Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no "process" when it comes to the President. He or she may CHOOSE to follow the formal process...but the President is the Original Authority when it comes to security classification. All other persons tasked to classify documents operate via delegation of that authority from the Office of the President.There is a "process" for declassifying documents. Trump apparently ignored that process. The DOJ/FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago had nothing to do with "classifications" - it had to do with the fact that Trump had removed/stole government property that belongs to the American people.
There is no "process" when it comes to the President. He or she may CHOOSE to follow the formal process...but the President is the Original Authority when it comes to security classification. All other persons tasked to classify documents operate via delegation of that authority from the Office of the President.
When senior officials leave government — on good terms; former FBI director James B. Comey lost his clearance after being fired — there has been an informal standard ofis continuing to grant clearance for the rest of their careers. Those clearances go through a review process every five years, but it’s common.
And he can't do it merely my "thinking" itEven if they don't follow the process, unclassified documents still get marked up as unclassified. The FBI will be able to determine which documents are still classified and which ones are not.
Yes, the president can declassify documents, but there isn’t a set protocol they have to follow
Former President Trump claimed documents found at Mar-a-Lago were “all declassified.” We explain why sitting presidents can declassify documents and how it works.www.verifythis.com
Now, go suck on your toes too...brat No, there is NO process. Do tell us the process. You can't because there is none or you would have referenced it. Now, go suck on your toes some more...brat
You are pitifully stupid. There IS a process. It has been widely reported on CNN, MSNBC and many other sane media outlets. Google it...
Presidential Power to Declassify Information, Explained
CNN or MSNBE...The Communist News Network and MSLSD!!! They have been wrong on every issue Trump and continue to be. Democrats are now getting worried because this again was a political move that the people now understand the motive of such things. Garland and Rey need to resign immediately. So does Biden since he authorized the raid of a political foe. He's become a leader through tyranny.
So when Sandy Berger was stuffing documents in his pants he could have just said Clinton declassified it, and Clinton could say yes he did and that is that?If there is no protocol needed, then there would never be any evidence needed as well. Like I said, Congress nor anyone else needs to know. Just the President. Now, as the video shows, most of the time while a President is in office, they will go to various heads of departments and discuss this with them. But, the department heads have no authority to declassify as the Constitution gives only the President that authority. So, no. No evidence is needed.
Yes, the president can declassify documents, but there isn’t a set protocol they have to follow
Former President Trump claimed documents found at Mar-a-Lago were “all declassified.” We explain why sitting presidents can declassify documents and how it works.
Did Biden lose his security clearance for stuffing his pockets with CHINA cash?Did Trump lose his security clearance when Biden became president?
And he can't do it merely my "thinking" it
So when Sandy Berger was stuffing documents in his pants he could have just said Clinton declassified it, and Clinton could say yes he did and that is that?
No.
At this point you have a private citizen, with documents that are illegal to have, claiming he declassified them in his former job (after denying he had them) but no evidence from anyone or any documentation that he did so. He is not currently the president. Why would you believe him Paricularly given the content of those documents?
The real problem here is that the rules (not laws) that govern these things are based on an assumption of common decency and respect for the institution he serves and represents. We have never a president lime Trump, who completely lacks that and serves only himself.
If so, that makes the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago even more seriously illegal. Does anyone know for sure?
Do ex Presidents keep their high level of security clearance after they leave office?
Answer (1 of 19): The President of the United States actually does not have any security clearance per se. As the chief of state, the President doesn’t need a security clearance because the President is the underlying authority from which clearance flows in the first place. Conversely, that autho...www.quora.com
Trump's defense...
I don't have any classified documents; but if I do, I declassified them when I was president; but if I didn't, I still have Executive Privilege; but if I don't, the raid of Mar-a-Lago was illegal because they took my passports; but if it wasn't, this is just a hoax, perpetrating a witch hunt by the deep state; but if it's not, the FBI, led by a man I appointed, planted the classified documents; but even if they didn't, the classified documents were just souvenirs anyway; but even if they're not, I was cooperating fully with the government; but even if I wasn't, Barack Hussein Obama did worse; but even if he didn't, I gave a standing order that all classified documents are declassified when they leave the Oval Office; but even if I didn't, I'm still the rightful president anyway because Democrats stole the 2020 election from me; but even if they didn't, I was just trolling the left; so there, neener, neener, neener! It doesn't matter because I still won't lose any support from the right.
Did Biden lose his security clearance for stuffing his pockets with CHINA cash?
Was Berger brought up on charges? Nope. But, again, this is a red herring. Berger was actually stealing. Clinton did not say that the documents were declassified. So, again, a red herring. Obama did not declassify what Hillary took to her home either. But, this is not another person with Trump. It was Trump who was moving and had the movers remove the documents that he said he declassified. End of story.So when Sandy Berger was stuffing documents in his pants he could have just said Clinton declassified it, and Clinton could say yes he did and that is that?
No.
At this point you have a private citizen, with documents that are illegal to have, claiming he declassified them in his former job (after denying he had them) but no evidence from anyone or any documentation that he did so. He is not currently the president. Why would you believe him Paricularly given the content of those documents?
The real problem here is that the rules (not laws) that govern these things are based on an assumption of common decency and respect for the institution he serves and represents. We have never a president lime Trump, who completely lacks that and serves only himself.
www.google.com
Yes. He was.Was Berger brought up on charges? Nope. But, again, this is a red herring. Berger was actually stealing. Clinton did not say that the documents were declassified. So, again, a red herring. Obama did not declassify what Hillary took to her home either. But, this is not another person with Trump. It was Trump who was moving and had the movers remove the documents that he said he declassified. End of story.
Thanks for the update. Berger was not the President and Clinton, as I said, did not declassify those documents. Trump did.
There is zero evidence Trump did and some of those documents can only be declassified by the originating agency.Thanks for the update. Berger was not the President and Clinton, as I said, did not declassify those documents. Trump did.
