Do Republicans believe a Muslim should be allowed to serve in public office if elected?

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

False, most Americans voted FOR Trump. The Stalinists had 3 million illegal aliens voting with them in California, but Americans chose Trump.

That's utter horseshit and not a single person on earth can prove such a thing. Trump lost the popular vote, cuck.

Oh, were you one of those dems that didn't know how elections are done in this country? Despite the Bush vs Gore issue?


Wow. That most have been VERY embarrassing for you.

I understand how the EC is undemocratic perfectly, That's why it should never have been created. There's no reason for a popular vote for President here since that's not how it's decided.

Err, then how would the state outcomes be decided?

They wouldn't. The one with the most votes, nationally, wins. That's democracy right, majority rule?

Good! You get a Constitutional amendment to change it. Meanwhile, we will sit back and laugh as you spit into the wind!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

That's the worst/best example YOU can come up with? How the fuck does his having served one term mitigate his blatant and opprobrious bigotry. And, you might recall, that I documented the fact that there are many others like him, in and out of government. You might be familiar with Rick Perry, Rick Santorum and Michelle Bachmann to name just a few.

The one term mitigated your implication that he was a representative of a strong and dangerous political movement.

The point -which I have proven -is that they are more of a threat to the endurance of secular government the Islam. If you are to blind to see that, or too dishonest to admit it, it's not my problem.

THe fact that the man you put forth as an example of what a threat they are, held his office for ONE term and that was out of government.


That does not prove that that movement is a threat. If anything it makes it look very weak.


TO discuss the threat of islam, we should look at nations that have allowed high levels of muslim immigration for a long time, to see what future issues we could have.

You are just trying to squirm out of admitting the reality of what I'm saying. Apparently you missed this: Christian Dominionism-The Real Threat to Our Secular Government

I note that you don't clarify what you are saying, you just say that I got it wrong. You don't respond to my point, and you post a link to another thread as an answer.


That's you being evasive. You lose.

As far a looking at other countries, name one that has a tradition of secular government and an establish democracy where the Muslim population has been a threat to - or has undermined-their system of government

Sure. Turkey.

Let me try to help since you seem to have a reading comprehension issue

1. Muslims in America are not a threat to secular democracy.

2.Some Christians are a threat to secular Democracy

3. More instances of domestic terrorism is perpetrated by non Muslims

4. Turkey is still a Democracy .

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "no religious test".

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "supreme law of the land" That makes Islam unconstitutional (illegal)

Sorry! Wrong answer. Thank you for playing! Johnny, tell us about our nice parting gifts for our contestants!

What legal Constitutional argument can you provide in a link, that says Sharia Law can coexist separately from our judicial rule of law under the Constitution?

Let me challenge the basis of your argument and see how well you can back it up. Links please.

 

[Correll]

False, most Americans voted FOR Trump. The Stalinists had 3 million illegal aliens voting with them in California, but Americans chose Trump.

That's utter horseshit and not a single person on earth can prove such a thing. Trump lost the popular vote, cuck.

Oh, were you one of those dems that didn't know how elections are done in this country? Despite the Bush vs Gore issue?


Wow. That most have been VERY embarrassing for you.

I understand how the EC is undemocratic perfectly, That's why it should never have been created. There's no reason for a popular vote for President here since that's not how it's decided.

Err, then how would the state outcomes be decided?

They wouldn't. The one with the most votes, nationally, wins. That's democracy right, majority rule? If the EC gets to pick who they want, and they do, you might as well just say well, American citizen, you don't get to vote for the President since, you don't.

The Founders were very much against straight Democracy. OUr system is all about limiting the dangers of mob rule.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

This thread proves that the far left is more dangerous than ISIS and that both have the same mindset.

No, it doesn't. The existential threat to the country is that conservatives keep making assertions like yours in the total absence of any factual data to back them up.

See a far left drone blazes in and proves my comments correct!

"See a far left drone blazes in and proves my comments correct!" Just the opposite is true.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/non-m...0-of-all-terrorist-attacks-in-america/5333619

So I guess 9/11, Fort Hood and San Bernadino were all just figments of our imagination.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I don’t think Muslims should be elected to public office. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Thank you for admitting that you have no respect for the constitution and the traditions that Made America Great long before tRump

My constitution says I select my candidates on any criteria I find relevant. Are you insane?

----------------------------------------------------- the problem is that once you let muslims into the USA and they become citizens they then have ALL the RIGHTS and privileges of any other American citizen . The only solution is to stop importing muslims into the USA Gents and Ladies !!

The problem is the bigots who unfairly malign Muslims

 

[Auld Phart]

Willhaft

Many here not born here serve and defend the Constitution. That is nativist dogmatism.

To hold a public office, whether it’s state or a federal form of government and to which the discussion of this thread is about, those are the requirements when you take a political position of representation

Article VI

"All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

I didn’t suggest a religious test dumbass! That’s the problem with the left, you give them basic FACTS and they try to cry some form of racism. Ever hear of an politician take an oath of office or is this sudden news to you?

Opposition to a Muslim, or any other religious person, merely because of their religion, is a religious test.

I never said opposition in my post did I ? . Nor did I State ANY RELIGION or non religion preference. Again we have a liberal who can’t see anything beyond race or religion. So if I State that to be an elected representative you have to take an oath of office to defend the Constitution, it’s laws and system of government, that somehow WillHaftawaite believes the oath, what that oath means, AND the Constitution itself is now a religious test.

Bravo!! What else do you want to try and imply regarding the facts I previously stated in my last post?

Did you forget what the title of the thread is?

What the majority of the posts have been about?
If you don't want a (generic) Muslim in office, the only reason would be his religion.

 

[KatieK]

Comey, and the EC, cost Clinton the election. Don't go there.

Trump having a message that spoke up for Middle America, cost Clinton the election.

No. Most Americans voted against Trump. He was always going to win the morons in the flyover.

'most' Americans voted against both of them, by staying home

In an election only those who vote matter. That's reality.

You really don't understand, do you?

MOST people voted against BOTH of them, by staying home.

They said, "we don't want either of those pieces of shit in the White House, an we're not going to help them get there"

(I knew you were dense from your comments last night, but seriously?)

The funny thing about an election is, the only ones who matter are those allowed to vote and those who do. The rest might as well be turds down the toilet since they had no say at all. Like you, they matter not at all. They never cared enough to bother showing up. Personally, I'd purge you from the system after two missed elections. You obviously don't care enough to express a right so you are therefore unworthy of said thing.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "no religious test".

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "supreme law of the land" That makes Islam unconstitutional (illegal)

Sorry! Wrong answer. Thank you for playing! Johnny, tell us about our nice parting gifts for our contestants!

What legal Constitutional argument can you provide in a link, that says Sharia Law can coexist separately from our judicial rule of law under the Constitution?

Let me challenge the basis of your argument and see how well you can back it up. Links please.

You obviously do not know what Sharia Law is. I suggest educating yourself first.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "no religious test".

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "supreme law of the land" That makes Islam unconstitutional (illegal)

Sorry! Wrong answer. Thank you for playing! Johnny, tell us about our nice parting gifts for our contestants!

What legal Constitutional argument can you provide in a link, that says Sharia Law can coexist separately from our judicial rule of law under the Constitution?

Let me challenge the basis of your argument and see how well you can back it up. Links please.

You obviously do not know what Sharia Law is. I suggest educating yourself first.

On the contrary, and a great dodge of actually backing your answer by the way. Having trouble?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

the far left is just as intolerant to other cultures and religions as the far right is...

Baseless Bovine Excrement.

the far left and right?....you bet they are....

You want to see what intolerance looks like??......

Gordon Klingenschmitt: Christians Must Run For Office So The Church Can ‘Take Over The Government’ | Right Wing Watch

In 2014, Religious Right activist Gordon Klingenschmitt was elected to a seat in the Colorado House of Representatives, despite his long history of extremist views and outrageous statements. Even though his term in office was repeatedly marked by controversy, Klingenschmitt decided to run for a seat in the state senate in 2016, only to lose the Republican primary, bringing his short political career to an end.

Despite his rather ignominious record, Klingenschmitt has now written a book entitled “How To Liberate The World in 30 Days: A Step-by-Step Guide to Take Back Your Country,” which he claims will teach conservative Christian how to get more involved in politics in order to save America.

So, your poster boy for Christian intolerance is a guy who managed to hold a seat in a State House for one term.


That's the worst/best example you can come up with?


That does not sound like a strong political force.

That's the worst/best example YOU can come up with? How the fuck does his having served one term mitigate his blatant and opprobrious bigotry. And, you might recall, that I documented the fact that there are many others like him, in and out of government. You might be familiar with Rick Perry, Rick Santorum and Michelle Bachmann to name just a few.

How long did it take to look through a thesaurus to come up with that word?

 

[Correll]

The one term mitigated your implication that he was a representative of a strong and dangerous political movement.

The point -which I have proven -is that they are more of a threat to the endurance of secular government the Islam. If you are to blind to see that, or too dishonest to admit it, it's not my problem.

THe fact that the man you put forth as an example of what a threat they are, held his office for ONE term and that was out of government.


That does not prove that that movement is a threat. If anything it makes it look very weak.


TO discuss the threat of islam, we should look at nations that have allowed high levels of muslim immigration for a long time, to see what future issues we could have.

You are just trying to squirm out of admitting the reality of what I'm saying. Apparently you missed this: Christian Dominionism-The Real Threat to Our Secular Government

I note that you don't clarify what you are saying, you just say that I got it wrong. You don't respond to my point, and you post a link to another thread as an answer.


That's you being evasive. You lose.

As far a looking at other countries, name one that has a tradition of secular government and an establish democracy where the Muslim population has been a threat to - or has undermined-their system of government

Sure. Turkey.

Let me try to help since you seem to have a reading comprehension issue

1. Muslims in America are not a threat to secular democracy.

2.Some Christians are a threat to secular Democracy

3. More instances of domestic terrorism is perpetrated by non Muslims

4. Turkey is still a Democracy .

1. They are part of the Progressive Alliance that is very much a threat to secular democracy in America.


2. not really. The few that actually would violate the Constitution in pursuit of some Theology, have insignificant support.

3. Lets keep it that way be limiting immigration of muslims.

4. Sure it is. What to make any bets on how long until the islamist President has a peaceful transition of power?

 

[Auld Phart]

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "no religious test".

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "supreme law of the land" That makes Islam unconstitutional (illegal)

Sorry! Wrong answer. Thank you for playing! Johnny, tell us about our nice parting gifts for our contestants!

What legal Constitutional argument can you provide in a link, that says Sharia Law can coexist separately from our judicial rule of law under the Constitution?

Let me challenge the basis of your argument and see how well you can back it up. Links please.

You obviously do not know what Sharia Law is. I suggest educating yourself first.

On the contrary, and a great dodge of actually backing your answer by the way. Having trouble?

not a bit.


You seem to be tho

 

[Correll]

I don’t think Muslims should be elected to public office. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Thank you for admitting that you have no respect for the constitution and the traditions that Made America Great long before tRump

My constitution says I select my candidates on any criteria I find relevant. Are you insane?

----------------------------------------------------- the problem is that once you let muslims into the USA and they become citizens they then have ALL the RIGHTS and privileges of any other American citizen . The only solution is to stop importing muslims into the USA Gents and Ladies !!

The problem is the bigots who unfairly malign Muslims

Sure. THAT'S the problem.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

If a Muslim is elected to public office, do Republicans feel they should be allowed to server or should they be banned?

Those who take upon themselves and be awarded with a public office must take an oath to uphold, to defend, the United States Constitution. Obviously, to be president, they must be born of this nation. In following these two set rules, they must refrain from any foreign culture influence and interest that contradicts with the oath to preserve and protect our Constitutional system of government. We have an established system that all cultures and religions must assimilate to, not a system that must bow and assimilate to your own set of values you once held in your country or region of origin. If they respect and uphold to that understanding regarding our nation’s government, I don’t see a problem.

Tell that to the Christion Dominionists

 

[DOTR]

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "no religious test".

I seem to remember part of the Constitution being about "supreme law of the land" That makes Islam unconstitutional (illegal)

Sorry! Wrong answer. Thank you for playing! Johnny, tell us about our nice parting gifts for our contestants!

What legal Constitutional argument can you provide in a link, that says Sharia Law can coexist separately from our judicial rule of law under the Constitution?

Let me challenge the basis of your argument and see how well you can back it up. Links please.

You obviously do not know what Sharia Law is. I suggest educating yourself first.

On the contrary, and a great dodge of actually backing your answer by the way. Having trouble?

How can I prove something does not exist? If you think you can, you are an idiot.

Why don't you cite the part of the Constitution where it says a Muslim cannot hold office? No one has done that, except to quote the wrong parts and reveal their ignorance.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That's the worst/best example YOU can come up with? How the fuck does his having served one term mitigate his blatant and opprobrious bigotry. And, you might recall, that I documented the fact that there are many others like him, in and out of government. You might be familiar with Rick Perry, Rick Santorum and Michelle Bachmann to name just a few.

The one term mitigated your implication that he was a representative of a strong and dangerous political movement.

The point -which I have proven -is that they are more of a threat to the endurance of secular government the Islam. If you are to blind to see that, or too dishonest to admit it, it's not my problem.

THe fact that the man you put forth as an example of what a threat they are, held his office for ONE term and that was out of government.


That does not prove that that movement is a threat. If anything it makes it look very weak.


TO discuss the threat of islam, we should look at nations that have allowed high levels of muslim immigration for a long time, to see what future issues we could have.

You are just trying to squirm out of admitting the reality of what I'm saying. Apparently you missed this: Christian Dominionism-The Real Threat to Our Secular Government

As far a looking at other countries, name one that has a tradition of secular government and an establish democracy where the Muslim population has been a threat to - or has undermined-their system of government

Name one Muslim democracy.

Turkey.

 

[DOTR]

Liberals: “you can blow us up, rape our women but please please don’t call us bigots”

 

[DOTR]

Liberal: “please send some muslims to protect us from Christians who are the real threat to America”