does God love us?

[ding]

God, you are stupid.

Why do you call your god stupid? I don't disagree...

Are Singularities Real?

They appear inside black holes and pose a big problem for physicists. What are singularities?

www.pbs.org

Though they sound exotic, mathematical singularities are actually common in solutions to all but the simplest equations in physics. The formation of shock waves and cracks, and even the motion of a billiard ball bouncing off a hard wall, can contain singularities. While these singularities fulfill the mathematical definition, they aren’t physically real either: they arise from idealized assumptions that physicists make to force the messy world of reality into the neat one of mathematics. In reality, no crack is perfectly sharp, no wall is perfectly hard, no shock wave is perfectly localized.

So a singularity isn't nothing. You stand corrected.

It isn't a surprise you make minimum wage.

 

[ding]

ding: So using your definition of a point or region of infinite mass density at which space and time are infinitely distorted by gravitational forces and which is held to be the final state of matter falling into a black hole, how did the universe expand in the first place?

taz: do you want some fries with that?

 

[ding]

 

[ding]

ding: why did the universe expand, taz?

taz: do you want paper or plastic?

 

[ding]

 

[Taz]

God, you are stupid.

Why do you call your god stupid? I don't disagree...

Are Singularities Real?

They appear inside black holes and pose a big problem for physicists. What are singularities?

www.pbs.org

Though they sound exotic, mathematical singularities are actually common in solutions to all but the simplest equations in physics. The formation of shock waves and cracks, and even the motion of a billiard ball bouncing off a hard wall, can contain singularities. While these singularities fulfill the mathematical definition, they aren’t physically real either: they arise from idealized assumptions that physicists make to force the messy world of reality into the neat one of mathematics. In reality, no crack is perfectly sharp, no wall is perfectly hard, no shock wave is perfectly localized.

So a singularity isn't nothing. You stand corrected.

It isn't a surprise you make minimum wage.

You’re projecting again.

 

[ding]

God, you are stupid.

Why do you call your god stupid? I don't disagree...

Are Singularities Real?

They appear inside black holes and pose a big problem for physicists. What are singularities?

www.pbs.org

Though they sound exotic, mathematical singularities are actually common in solutions to all but the simplest equations in physics. The formation of shock waves and cracks, and even the motion of a billiard ball bouncing off a hard wall, can contain singularities. While these singularities fulfill the mathematical definition, they aren’t physically real either: they arise from idealized assumptions that physicists make to force the messy world of reality into the neat one of mathematics. In reality, no crack is perfectly sharp, no wall is perfectly hard, no shock wave is perfectly localized.

So a singularity isn't nothing. You stand corrected.

It isn't a surprise you make minimum wage.

You’re projecting again.

Our debate in the Bull Ring will be epic.

 

[Taz]

God, you are stupid.

Why do you call your god stupid? I don't disagree...

Are Singularities Real?

They appear inside black holes and pose a big problem for physicists. What are singularities?

www.pbs.org

Though they sound exotic, mathematical singularities are actually common in solutions to all but the simplest equations in physics. The formation of shock waves and cracks, and even the motion of a billiard ball bouncing off a hard wall, can contain singularities. While these singularities fulfill the mathematical definition, they aren’t physically real either: they arise from idealized assumptions that physicists make to force the messy world of reality into the neat one of mathematics. In reality, no crack is perfectly sharp, no wall is perfectly hard, no shock wave is perfectly localized.

So a singularity isn't nothing. You stand corrected.

It isn't a surprise you make minimum wage.

You’re projecting again.

Our debate in the Bull Ring will be epic.

You’ll just repeat all the unlinked nonsense you always do.

 

[ding]

God, you are stupid.

Why do you call your god stupid? I don't disagree...

Are Singularities Real?

They appear inside black holes and pose a big problem for physicists. What are singularities?

www.pbs.org

Though they sound exotic, mathematical singularities are actually common in solutions to all but the simplest equations in physics. The formation of shock waves and cracks, and even the motion of a billiard ball bouncing off a hard wall, can contain singularities. While these singularities fulfill the mathematical definition, they aren’t physically real either: they arise from idealized assumptions that physicists make to force the messy world of reality into the neat one of mathematics. In reality, no crack is perfectly sharp, no wall is perfectly hard, no shock wave is perfectly localized.

So a singularity isn't nothing. You stand corrected.

It isn't a surprise you make minimum wage.

You’re projecting again.

Our debate in the Bull Ring will be epic.

You’ll just repeat all the unlinked nonsense you always do.

You sound scared.

 

[Taz]

God, you are stupid.

Why do you call your god stupid? I don't disagree...

Are Singularities Real?

They appear inside black holes and pose a big problem for physicists. What are singularities?

www.pbs.org

Though they sound exotic, mathematical singularities are actually common in solutions to all but the simplest equations in physics. The formation of shock waves and cracks, and even the motion of a billiard ball bouncing off a hard wall, can contain singularities. While these singularities fulfill the mathematical definition, they aren’t physically real either: they arise from idealized assumptions that physicists make to force the messy world of reality into the neat one of mathematics. In reality, no crack is perfectly sharp, no wall is perfectly hard, no shock wave is perfectly localized.

So a singularity isn't nothing. You stand corrected.

It isn't a surprise you make minimum wage.

You’re projecting again.

Our debate in the Bull Ring will be epic.

You’ll just repeat all the unlinked nonsense you always do.

You sound scared.

Of hearing all your unlinked crap again? You bet.

 

[BreezeWood]

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing. The singularity occurs when running the equations backwards to the point of origin. Black holes may be a different matter.

.

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing.

.
you are a broken record -

there is no collapse, the compaction occurs without ever changing direction as pointed out previously. the cyclical transition is the moment of singularity.

the same as the boomerang returns to its point of origin never changing direction -

bb - the finite angle of trajectory in a vacuum is the compaction of matter as the mirror image of its expulsion.


your problem of comprehension is yours alone - bb is a cyclical event.

 

[ding]

God, you are stupid.

Why do you call your god stupid? I don't disagree...

Are Singularities Real?

They appear inside black holes and pose a big problem for physicists. What are singularities?

www.pbs.org

Though they sound exotic, mathematical singularities are actually common in solutions to all but the simplest equations in physics. The formation of shock waves and cracks, and even the motion of a billiard ball bouncing off a hard wall, can contain singularities. While these singularities fulfill the mathematical definition, they aren’t physically real either: they arise from idealized assumptions that physicists make to force the messy world of reality into the neat one of mathematics. In reality, no crack is perfectly sharp, no wall is perfectly hard, no shock wave is perfectly localized.

So a singularity isn't nothing. You stand corrected.

It isn't a surprise you make minimum wage.

You’re projecting again.

Our debate in the Bull Ring will be epic.

You’ll just repeat all the unlinked nonsense you always do.

You sound scared.

Of hearing all your unlinked crap again? You bet.

I know you are.

 

[ding]

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing. The singularity occurs when running the equations backwards to the point of origin. Black holes may be a different matter.

.

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing.

.
you are a broken record -

there is no collapse, the compaction occurs without ever changing direction as pointed out previously. the cyclical transition is the moment of singularity.

the same as the boomerang returns to its point of origin never changing direction -

bb - the finite angle of trajectory in a vacuum is the compaction of matter as the mirror image of its expulsion.


your problem of comprehension is yours alone - bb is a cyclical event.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

 

[BreezeWood]

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing. The singularity occurs when running the equations backwards to the point of origin. Black holes may be a different matter.

.

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing.

.
you are a broken record -

there is no collapse, the compaction occurs without ever changing direction as pointed out previously. the cyclical transition is the moment of singularity.

the same as the boomerang returns to its point of origin never changing direction -

bb - the finite angle of trajectory in a vacuum is the compaction of matter as the mirror image of its expulsion.


your problem of comprehension is yours alone - bb is a cyclical event.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.
comprehension does help in formulating a response -

the boomerang theory is relatively new, simple experiment will be to toss a handgrenade into outerspace and track the shrapnel. and see if it will not reformulate itself as a mirror image.

 

[ding]

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing. The singularity occurs when running the equations backwards to the point of origin. Black holes may be a different matter.

.

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing.

.
you are a broken record -

there is no collapse, the compaction occurs without ever changing direction as pointed out previously. the cyclical transition is the moment of singularity.

the same as the boomerang returns to its point of origin never changing direction -

bb - the finite angle of trajectory in a vacuum is the compaction of matter as the mirror image of its expulsion.


your problem of comprehension is yours alone - bb is a cyclical event.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.
comprehension does help in formulating a response -

the boomerang theory is relatively new, simple experiment will be to toss a handgrenade into outerspace and track the shrapnel. and see if it will not reformulate itself as a mirror image.

Is this your idea?

 

[basquebromance]

Americans have swapped God for politics

If only Americans could begin believing in politics less fervently, realizing instead that life is elsewhere

on the left, my friends, the ‘woke’ take religious notions such as original sin, atonement, ritual, and excommunication and repurpose them for secular ends, while on the right, folks, adherents of a Trump-centric ethno-nationalism still drape themselves in some of the trappings of organized religion, but the result is a movement that often looks like a tent revival stripped of Christian witness

 

[basquebromance]

this is America baby, you pray how you want, you fuck how you want, you eat burgers how you want, you curse liberals how you want

 

[BreezeWood]

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing. The singularity occurs when running the equations backwards to the point of origin. Black holes may be a different matter.

.

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing.

.
you are a broken record -

there is no collapse, the compaction occurs without ever changing direction as pointed out previously. the cyclical transition is the moment of singularity.

the same as the boomerang returns to its point of origin never changing direction -

bb - the finite angle of trajectory in a vacuum is the compaction of matter as the mirror image of its expulsion.


your problem of comprehension is yours alone - bb is a cyclical event.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.
comprehension does help in formulating a response -

the boomerang theory is relatively new, simple experiment will be to toss a handgrenade into outerspace and track the shrapnel. and see if it will not reformulate itself as a mirror image.

Is this your idea?

.

simple experiment will be to toss a handgrenade into outerspace and track the shrapnel. and see if it will not reformulate itself as a mirror image.

Is this your idea?

.
its for anyone to take credit for the experiment, establishing the grenade if that is what you were inquiring as an immobile object first would be nearly impossible and most likely required.
.
.

this is America baby, you pray how you want, you fuck how you want, you eat burgers how you want, you curse liberals how you want

.
and that explains your "us" ... good luck with your cursing.

* you'll need it.

 

[ding]

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing. The singularity occurs when running the equations backwards to the point of origin. Black holes may be a different matter.

.

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing.

.
you are a broken record -

there is no collapse, the compaction occurs without ever changing direction as pointed out previously. the cyclical transition is the moment of singularity.

the same as the boomerang returns to its point of origin never changing direction -

bb - the finite angle of trajectory in a vacuum is the compaction of matter as the mirror image of its expulsion.


your problem of comprehension is yours alone - bb is a cyclical event.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.
comprehension does help in formulating a response -

the boomerang theory is relatively new, simple experiment will be to toss a handgrenade into outerspace and track the shrapnel. and see if it will not reformulate itself as a mirror image.

Is this your idea?

.

simple experiment will be to toss a handgrenade into outerspace and track the shrapnel. and see if it will not reformulate itself as a mirror image.

Is this your idea?

.
its for anyone to take credit for the experiment, establishing the grenade if that is what you were inquiring as an immobile object first would be nearly impossible and most likely required.
.
.

this is America baby, you pray how you want, you fuck how you want, you eat burgers how you want, you curse liberals how you want

.
and that explains your "us" ... good luck with your cursing.

* you'll need it.

So you are saying this so-called boomerang theory is your theory?

 

[BreezeWood]

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing. The singularity occurs when running the equations backwards to the point of origin. Black holes may be a different matter.

.

So in the context of the Big Bang there is no physical singularity because the universe was expanding and not collapsing.

.
you are a broken record -

there is no collapse, the compaction occurs without ever changing direction as pointed out previously. the cyclical transition is the moment of singularity.

the same as the boomerang returns to its point of origin never changing direction -

bb - the finite angle of trajectory in a vacuum is the compaction of matter as the mirror image of its expulsion.


your problem of comprehension is yours alone - bb is a cyclical event.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.

That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Whose model is this anyway?

.
comprehension does help in formulating a response -

the boomerang theory is relatively new, simple experiment will be to toss a handgrenade into outerspace and track the shrapnel. and see if it will not reformulate itself as a mirror image.

Is this your idea?

.

simple experiment will be to toss a handgrenade into outerspace and track the shrapnel. and see if it will not reformulate itself as a mirror image.

Is this your idea?

.
its for anyone to take credit for the experiment, establishing the grenade if that is what you were inquiring as an immobile object first would be nearly impossible and most likely required.
.
.

this is America baby, you pray how you want, you fuck how you want, you eat burgers how you want, you curse liberals how you want

.
and that explains your "us" ... good luck with your cursing.

* you'll need it.

So you are saying this so-called boomerang theory is your theory?

.

So you are saying this so-called boomerang theory is your theory?

you are a broken record -

.
really bing, your dialogue could use some refreshing ...