Doctors are coming out in droves saying hydroxychloroquine works

[progressive hunter]

it has only effected 1% of the people negatively and we have destroyed over 50% of some business's,, not to mention what its done to peoples livelihoods,,,
thats not acceptable

Just like WWII effected 0.2% of americans, yet the economic impact was much more than the coronavirus shutdowns.

I dont see the comparison,,,

 

[meaner gene]

Death and Disability from Warfarin-Associated Intracranial and ...

Of the 40 patients who died from warfarin-associated hemorrhage, 35 (88%) died of intracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate of 0.23% [95% CI, 0.16%–0.32%]) and only 5 died of major extracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate 0.03% [95% CI, 0.01%–0.08%])

so you have none,,,
GOT IT,,,

Calling a scientific medical study "none"?

That can only be the result of dollars and no sense.

 

[jc456]

it has only effected 1% of the people negatively and we have destroyed over 50% of some business's,, not to mention what its done to peoples livelihoods,,,
thats not acceptable

Just like WWII effected 0.2% of americans, yet the economic impact was much more than the coronavirus shutdowns.

 

[progressive hunter]

Death and Disability from Warfarin-Associated Intracranial and ...

Of the 40 patients who died from warfarin-associated hemorrhage, 35 (88%) died of intracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate of 0.23% [95% CI, 0.16%–0.32%]) and only 5 died of major extracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate 0.03% [95% CI, 0.01%–0.08%])

so you have none,,,
GOT IT,,,

Calling a scientific medical study "none"?

That can only be the result of dollars and no sense.

sighting a single study means nothing other than you know how to copy and paste,,,

 

[meaner gene]

If people wore masks, the spread of coronavirus would be much lower

Post that data

It was reported by the governor of colorado. He compared counties requiring masks in his state with those that didn't. And he concluded that masks work beyond all doubt.

 

[mudwhistle]

that brings me back to "right to try"

it proven to be safe and only given under a doctors supervision,,,

There are adverse events related to hydroxychloroquine. It's not the most dangerous drug out there, but it's not "safe".

As I said, I'm opposed to people claim to have proof of a cure when that's not true.

It's not safe for people like Dr Fauci and Bill Gate's pocket book.
They've been using the drug for decades and it never became unsafe till now.

 

[jc456]

Death and Disability from Warfarin-Associated Intracranial and ...

Of the 40 patients who died from warfarin-associated hemorrhage, 35 (88%) died of intracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate of 0.23% [95% CI, 0.16%–0.32%]) and only 5 died of major extracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate 0.03% [95% CI, 0.01%–0.08%])

so you have none,,,
GOT IT,,,

Calling a scientific medical study "none"?

That can only be the result of dollars and no sense.

sighting a single study means nothing other than you know how to copy and paste,,,

That study is good, but multiple drs. Come out and that’s invalidated. Can’t make up their insanity

 

[jc456]

If people wore masks, the spread of coronavirus would be much lower

Post that data

It was reported by the governor of colorado. He compared counties requiring masks in his state with those that didn't. And he concluded that masks work beyond all doubt.

Hahaha hahaha

 

[colfax_m]

that brings me back to "right to try"

it proven to be safe and only given under a doctors supervision,,,

There are adverse events related to hydroxychloroquine. It's not the most dangerous drug out there, but it's not "safe".

As I said, I'm opposed to people claim to have proof of a cure when that's not true.

It's not safe for people like Dr Fauci and Bill Gate's pocket book.
They've been using the drug for decades and it never became unsafe till now.

No one is saying it “became unsafe”. It was always associated with some side effects, like any drug. The difference is that when benefits outweigh the risks, it’s useful therapy. When there’s no benefit to using hydroxychloroquine, that means the risks are too great to use.

 

[progressive hunter]

that brings me back to "right to try"

it proven to be safe and only given under a doctors supervision,,,

There are adverse events related to hydroxychloroquine. It's not the most dangerous drug out there, but it's not "safe".

As I said, I'm opposed to people claim to have proof of a cure when that's not true.

It's not safe for people like Dr Fauci and Bill Gate's pocket book.
They've been using the drug for decades and it never became unsafe till now.

No one is saying it “became unsafe”. It was always associated with some side effects, like any drug. The difference is that when benefits outweigh the risks, it’s useful therapy. When there’s no benefit to using hydroxychloroquine, that means the risks are too great to use.

that would be true if there wasnt evidence its works and has yet to cause any harm,,,

 

[meaner gene]

Does that mean you refused to join the military?

They don't give you a choice about medical issues. Especially before shipping out overseas.

Sure they do

What army were you ever in ? The kiss army?

 

[jc456]

No one is saying it “became unsafe”. It was always associated with some side effects, like any drug. The difference is that when benefits outweigh the risks, it’s useful therapy. When there’s no benefit to using hydroxychloroquine, that means the risks are too great to use

Then no one ever should take it. Holy fk decades, and now it’s sooooo fking unsafe? Alice, you’re beyond the looking glass

 

[meaner gene]

Death and Disability from Warfarin-Associated Intracranial and ...

Of the 40 patients who died from warfarin-associated hemorrhage, 35 (88%) died of intracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate of 0.23% [95% CI, 0.16%–0.32%]) and only 5 died of major extracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate 0.03% [95% CI, 0.01%–0.08%])

so you have none,,,
GOT IT,,,

Calling a scientific medical study "none"?

That can only be the result of dollars and no sense.

sighting a single study means nothing other than you know how to copy and paste,,,

You seem to have missed the point. It was a drug to prevent strokes, that kills people.
But as they showed, the fatality rate was acceptable.
With an annualized mortality rate of 0.23%

 

[progressive hunter]

Death and Disability from Warfarin-Associated Intracranial and ...

Of the 40 patients who died from warfarin-associated hemorrhage, 35 (88%) died of intracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate of 0.23% [95% CI, 0.16%–0.32%]) and only 5 died of major extracranial hemorrhage (annualized mortality rate 0.03% [95% CI, 0.01%–0.08%])

so you have none,,,
GOT IT,,,

Calling a scientific medical study "none"?

That can only be the result of dollars and no sense.

sighting a single study means nothing other than you know how to copy and paste,,,

You seem to have missed the point. It was a drug to prevent strokes, that kills people.
But as they showed, the fatality rate was acceptable.
With an annualized mortality rate of 0.23%

OK,,
whats that got to do with current events???

 

[meaner gene]

They've been using the drug for decades and it never became unsafe till now.

The same for morphine. It's not safe or acceptable for widespread use also.

 

[progressive hunter]

They've been using the drug for decades and it never became unsafe till now.

The same for morphine. It's not safe or acceptable for widespread use also.

Morphine is widely used today,,,

 

[meaner gene]

Then no one ever should take it. Holy fk decades, and now it’s sooooo fking unsafe? Alice, you’re beyond the looking glass

You know about treating patients by removing half their brain.

But it's not approved for treating headaches.

 

[progressive hunter]

Then no one ever should take it. Holy fk decades, and now it’s sooooo fking unsafe? Alice, you’re beyond the looking glass

You know about treating patients by removing half their brain.

But it's not approved for treating headaches.

everybody knows amputation is the proper way to deal with headaches,,,

 

[meaner gene]

You seem to have missed the point. It was a drug to prevent strokes, that kills people.
But as they showed, the fatality rate was acceptable.
With an annualized mortality rate of 0.23%

OK,,
whats that got to do with current events???

It's all about cost benefit. And hydroxychloroquine had higher proven costs, than provable benefits.

 

[progressive hunter]

You seem to have missed the point. It was a drug to prevent strokes, that kills people.
But as they showed, the fatality rate was acceptable.
With an annualized mortality rate of 0.23%

OK,,
whats that got to do with current events???

It's all about cost benefit. And hydroxychloroquine had higher proven costs, than provable benefits.

what are your qualifications for such a claim???

other than copy and paste,,,