Apparently you don't understand it either then.false my OP stated a paradox of classical logic that dong on the internet doesnt understandNo, GT, your OP stated it was not possible to logically see it any other way than the two options.you place logic as a limit on the limitless and miss the conversation dingbat
leave
That's not right.
Your OP is a logical fallacy.
as established by ding on the internet
An all powerful being would be all powerful in all things.
All powerful in creating rocks.
All powerful in lifting rocks.
He can create rocks of infinite mass.
He can lift rocks of infinite mass.
Is there any rock he can't create? No.
Is there any rock he can't lift? No.
Can he create a rock he can't lift? That isn't logically possible because he is unlimited in what he can lift and he is unlimited in what he can create. But since he can create a rock of infinite mass the illogical answer would be, yes. Infinity encompasses everything.
Does the logical answer of no he cannot create a rock he cannot lift, mean he isn't all powerful? No. His ability to do all things is unlimited. His ability to create is infinite and his ability to lift is infinite.