Circe
Platinum Member
- Jan 28, 2013
- 13,922
- 7,009
No, I shouldn't. That would just be silly.Nope you should condemn aggressors in war and any kind of crime that’s committed as bad. It’s pretty simple
You can do that in my place, if you want.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I shouldn't. That would just be silly.Nope you should condemn aggressors in war and any kind of crime that’s committed as bad. It’s pretty simple
Jesus, Sue. Don't you know what is going on? You believe all that Trump trash?
Right totally silly. Nothing wrong thereNo, I shouldn't. That would just be silly.
You can do that in my place, if you want.
This is one of those answers that are simple and easy and wrong.Nope you should condemn aggressors in war and any kind of crime that’s committed as bad. It’s pretty simple
Im happy to think harder thoughts make a real counter argument and I’ll respond in kindThis is one of those answers that are simple and easy and wrong.
You are able to think better about war than mouthing simple pieties --- that's IQ 95 territory. I expect this from some of the lesser lights here, espec. certain Christians who really can't think in a more advanced way, and that's fine. But I would expect you to think harder thoughts, like Realpolitik.
Vietnam was a civil war. The problem with Vietnam is the US feared Chinese involvement as what happened in Korea! We steamrolled over North Korea, then 100k Chinese soldiers charged into the country.In the mid-1960s, then US President Lyndon Johnson sent massive numbers of US troops to Vietnam. At the time, most Americans, without having much information, blindly supported this action. A few years later, after Americans became more informed (and thousands of dead troops were returning in wooden crates), millions of Americans became fiercely opposed to that military endeavor, and Johnson himself refused to run for re-election in 1968.
I don't know too much about the Russia/Ukraine scenario, but I do know that Ukraine has been part of Russia for hundreds of years. Ukraine is rich in natural resources, while the Ukranian people (with 99.8% literacy) are among the poorest in the world.
Would the Ukranians, now tolerating a corrupt government, be worse off, the same, or better off if that corrupt government disappeared, and Russia (or just about anybody else) were to talk over in Ukraine ? Is Russia going to be fighting the Ukranian PEOPLE, or just a Ukrainan GOVERNMENT, that represents not much more than a wealthy plutocracy of a small number of Ukrainians ?
In any case, Russia is currently going into Ukraine (a non-NATO country), so what business is it of Joe Biden or the US government to be involved in this, with sanctions, troops, or in whatever way ? Do we really understand this whole thing ?
I'm sorry, but this is not a comic books, that you are probably used to, so there are too many words and concepts here.... Therefore, don't bother.Words please… use your words…
I was actually asking for words and original thought. That’s how dialogues work. Give it a tryI'm sorry, but this is not a comic books that you are probably used to, so there are too many words and concepts here.... Therefore, don't bother.
Americans have spent too many sons (and daughters) on adventurist wars thousands of miles offshore. There's no reason in hell or high water for us (America) to confront Russia militarily at this stage. I mean, supposing Biden and NATO declare war on Russia what would that even look like? A conventional war? A limited nuclear exchange on the ground with small battlefield nuclear munitions? To what end? To drive the Russians out of Ukraine? What then? The only justification for engaging Russia directly would be something like Russian forces driving into Poland or some other proper Eastern European nation. To answer your question, no, I do not believe the American people feel anything close to a sufficient affinity with the Ukrainians to volunteer up their sons and daughters to the slaughter. War between First World armies looks a hell of a lot worse these days than in the 1940's. The death toll from any such war would be staggering.
There is a video, not very long one and you can find answers to your questions there, with illustrations. And I wouldn't have to print the whole novel on the computer.I was actually asking for words and original thought. That’s how dialogues work. Give it a try
Biden has nothing to do with any of this. It's about Putin's desire to conquer and expand its territory. It's about power and control.Ukraine is a NATO partner nation. They are a sovereign nation. Hell, our fucking gov't is corrupt. Do we not deserve protection from invasion?
IF we could have prevented this, the stock market wouldn't be tanking and MAYBE we could keep gas below 5 dollars a gallon. But thanks to Biden's incompetency it'll hit that and beyond.
We know enough about 1938 and 1939 with Nazi Germany and Hitler. We know enough that Putin is no different.Have you thought this through ? What if the "bullies" are the Ukranian government, and the victims of the bullying are the Ukranian people ? And a Russia takeover might stop that bullying ?
Do You Know Enough About Russia/Ukraine to Support US Involvement ?
And the do nothing Trump, who wanted a favor first from Ukraine? Instead of asking for favors to get dirt on his opponent, that time could have been spent more wisely by beefing up Ukraine's missile defense system. He did shit. Everyone knew, after Crimea who was next.
And the do nothing Trump, who wanted a favor first from Ukraine? Instead of asking for favors to get dirt on his opponent, that time could have been spent more wisely by beefing up Ukraine's missile defense system. He did shit. Everyone knew, after Crimea who was next.
Really? And Trump? I need a favor first from Selensky just to give him military support, because he needed political dirt on Biden? Are you fucking kidding me? Weak doesn't even begin to tell us about Trump.It is not the responsibility of the US to protect Ukraine or anybody else over there.
However, as history proves out all too well, we need to forcefully publicly condemn military expansion like the Russians are going.
President Potatohead (i.e, Leader of the Free World) has been very weak and ineffective in marshaling world support against the Russians.
As we saw very well with that disaster in Afghanistan and the economic problems in this country he isn't very good at the job. A total failure.
He is a stupid and weak President and anybody that voted for him is an idiot.
That's a lie. Not how the story went down. If that were true, you would have posted the evidence. You are a worthless piece of shit liar.The Ukraine made the Biden family rich.
A Biden kid, that never had a real job in his life and got kicked out the Navy because of cocaine addiction, was getting $80K a month for his "expertise" in global energy issues and VP Biden had to threaten the Ukrainians to keep him form being investigated for corruption.
It went down with even more disgusting details. You know, usual democrat shit.That's a lie. Not how the story went down.
That's a lie. Not how the story went down. If that were true, you would have posted the evidence. You are a worthless piece of shit liar.
Putin will test NATO resolve by sending troops into Estonia.Putin's plan is to reconstitute the old Soviet Union and this clown President Potatohead isn't smart enough to give a shit. What could possibly go wrong?