Do You Believe We Came From Monkeys?

If the whole world could be Christian, and we could wipe out the rest, we may lead more peaceful lives around the planet. Especially after we destroy all the crazy splinter factions that don't agree with the central principle.

However, that requires genocide. I'd rather convince the world to be atheist, or to be more understanding, using logic and truth. It's a lot more peaceful and eco-friendly.

But then, there are the types that are so fanatical, that they may need smiting... :)

Nothing to smile about. Genocide was committed by social Darwinists, eugenicists, Hitler, Planned Parenthood, state atheism, communists and the like. All leftist and atheist leaning groups.

democratic%2Bsocialism%2Bcarried%2Bto%2Bits%2Blogical%2Bconclusion-garrison.jpg
(edited)
All committed by religious fanatics.

Socialism is a religion too. Just as much as any other. It's actually based on Calvinism and Puritanism ideas that we must remove all earthly claims in favor of the state. Or "God" as they called it. Replace "state" with "god", and you have the same thing. They all lead to a "Heaven" or "Utopia" that cannot exist, to the benefit of their respective rulers.

Hitler believed in a religion where the underground gods wanted to wipe out non-believers.

All these genocidal people that have tried to influence us, are trying to trick us to believe in their "god".

Atheists look at this, and say WTF is wrong with these people?!?
 
I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Evolution does not claim we came from monkeys. It suggest we have common ancestry.
 
Psst, the "missing link" may be extraterrestrial. Think about it for a little bit.

But actually there is no missing link.
 
What came first, the chicken, or the egg?

We all know the answer, and there is no missing link.
 
But ET's could have sped us along the path of evolution and knowledge. Culminating with the great Sumerian civilization 6000 years ago, that we take for granted today.
 
I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.
Nearly all animals on earth today come from a common ancestors, not from any spices that exist today. So cats didn't come from seals but they did come from a common ancestor many millions of ears ago, long before cats or seals existed.
 
If the whole world could be Christian, and we could wipe out the rest, we may lead more peaceful lives around the planet. Especially after we destroy all the crazy splinter factions that don't agree with the central principle.

However, that requires genocide. I'd rather convince the world to be atheist, or to be more understanding, using logic and truth. It's a lot more peaceful and eco-friendly.

But then, there are the types that are so fanatical, that they may need smiting... :)

Nothing to smile about. Genocide was committed by social Darwinists, eugenicists, Hitler, Planned Parenthood, state atheism, communists and the like. All leftist and atheist leaning groups.

democratic%2Bsocialism%2Bcarried%2Bto%2Bits%2Blogical%2Bconclusion-garrison.jpg
All committed by religious fanatics.

Socialism is a religion too. Just as much as any other. It's actually based on Calvinism and Puritanism ideas that we must remove all earthly claims in favor of the state. Or "God" as they called it. Replace "state" with "god", and you have the same thing.

Hitler believed in a religion where the underground gods wanted to wipe out non-believers.

All these genocidal people that have tried to influence us, are trying to trick us to believe in their "god".

Atheists look at this, and say WTF is wrong with these people?!?

We do not traditionally think socialism is a religion, but a political system. Whatever. If you want to call it a religion, fine, but it's not based on Christianity. I would think it's based on leftist 'religion' like secular humanism, i.e. atheism. Didn't we have communal living from the libbies during the 60s? I saw Easy Rider, one of the classic 60s movies.

"It was from this secular humanist morality that Robert Owen (began an experiment in communal living in 1825) derived his understanding of Ethical Socialism and formulated his experiments in constructing Utopian communities in Britain and in a fledging America. In purchasing property from a religious community, Owen dubbed the experiment "New Harmony" and proceeded to fabricate his little society based upon humanist liberty and egalitarian tenets while deconstructing institutions such as marriage in the service of a worldly human happiness."

Socialism as Religion

Robert Owen - Wikipedia

Again, genocide is from Darwin. It led to eugenics from Darwin's cousin. Trying to bring this post back to science. There was a book written called Hitler's Scientists by John Cornwell.

"From chapter 1 to 6, through relationships with scientists who make weapons, Hitler realized the power of science and technology in relation to dominance through war. Germany's dominance in science fields helped the Nazi Party to gain advantages in weapons and machines. In the 1900s, Germans made early advances in the liquefaction of gases, the production of electrical power, and electrochemistry. Especially in the case of German chemist Fritz Haber(considered the "father of chemical warfare") who became an honorable scientist in Germany who had contributed to producing high explosives during World War I. Furthermore, during this time period, Haber got recognized for producing poison gas with his colleagues. After the First World War, the topic of racial hygiene became prevalent in Germany, and Hitler overpowered the Nazi party and brain washed Germans to practice eugenics and the destruction of "impurities" in an "inferior" race."

Hitler's Scientists - Wikipedia

The state atheists like Hitler and his scientists killed around 11 million. Doesn't this prove that genocide is leftist 'religion?' If you believe otherwise, ti's based on Satanic lies as pointed out many times in the Religion and Ethics forum.
 
Socialist religion, and Hitler based on his crazy religion, killed a lot of people. And they got folks to follow them by making them think their afterlife (or future advance) was dependent on them following the crazy orders they were given.

Those were religions. And just like many other religions, they killed a lot of people, because they thought they were right! They were brainwashed into thinking they were right! And it allowed them to kill people like crazy, because they though they were doing the right thing. Based on their religious brainwashing.

Christians did the same. And those were really horrible deaths, because it took knives and rocks and swords. They evil ones didn't die quickly. And they killed and raped and rampaged throughout the world. Because God and Jesus told them to.

Or so they say...

They're all full of shit. And anybody who follows that is full of shit too. You can't forgive your religion for the crimes it has committed. This is what people follow. And it will happen again.

Just like today where the Church is giving a blind eye to kids who have been molested by wicked gay priests. There are thousands of kids, now grownups, saying they were blown by priests and nobody cared. The Pope is even under scrutiny for allowing this under his watch.

If these priests and popes are really holy people connected directly to god, then god should smite them.

But he doesn't.

Why?

Because your God doesn't exist.
 
It's a made-up tale to make people feel good, and ultimately to make them follow a ruler that says he talks to "god", so he can create an army of followers to fight his battles.

People that tell you to argue the fallacy that we came from monkeys, are the same people that are using you to fight their battles.

You, Bond, are fighting a battle that you were brainwashed into. Despite all obvious evidence. You do it because you feel like a warrior for Christianity.

You were brainwashed into this.
 
I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.
Nearly all animals on earth today come from a common ancestors, not from any spices that exist today. So cats didn't come from seals but they did come from a common ancestor many millions of ears ago, long before cats or seals existed.

Nearly?
 
Socialist religion, and Hitler based on his crazy religion, killed a lot of people. And they got folks to follow them by making them think their afterlife (or future advance) was dependent on them following the crazy orders they were given.

Those were religions. And just like many other religions, they killed a lot of people, because they thought they were right! They were brainwashed into thinking they were right! And it allowed them to kill people like crazy, because they though they were doing the right thing. Based on their religious brainwashing.

Christians did the same. And those were really horrible deaths, because it took knives and rocks and swords. They evil ones didn't die quickly. And they killed and raped and rampaged throughout the world. Because God and Jesus told them to.

Or so they say...

They're all full of shit. And anybody who follows that is full of shit too. You can't forgive your religion for the crimes it has committed. This is what people follow. And it will happen again.

Just like today where the Church is giving a blind eye to kids who have been molested by wicked gay priests. There are thousands of kids, now grownups, saying they were blown by priests and nobody cared. The Pope is even under scrutiny for allowing this under his watch.

If these priests and popes are really holy people connected directly to god, then god should smite them.

But he doesn't.

Why?

Because your God doesn't exist.

You're starting to ramble on because you do not reply to my truthful statements backed up by my links. It goes to show that your statements are based on assertions and do not present a coherent argument. Is this typical of atheists? No, I've heard atheists with better arguments, but they end up being wrong. Still, they presented an actual argument.

First, we know that socialism (politics and ideology) is based on secular humanism. Secular humanism is based on Marxist humanism and Karl Marx. Is it any wonder that this is the basis of your rants against Christianity? At least, the atheists I know admit this is their foundation. If you haven't realized this already, then this is the path you are heading down.

As for the Christians doing violence and killing because God told them to, it is the story of the Canaanites which has been explained several times already. God had good reason for destroying his enemies that stood in the way and would kill the Israelites.

Why did God command the extermination / genocide of the Canaanites, women and children included?

As for the gay priests, you're referring to Catholics and Pope Francis has to deal with it. The church should be sued by its victims in my opinion.

There is no reason for the god of the world to smite Catholics. Many Christians think the Catholics may be fall under Satan when the time comes. It is a form of Christianity under human influence instead of following the Bible. Satan doesn't just influence non-believers. He influences believers, too. The theistic evolutionists.

And from all your nonsense, you conclude God doesn't exist. It's just the rantings of someone who's gone looney tunes.

It's a made-up tale to make people feel good, and ultimately to make them follow a ruler that says he talks to "god", so he can create an army of followers to fight his battles.

People that tell you to argue the fallacy that we came from monkeys, are the same people that are using you to fight their battles.

You, Bond, are fighting a battle that you were brainwashed into. Despite all obvious evidence. You do it because you feel like a warrior for Christianity.

You were brainwashed into this

It's not made up at all. It was written down many centuries ago by people from different walks of life. It's part history, part science (even though it's not a science book) and for our lives in the future. If one studies it, then there is no other conclusion that they can come to. As I stated, I compared evolution from evolution.berkeley.edu and what the Bible says and the Bible is correct. Prior to that, I believed in evolution. However, around 2011 I had serious doubts about evolution based on its own merits.

Darwin was wrong and much of evolution has not panned out. I started seriously questioning it in 2011 when there wasn't an explanation of how multicell creatures come into existence. How did sexual reproduction evolve? Where is the mountain of evidence of transitional fossils? What are scientific breakthroughs based on evolution? Why is evolution considered science when it's more forensics and forensics without adequate evidence could be wrong (and it usually is)? Living creatures and their births look like there is intelligence behind their designs just like DNA. Evos cannot explain nor have arguments to disprove, but try to pass off their dogma instead. Why is evolution dogma taught as science? It's more philosophy and religion. Creation should be taught as science since it provides the origins to biology, zoology, geology and paleontolgy which is filled with erroneous ideas taught from evolution.

You keep believing we came from a monkey or a common ancestor, but there is no evidence of this monkey or common ancestor. They should be in abundance. When asked why there aren't any today, we get the same fossil evidence circular reasoning mumbo jumbo. How does knowing you came from an ape help at all then? What other science has it led to? What good does knowing that your DNA is similar to a monkey's DNA done? What good is knowing birds came from dinosaurs? It's just used to promote evolution, as circular reasoning is ought to do.

So, clearly I wasn't brainwashed into anything. My faith in Jesus is my faith. It has led to my discovering creation science and discovering it better explains our reality and origins and our future than the myths of evolution. All your mountain of evidence, theories and "facts" has led to a lot of nothing which beliefs in myths are ought to do. While belief in creation science and the Bible has led to all kinds of breakthroughs such as mathematics, magnetic field strength, continental drift and plate tectonics, radioactive decay and helium in rocks, cold material near the earth's core and much more. I don't have to list all the scientists who believed in creation and their accomplishments as it will fill multiple pages here.
 
I must say that Sean Connery was my favorite James Bond. He certainly knew when and how to wear a suit --- and he wasn't a pretty boy either.
 
It's a made-up tale to make people feel good, and ultimately to make them follow a ruler that says he talks to "god", so he can create an army of followers to fight his battles.

People that tell you to argue the fallacy that we came from monkeys, are the same people that are using you to fight their battles.

You, Bond, are fighting a battle that you were brainwashed into. Despite all obvious evidence. You do it because you feel like a warrior for Christianity.

You were brainwashed into this.

You are back to your tired, old tropes thinking that creation scientists were brainwashed into this. Nothing of the kind. In fact, creationists created science to pay homage to God. It's the other way around, so you are wrong once again.

However, I did find the following to add to the discussion. It lists the ways an ape-human or common ancestor could be demonstrated in science.

  1. Combine ape fossil bones with human fossil bones and declare the two to be one individual—a real “apeman.”
  2. Emphasize certain humanlike qualities of fossilized ape bones, and with imagination upgrade apes to be more humanlike.
  3. Emphasize certain apelike qualities of fossilized human bones, and with imagination downgrade humans to be more apelike.
iu


The problem for evolutionists is NONE of the above occurred naturally. Two out of three are imaginary. The first one was deliberate fraud or based on fallacies of insufficient evidence. They were all reconstructed by the evolutionists trying to show common ancestry.
 
Socialist religion, and Hitler based on his crazy religion, killed a lot of people. And they got folks to follow them by making them think their afterlife (or future advance) was dependent on them following the crazy orders they were given.

Those were religions. And just like many other religions, they killed a lot of people, because they thought they were right! They were brainwashed into thinking they were right! And it allowed them to kill people like crazy, because they though they were doing the right thing. Based on their religious brainwashing.

Christians did the same. And those were really horrible deaths, because it took knives and rocks and swords. They evil ones didn't die quickly. And they killed and raped and rampaged throughout the world. Because God and Jesus told them to.

Or so they say...

They're all full of shit. And anybody who follows that is full of shit too. You can't forgive your religion for the crimes it has committed. This is what people follow. And it will happen again.

Just like today where the Church is giving a blind eye to kids who have been molested by wicked gay priests. There are thousands of kids, now grownups, saying they were blown by priests and nobody cared. The Pope is even under scrutiny for allowing this under his watch.

If these priests and popes are really holy people connected directly to god, then god should smite them.

But he doesn't.

Why?

Because your God doesn't exist.

You're starting to ramble on because you do not reply to my truthful statements backed up by my links. It goes to show that your statements are based on assertions and do not present a coherent argument. Is this typical of atheists? No, I've heard atheists with better arguments, but they end up being wrong. Still, they presented an actual argument.

First, we know that socialism (politics and ideology) is based on secular humanism. Secular humanism is based on Marxist humanism and Karl Marx. Is it any wonder that this is the basis of your rants against Christianity? At least, the atheists I know admit this is their foundation. If you haven't realized this already, then this is the path you are heading down.

As for the Christians doing violence and killing because God told them to, it is the story of the Canaanites which has been explained several times already. God had good reason for destroying his enemies that stood in the way and would kill the Israelites.

Why did God command the extermination / genocide of the Canaanites, women and children included?

As for the gay priests, you're referring to Catholics and Pope Francis has to deal with it. The church should be sued by its victims in my opinion.

There is no reason for the god of the world to smite Catholics. Many Christians think the Catholics may be fall under Satan when the time comes. It is a form of Christianity under human influence instead of following the Bible. Satan doesn't just influence non-believers. He influences believers, too. The theistic evolutionists.

And from all your nonsense, you conclude God doesn't exist. It's just the rantings of someone who's gone looney tunes.

It's a made-up tale to make people feel good, and ultimately to make them follow a ruler that says he talks to "god", so he can create an army of followers to fight his battles.

People that tell you to argue the fallacy that we came from monkeys, are the same people that are using you to fight their battles.

You, Bond, are fighting a battle that you were brainwashed into. Despite all obvious evidence. You do it because you feel like a warrior for Christianity.

You were brainwashed into this

It's not made up at all. It was written down many centuries ago by people from different walks of life. It's part history, part science (even though it's not a science book) and for our lives in the future. If one studies it, then there is no other conclusion that they can come to. As I stated, I compared evolution from evolution.berkeley.edu and what the Bible says and the Bible is correct. Prior to that, I believed in evolution. However, around 2011 I had serious doubts about evolution based on its own merits.

Darwin was wrong and much of evolution has not panned out. I started seriously questioning it in 2011 when there wasn't an explanation of how multicell creatures come into existence. How did sexual reproduction evolve? Where is the mountain of evidence of transitional fossils? What are scientific breakthroughs based on evolution? Why is evolution considered science when it's more forensics and forensics without adequate evidence could be wrong (and it usually is)? Living creatures and their births look like there is intelligence behind their designs just like DNA. Evos cannot explain nor have arguments to disprove, but try to pass off their dogma instead. Why is evolution dogma taught as science? It's more philosophy and religion. Creation should be taught as science since it provides the origins to biology, zoology, geology and paleontolgy which is filled with erroneous ideas taught from evolution.

You keep believing we came from a monkey or a common ancestor, but there is no evidence of this monkey or common ancestor. They should be in abundance. When asked why there aren't any today, we get the same fossil evidence circular reasoning mumbo jumbo. How does knowing you came from an ape help at all then? What other science has it led to? What good does knowing that your DNA is similar to a monkey's DNA done? What good is knowing birds came from dinosaurs? It's just used to promote evolution, as circular reasoning is ought to do.

So, clearly I wasn't brainwashed into anything. My faith in Jesus is my faith. It has led to my discovering creation science and discovering it better explains our reality and origins and our future than the myths of evolution. All your mountain of evidence, theories and "facts" has led to a lot of nothing which beliefs in myths are ought to do. While belief in creation science and the Bible has led to all kinds of breakthroughs such as mathematics, magnetic field strength, continental drift and plate tectonics, radioactive decay and helium in rocks, cold material near the earth's core and much more. I don't have to list all the scientists who believed in creation and their accomplishments as it will fill multiple pages here.

That was a long infomercial for the irrelevant Christian creation ministries.

And yes, the geocentric model is true, at least for the Flat Earth loons.

 
If the whole world could be Christian, and we could wipe out the rest, we may lead more peaceful lives around the planet. Especially after we destroy all the crazy splinter factions that don't agree with the central principle.

However, that requires genocide. I'd rather convince the world to be atheist, or to be more understanding, using logic and truth. It's a lot more peaceful and eco-friendly.

But then, there are the types that are so fanatical, that they may need smiting... :)

Nothing to smile about. Genocide was committed by social Darwinists, eugenicists, Hitler, Planned Parenthood, state atheism, communists and the like. All leftist and atheist leaning groups.

democratic%2Bsocialism%2Bcarried%2Bto%2Bits%2Blogical%2Bconclusion-garrison.jpg
All committed by religious fanatics.

Socialism is a religion too. Just as much as any other. It's actually based on Calvinism and Puritanism ideas that we must remove all earthly claims in favor of the state. Or "God" as they called it. Replace "state" with "god", and you have the same thing.

Hitler believed in a religion where the underground gods wanted to wipe out non-believers.

All these genocidal people that have tried to influence us, are trying to trick us to believe in their "god".

Atheists look at this, and say WTF is wrong with these people?!?

We do not traditionally think socialism is a religion, but a political system. Whatever. If you want to call it a religion, fine, but it's not based on Christianity. I would think it's based on leftist 'religion' like secular humanism, i.e. atheism. Didn't we have communal living from the libbies during the 60s? I saw Easy Rider, one of the classic 60s movies.

"It was from this secular humanist morality that Robert Owen (began an experiment in communal living in 1825) derived his understanding of Ethical Socialism and formulated his experiments in constructing Utopian communities in Britain and in a fledging America. In purchasing property from a religious community, Owen dubbed the experiment "New Harmony" and proceeded to fabricate his little society based upon humanist liberty and egalitarian tenets while deconstructing institutions such as marriage in the service of a worldly human happiness."

Socialism as Religion

Robert Owen - Wikipedia

Again, genocide is from Darwin. It led to eugenics from Darwin's cousin. Trying to bring this post back to science. There was a book written called Hitler's Scientists by John Cornwell.

"From chapter 1 to 6, through relationships with scientists who make weapons, Hitler realized the power of science and technology in relation to dominance through war. Germany's dominance in science fields helped the Nazi Party to gain advantages in weapons and machines. In the 1900s, Germans made early advances in the liquefaction of gases, the production of electrical power, and electrochemistry. Especially in the case of German chemist Fritz Haber(considered the "father of chemical warfare") who became an honorable scientist in Germany who had contributed to producing high explosives during World War I. Furthermore, during this time period, Haber got recognized for producing poison gas with his colleagues. After the First World War, the topic of racial hygiene became prevalent in Germany, and Hitler overpowered the Nazi party and brain washed Germans to practice eugenics and the destruction of "impurities" in an "inferior" race."

Hitler's Scientists - Wikipedia

The state atheists like Hitler and his scientists killed around 11 million. Doesn't this prove that genocide is leftist 'religion?' If you believe otherwise, ti's based on Satanic lies as pointed out many times in the Religion and Ethics forum.

:laugh2: :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301:
 
Socialist religion, and Hitler based on his crazy religion, killed a lot of people. And they got folks to follow them by making them think their afterlife (or future advance) was dependent on them following the crazy orders they were given.

Those were religions. And just like many other religions, they killed a lot of people, because they thought they were right! They were brainwashed into thinking they were right! And it allowed them to kill people like crazy, because they though they were doing the right thing. Based on their religious brainwashing.

Christians did the same. And those were really horrible deaths, because it took knives and rocks and swords. They evil ones didn't die quickly. And they killed and raped and rampaged throughout the world. Because God and Jesus told them to.

Or so they say...

They're all full of shit. And anybody who follows that is full of shit too. You can't forgive your religion for the crimes it has committed. This is what people follow. And it will happen again.

Just like today where the Church is giving a blind eye to kids who have been molested by wicked gay priests. There are thousands of kids, now grownups, saying they were blown by priests and nobody cared. The Pope is even under scrutiny for allowing this under his watch.

If these priests and popes are really holy people connected directly to god, then god should smite them.

But he doesn't.

Why?

Because your God doesn't exist.

You're starting to ramble on because you do not reply to my truthful statements backed up by my links. It goes to show that your statements are based on assertions and do not present a coherent argument. Is this typical of atheists? No, I've heard atheists with better arguments, but they end up being wrong. Still, they presented an actual argument.

First, we know that socialism (politics and ideology) is based on secular humanism. Secular humanism is based on Marxist humanism and Karl Marx. Is it any wonder that this is the basis of your rants against Christianity? At least, the atheists I know admit this is their foundation. If you haven't realized this already, then this is the path you are heading down.

As for the Christians doing violence and killing because God told them to, it is the story of the Canaanites which has been explained several times already. God had good reason for destroying his enemies that stood in the way and would kill the Israelites.

Why did God command the extermination / genocide of the Canaanites, women and children included?

As for the gay priests, you're referring to Catholics and Pope Francis has to deal with it. The church should be sued by its victims in my opinion.

There is no reason for the god of the world to smite Catholics. Many Christians think the Catholics may be fall under Satan when the time comes. It is a form of Christianity under human influence instead of following the Bible. Satan doesn't just influence non-believers. He influences believers, too. The theistic evolutionists.

And from all your nonsense, you conclude God doesn't exist. It's just the rantings of someone who's gone looney tunes.

It's a made-up tale to make people feel good, and ultimately to make them follow a ruler that says he talks to "god", so he can create an army of followers to fight his battles.

People that tell you to argue the fallacy that we came from monkeys, are the same people that are using you to fight their battles.

You, Bond, are fighting a battle that you were brainwashed into. Despite all obvious evidence. You do it because you feel like a warrior for Christianity.

You were brainwashed into this

It's not made up at all. It was written down many centuries ago by people from different walks of life. It's part history, part science (even though it's not a science book) and for our lives in the future. If one studies it, then there is no other conclusion that they can come to. As I stated, I compared evolution from evolution.berkeley.edu and what the Bible says and the Bible is correct. Prior to that, I believed in evolution. However, around 2011 I had serious doubts about evolution based on its own merits.

Darwin was wrong and much of evolution has not panned out. I started seriously questioning it in 2011 when there wasn't an explanation of how multicell creatures come into existence. How did sexual reproduction evolve? Where is the mountain of evidence of transitional fossils? What are scientific breakthroughs based on evolution? Why is evolution considered science when it's more forensics and forensics without adequate evidence could be wrong (and it usually is)? Living creatures and their births look like there is intelligence behind their designs just like DNA. Evos cannot explain nor have arguments to disprove, but try to pass off their dogma instead. Why is evolution dogma taught as science? It's more philosophy and religion. Creation should be taught as science since it provides the origins to biology, zoology, geology and paleontolgy which is filled with erroneous ideas taught from evolution.

You keep believing we came from a monkey or a common ancestor, but there is no evidence of this monkey or common ancestor. They should be in abundance. When asked why there aren't any today, we get the same fossil evidence circular reasoning mumbo jumbo. How does knowing you came from an ape help at all then? What other science has it led to? What good does knowing that your DNA is similar to a monkey's DNA done? What good is knowing birds came from dinosaurs? It's just used to promote evolution, as circular reasoning is ought to do.

So, clearly I wasn't brainwashed into anything. My faith in Jesus is my faith. It has led to my discovering creation science and discovering it better explains our reality and origins and our future than the myths of evolution. All your mountain of evidence, theories and "facts" has led to a lot of nothing which beliefs in myths are ought to do. While belief in creation science and the Bible has led to all kinds of breakthroughs such as mathematics, magnetic field strength, continental drift and plate tectonics, radioactive decay and helium in rocks, cold material near the earth's core and much more. I don't have to list all the scientists who believed in creation and their accomplishments as it will fill multiple pages here.
I'm sorry for whatever happened to you in 2011.

If it makes you feel good to follow these beliefs, then go for it!

Do not hurt, do not kill, do not do anything wrong based on those beliefs. Do not think you are superior because of those beliefs. Do not use your beliefs to hurt or hinder others.

And then I'm totally cool with it!
 
I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.
Clearly, the more logical/rational answer as to where we came from is:
A vast, invisible fairy or similar thing, reached down into some mud, molded the clump of mud to look human, sprinkled its fairy-dust on it so that it would become human, then once it had its human, it ripped out a rib from the human (rather than simply mold some more mud) and made an opposite sex human.
Clearly, far more rational than the evolutionary process.
 

Forum List

Back
Top