Do women have the right to guns in the US?

[WinterBorn]

Don't lie, the right has never smeared in feminism. It's just that the modern layman has left shit instead of brains in his head, they confuse everything. They now began to consider the Prussian slave owners right.

Leftists want to take away everyone's guns. You want women to be unable to possess guns. You follow the same leftist ideology, but with only half the victims.

When you want to disarm people, you are not a rightwinger.

 

[rupol2000]

Leftists want to take away everyone's guns. You want women to be unable to possess guns. You follow the same leftist ideology, but with only half the victims.

When you want to disarm people, you are not a rightwinger.

Once again: the Right is not a feminist. I hope you're not an idiot not to understand this.​

 

[WinterBorn]

Once again: the Right is not a feminist. I hope you're not an idiot not to understand this.​

But the right is in favor of women being armed if they choose. I hope you are not too stupid to understand that.

 

[rupol2000]

But the right is in favor of women being armed if they choose. I hope you are not too stupid to understand that.

No, I was wrong, you're an idiot.

 

[BlackSand]

No, I was wrong, you're an idiot.

.


Short of caveman style, you aren't getting laid, and your frustration shows ...

.​

 

[rupol2000]

The basis of the right order is a male warrior, a female keeper of the hearth. The possession of a weapon by a woman is as blasphemous as sodomy.
This is a fucking fundamental question.

 

[rupol2000]

Where are the women there?

 

[WinterBorn]

No, I was wrong, you're an idiot.

Wrong again.

Tell me what I said that inaccurate. You have said the left wants to disarm us. And you have said you disagree with arming women

 

[rupol2000]

Wrong again.

This time I'm definitely not wrong, rest

 

[WinterBorn]

This time I'm definitely not wrong, rest

There are many cultures that have women fighting alongside the men.

But the fundamental point is that the right does not want to disarm women. You do.

 

[BlackSand]

The basis of the right order is a male warrior, a female keeper of the hearth. The possession of a weapon by a woman is as blasphemous as sodomy.
This is a fucking fundamental question.

.

I have a Hearth Room off the Kitchen ... Among other things, it has a poker table, gun cabinet and a wet-bar.
It's not gender specific ...

.​

 

[rupol2000]

As for the traditions of the military aristocracy and military estates in Russia: there were no women there. Only male hussars wore a uniform, only they mounted a horse. The women didn't even have pants. The touch of a woman to a saber was not allowed.

Among the serfs of the northwest there could be "equality" because there men were drunks. There is evidence that there women were powerful. But the serfs did not have military weapons and they did not fucking live in right-wing traditions.
And still only men were recruited.

 

[rupol2000]

Among the European knights, too, there were never women.
They could only be recruited into the army from the rabble of leftist regimes, just like children. But this is also rare.

 

[rupol2000]

In a right society, a woman does not own a weapon and does not touch a weapon. A man does not touch the preparation of food if he is not on a campaign.

The woman who touched the weapon is disgraced.
A man who began to do women's affairs is disgraced.

 

[BlackSand]

In a right society, a woman does not own a weapon and does not touch a weapon. A man does not touch the preparation of food if he is not on a campaign.

The woman who touched the weapon is disgraced.
A man who began to do women's affairs is disgraced.

.

If you believe that ...
You are just pathetically insecure and afraid of women in general ...

.​

 

[rupol2000]

Not only a woman, but not every man could be a warrior. If honor is hurt, it washed by blood. The man could not afford weakness. He must be ready to give his life at any second on the war or in peace.

 

[rupol2000]

Valor was a knightly virtue. It means to be always ready for death and not to disgrace honor against any. The knight did not contact either commoners or merchants.

 

[rupol2000]

.

If you believe that ...
You are just pathetically insecure and afraid of women in general ...

.​

Women should be afraid. Extra relationships should be avoided. A real man should not be dissolute, this is the nature of dogs who are trying to throw their filthy seed everywhere, precisely because it is filthy.

 

[BlackSand]

Women should be afraid. Extra relationships should be avoided. A real man should not be dissolute, this is the nature of dogs who are trying to throw their filthy seed everywhere, precisely because it is filthy.

.

You are so Neanderthal backwards.
Men have every right to be afraid of women.

As retarded, insecure and possessive as some men can be ...
Depending on who is watching, a woman can kill a man with a smile ...

.​

 

[rupol2000]

You are so Neanderthal backwards.
Men have every right to be afraid of women.

As retarded, insecure and possessive as some men can be ...
Depending on who is watching, a woman can kill a man with a smile

This is a wiring of whores who want to get the seed of any man. Or vice versa, the male dog wants to dishonor the right girl.

This is how bastardity appeared in Europe