Does the first amendment mean we can discriminate?

[Two Thumbs]

yes

the US government cannot and will not force the naacp to give a scholarship to a non black or hispanic

Would you like to form the NAAWP? Because then congratulations, as a private organization, you would be able to give away money to whoever the hell you want. Want to give only to white people? Congrats get on it.

Is a privately owned bakery a "private organization"? By your logic, shouldn't that privately owned business be allowed to refuse to participate in something they consider abhorrent?

Well, you see, the libturds invented this fiction called a "public business" which allowed them to narrow the definition of "private" to the point where it's practically meaningless. A "public business" is private property, so they have to go through these mental gymnastics to claim that it isn't really private property because it sells to "the public," meaning everyone, even if the owner chooses not to sell to everyone.

Understand?

I guess they do sell to private persons so that makes it a private to private transaction. Where is the public involved?

the naacp gets millions from our tax dollars
the bakery did not

therefore the naacp MUST give scholarships to everyone while the bakery can pick and choose

just admit to the double standard and confess this has nothing to do with equality or discrimination

"the naacp gets millions from our tax dollars"

?? What? The NAACP is a private Civil Rights org, doof. It's a 501c3. It doesn't get "millions of our tax dollars."

lets pretend you are right

does that allow them to be a racist group that can deny people aid based only on the color of their skin?

if it does, fuck off when you bitch about gays being denied or just admit you have been a double standard pile of lying shit your whole life.

if not, well that's awesome.

 

[bripat9643]

yes

the US government cannot and will not force the naacp to give a scholarship to a non black or hispanic

Would you like to form the NAAWP? Because then congratulations, as a private organization, you would be able to give away money to whoever the hell you want. Want to give only to white people? Congrats get on it.

Is a privately owned bakery a "private organization"? By your logic, shouldn't that privately owned business be allowed to refuse to participate in something they consider abhorrent?

Well, you see, the libturds invented this fiction called a "public business" which allowed them to narrow the definition of "private" to the point where it's practically meaningless. A "public business" is private property, so they have to go through these mental gymnastics to claim that it isn't really private property because it sells to "the public," meaning everyone, even if the owner chooses not to sell to everyone.

Understand?

I guess they do sell to private persons so that makes it a private to private transaction. Where is the public involved?

the naacp gets millions from our tax dollars
the bakery did not

therefore the naacp MUST give scholarships to everyone while the bakery can pick and choose

just admit to the double standard and confess this has nothing to do with equality or discrimination

"the naacp gets millions from our tax dollars"

?? What? The NAACP is a private Civil Rights org, doof. It's a 501c3. It doesn't get "millions of our tax dollars."

As a 501c3 they are not allowed to endorse specific candidates or give money to candidates. The NAACP does both. That's why Republicans in the house launched a Congressional investigation of them.

 

[paperview]

yes

the US government cannot and will not force the naacp to give a scholarship to a non black or hispanic

Is a privately owned bakery a "private organization"? By your logic, shouldn't that privately owned business be allowed to refuse to participate in something they consider abhorrent?

Well, you see, the libturds invented this fiction called a "public business" which allowed them to narrow the definition of "private" to the point where it's practically meaningless. A "public business" is private property, so they have to go through these mental gymnastics to claim that it isn't really private property because it sells to "the public," meaning everyone, even if the owner chooses not to sell to everyone.

Understand?

I guess they do sell to private persons so that makes it a private to private transaction. Where is the public involved?

the naacp gets millions from our tax dollars
the bakery did not

therefore the naacp MUST give scholarships to everyone while the bakery can pick and choose

just admit to the double standard and confess this has nothing to do with equality or discrimination

"the naacp gets millions from our tax dollars"

?? What? The NAACP is a private Civil Rights org, doof. It's a 501c3. It doesn't get "millions of our tax dollars."

As a 501c3 they are not allowed to endorse specific candidates or give money to candidates. The NAACP does both. That's why Republicans in the house launched a Congressional investigation of them.

And the result was?

Yup we know. That was back when sicking the IRS as political retaliation against opponents was something the GOP gleefully hugged.

"The Internal Revenue Service informed the NAACP in October 2004 that it was investigating its tax-exempt status based on Julian Bond's speech at its 2004 Convention in which he criticized President George W. Bush as well as other political figures.[35][36] In general, the US Internal Revenue Code prohibits organizations granted tax-exempt status from "directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office."[37] The NAACP denounced the investigation as retaliation for its success in increasing the number of African Americans who vote.[35][38] In August 2006, the IRS investigation concluded with the agency's finding "that the remarks did not violate the group's tax-exempt status."[39]

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Ooops.

 

[bripat9643]

yes

the US government cannot and will not force the naacp to give a scholarship to a non black or hispanic

Well, you see, the libturds invented this fiction called a "public business" which allowed them to narrow the definition of "private" to the point where it's practically meaningless. A "public business" is private property, so they have to go through these mental gymnastics to claim that it isn't really private property because it sells to "the public," meaning everyone, even if the owner chooses not to sell to everyone.

Understand?

I guess they do sell to private persons so that makes it a private to private transaction. Where is the public involved?

the naacp gets millions from our tax dollars
the bakery did not

therefore the naacp MUST give scholarships to everyone while the bakery can pick and choose

just admit to the double standard and confess this has nothing to do with equality or discrimination

"the naacp gets millions from our tax dollars"

?? What? The NAACP is a private Civil Rights org, doof. It's a 501c3. It doesn't get "millions of our tax dollars."

As a 501c3 they are not allowed to endorse specific candidates or give money to candidates. The NAACP does both. That's why Republicans in the house launched a Congressional investigation of them.

And the result was?

Yup we know. That was back when sicking the IRS as political retaliation against opponents was something the GOP gleefully hugged.

"The Internal Revenue Service informed the NAACP in October 2004 that it was investigating its tax-exempt status based on Julian Bond's speech at its 2004 Convention in which he criticized President George W. Bush as well as other political figures.[35][36] In general, the US Internal Revenue Code prohibits organizations granted tax-exempt status from "directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office."[37] The NAACP denounced the investigation as retaliation for its success in increasing the number of African Americans who vote.[35][38] In August 2006, the IRS investigation concluded with the agency's finding "that the remarks did not violate the group's tax-exempt status."[39]

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Ooops.

Yep, the IRS concluded that, and the recent scandal on approving applications for conservative 501c3 and 501c4 organizations proves how impartial and objective the IRS is.

 

[Two Thumbs]

just to be clear;

every leftist is a hypocrite, if they weren't they would demand that the naacp and shit like BET be shut down