Do you leftest cretins realize what just happened?

This is the ONLY place I've heard a positive spin on this decision. Hope it works.
You hope it works. Even if it does, you will believe the inevitable spin by the left wing propagandists that it did not work.

You already think Trump is the worst president, all while ignoring the long list of accomplishments.

For instance all of the things he has done in his first year for Jobs and the economy.

  • Passage of the tax reform bill providing $5.5 billion in cuts and repealing the Obamacare mandate.
  • Increase of the GDP above 3 percent.
  • Creation of 1.7 million new jobs, cutting unemployment to 4.1 percent.
  • Saw the Dow Jones reach record highs.
  • A rebound in economic confidence to a 17-year high.
  • A new executive order to boost apprenticeships.
  • A move to boost computer sciences in Education Department programs.
  • Prioritizing women-owned businesses for some $500 million in SBA loans.
    • Signed an Executive Order demanding that two regulations be killed for every new one creates. He beat that big and cut 16 rules and regulations for every one created, saving $8.1 billion.
    • Signed 15 congressional regulatory cuts.
    • Withdrew from the Obama-era Paris Climate Agreement, ending the threat of environmental regulations.
    • Signed an Executive Order cutting the time for infrastructure permit approvals.
    • Eliminated an Obama rule on streams that Trump felt unfairly targeted the coal industry
      • Made good on his campaign promise to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
      • Opened up the North American Free Trade Agreement for talks to better the deal for the U.S.
      • Worked to bring companies back to the U.S., and companies like Toyota, Mazda, Broadcom Limited, and Foxconn announced plans to open U.S. plants.
      • Worked to promote the sale of U.S products abroad.
      • Made enforcement of U.S. trade laws, especially those that involve national security, a priority.
      • Ended Obama’s deal with Cuba

    • Boosting U.S. energy dominance
      • The Department of Interior, which has led the way in cutting regulations, opened plans to lease 77 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico for oil and gas drilling.
      • Trump traveled the world to promote the sale and use of U.S. energy.
      • Expanded energy infrastructure projects like the Keystone XL Pipeline snubbed by Obama.
      • Ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to kill Obama’s Clean Power Plan.
      • EPA is reconsidering Obama rules on methane emissions.


  • Protecting the U.S. homeland
    • Laid out new principles for reforming immigration and announced plan to end "chain migration," which lets one legal immigrant to bring in dozens of family members.
    • Made progress to build the border wall with Mexico.
    • Ended the Obama-era “catch and release” of illegal immigrants.
    • Boosted the arrests of illegals inside the U.S.
    • Doubled the number of counties participating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement charged with deporting illegals.
    • Removed 36 percent more criminal gang members than in fiscal 2016.
    • Started the end of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival program.
    • Ditto for other amnesty programs like Deferred Action for Parents of Americans.
    • Cracking down on some 300 sanctuary cities that defy ICE but still get federal dollars.
    • Added some 100 new immigration

Year One List: 81 major Trump achievements, 11 Obama legacy items repealed
Why do you (specifcally you) ignore all of that.

Funny how for the previous 8 years the folks on the right told us 100,000 times that the government does not create jobs. But when a guy with an (R) by his name in in the White House all of sudden he alone has created 1.7 million jobs.

I guess that is why job creation slowed down so much from the previous 4 years, now Trump is creating the jobs instead of the private sector.

they're very busy lying for their orange Jesus.
:cuckoo:

anyone who is a trumptard has no business saying anyone else is crazy.

but it's really cute how all he had to do was move the embassy to Jerusalem and you don't care about what is happening here.

all good... silly boy

I care about corruption in politics ..I care about abuse of power....i care stupid politicians making idiot deals with the Iranian NUT-JOBS ....I care about scummy politicians like the Clintons getting rich off supposedly "serving the public" what do you care about?
 
Thats why they are trying to stop him. He can’t be bought.

Remember his stance on serving in government and then not being allowed to work for lobbyists after you retire?

That got to piss people like Schumer, Schiff, Pelosi, Clinton etc. off

:rofl:

he's been bought by Saudi Arabia, Russia et al,

trumptards are such morons.


You need a candidate that can beat Trump.

The hag & Co. didn't come close.

:banana:

Actually they did come close, close enough to win the popular vote and the EC margin of victory was the 9th smallest in the history of the country.

And that was with the worst and most corrupt candidate ever who ran the worst campaign since Bush I in 1991/2.

Hillary didn't win the popular vote because there was no popular vote election, no popular vote campaign strategy, no popular vote campaign ads. There is no way to know who would have won a popular vote election so stop pretending Hillary won something. She lost, she got the shit kicked out of her Trump crushed her winning 30 states including 3 of Hillary's blue states.
Hillary only won 15% of all Counties in The US.

I ask anyone to explain to me how juat 15% of The geographical USnin large cities should Dictste who should be President to the other 85%?

Very simple...counties do not vote, people do. Empty land gets no vote


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Trump solidified the rust belt and the union vote. The blue wall just became a RED REPUBLICAN WALL.

hahahahahahaha

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahasha

The unions are going to love the lost jobs from these tariffs...:21::21::21:
What are you talking about? Unions know Republicans are only looking out for their best interest.

Look at Wisconsin....oh wait
Uhhh look at the public union case before the Supreme Court....oh wait

Never mind


You know the difference between public and private unions right?.....
Yes. And?....


Even FDR was against public unions sucking money off the tit of the American people..there certainly shouldn't be a federal public unions.....local governemnt can do what they want not the federal government..

 
Trump solidified the rust belt and the union vote. The blue wall just became a RED REPUBLICAN WALL.

hahahahahahaha

another dummy who still thinks trump will do as he says.

as if it matters- steel jobs aren't coming back

*shrug
 
:rofl:

he's been bought by Saudi Arabia, Russia et al,

trumptards are such morons.


You need a candidate that can beat Trump.

The hag & Co. didn't come close.

:banana:

Actually they did come close, close enough to win the popular vote and the EC margin of victory was the 9th smallest in the history of the country.

And that was with the worst and most corrupt candidate ever who ran the worst campaign since Bush I in 1991/2.

Hillary didn't win the popular vote because there was no popular vote election, no popular vote campaign strategy, no popular vote campaign ads. There is no way to know who would have won a popular vote election so stop pretending Hillary won something. She lost, she got the shit kicked out of her Trump crushed her winning 30 states including 3 of Hillary's blue states.
Hillary only won 15% of all Counties in The US.

I ask anyone to explain to me how juat 15% of The geographical USnin large cities should Dictste who should be President to the other 85%?

Very simple...counties do not vote, people do. Empty land gets no vote


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


States do..which is why Trump won handily
 
He hasn't done anything yet. He doesn't even know what he's proposing. He's a moron.


Yea Trump is a moron…

That explains why he just keeps spanking your liberal asses.

trump trolls love Donald because he is as stupid and insane as they are.



:rolleyes:Look at your posts...I'm embarrassed for you

not half as embarrassed as I am for someone as ignorant as you.

there is a reason that trump voters were uneducated, sorry if that makes you sad.

or would you like to lie about that?


You're the one who looks uneducated with your childlike posts
 
Do you leftest cretins realize what just happened?

pro tip- spell check title before calling others, cretins, cretin

:lol:
 
/----/ Well that does it. I'm giving Trump one more chance in 2020 then after that I'm not voting for him ever again. Thanks for the inside scoop.
View attachment 180046

Yep, and after that you will vote for whomever your party masters tell you to vote for. You are a good little sheep!
/----/ Who are my party masters? Sen Mc Turtle? John McLame? Lyin' Ryan? Who?

I do not know which ones you answer to personally.
/----/ I'm Tea Party - we have no Party leaders. Sorry, can't help you there.

I've never met a teatard that had over a high school education.

you?


You need to get out more....Your sheltered existence is apparent
 
You need a candidate that can beat Trump.

The hag & Co. didn't come close.

:banana:

Actually they did come close, close enough to win the popular vote and the EC margin of victory was the 9th smallest in the history of the country.

And that was with the worst and most corrupt candidate ever who ran the worst campaign since Bush I in 1991/2.

Hillary didn't win the popular vote because there was no popular vote election, no popular vote campaign strategy, no popular vote campaign ads. There is no way to know who would have won a popular vote election so stop pretending Hillary won something. She lost, she got the shit kicked out of her Trump crushed her winning 30 states including 3 of Hillary's blue states.
Hillary only won 15% of all Counties in The US.

I ask anyone to explain to me how juat 15% of The geographical USnin large cities should Dictste who should be President to the other 85%?

Very simple...counties do not vote, people do. Empty land gets no vote


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


States do..which is why Trump won handily

Trump did win, you are correct! Well done! I am so proud for you that you know that


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
:rofl:

he's been bought by Saudi Arabia, Russia et al,

trumptards are such morons.


You need a candidate that can beat Trump.

The hag & Co. didn't come close.

:banana:

Actually they did come close, close enough to win the popular vote and the EC margin of victory was the 9th smallest in the history of the country.

And that was with the worst and most corrupt candidate ever who ran the worst campaign since Bush I in 1991/2.

Hillary didn't win the popular vote because there was no popular vote election, no popular vote campaign strategy, no popular vote campaign ads. There is no way to know who would have won a popular vote election so stop pretending Hillary won something. She lost, she got the shit kicked out of her Trump crushed her winning 30 states including 3 of Hillary's blue states.
Hillary only won 15% of all Counties in The US.

I ask anyone to explain to me how juat 15% of The geographical USnin large cities should Dictste who should be President to the other 85%?

Very simple...counties do not vote, people do. Empty land gets no vote


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Dear Golfing Gator
are you okay with millions of people concentrated in liberal
regions of NY and CA deciding EVERY election
by counting those votes more than millions of people
from a wider range of states from the South and Midwest?

What is your threshold?

Do you want to raise the bar to 2/3 or 3/4 instead of majority?
We could argue to have preferential ballots
so runoffs can still be decided in one election, by looking at weighed votes
numbered in the order that people would rank the candidates.

Even if you did count the pure popular vote,
do you understand that announcing this different structure and process,
then both the candidates, the parties and voters would change their
votes and strategies as well?

More people in RED states would invest in getting their
most POPULOUS RED counties and cities to get voters to the polls
to counteract the liberal concentrations in NY and CA.

So it would be more money invested to get TX and FL voters
and not spend resources on states with minimal population.

Is that any solution?

Once TX knows their Electoral votes are going Republican,
they focus their dollars on getting other states electoral votes.

But if we switch to popular vote, then the liberals pour all their
money into concentrated high population cities in NY and CA,
and all the Democrats focus their legislation lobbying and
political action YEARROUND to woo and satisfy those voters
in high population areas that decide the vote every election.

And the Republicans focus on cities and states which add
up to the highest numbers of voters. So the bigger cities
in TX get all the political attention to keep their party and officials
support of those voters and all the money goes there.

Is that really what you want?
A battle for political control by high populous
cities in NY and CA vs. TX and FL?
 
Actually they did come close, close enough to win the popular vote and the EC margin of victory was the 9th smallest in the history of the country.

And that was with the worst and most corrupt candidate ever who ran the worst campaign since Bush I in 1991/2.

Hillary didn't win the popular vote because there was no popular vote election, no popular vote campaign strategy, no popular vote campaign ads. There is no way to know who would have won a popular vote election so stop pretending Hillary won something. She lost, she got the shit kicked out of her Trump crushed her winning 30 states including 3 of Hillary's blue states.
Hillary only won 15% of all Counties in The US.

I ask anyone to explain to me how juat 15% of The geographical USnin large cities should Dictste who should be President to the other 85%?

Very simple...counties do not vote, people do. Empty land gets no vote


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


States do..which is why Trump won handily

Trump did win, you are correct! Well done! I am so proud for you that you know that


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
/----/ Then stop being a whiny little bitch about the irrelevant popular vote.
 
‘Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin, a fellow Republican, urged Trump to rethink the tariffs.

“If the president wants to protect good-paying, family-supporting jobs in America, especially here in Wisconsin, then he should reconsider the administration’s position on these tariffs, particularly on ultra-thin aluminum,” Walker said in a statement.

Many economists say that instead of increasing employment, price increases for consumers of steel and aluminum such as the auto and oil industries will destroy more U.S. jobs than they create.’

'Trade wars are good,' Trump says, defying global concern over tariffs

“Rethink”?

There’s no evidence Trump put any ‘thought’ into his reckless, irresponsible tariffs.


There are no Tariffs yet
 
:rofl:

he's been bought by Saudi Arabia, Russia et al,

trumptards are such morons.


You need a candidate that can beat Trump.

The hag & Co. didn't come close.

:banana:

Actually they did come close, close enough to win the popular vote and the EC margin of victory was the 9th smallest in the history of the country.

And that was with the worst and most corrupt candidate ever who ran the worst campaign since Bush I in 1991/2.

Hillary didn't win the popular vote because there was no popular vote election, no popular vote campaign strategy, no popular vote campaign ads. There is no way to know who would have won a popular vote election so stop pretending Hillary won something. She lost, she got the shit kicked out of her Trump crushed her winning 30 states including 3 of Hillary's blue states.
Hillary only won 15% of all Counties in The US.

I ask anyone to explain to me how juat 15% of The geographical USnin large cities should Dictste who should be President to the other 85%?

no one is talking about percentage of counties. a lot of the counties isn the middle of the country have almost no people and have votes worth 800 of mine in the EC.

she lost by 3 million votes. period.

nutbar

Dear jillian
do you mean she lost despite 3 million votes that people
like Lakhota argue should have made her the winner?

What do think if all states split their electoral votes to represent
how their population voted. Wouldn't that be more fair?

It wouldn't be by county, but by electoral district.
And if a district is split between candidates
then both get their share of E votes unless there is only 1 E Vote for that area.

I think when this was calculated for Clinton,
it was either a closer election or she would have won.

So in cases of close elections, if we also set up a preferential
ballot where voters rank their 2nd and 3rd choices etc.,
we could also decide runoffs and require higher than majority rule.

What are your thoughts or suggestions on any of these
refinements to the winner take all system
that leaves out half the nation every time?
 
:rofl:

he's been bought by Saudi Arabia, Russia et al,

trumptards are such morons.


You need a candidate that can beat Trump.

The hag & Co. didn't come close.

:banana:

Actually they did come close, close enough to win the popular vote and the EC margin of victory was the 9th smallest in the history of the country.

And that was with the worst and most corrupt candidate ever who ran the worst campaign since Bush I in 1991/2.

Hillary didn't win the popular vote because there was no popular vote election, no popular vote campaign strategy, no popular vote campaign ads. There is no way to know who would have won a popular vote election so stop pretending Hillary won something. She lost, she got the shit kicked out of her Trump crushed her winning 30 states including 3 of Hillary's blue states.
Hillary only won 15% of all Counties in The US.

I ask anyone to explain to me how juat 15% of The geographical USnin large cities should Dictste who should be President to the other 85%?

no one is talking about percentage of counties. a lot of the counties isn the middle of the country have almost no people and have votes worth 800 of mine in the EC.

she lost by 3 million votes. period.

nutbar
The Beast lost, thank Trump and thank God.
 
Hillary didn't win the popular vote because there was no popular vote election, no popular vote campaign strategy, no popular vote campaign ads. There is no way to know who would have won a popular vote election so stop pretending Hillary won something. She lost, she got the shit kicked out of her Trump crushed her winning 30 states including 3 of Hillary's blue states.
Hillary only won 15% of all Counties in The US.

I ask anyone to explain to me how juat 15% of The geographical USnin large cities should Dictste who should be President to the other 85%?

Very simple...counties do not vote, people do. Empty land gets no vote


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


States do..which is why Trump won handily

Trump did win, you are correct! Well done! I am so proud for you that you know that


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
/----/ Then stop being a whiny little bitch about the irrelevant popular vote.

Dear Cellblock2429 and Golfing Gator
it's not "irrelevant", that's going too far.
the problem is our system doesn't fully count or account
for the popular vote of all citizens.

What do you both think of the idea of states
splitting the Electoral Votes per district so these
DO reflect the popular vote proportionally?

Wouldn't that push for more accountability and service
to the local districts to represent their people and party bases.

Better yet, allow these district level reps to serve their
constituents directly, by taking and resolving grievances
including complaints of govt abuses and ethics or conflicts of
interest and beliefs, and make the Electors for each party
responsible for communicating between the people
and the officials in govt from local to national levels,
whether city county or state and federal.

Wouldn't that push more leaders to represent the diverse
needs demands and grievances of all the people in our
districts, our counties and states and nation?
 
not half as embarrassed as I am for someone as ignorant as you.

there is a reason that trump voters were uneducated, sorry if that makes you sad.

or would you like to lie about that?

^Observe the grammar skills above, and this person has the audacity to mention education. :26:
/-----/ Jillian reminds me of the dropout interviewed on TV, "I don't need no edumafacation."

it's so cute watching uneducated trumptards pretend they're not morons.

This is really what pisses your kind off. People you consider your inferiors overruling you.
But your crassness shows that you aren’t nearly as superior as you imagine yourself to be. Hillary made the same mistake when her fraustration overwhelmed her and she started a rant about deplorables.
Learn to lose. The goy are gaining a voice. Almost like the country belongs to us or something.
 
Last edited:
Hillary only won 15% of all Counties in The US.

I ask anyone to explain to me how juat 15% of The geographical USnin large cities should Dictste who should be President to the other 85%?

Very simple...counties do not vote, people do. Empty land gets no vote


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


States do..which is why Trump won handily

Trump did win, you are correct! Well done! I am so proud for you that you know that


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
/----/ Then stop being a whiny little bitch about the irrelevant popular vote.

Dear Cellblock2429 and Golfing Gator
it's not "irrelevant", that's going too far.
the problem is our system doesn't fully count or account
for the popular vote of all citizens.

What do you both think of the idea of states
splitting the Electoral Votes per district so these
DO reflect the popular vote proportionally?

Wouldn't that push for more accountability and service
to the local districts to represent their people and party bases.

Better yet, allow these district level reps to serve their
constituents directly, by taking and resolving grievances
including complaints of govt abuses and ethics or conflicts of
interest and beliefs, and make the Electors for each party
responsible for communicating between the people
and the officials in govt from local to national levels,
whether city county or state and federal.

Wouldn't that push more leaders to represent the diverse
needs demands and grievances of all the people in our
districts, our counties and states and nation?


Federalism should do that. The best government is that which is closest.
 
Trump solidified the rust belt and the union vote. The blue wall just became a RED REPUBLICAN WALL.

hahahahahahaha


if the U.S. economy were only that simple...

Trump has proposed something that is universally seen as colossally stupid.
 
Trump is a populist. Like Bill Clinton, nothing he says means anything. It's about what he proposes. Be honest, you never went after Slick when he changed his position in every speech

Bill changed his position with some what regulatory, but nothing to the extent that Trump does. Trump will take two different positions in the same day.

Bull shit. How old are you? You don't remember when Slick was President?

I am 54 and I remember it well. For all of his problems, he never took two opposite positions in less than 24 hours.

If you think he did, feel free to provide the example of him doing so.

Wow, you're the same age as me and can't remember Clinton. Clinton was known specifically for telling EVERYONE whatever they wanted to hear. In less than 24 hours? You're full of shit, he did that all the time. He sometimes flipped multiple times in a day. Depends who he was speaking to.

That's how he got the name SLICK, geniak. For saying to people whatever they wanted to hear. But you don't remember that. Suuuurrrrreeeeeeee you don't ...

Unless you're saying you've had a stroke since Slick left office. Have you? Seriously. Have you had a stroke since Slick left office?

Feel free to provide one example of him taking two different positions in 24 hours. If he did it as often as you say then there has to be 1000s for them for you to choose between.

By the way, he was called "slick" for running his campaign for governor as a progressive and then being a centrist once he was in office, not for changing on a daily basis. It stuck when he took office as POTUS because he did the same thing.

Is there anything you are not wrong about?

You're 54 and you don't remember the flip flop President? The guy who's nickname, Slick, is for his flip flops? I can't take you seriously. I'm just going to laugh at you

:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top