Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Wow, I'm glad there aren't any of those around. They sound scary. Wait, you're being facetious. Good one. We all know no one advocates the absurdity you say as if you believe.If you believe the gun rights extremists around here,
kids have the constitutional right to take machine guns to school.
Trump wants guns in classrooms — maybe
On Friday, speaking at the National Rifle Association's annual convention, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee said that he, as president, would do away with all gun-free zones. Schools are, of course, gun-free zones, and Trump had said on a previous occasion, "I will get rid of gun-free zones on schools."
After the NRA speech, Hillary Clinton called Trump out for saying he would allow guns in classrooms, which are rooms that exist in schools.
Donald Trump: ‘I will get rid of gun-free zones on schools’
To clear things up, Trump went on Fox News on Sunday and said this:
"I don't want to have guns in classrooms. Although, in some cases, teachers should have guns in classrooms. … Things that are going on in our schools are unbelievable. You look at some of our schools, unbelievable what's going on. But I'm not advocating guns in classrooms. But remember, in some cases, and a lot of people have made this case, teachers should be able to have guns. Trained teachers should be able to have guns."
How much clearer can the man be? He doesn't want guns in classrooms, Clinton is a liar for saying so, but he does think there should be guns in classrooms, but he's not advocating for them, but he thinks they should be there.
-----------------------------------------
I think it was all a suggestion except when it wasn't. That should clear things up nicely.
Donald Trump feels that loaded weapons should be allowed in elementary schools.
Good. When law-abiding adults are allowed their freedom to own and carry, most still won't bother. But a few will. And some nutcase planning a Sandy Hook type massacre, hoping for tons of headlines after he's dead, will know that probably a few people nearby are armed... and he won't know which ones. And he knows he probably won't last beyond his first few shots, and so will only get a mention on Page 4 below the ads for cabbage. So he'll be less likely to pull his little scene in the first place.
How many kids that were killed at Sandy Hook, would still be alive today if Democrats hadn't forbidden all law-abiding citizens to defend the kids in their charge?
Yeah because a few trained teachers carrying a concealed weapon is exactly the same as letting toddlers play with gunsStart 'em off young.
How typical.How many more would be slaughtered if you gun fetishists equipped every Wyatt Earp lunchbox with the real deal.
Donald Trump feels that loaded weapons should be allowed in elementary schools.
Good. When law-abiding adults are allowed their freedom to own and carry, most still won't bother. But a few will. And some nutcase planning a Sandy Hook type massacre, hoping for tons of headlines after he's dead, will know that probably a few people nearby are armed... and he won't know which ones. And he knows he probably won't last beyond his first few shots, and so will only get a mention on Page 4 below the ads for cabbage. So he'll be less likely to pull his little scene in the first place.
How many kids that were killed at Sandy Hook, would still be alive today if Democrats hadn't forbidden all law-abiding citizens to defend the kids in their charge?
Do you have any evidence that this oft-debunked fib is true?Donald Trump feels that loaded weapons should be allowed in elementary schools.
Good. When law-abiding adults are allowed their freedom to own and carry, most still won't bother. But a few will. And some nutcase planning a Sandy Hook type massacre, hoping for tons of headlines after he's dead, will know that probably a few people nearby are armed... and he won't know which ones. And he knows he probably won't last beyond his first few shots, and so will only get a mention on Page 4 below the ads for cabbage. So he'll be less likely to pull his little scene in the first place.
How many kids that were killed at Sandy Hook, would still be alive today if Democrats hadn't forbidden all law-abiding citizens to defend the kids in their charge?
None.
Why should I "support" another fib you made up out of whole cloth, that I never said in the first place?But you are free to continue the fantasy that guns in the hands of teachers are a panacea for gun violence in the schools.
How about if we do this instead: Obey the Constitution.Let's do this: The NRA ought to charge a minimum assessment to all of its members of $120.00 per year to select a someone in every classroom in your state who would be willing to be armed on campus (or a parent, custodian, volunteer); provide each with a proper firearm once they have been trained, evaluated by a psychologist and determined to be a sane and sober person.. Then continue this study for five years and see what outcome might transpire.
And a more logical, no-brainer suggestion has never been made. Sheesh, OF COURSE some teachers should have loaded guns handy, and this fact should be advertised so that every would-be mass shooter or terrorist knows that schools won't be such easy targets anymore.
The Israelis have had armed teachers for years, without problems.
Why do you fear guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens, especially when those guns could enable those citizens to save lives?
Let me tell you: Your brainwashed brain might not be able to handle such common sense and logic as Trump is proposing, but a lot of average Americans heartily agree with Trump that it's high time to start arming our teachers, and also our military personnel at recruiting stations.
And a more logical, no-brainer suggestion has never been made. Sheesh, OF COURSE some teachers should have loaded guns handy, and this fact should be advertised so that every would-be mass shooter or terrorist knows that schools won't be such easy targets anymore.
The Israelis have had armed teachers for years, without problems.
Why do you fear guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens, especially when those guns could enable those citizens to save lives?
Let me tell you: Your brainwashed brain might not be able to handle such common sense and logic as Trump is proposing, but a lot of average Americans heartily agree with Trump that it's high time to start arming our teachers, and also our military personnel at recruiting stations.
Imagine a teacher at the blackboard explaining how to perform long division to the children when the door opens and before she can drop her chalk and pull out her gun she or he is dead on the floor.
Do you have any evidence that this oft-debunked fib is true?Donald Trump feels that loaded weapons should be allowed in elementary schools.
Good. When law-abiding adults are allowed their freedom to own and carry, most still won't bother. But a few will. And some nutcase planning a Sandy Hook type massacre, hoping for tons of headlines after he's dead, will know that probably a few people nearby are armed... and he won't know which ones. And he knows he probably won't last beyond his first few shots, and so will only get a mention on Page 4 below the ads for cabbage. So he'll be less likely to pull his little scene in the first place.
How many kids that were killed at Sandy Hook, would still be alive today if Democrats hadn't forbidden all law-abiding citizens to defend the kids in their charge?
None.
Why should I "support" another fib you made up out of whole cloth, that I never said in the first place?But you are free to continue the fantasy that guns in the hands of teachers are a panacea for gun violence in the schools.
How about if we do this instead: Obey the Constitution.Let's do this: The NRA ought to charge a minimum assessment to all of its members of $120.00 per year to select a someone in every classroom in your state who would be willing to be armed on campus (or a parent, custodian, volunteer); provide each with a proper firearm once they have been trained, evaluated by a psychologist and determined to be a sane and sober person.. Then continue this study for five years and see what outcome might transpire.
When law-abiding adults are allowed their freedom to own and carry, most still won't bother. But a few will. And some nutcase planning a Sandy Hook type massacre, hoping for tons of headlines after he's dead, will know that probably a few people nearby are armed... and he won't know which ones. And he knows he probably won't last beyond his first few shots, and so will only get a mention on Page 4 below the ads for cabbage. So he'll be less likely to pull his little scene in the first place.
How many kids that were killed at Sandy Hook, would still be alive today if Democrats hadn't forbidden all law-abiding citizens to defend the kids in their charge?
And a more logical, no-brainer suggestion has never been made. Sheesh, OF COURSE some teachers should have loaded guns handy, and this fact should be advertised so that every would-be mass shooter or terrorist knows that schools won't be such easy targets anymore.
The Israelis have had armed teachers for years, without problems.
Why do you fear guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens, especially when those guns could enable those citizens to save lives?
Let me tell you: Your brainwashed brain might not be able to handle such common sense and logic as Trump is proposing, but a lot of average Americans heartily agree with Trump that it's high time to start arming our teachers, and also our military personnel at recruiting stations.
Imagine a teacher at the blackboard explaining how to perform long division to the children when the door opens and before she can drop her chalk and pull out her gun she or he is dead on the floor.
Imagine an elementary school considered by scumbag federal officials as a GUN FREE ZONE . A criminally insane individual slaughters 20 children.
Wrong as usual.COTUS (Art. I, sec 8, clause 1) authorizes the congress to provide for the "common Defence and general welfare".
It says that Congress can spend tax money on the Common Defence, and on programs that benefit all Americans equally. It is a restriction on Congressional spending, specifically prohibiting spending on special interests. Thanks to illiterate persons such as yourself who have no idea of what "General Welfare" meant in the late 1700s, this is one of the most-violated commands in the Constitution.
See:
General Welfare Clause
And quite stupid, of course. But for some reason liberals keep bringing it up again and again, especially after losing a debate on gun rights and the 2nd amendment (such as now).If the Congress feels the need to provide guns to someone in every classroom in America, that would be fine.
Why do you liberals want to provide guns to someone in every classroom in America?
Why do the Israelis have armed teachers?And a more logical, no-brainer suggestion has never been made. Sheesh, OF COURSE some teachers should have loaded guns handy, and this fact should be advertised so that every would-be mass shooter or terrorist knows that schools won't be such easy targets anymore.
The Israelis have had armed teachers for years, without problems.
Why do you fear guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens, especially when those guns could enable those citizens to save lives?
Let me tell you: Your brainwashed brain might not be able to handle such common sense and logic as Trump is proposing, but a lot of average Americans heartily agree with Trump that it's high time to start arming our teachers, and also our military personnel at recruiting stations.
How typical.How many more would be slaughtered if you gun fetishists equipped every Wyatt Earp lunchbox with the real deal.
When the liberal loses the debate (happens a lot nowadays), he makes up something the conservative never said and tries to bash him for that instead.
