Does international law require Israel to vacate the disputed territories

[Kondor3]

You can (and, no doubt, will) spend the next hundred years, pissing and moaning about old legalities and standings...

None of that old shit makes the slightest bit of difference anymore...

Title Deed to The Land has been changed, by force of arms, and victory on the battlefield, time and again...

Vae victus...

Just as Muslims have done to non-Muslims, again and again and again, throughout their blood-drenched history...

Now the shoe's finally on the other foot... and about time, eh?

This is all over but the shoutin', kiddies...

This is where things are headed...

Guaranteed...

The Jewish Reconquista continues apace...

Un-stoppable...

Hell, they're nearly there, already...

Just a few more slivers of land to gobble up...

Continuing to eject the dumbass Neanderthals who haven't yet taken the hint and packed up and departed for greener pastures.

 

[montelatici]

You can (and, no doubt, will) spend the next hundred years, pissing and moaning about old legalities and standings...

None of that old shit makes the slightest bit of difference anymore...

Title Deed to The Land has been changed, by force of arms, and victory on the battlefield, time and again...

Vae victus...

Just as Muslims have done to non-Muslims, again and again and again, throughout their blood-drenched history...

Now the shoe's finally on the other foot... and about time, eh?

This is all over but the shoutin', kiddies...

This is where things are headed...

Guaranteed...

The Jewish Reconquista continues apace...

Un-stoppable...

Hell, they're nearly there, already...

Just a few more slivers of land to gobble up...

Continuing to eject the dumbass Neanderthals who haven't yet taken the hint and packed up and departed for greener pastures.

Not only are the non-Jews increasing as a proportion of the population under Jew rule and control, they now are equal in number to the Jews, and they aren't going anywhere. As usual, as they have done throughout history, the Jews are shooting themselves in the foot. It's called overreach.

 

[Kondor3]

...Not only are the non-Jews increasing as a proportion of the population under Jew rule and control, they now are equal in number to the Jews, and they aren't going anywhere. As usual, as they have done throughout history, the Jews are shooting themselves in the foot. It's called overreach.

Population pressure is the only weapon you have left.

One that is easily negated by...

1. carpet bombing, or...

2. expulsion

The answer will be (2).

Far more humane, and much less paperwork, and fewer repercussions.

It's already been happening on a piecemeal basis for decades, during every wave of settlement.

The Third Intifada might very well prove to be the trigger for The Big Expulsion.

And there won't be a soul lifting a finger (militarily) to stop it.

So feel free to "bring it", when ready.

The sooner you do, the sooner this is over... for good.

Or, alternatively...

Far better, for the UN to step-in, and relocate the Palestinians, before it's too late.

Scattered to the Four Winds, the world will soon forget they even existed as a failed concept, never mind as a nation-that-never-was.

 

[montelatici]

...Not only are the non-Jews increasing as a proportion of the population under Jew rule and control, they now are equal in number to the Jews, and they aren't going anywhere. As usual, as they have done throughout history, the Jews are shooting themselves in the foot. It's called overreach.

Population pressure is the only weapon you have left.

One that is easily negated by...

1. carpet bombing, or...

2. expulsion

The answer will be (2).

Far more humane, and much less paperwork, and fewer repercussions.

It's already been happening on a piecemeal basis for decades, during every wave of settlement.

The Third Intifada might very well prove to be the trigger for The Big Expulsion.

And there won't be a soul lifting a finger (militarily) to stop it.

So feel free to "bring it", when ready.

The sooner you do, the sooner this is over.

Or, alternatively...

Far better, for the UN to step-in, and relocate the Palestinians, before it's too late.

Scattered to the Four Winds, the world will soon forget they even existed as a concept, never mind as a people.

There won't be any carpet bombing or expulsion. You are just an immature little prick with murderous dreams. By the way, promoting genocide is not kosher on this board.

 

[Kondor3]

...There won't be any carpet bombing...

Agreed.

...or expulsion...

Wrong.

...You are just an immature little prick with murderous dreams...

Thank you for your feedback, Achmed, although it is irrelevant to discussions of applicable international law, or whether such law is even germaine to Reality.

...By the way, promoting genocide is not kosher on this board.

So, who is promoting genocide?

 

[montelatici]

...There won't be any carpet bombing...

Agreed.

...or expulsion...

Wrong.

...You are just an immature little prick with murderous dreams...

Thank you for your feedback, Achmed, although it is irrelevant to discussions of applicable international law, or whether such law is even germaine to Reality.

...By the way, promoting genocide is not kosher on this board.

So, who is promoting genocide?

You just changed your tune on carpet bombing, so now you are only promoting ethnic cleansing. Another war crime. There won;t be any expulsion, just the slow reduction of the percentage of Jews under Jew control/rule until all the non-Jews achieve enfranchisement. That's what has happened to 20th century European colonial projects.

 

[Kondor3]

...You just changed your tune on carpet bombing...

I have done no such thing, Achmed; I have never advocated carpet bombing; I merely posit that carpet bombing is one of two ways by which your Neanderthals can be eliminated.

And, both here and historically on this board, I have always held that Expulsion is - by far - the preferred solution.

...so now you are only promoting ethnic cleansing...

I do not promote it.

I predict it.

...Another war crime...

Tell that to the East Prussians of 1945.

Tell that to the Sudatenlanders of 1945.

Tell that to the Hindus expelled from Pakistan in 1947.

Tell that to the Muslims expelled from India in 1947.

Tell that to the Jews expelled from several Muslim-dominated countries during the 1948-1970 time frame.

The shoe's on the other foot, now, eh, Achmed? Enjoy.

...There won;t be any expulsion...

Yes, there will be.

...just the slow reduction of the percentage of Jews under Jew control/rule until all the non-Jews achieve enfranchisement...

Which is precisely why The Expulsion WILL occur.

The logistics involved, in providing control, transport, logistics and pay-off, will prove far more challenging than the military aspects of such an operation.

Once the heart is hardened, and once the IDF is cleared 'weapons hot' in that context, the gloves and restraints are lifted, and it really won't require much time.

And... interestingly ... there won't be a single soul on the outside who will lift a finger (militarily) to stop it.

===================================================

International law really doesn't have one helluva lot to do with what is going to unfold.

The 'disputed' territories are already mostly Jewish.

They are going to remain so.

And, the few remaining and disjointed fragments beyond their control, will not remain so, for much longer.

Best to muster the international community now, to evacuate the so-called Palestinians, peaceably, before the balloon goes up.

 

[montelatici]

There won't be any expulsion. Your ethnic cleansing and genocidal dreams of millions of dead or exiled non-Jews are just that, dreams.

For the Palestinians, it is 'never again" with respect to expulsion.

 

[Hollie]

There won't be any expulsion. Your ethnic cleansing and genocidal dreams of millions of dead or exiled non-Jews are just that, dreams.

For the Palestinians, it is 'never again" with respect to expulsion.

For the laughably inept Pal'istanians, the "never again" phrase is being voiced by the Syrians, Egyptians and Lebanese who will "never again" bear the political, financial and societal burden of the black hole that is their former citizens.

 

[fanger]

Since 1967, Israel has been holding the areas of Judea and Samaria [hereinafter – the area] in belligerent occupation
HCJ 316/03

 

[Indeependent]

Try and keep it polite kids

The simple fact is that the case does nothing to support revisionist claims that Israel is in violation go international law by being in the disputed territories.

Nor does its use of language within the petition by a well known pro palestinian group reflect the Israeli court position on there terms to be applied.

The simple reality is that Monty can't defend his claims concerning the legalities of Israel's existence and he's desperate to pretend his reference has anything to do do with the subject at all.

It just confirms that the Israeli Supreme Court, therefore Israeli law, considers the territories under belligerent occupation, as does the rest of the world under international law. It was the Court that wrote the Judgement, not Palestinians.

It confirms nothing

It was language included by an anti Israeli group in a legal complaint that they LOST in court.

WOW
You really are just completely blinded by hatred and bigotry

LOL. The Israeli Supreme Court confirmed that it was Occupied Territory. There is no hate associated with a court decision. Just fact. My, you are silly.

Don't feed the ignorant trolls....

There is plenty of documented evidence out there for these zionuts to read...

Link?
Coming from a lad who JUST heard of the JDL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Indeependent]

Since 1967, Israel has been holding the areas of Judea and Samaria [hereinafter – the area] in belligerent occupation
HCJ 316/03

Belligerent Jews vs Key Stone Cops Muslims

 

[Boston1]

And the beauty of it all, is that while there is no law that requires Israel to vacate the disputed territories. Or any law that prohibits the Israeli's from erecting security fences to contain the Arab Muslim colonial combatants. Or any law that prevents the Arab Muslim colonists from leaving Israeli held territory. The Arab Muslim colonial governments are actually compelled by the Geneva convention to take them back. So really, the Arab Muslim colonials are free to leave anytime as long as they are not wanted war criminals and can obtain a permit. ;--)

See
IV Geneva convention

Quote

• 
  Art. 14. In time of peace, the High Contracting Parties and, after the outbreak of hostilities, the Parties thereto, may establish in their own territory and, if the need arises, in occupied areas, hospital and safety zones and localities so organized as to protect from the effects of war, wounded, sick and aged persons, children under fifteen, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven.
  
  Upon the outbreak and during the course of hostilities, the Parties concerned may conclude agreements on mutual recognition of the zones and localities they have created. They may for this purpose implement the provisions of the Draft Agreement annexed to the present Convention, with such amendments as they may consider necessary.

• 
  Art. 15. Any Party to the conflict may, either direct or through a neutral State or some humanitarian organization, propose to the adverse Party to establish, in the regions where fighting is taking place, neutralized zones intended to shelter from the effects of war the following persons, without
  distinction:
  
  (a) wounded and sick combatants or non-combatants;
  (b) civilian persons who take no part in hostilities, and who, while they reside in the zones, perform no work of a military character.

• 
  Art. 17. The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas, of wounded, sick, infirm, and aged persons, children and maternity cases, and for the passage of ministers of all religions, medical personnel and medical equipment on their way to such areas.

• 
  Art. 28. The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

• 
  Art. 35. All protected persons who may desire to leave the territory at the outset of, or during a conflict, shall be entitled to do so, unless their departure is contrary to the national interests of the State. The applications of such persons to leave shall be decided in accordance with regularly established procedures and the decision shall be taken as rapidly as possible. Those persons permitted to leave may provide themselves with the necessary funds for their journey and take with them a reasonable amount of their effects and articles of personal use.
  
  If any such person is refused permission to leave the territory, he shall be entitled to have refusal reconsidered, as soon as possible by an appropriate court or administrative board designated by the Detaining Power for that purpose.
  
  Upon request, representatives of the Protecting Power shall, unless reasons of security prevent it, or the persons concerned object, be furnished with the reasons for refusal of any request for permission to leave the territory and be given, as expeditiously as possible, the names of all persons who have been denied permission to leave.
  
  Art. 36. Departures permitted under the foregoing Article shall be carried out in satisfactory conditions as regards safety, hygiene, sanitation and food. All costs in connection therewith, from the point of exit in the territory of the Detaining Power, shall be borne by the country of destination, or, in the case of accommodation in a neutral country, by the Power whose nationals are benefited. The practical details of such movements may, if necessary, be settled by special agreements between the Powers concerned.
  
  The foregoing shall not prejudice such special agreements as may be concluded between Parties to the conflict concerning the exchange and repatriation of their nationals in enemy hands.

End Quote

 

[montelatici]

And the beauty of it all, is that while there is no law that requires Israel to vacate the disputed territories. Or any law that prohibits the Israeli's from erecting security fences to contain the Arab Muslim colonial combatants. Or any law that prevents the Arab Muslim colonists from leaving Israeli held territory. The Arab Muslim colonial governments are actually compelled by the Geneva convention to take them back. So really, the Arab Muslim colonials are free to leave anytime as long as they are not wanted war criminals and can obtain a permit. ;--)

See
IV Geneva convention

Quote

• 
  Art. 14. In time of peace, the High Contracting Parties and, after the outbreak of hostilities, the Parties thereto, may establish in their own territory and, if the need arises, in occupied areas, hospital and safety zones and localities so organized as to protect from the effects of war, wounded, sick and aged persons, children under fifteen, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven.
  
  Upon the outbreak and during the course of hostilities, the Parties concerned may conclude agreements on mutual recognition of the zones and localities they have created. They may for this purpose implement the provisions of the Draft Agreement annexed to the present Convention, with such amendments as they may consider necessary.

• 
  Art. 15. Any Party to the conflict may, either direct or through a neutral State or some humanitarian organization, propose to the adverse Party to establish, in the regions where fighting is taking place, neutralized zones intended to shelter from the effects of war the following persons, without
  distinction:
  
  (a) wounded and sick combatants or non-combatants;
  (b) civilian persons who take no part in hostilities, and who, while they reside in the zones, perform no work of a military character.

• 
  Art. 17. The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas, of wounded, sick, infirm, and aged persons, children and maternity cases, and for the passage of ministers of all religions, medical personnel and medical equipment on their way to such areas.

• 
  Art. 28. The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

• 
  Art. 35. All protected persons who may desire to leave the territory at the outset of, or during a conflict, shall be entitled to do so, unless their departure is contrary to the national interests of the State. The applications of such persons to leave shall be decided in accordance with regularly established procedures and the decision shall be taken as rapidly as possible. Those persons permitted to leave may provide themselves with the necessary funds for their journey and take with them a reasonable amount of their effects and articles of personal use.
  
  If any such person is refused permission to leave the territory, he shall be entitled to have refusal reconsidered, as soon as possible by an appropriate court or administrative board designated by the Detaining Power for that purpose.
  
  Upon request, representatives of the Protecting Power shall, unless reasons of security prevent it, or the persons concerned object, be furnished with the reasons for refusal of any request for permission to leave the territory and be given, as expeditiously as possible, the names of all persons who have been denied permission to leave.
  
  Art. 36. Departures permitted under the foregoing Article shall be carried out in satisfactory conditions as regards safety, hygiene, sanitation and food. All costs in connection therewith, from the point of exit in the territory of the Detaining Power, shall be borne by the country of destination, or, in the case of accommodation in a neutral country, by the Power whose nationals are benefited. The practical details of such movements may, if necessary, be settled by special agreements between the Powers concerned.
  
  The foregoing shall not prejudice such special agreements as may be concluded between Parties to the conflict concerning the exchange and repatriation of their nationals in enemy hands.

End Quote

"ISRAEL 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMAR

ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2014 United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor


http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236814.pdf

 

[Indeependent]

And the beauty of it all, is that while there is no law that requires Israel to vacate the disputed territories. Or any law that prohibits the Israeli's from erecting security fences to contain the Arab Muslim colonial combatants. Or any law that prevents the Arab Muslim colonists from leaving Israeli held territory. The Arab Muslim colonial governments are actually compelled by the Geneva convention to take them back. So really, the Arab Muslim colonials are free to leave anytime as long as they are not wanted war criminals and can obtain a permit. ;--)

See
IV Geneva convention

Quote

• 
  Art. 14. In time of peace, the High Contracting Parties and, after the outbreak of hostilities, the Parties thereto, may establish in their own territory and, if the need arises, in occupied areas, hospital and safety zones and localities so organized as to protect from the effects of war, wounded, sick and aged persons, children under fifteen, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven.
  
  Upon the outbreak and during the course of hostilities, the Parties concerned may conclude agreements on mutual recognition of the zones and localities they have created. They may for this purpose implement the provisions of the Draft Agreement annexed to the present Convention, with such amendments as they may consider necessary.

• 
  Art. 15. Any Party to the conflict may, either direct or through a neutral State or some humanitarian organization, propose to the adverse Party to establish, in the regions where fighting is taking place, neutralized zones intended to shelter from the effects of war the following persons, without
  distinction:
  
  (a) wounded and sick combatants or non-combatants;
  (b) civilian persons who take no part in hostilities, and who, while they reside in the zones, perform no work of a military character.

• 
  Art. 17. The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas, of wounded, sick, infirm, and aged persons, children and maternity cases, and for the passage of ministers of all religions, medical personnel and medical equipment on their way to such areas.

• 
  Art. 28. The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

• 
  Art. 35. All protected persons who may desire to leave the territory at the outset of, or during a conflict, shall be entitled to do so, unless their departure is contrary to the national interests of the State. The applications of such persons to leave shall be decided in accordance with regularly established procedures and the decision shall be taken as rapidly as possible. Those persons permitted to leave may provide themselves with the necessary funds for their journey and take with them a reasonable amount of their effects and articles of personal use.
  
  If any such person is refused permission to leave the territory, he shall be entitled to have refusal reconsidered, as soon as possible by an appropriate court or administrative board designated by the Detaining Power for that purpose.
  
  Upon request, representatives of the Protecting Power shall, unless reasons of security prevent it, or the persons concerned object, be furnished with the reasons for refusal of any request for permission to leave the territory and be given, as expeditiously as possible, the names of all persons who have been denied permission to leave.
  
  Art. 36. Departures permitted under the foregoing Article shall be carried out in satisfactory conditions as regards safety, hygiene, sanitation and food. All costs in connection therewith, from the point of exit in the territory of the Detaining Power, shall be borne by the country of destination, or, in the case of accommodation in a neutral country, by the Power whose nationals are benefited. The practical details of such movements may, if necessary, be settled by special agreements between the Powers concerned.
  
  The foregoing shall not prejudice such special agreements as may be concluded between Parties to the conflict concerning the exchange and repatriation of their nationals in enemy hands.

End Quote

"ISRAEL 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMAR

ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2014 United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor


http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236814.pdf

Please detail the PDFs pages to focus on.

 

[montelatici]

And the beauty of it all, is that while there is no law that requires Israel to vacate the disputed territories. Or any law that prohibits the Israeli's from erecting security fences to contain the Arab Muslim colonial combatants. Or any law that prevents the Arab Muslim colonists from leaving Israeli held territory. The Arab Muslim colonial governments are actually compelled by the Geneva convention to take them back. So really, the Arab Muslim colonials are free to leave anytime as long as they are not wanted war criminals and can obtain a permit. ;--)

See
IV Geneva convention

Quote

• 
  Art. 14. In time of peace, the High Contracting Parties and, after the outbreak of hostilities, the Parties thereto, may establish in their own territory and, if the need arises, in occupied areas, hospital and safety zones and localities so organized as to protect from the effects of war, wounded, sick and aged persons, children under fifteen, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven.
  
  Upon the outbreak and during the course of hostilities, the Parties concerned may conclude agreements on mutual recognition of the zones and localities they have created. They may for this purpose implement the provisions of the Draft Agreement annexed to the present Convention, with such amendments as they may consider necessary.

• 
  Art. 15. Any Party to the conflict may, either direct or through a neutral State or some humanitarian organization, propose to the adverse Party to establish, in the regions where fighting is taking place, neutralized zones intended to shelter from the effects of war the following persons, without
  distinction:
  
  (a) wounded and sick combatants or non-combatants;
  (b) civilian persons who take no part in hostilities, and who, while they reside in the zones, perform no work of a military character.

• 
  Art. 17. The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas, of wounded, sick, infirm, and aged persons, children and maternity cases, and for the passage of ministers of all religions, medical personnel and medical equipment on their way to such areas.

• 
  Art. 28. The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

• 
  Art. 35. All protected persons who may desire to leave the territory at the outset of, or during a conflict, shall be entitled to do so, unless their departure is contrary to the national interests of the State. The applications of such persons to leave shall be decided in accordance with regularly established procedures and the decision shall be taken as rapidly as possible. Those persons permitted to leave may provide themselves with the necessary funds for their journey and take with them a reasonable amount of their effects and articles of personal use.
  
  If any such person is refused permission to leave the territory, he shall be entitled to have refusal reconsidered, as soon as possible by an appropriate court or administrative board designated by the Detaining Power for that purpose.
  
  Upon request, representatives of the Protecting Power shall, unless reasons of security prevent it, or the persons concerned object, be furnished with the reasons for refusal of any request for permission to leave the territory and be given, as expeditiously as possible, the names of all persons who have been denied permission to leave.
  
  Art. 36. Departures permitted under the foregoing Article shall be carried out in satisfactory conditions as regards safety, hygiene, sanitation and food. All costs in connection therewith, from the point of exit in the territory of the Detaining Power, shall be borne by the country of destination, or, in the case of accommodation in a neutral country, by the Power whose nationals are benefited. The practical details of such movements may, if necessary, be settled by special agreements between the Powers concerned.
  
  The foregoing shall not prejudice such special agreements as may be concluded between Parties to the conflict concerning the exchange and repatriation of their nationals in enemy hands.

End Quote

"ISRAEL 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMAR

ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2014 United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor


http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236814.pdf

Please detail the PDFs pages to focus on.

No need. The heading "Occupied Territories" is included at the top of every page of the U.S. State Department report.

 

[Indeependent]

And the beauty of it all, is that while there is no law that requires Israel to vacate the disputed territories. Or any law that prohibits the Israeli's from erecting security fences to contain the Arab Muslim colonial combatants. Or any law that prevents the Arab Muslim colonists from leaving Israeli held territory. The Arab Muslim colonial governments are actually compelled by the Geneva convention to take them back. So really, the Arab Muslim colonials are free to leave anytime as long as they are not wanted war criminals and can obtain a permit. ;--)

See
IV Geneva convention

Quote

• 
  Art. 14. In time of peace, the High Contracting Parties and, after the outbreak of hostilities, the Parties thereto, may establish in their own territory and, if the need arises, in occupied areas, hospital and safety zones and localities so organized as to protect from the effects of war, wounded, sick and aged persons, children under fifteen, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven.
  
  Upon the outbreak and during the course of hostilities, the Parties concerned may conclude agreements on mutual recognition of the zones and localities they have created. They may for this purpose implement the provisions of the Draft Agreement annexed to the present Convention, with such amendments as they may consider necessary.

• 
  Art. 15. Any Party to the conflict may, either direct or through a neutral State or some humanitarian organization, propose to the adverse Party to establish, in the regions where fighting is taking place, neutralized zones intended to shelter from the effects of war the following persons, without
  distinction:
  
  (a) wounded and sick combatants or non-combatants;
  (b) civilian persons who take no part in hostilities, and who, while they reside in the zones, perform no work of a military character.

• 
  Art. 17. The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas, of wounded, sick, infirm, and aged persons, children and maternity cases, and for the passage of ministers of all religions, medical personnel and medical equipment on their way to such areas.

• 
  Art. 28. The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

• 
  Art. 35. All protected persons who may desire to leave the territory at the outset of, or during a conflict, shall be entitled to do so, unless their departure is contrary to the national interests of the State. The applications of such persons to leave shall be decided in accordance with regularly established procedures and the decision shall be taken as rapidly as possible. Those persons permitted to leave may provide themselves with the necessary funds for their journey and take with them a reasonable amount of their effects and articles of personal use.
  
  If any such person is refused permission to leave the territory, he shall be entitled to have refusal reconsidered, as soon as possible by an appropriate court or administrative board designated by the Detaining Power for that purpose.
  
  Upon request, representatives of the Protecting Power shall, unless reasons of security prevent it, or the persons concerned object, be furnished with the reasons for refusal of any request for permission to leave the territory and be given, as expeditiously as possible, the names of all persons who have been denied permission to leave.
  
  Art. 36. Departures permitted under the foregoing Article shall be carried out in satisfactory conditions as regards safety, hygiene, sanitation and food. All costs in connection therewith, from the point of exit in the territory of the Detaining Power, shall be borne by the country of destination, or, in the case of accommodation in a neutral country, by the Power whose nationals are benefited. The practical details of such movements may, if necessary, be settled by special agreements between the Powers concerned.
  
  The foregoing shall not prejudice such special agreements as may be concluded between Parties to the conflict concerning the exchange and repatriation of their nationals in enemy hands.

End Quote

"ISRAEL 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMAR

ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2014 United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor


http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236814.pdf

Please detail the PDFs pages to focus on.

No need. The heading "Occupied Territories" is included at the top of every page of the U.S. State Department report.

Too funny. Just like the Iraq War Bill passed by GW had over 32,000 earmarks.
The title of a document can be misleading or even indicate a debunking of a claim.
Specific pages please.

 

[montelatici]

And the beauty of it all, is that while there is no law that requires Israel to vacate the disputed territories. Or any law that prohibits the Israeli's from erecting security fences to contain the Arab Muslim colonial combatants. Or any law that prevents the Arab Muslim colonists from leaving Israeli held territory. The Arab Muslim colonial governments are actually compelled by the Geneva convention to take them back. So really, the Arab Muslim colonials are free to leave anytime as long as they are not wanted war criminals and can obtain a permit. ;--)

See
IV Geneva convention

Quote

• 
  Art. 14. In time of peace, the High Contracting Parties and, after the outbreak of hostilities, the Parties thereto, may establish in their own territory and, if the need arises, in occupied areas, hospital and safety zones and localities so organized as to protect from the effects of war, wounded, sick and aged persons, children under fifteen, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven.
  
  Upon the outbreak and during the course of hostilities, the Parties concerned may conclude agreements on mutual recognition of the zones and localities they have created. They may for this purpose implement the provisions of the Draft Agreement annexed to the present Convention, with such amendments as they may consider necessary.

• 
  Art. 15. Any Party to the conflict may, either direct or through a neutral State or some humanitarian organization, propose to the adverse Party to establish, in the regions where fighting is taking place, neutralized zones intended to shelter from the effects of war the following persons, without
  distinction:
  
  (a) wounded and sick combatants or non-combatants;
  (b) civilian persons who take no part in hostilities, and who, while they reside in the zones, perform no work of a military character.

• 
  Art. 17. The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas, of wounded, sick, infirm, and aged persons, children and maternity cases, and for the passage of ministers of all religions, medical personnel and medical equipment on their way to such areas.

• 
  Art. 28. The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

• 
  Art. 35. All protected persons who may desire to leave the territory at the outset of, or during a conflict, shall be entitled to do so, unless their departure is contrary to the national interests of the State. The applications of such persons to leave shall be decided in accordance with regularly established procedures and the decision shall be taken as rapidly as possible. Those persons permitted to leave may provide themselves with the necessary funds for their journey and take with them a reasonable amount of their effects and articles of personal use.
  
  If any such person is refused permission to leave the territory, he shall be entitled to have refusal reconsidered, as soon as possible by an appropriate court or administrative board designated by the Detaining Power for that purpose.
  
  Upon request, representatives of the Protecting Power shall, unless reasons of security prevent it, or the persons concerned object, be furnished with the reasons for refusal of any request for permission to leave the territory and be given, as expeditiously as possible, the names of all persons who have been denied permission to leave.
  
  Art. 36. Departures permitted under the foregoing Article shall be carried out in satisfactory conditions as regards safety, hygiene, sanitation and food. All costs in connection therewith, from the point of exit in the territory of the Detaining Power, shall be borne by the country of destination, or, in the case of accommodation in a neutral country, by the Power whose nationals are benefited. The practical details of such movements may, if necessary, be settled by special agreements between the Powers concerned.
  
  The foregoing shall not prejudice such special agreements as may be concluded between Parties to the conflict concerning the exchange and repatriation of their nationals in enemy hands.

End Quote

"ISRAEL 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMAR

ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2014 United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor


http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236814.pdf

Please detail the PDFs pages to focus on.

No need. The heading "Occupied Territories" is included at the top of every page of the U.S. State Department report.

Too funny. Just like the Iraq War Bill passed by GW had over 32,000 earmarks.
The title of a document can be misleading or even indicate a debunking of a claim.
Specific pages please.

Page 2 thru 119.

 

[Indeependent]

And the beauty of it all, is that while there is no law that requires Israel to vacate the disputed territories. Or any law that prohibits the Israeli's from erecting security fences to contain the Arab Muslim colonial combatants. Or any law that prevents the Arab Muslim colonists from leaving Israeli held territory. The Arab Muslim colonial governments are actually compelled by the Geneva convention to take them back. So really, the Arab Muslim colonials are free to leave anytime as long as they are not wanted war criminals and can obtain a permit. ;--)

See
IV Geneva convention

Quote

• 
  Art. 14. In time of peace, the High Contracting Parties and, after the outbreak of hostilities, the Parties thereto, may establish in their own territory and, if the need arises, in occupied areas, hospital and safety zones and localities so organized as to protect from the effects of war, wounded, sick and aged persons, children under fifteen, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven.
  
  Upon the outbreak and during the course of hostilities, the Parties concerned may conclude agreements on mutual recognition of the zones and localities they have created. They may for this purpose implement the provisions of the Draft Agreement annexed to the present Convention, with such amendments as they may consider necessary.

• 
  Art. 15. Any Party to the conflict may, either direct or through a neutral State or some humanitarian organization, propose to the adverse Party to establish, in the regions where fighting is taking place, neutralized zones intended to shelter from the effects of war the following persons, without
  distinction:
  
  (a) wounded and sick combatants or non-combatants;
  (b) civilian persons who take no part in hostilities, and who, while they reside in the zones, perform no work of a military character.

• 
  Art. 17. The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas, of wounded, sick, infirm, and aged persons, children and maternity cases, and for the passage of ministers of all religions, medical personnel and medical equipment on their way to such areas.

• 
  Art. 28. The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

• 
  Art. 35. All protected persons who may desire to leave the territory at the outset of, or during a conflict, shall be entitled to do so, unless their departure is contrary to the national interests of the State. The applications of such persons to leave shall be decided in accordance with regularly established procedures and the decision shall be taken as rapidly as possible. Those persons permitted to leave may provide themselves with the necessary funds for their journey and take with them a reasonable amount of their effects and articles of personal use.
  
  If any such person is refused permission to leave the territory, he shall be entitled to have refusal reconsidered, as soon as possible by an appropriate court or administrative board designated by the Detaining Power for that purpose.
  
  Upon request, representatives of the Protecting Power shall, unless reasons of security prevent it, or the persons concerned object, be furnished with the reasons for refusal of any request for permission to leave the territory and be given, as expeditiously as possible, the names of all persons who have been denied permission to leave.
  
  Art. 36. Departures permitted under the foregoing Article shall be carried out in satisfactory conditions as regards safety, hygiene, sanitation and food. All costs in connection therewith, from the point of exit in the territory of the Detaining Power, shall be borne by the country of destination, or, in the case of accommodation in a neutral country, by the Power whose nationals are benefited. The practical details of such movements may, if necessary, be settled by special agreements between the Powers concerned.
  
  The foregoing shall not prejudice such special agreements as may be concluded between Parties to the conflict concerning the exchange and repatriation of their nationals in enemy hands.

End Quote

"ISRAEL 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMAR

ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2014 United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor


http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236814.pdf

Please detail the PDFs pages to focus on.

No need. The heading "Occupied Territories" is included at the top of every page of the U.S. State Department report.

Too funny. Just like the Iraq War Bill passed by GW had over 32,000 earmarks.
The title of a document can be misleading or even indicate a debunking of a claim.
Specific pages please.

Page 2 thru 119.

You are so pathetic.
I presume of the documents you have posted in the 3 days YOU have not read every page because you're posting too fast for that to be true.

 

[montelatici]

"ISRAEL 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMAR

ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2014 United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor


http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236814.pdf

Please detail the PDFs pages to focus on.

No need. The heading "Occupied Territories" is included at the top of every page of the U.S. State Department report.

Too funny. Just like the Iraq War Bill passed by GW had over 32,000 earmarks.
The title of a document can be misleading or even indicate a debunking of a claim.
Specific pages please.

Page 2 thru 119.

You are so pathetic.
I presume of the documents you have posted in the 3 days YOU have not read every page because you're posting too fast for that to be true.

There is no need to read the whole document. If the U.S. Department of State is reporting on the Occupied Territories and not something called "Disputed Territories", and "Occupied Territories" is printed on the pages I referenced. That is all that is necessary to demonstrate that the U.S. Government considers the territories occupied. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer, are you.