protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 56,926
- 18,285
Sounds like you've been watching too much MSNBC. Hillary openly admittted that at least 2 of her aides Cheryl Whatever her name is and Muslim Brotherhood Huma Abedin both got the emails, and Huma openly admitted it before Congress just recently. You need to get out more.But then again, it depends whether anyone actually found any of these secrets, doesn't it? You haven't shown any example of any other country or any unauthorized person seeing these documents, have you?
You "know" lots of damage has been done. Okay, then prove it. Show me which documents Hillary had on her files, that have been made public or made know to other countries, and you show me where they have done any damage with relevant proof. Because, as you said you "KNOW" this is true, so it'll be easy for you to prove it.
As for Obama's "weakness" in pulling out of Iraq. It's a stupid argument and I won't discuss it. You're wrong.
Islam hasn't always been the enemy of the west. Your history is rather poor.
As for your argument about post 2008, again, this is a poor argument. Just because Obama is president, doesn't mean all the damage that Bush did between 2001 and 2008 suddenly stops doing damage.
The left pretend there is not danger? Really? I know there is danger. I know that without the invasion of Iraq there'd be less danger now than there currently is.
And NO, it DOES NOT depend on whether anyone actually found any of these secrets. The mere fact that Hillary has had the highest level of top secret stuff given to her and that her email server was private in her home, unencrypted, leaving them exposed to hackers, is enough. Simple as that. I don't have to show you documents, or anything else. Even John Kerry openly admitted that "Very likely China, Russia read my emails"
And "Islam hasn't always been the enemy of the west" you say ? So you haven't done your homewrk on that either apparently. That combined with brain destruction from MSNBC, and you'll liable to walk around saying preposterous things like that.
Basra attacked/conquered - 634 AD
Damascus attacked/conquered - 635 AD
Ctesiphon attacked/conquered - 636 AD
Alexandria attacked/conquered - 641 AD
Sicily attacked/conquered - 666 AD
Kabul attacked/conquered - 670 AD
Jerusalem attacked/conquered - 687 AD
Carthage attacked/conquered - 698 AD
Southern Spain attacked/conquered - 711 AD
Narbonne (Southern France) attacked/conquered - 720 AD
Battle of Poitiers (France) - Muslim advance halted - 732 AD
Armenia attacked/conquered - 1064 AD
Battle of Manzikert - 1071 AD
Nicaea attacked/conquered - 1331 AD
Kosovo attacked/conquered - 1389 AD
Bulgaria attacked/conquered - 1393 AD
Constantinople attacked - 1453 AD
Greece attacked/conquered - 1460 AD
Belgrade attacked/conquered - 1521 AD
Siege of Vienna (attacked) - Muslim advance halted - 1683 AD
As for what damage Bush did or didn't do, he isn't president of the US right now., Obama is and that's why we have ISIS now, and that idiot is inviting them in here, tucked in with 185,000 unvettable Syrian refugees. And Hillary (who is running for president NOW), wants to continue that madness.
Last edited: