Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama is not a progressive and doesn't have a progressive agenda.sigh
corporations arent the reason obama is failing; the Progressive agenda is failing
corporations hire mommy and daddy and pay for the welfare state obama's inept policies has created
Generally speaking, it makes people dependent. If someone is getting a regular welfare check he or she is less likely to search for a job. If someone's belly is full then he or she is less likely to hunt. Does welfare make them lazy? Perhaps or perhaps not. Some welfare recipients may go skiing every weekend for all I know but if they're getting free money they're less likely to seek employment.
One time in my life (early 20s) I was getting unemployment. Since I was getting paid while kicking back at home I stretched it out for as long as I could. I would pretend to look for work but I wasn't really looking for a good job. I used most of my unemployment money to buy beer and pot.
So you believe we have to make our poor suffer more?
Starving children is an incentive to go out and find a job
There you go again.
So someone points out a fact - and that means he hates the poor.
Lame rwinger....lame.
I could just as easily ask you - so we should pay for everything for the poor - no questions asked no matter how irresponsible people get? Juts pay everything?
Oh that's right - we did that. My photos above showed how that turned out.
Liberals/Democrats all try and pretend that the social disasters of the 60's and 70's didn't happen. It did happen. Even though the $billions in federal housing complexes have all been torn down - those cities have swept all evidence under the rug.
You would at least think liberals would just try and pretend it didn't happen. And surely avoid the same mistakes again...surely.
But no....they are trying to do it again.
So you believe we have to make our poor suffer more?
Starving children is an incentive to go out and find a job
There you go again.
So someone points out a fact - and that means he hates the poor.
Lame rwinger....lame.
I could just as easily ask you - so we should pay for everything for the poor - no questions asked no matter how irresponsible people get? Juts pay everything?
Oh that's right - we did that. My photos above showed how that turned out.
Liberals/Democrats all try and pretend that the social disasters of the 60's and 70's didn't happen. It did happen. Even though the $billions in federal housing complexes have all been torn down - those cities have swept all evidence under the rug.
You would at least think liberals would just try and pretend it didn't happen. And surely avoid the same mistakes again...surely.
But no....they are trying to do it again.
I'm sorry...I just don't buy into the rightwing "The poor do not suffer enough"
Removing a safety net from struggling Americans does not induce them to go out and get jobs when there are no jobs to be gotten
I haven't commented on the other stuff, but since you brought it up...My apologies as I was wrong about that.
Thanks for confirming all the other facts in my post.
...corporations are allowed to "off-shore" their profits in order to reduce their tax burden.
70% of the corporations in this country, don't pay any taxes at all.
The tax rate for capital gains and dividends, is only 15%. That needs to increase to 25%.
As far as your comment on the democrats and the tax code, they were not the ones pushing to keep the Bush tax cuts for the rich, the republican whores and bitches, were.
Trickle down....got it
how does trickle-UP work leftard?
how's that working out?
Great topic for another thread
How does Consumer Side economics work out? Put money in the hands of millions instead of billions in the hands of a few?
Obama is not a progressive and doesn't have a progressive agenda.sigh
corporations arent the reason obama is failing; the Progressive agenda is failing
corporations hire mommy and daddy and pay for the welfare state obama's inept policies has created
His foreign policy is neo-conservative and his domestic policy is corporate driven.
He doesn't even have a single liberal in his cabinet.
Obama is center-right.
So you believe we have to make our poor suffer more?
Starving children is an incentive to go out and find a job
There you go again.
So someone points out a fact - and that means he hates the poor.
Lame rwinger....lame.
I could just as easily ask you - so we should pay for everything for the poor - no questions asked no matter how irresponsible people get? Juts pay everything?
Oh that's right - we did that. My photos above showed how that turned out.
Liberals/Democrats all try and pretend that the social disasters of the 60's and 70's didn't happen. It did happen. Even though the $billions in federal housing complexes have all been torn down - those cities have swept all evidence under the rug.
You would at least think liberals would just try and pretend it didn't happen. And surely avoid the same mistakes again...surely.
But no....they are trying to do it again.
I'm sorry...I just don't buy into the rightwing "The poor do not suffer enough"
Removing a safety net from struggling Americans does not induce them to go out and get jobs when there are no jobs to be gotten
There you go again.
So someone points out a fact - and that means he hates the poor.
Lame rwinger....lame.
I could just as easily ask you - so we should pay for everything for the poor - no questions asked no matter how irresponsible people get? Juts pay everything?
Oh that's right - we did that. My photos above showed how that turned out.
Liberals/Democrats all try and pretend that the social disasters of the 60's and 70's didn't happen. It did happen. Even though the $billions in federal housing complexes have all been torn down - those cities have swept all evidence under the rug.
You would at least think liberals would just try and pretend it didn't happen. And surely avoid the same mistakes again...surely.
But no....they are trying to do it again.
I'm sorry...I just don't buy into the rightwing "The poor do not suffer enough"
Removing a safety net from struggling Americans does not induce them to go out and get jobs when there are no jobs to be gotten
Show us one example where a "safety net" has been removed for "struggling Americans".
Used to be we helped those in true need.
Now it is to "struggling Americans"
Most ALL Americans are struggling these days. Government is not be the ones that help them.
Family, community and philanthropy has been looked down on and replaced with GOVERNMENT.
And the policy is a massive failure.
There you go again.
So someone points out a fact - and that means he hates the poor.
Lame rwinger....lame.
I could just as easily ask you - so we should pay for everything for the poor - no questions asked no matter how irresponsible people get? Juts pay everything?
Oh that's right - we did that. My photos above showed how that turned out.
Liberals/Democrats all try and pretend that the social disasters of the 60's and 70's didn't happen. It did happen. Even though the $billions in federal housing complexes have all been torn down - those cities have swept all evidence under the rug.
You would at least think liberals would just try and pretend it didn't happen. And surely avoid the same mistakes again...surely.
But no....they are trying to do it again.
I'm sorry...I just don't buy into the rightwing "The poor do not suffer enough"
Removing a safety net from struggling Americans does not induce them to go out and get jobs when there are no jobs to be gotten
"the poor dont suffer enough"
this is what left-wing losers think passes for debate
poor loser; must suck to know there are WAY more poor people on obama's watch then there were when Republicans ran things
nice job; "change you can believe in"?
I'm sorry...I just don't buy into the rightwing "The poor do not suffer enough"
Removing a safety net from struggling Americans does not induce them to go out and get jobs when there are no jobs to be gotten
"the poor dont suffer enough"
this is what left-wing losers think passes for debate
poor loser; must suck to know there are WAY more poor people on obama's watch then there were when Republicans ran things
nice job; "change you can believe in"?
That is very true and it is a phenomena that has been going on for thirthy years and has been exacerbated by the Great Bush Economic Collapse of 2008.
As a country, we suffer not just from the number of Americans on welfare but the number of Working Americans who no longer earn enough to support a family on. We have a corporate America that likes to keep its workforce on edge. Low wages, low job security, low chances of advancement
That is the America we have settled for
President Obama cannot wave his magic wand and end that. But he can nibble around the edges. Force employers to give health insurance, raise the minimum wage, make education affordable
All opposed by Conservatives
So you believe we have to make our poor suffer more?
Starving children is an incentive to go out and find a job
There you go again.
So someone points out a fact - and that means he hates the poor.
Lame rwinger....lame.
I could just as easily ask you - so we should pay for everything for the poor - no questions asked no matter how irresponsible people get? Juts pay everything?
Oh that's right - we did that. My photos above showed how that turned out.
Liberals/Democrats all try and pretend that the social disasters of the 60's and 70's didn't happen. It did happen. Even though the $billions in federal housing complexes have all been torn down - those cities have swept all evidence under the rug.
You would at least think liberals would just try and pretend it didn't happen. And surely avoid the same mistakes again...surely.
But no....they are trying to do it again.
I'm sorry...I just don't buy into the rightwing "The poor do not suffer enough"
Removing a safety net from struggling Americans does not induce them to go out and get jobs when there are no jobs to be gotten
how does trickle-UP work leftard?
how's that working out?
Great topic for another thread
How does Consumer Side economics work out? Put money in the hands of millions instead of billions in the hands of a few?
once again; must suck for you knowing the most Progressive-minded President maybe in your lifetime has more richer people getting RICHER FASTER and more Middle Class and poor getting POORER FASTER than on the Republican's watch?
There you go again.
So someone points out a fact - and that means he hates the poor.
Lame rwinger....lame.
I could just as easily ask you - so we should pay for everything for the poor - no questions asked no matter how irresponsible people get? Juts pay everything?
Oh that's right - we did that. My photos above showed how that turned out.
Liberals/Democrats all try and pretend that the social disasters of the 60's and 70's didn't happen. It did happen. Even though the $billions in federal housing complexes have all been torn down - those cities have swept all evidence under the rug.
You would at least think liberals would just try and pretend it didn't happen. And surely avoid the same mistakes again...surely.
But no....they are trying to do it again.
I'm sorry...I just don't buy into the rightwing "The poor do not suffer enough"
Removing a safety net from struggling Americans does not induce them to go out and get jobs when there are no jobs to be gotten
And once again you ignore the elephant in the room, and talk about the mouse.
There is no safety net. Never was, never will be.
The multi-generational disastrous social "safety net" policies of the 60's-70's utterly destroyed millions of lives, and the black race is STILL reeling in the aftermath.
As someone said - welfare does not necessarily make people lazy, but overwhelming and undeniable historical evidence shows us - IT MAKES PEOPLE DEPENDENT.
That is not a safety net RW. That is a crutch. It ruins the lives and stifles opportunity for the very poor you want to help.
As the saying goes - you can help the helpless, but you can't help the hopeless.
"the poor dont suffer enough"
this is what left-wing losers think passes for debate
poor loser; must suck to know there are WAY more poor people on obama's watch then there were when Republicans ran things
nice job; "change you can believe in"?
That is very true and it is a phenomena that has been going on for thirthy years and has been exacerbated by the Great Bush Economic Collapse of 2008.
As a country, we suffer not just from the number of Americans on welfare but the number of Working Americans who no longer earn enough to support a family on. We have a corporate America that likes to keep its workforce on edge. Low wages, low job security, low chances of advancement
That is the America we have settled for
President Obama cannot wave his magic wand and end that. But he can nibble around the edges. Force employers to give health insurance, raise the minimum wage, make education affordable
All opposed by Conservatives
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!1 mommy mommy people i insist i'm smarter than are making me fail worse then they did!!
lol what an idiot you are
I'm sorry...I just don't buy into the rightwing "The poor do not suffer enough"
Removing a safety net from struggling Americans does not induce them to go out and get jobs when there are no jobs to be gotten
And once again you ignore the elephant in the room, and talk about the mouse.
There is no safety net. Never was, never will be.
The multi-generational disastrous social "safety net" policies of the 60's-70's utterly destroyed millions of lives, and the black race is STILL reeling in the aftermath.
As someone said - welfare does not necessarily make people lazy, but overwhelming and undeniable historical evidence shows us - IT MAKES PEOPLE DEPENDENT.
That is not a safety net RW. That is a crutch. It ruins the lives and stifles opportunity for the very poor you want to help.
As the saying goes - you can help the helpless, but you can't help the hopeless.
I don't see your obsession with the failed social experiments of the 60s and 70s. Seemed like a good idea at the time...but we have moved on
Doesn't mean we ahould stop trying, only that we need a change of direction
And once again you ignore the elephant in the room, and talk about the mouse.
There is no safety net. Never was, never will be.
The multi-generational disastrous social "safety net" policies of the 60's-70's utterly destroyed millions of lives, and the black race is STILL reeling in the aftermath.
As someone said - welfare does not necessarily make people lazy, but overwhelming and undeniable historical evidence shows us - IT MAKES PEOPLE DEPENDENT.
That is not a safety net RW. That is a crutch. It ruins the lives and stifles opportunity for the very poor you want to help.
As the saying goes - you can help the helpless, but you can't help the hopeless.
I don't see your obsession with the failed social experiments of the 60s and 70s. Seemed like a good idea at the time...but we have moved on
Doesn't mean we ahould stop trying, only that we need a change of direction
lol good one stupid. just experiment with people and move on after you ruin them. that's why they are called "projects"; you know, where countless young black males have died in violence?
I don't see your obsession with the failed social experiments of the 60s and 70s. Seemed like a good idea at the time...but we have moved on
Doesn't mean we ahould stop trying, only that we need a change of direction
lol good one stupid. just experiment with people and move on after you ruin them. that's why they are called "projects"; you know, where countless young black males have died in violence?
Yep
That is the way things generally work out in life. You try things, evaluate how they turned out and adjust accordingly
