Does AOC know $15 minimum wage in states like Mississippi will put people out of work?

The myth is that your employment is Supposed to support you fully. That’s not what it’s there for, to make you utterly free and self sustaining. Based on your skills, you may have to rent a room. Employment is not designed to get you a house nor even a one bedroom apartment all to yourself
Again, AOC is the generation of personal comforts rather than personal achievements resisting the realities that achievement does, or may not, provide.
a minimum wage may not be able to do that. in any case, it should not matter if unemployed labor can simply apply for unemployment compensation at the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour as a capital alternative to welfare.
 
Employment is at the will of either party in our at-will employment States.

Only the right wing believes in being illegal to our own laws, while blaming less fortunate illegals for their illegalities.
Blaming illegal acts on the illegal doing it
That’s emotionally horrid while factually correct.
we have a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the legal concept of employment at the will of either party.

there is no express immigration clause. that is the social difference.
Immigration laws, not clauses
immigration laws based on what authority? there is no express power over immigration.
 
Name one company that went "out of business" because they paid their employees to much money.

The list is endless, you moron! If you pay your employees a set salary and you are not bringing in the revenue to pay them, what happens, dumbass?

If the list is endless, then name one company.

Why do companies go out to business, dumbass? It is because they could not make a profit. Why couldn't they make a profit? They were obviously paying their employees too much for the job they were performing. My God man, you are dumber than a pile of rocks!

If you can’t make a profit without workers making no more than $7.25 an hour, you don’t belong in business
Correct. Wages are a component of livelihood for millions of people. Too important to be left simply to the whims of employers. Pay a decent wage or stay out of business, and do what all the rest of us do - Get a Job.

Should government control prices as well? Why/how is it any different?
 
Take it or leave it is the choice

Right. And free people have the right to make that choice. Government has no business overruling their decision.
we subscribe to capitalism not right wing fantasy. capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment and social inefficiency that must be corrected for. unemployment compensation is simply that; we must ensure full employment of capital resources at every practicable opportunity.
 
If you can’t make a profit without workers making no more than $7.25 an hour, you don’t belong in business
Correct. Wages are a component of livelihood for millions of people. Too important to be left simply to the whims of employers. Pay a decent wage or stay out of business, and do what all the rest of us do - Get a Job.
Of course, the creator and owner of the business, with all the costs and responsibilities thereof, should Not set the wages but rather the employee should.
What country or planet do you think this is ?
 
Take it or leave it is the choice

Right. And free people have the right to make that choice. Government has no business overruling their decision.
we subscribe to capitalism not right wing fantasy. capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment and social inefficiency that must be corrected for. unemployment compensation is simply that; we must ensure full employment of capital resources at every practicable opportunity.

We really do need a "hand jerking off" emoji.
 
Employment is at the will of either party in our at-will employment States.

Only the right wing believes in being illegal to our own laws, while blaming less fortunate illegals for their illegalities.
Blaming illegal acts on the illegal doing it
That’s emotionally horrid while factually correct.
we have a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the legal concept of employment at the will of either party.

there is no express immigration clause. that is the social difference.
Immigration laws, not clauses
immigration laws based on what authority? there is no express power over immigration.
We have many laws and practices that are not enumerated as expressed powers. We defeated Germany, there is nothing referencing our constitutional authority to do so.
 
And only bigots and racist say that! Wow, you are a racist and a bigot, thanks for the admission. And again you prove my point.
i am not practicing bigotry; i just need to win my arguments to be superior to you. gossip is not any form of argument. Men have arguments, wo-men may not.

You haven’t any facts, you are a bigot.
i have valid arguments like Men do.

Good grief saying you have a valid argument, isn’t a valid argument. You won’t explain your position, you don’t clarify your position, so 90% of the time I have no clue what your argument is.
A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a simple cost of living adjustment; unemployment is natural under capitalism and we resort to the socialism of equality and equal protection of the law to correct for that inefficiency of capitalism, for the greater social good and to promote the general welfare.

Name a country where this scenario works?
 
Should government control prices as well? Why/how is it any different?
In SOME cases, yes - when they effect the livelihoods of millions of people - ex. Huge housing rent increases. My rent just went from $550/mo, to $900/mo. I moved, at great cost to me. Many others did too.
 
Should government control prices as well? Why/how is it any different?
In SOME cases, yes - when they effect the livelihoods of millions of people - ex. Huge housing rent increases. My rent just went from $550/mo, to $900/mo. I moved, at great cost to me. Many others did too.
So the rental payment is to benefit you alone and not the owner?
 
Of course, the creator and owner of the business, with all the costs and responsibilities thereof, should Not set the wages but rather the employee should.
What country or planet do you think this is ?
The cost of living should set wages, not employers or employees
 
The myth is that your employment is Supposed to support you fully. That’s not what it’s there for, to make you utterly free and self sustaining. Based on your skills, you may have to rent a room. Employment is not designed to get you a house nor even a one bedroom apartment all to yourself
Again, AOC is the generation of personal comforts rather than personal achievements resisting the realities that achievement does, or may not, provide.
Nobody says a minimum wage is supposed to be enough to live on
But it should be enough to get you started in life. Pay for school, buy a car, basic necessities

It used to but no longer does
 
If you can’t make a profit without workers making no more than $7.25 an hour, you don’t belong in business
Correct. Wages are a component of livelihood for millions of people. Too important to be left simply to the whims of employers. Pay a decent wage or stay out of business, and do what all the rest of us do - Get a Job.
Of course, the creator and owner of the business, with all the costs and responsibilities thereof, should Not set the wages but rather the employee should.
What country or planet do you think this is ?
We should not have to subsidize his employees
 
Of course, the creator and owner of the business, with all the costs and responsibilities thereof, should Not set the wages but rather the employee should.
What country or planet do you think this is ?
The cost of living should set wages, not employers or employees
That makes no sense. The cost of living is an abstract concept. It doesn't make decisions. People do. But you want government to overrule their decisions.
 
Of course, the creator and owner of the business, with all the costs and responsibilities thereof, should Not set the wages but rather the employee should.
What country or planet do you think this is ?
The cost of living should set wages, not employers or employees
That makes no sense. The cost of living is an abstract concept. It doesn't make decisions. People do. But you want government to overrule their decisions.
As to your final sentence-in many, many ways. Take from the achievers and give to those who wont
 

Forum List

Back
Top