosea among others. Creates a lot of confusion. IMO they were so eager to prove that Jesus was the messiah expected by the Jews that they were compelled to gild the lily. I don't think it was necessary. Jesus seems to have been quite remarkable without the meddling.
The remarkable thing, of course, is that he turned out also to be the world's savior.
How is that possible? The Jewish messiah was to be an anointed warrior king (like David) who would vanquish the enemies of the Jews.
Cyrus the Great was also called the messiah and for a time Bar Kochba was too.
Jesus turned upside-down the expectation of Israel's Messiah. The traditional kingdom that the Israelites expected was the one that even the Baptist expected, who expressed disappointment with Jesus when he supposed that God’s dominion had not arrived in a timely enough fashion (Mt 11:2-3; Lk 7:20). Like his countrymen, the Baptist expected to see a political empire of his people with Jerusalem as its capital. Instead, he saw that Jesus had been spending his time preaching and healing while he himself was in jail (Mt 11:4-6; Lk 7:21-23), while Rome was still occupying Judea and Galilee, and while the temple and the Old Covenant remained in place.A fundamental mistake Christians make is to call Jesus their Messiah. He was not. He was Israel's Messiah.Christians have so distorted Israel's scriptures, no wonder they're so confused.No, the evidence totally supports what I believe. The Bible clearly teaches that the human race is depraved. It is you who disregards the obvious.
So God created us in his image and made us depraved??? LOLOL.. You sure you don't want to rethink that?
I am afraid that's true. Christians have fiddled with Isaiah and Hosea among others. Creates a lot of confusion. IMO they were so eager to prove that Jesus was the messiah expected by the Jews that they were compelled to gild the lily. I don't think it was necessary. Jesus seems to have been quite remarkable without the meddling.
The remarkable thing, of course, is that he turned out also to be the world's savior.
How is that possible? The Jewish messiah was to be an anointed warrior king (like David) who would vanquish the enemies of the Jews.
Cyrus the Great was also called the messiah and for a time Bar Kochba was too.
The Messianic Age was replete with self-proclaimed messiahs, from Theudas and Judas (Antiquities 20.5.1 & 2; Acts 5:36-37) to Bar-Jesus (Acts 13:6-12) to Simon bar Kokhba. They all fit that warrior mold; they all saw themselves ensconced in history as mighty warriors and faithful servants who would restore the glory of their promised land.
Jesus is the only one who actually made a difference, as history bears out, and he preached new life not in temple or territory but in God.
Hence his differences with the Pharisees and their scribes and the elders and chief priests. Paul preached the same salvation (not in temple but in God). So the Jews had them both executed.Jesus turned upside-down the expectation of Israel's Messiah. The traditional kingdom that the Israelites expected was the one that even the Baptist expected, who expressed disappointment with Jesus when he supposed that God’s dominion had not arrived in a timely enough fashion (Mt 11:2-3; Lk 7:20). Like his countrymen, the Baptist expected to see a political empire of his people with Jerusalem as its capital. Instead, he saw that Jesus had been spending his time preaching and healing while he himself was in jail (Mt 11:4-6; Lk 7:21-23), while Rome was still occupying Judea and Galilee, and while the temple and the Old Covenant remained in place.
The Messianic Age was replete with self-proclaimed messiahs, from Theudas and Judas (Antiquities 20.5.1 & 2; Acts 5:36-37) to Bar-Jesus (Acts 13:6-12) to Simon bar Kokhba. They all fit that warrior mold; they all saw themselves ensconced in history as mighty warriors and faithful servants who would restore the glory of their promised land.
Jesus is the only one who actually made a difference, as history bears out, and he preached new life not in temple or territory but in God.
Great post.. Jesus didn't fit the expectation at all.
You must be the dumbest motherfucker on this board, TN. Apparently you believe allegory means not true.
Allegory describes a truth but in an allegorical fashion. It's not a science book.
Hence his differences with the Pharisees and their scribes and the elders and chief priests. Paul preached the same salvation (not in temple but in God). So the Jews had them both executed.Jesus turned upside-down the expectation of Israel's Messiah. The traditional kingdom that the Israelites expected was the one that even the Baptist expected, who expressed disappointment with Jesus when he supposed that God’s dominion had not arrived in a timely enough fashion (Mt 11:2-3; Lk 7:20). Like his countrymen, the Baptist expected to see a political empire of his people with Jerusalem as its capital. Instead, he saw that Jesus had been spending his time preaching and healing while he himself was in jail (Mt 11:4-6; Lk 7:21-23), while Rome was still occupying Judea and Galilee, and while the temple and the Old Covenant remained in place.
The Messianic Age was replete with self-proclaimed messiahs, from Theudas and Judas (Antiquities 20.5.1 & 2; Acts 5:36-37) to Bar-Jesus (Acts 13:6-12) to Simon bar Kokhba. They all fit that warrior mold; they all saw themselves ensconced in history as mighty warriors and faithful servants who would restore the glory of their promised land.
Jesus is the only one who actually made a difference, as history bears out, and he preached new life not in temple or territory but in God.
Great post.. Jesus didn't fit the expectation at all.
Jesus said, "NO MAN can come to the Father except through Me."Why are these differences a problem?
