Donald Trump might be the dimmest president ever

At least until the next Republican since every republican has always been the dumbest one ever.

You know, you might be onto something there, except HW was the exception to the rule :)

Not at the time. At the time the Democrats insisted that HW was the dumbest Republican ever. Then Dole was the dumbest Republican ever. For my entire life every single Republican has been the dumbest ever.

Look. That has been used and overused to the point of stupidity.
 
No question about it....He is also the first president to not have a vision outside of personal profit.

The guy doesn't give a shit about the future of this country.

Sure Matty, that's why his message about bringing jobs back to America resonated so well with Americans. While liberals just run around saying "automation" is taking all their jobs anyway. That's why he meets with industry leaders all the time, trying to get them to bring jobs back....because he doesn't give a shit, right? How much did the Clintons or Obama ever do that kind of stuff? Never. They were just happy to take payoffs from Wall Street, which profits off exporting jobs to China and Mexico.
Your mentally disturbed president is planning to keep a horrific campaign pledge to the coal industry and forsake the alternative energy industry that's ten times more productive with jobs.
The next time DT does something right will be the first time
 
Trump is the stupidest Republican so far and Reagan, by a huge margin, is the most corrupt Republican criminal.

In all honesty, why can't conservatives just find ONE PERSON who is honest and just does the job he gets paid to do? Why is this an impossible quest for them? George H W Bush Sr was the last respectable president Republicans voted for. Before that it was Eisenhower who if he were running today I'd vote for him.

Why is this party entirely populated now by liars and mental patients?
Fact: the Reagan administration WAS the most corrupt in history with the most cabinet indictments and convictions.
I thought no one could be as god awful stupid as GW but DT makes him look like Albert Einstein..
 
No question about it....He is also the first president to not have a vision outside of personal profit.

The guy doesn't give a shit about the future of this country.

On the contrary, I would argue he is precisely without need for personal wealth which makes him a major improvement over the standard politician. He had no need to do this job, certainly the pay wasn't the lure, he's not even taking the pay.

Ultimately he fought a different battle his entire life, I imagine many of these career politicians don't appreciate this and they will do their best to impede his success. Can you imagine if a non-politician runs the country better than us? All of the lobbyists and bagmen will lose all their influence.

Always consider these points before you go after him. He's certainly not perfect and definitely not diplomatic, but this is why he is supported. America needs a non-politician to get it back on track. I recall a certain actor became president, and will go down as one of the best leaders in world history not just U.S history.


THE FAILED ACTOR?



The presidency of Ronald Reagan in the United States was marked by multiple scandals, resulting in the investigation, indictment, or conviction of over 138 administration officials, the largest number for any U.S. president



The Iran–Contra affair, as it became known, did serious damage to the Reagan presidency. The investigations were effectively halted when President George H. W. Bush (Reagan's vice president) pardoned (AND 7 OTHER REAGAN GUYS) Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger before his trial began





1 Iran–Contra affair

2 Department of Housing and Urban Development grant rigging

3 Lobbying scandal

4 EPA scandals

5 Inslaw Affair 6 Savings & loan crisis

7 Operation Ill Wind (50 CONVICTIONS)

8 Wedtech Scandal



Reagan administration scandals - Wikipedia


reagan-fondling.jpg






How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan

With the Gipper's reputation flagging after Clinton, neoconservatives launched a stealthy campaign to remake him as a "great" president.




The myth of Ronald Reagan was already looming in the spring of 1997 — when a highly popular President Bill Clinton was launching his second-term, pre-Monica Lewinsky, and the Republican brand seemed at low ebb. But what neoconservative activist Grover Norquist and his allies proposed that spring was virtually unheard of — an active, mapped-out, audacious campaign to spread a distorted vision of Reagan’s legacy across America.


In a sense, some of the credit for triggering this may belong to those supposedly liberal editors at the New York Times, and their decision at the end of 1996 to publish that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. survey of the presidents. The below-average rating by the historians for Reagan, coming right on the heels of Clintons’ easy reelection victory, was a wake-up call for these people who came to Washington in the 1980s as the shock troops of a revolution and now saw everything slipping away. The first Reagan salvos came from the Heritage Foundation, the same conservative think tank that also had feted the 10th anniversary of the Reagan tax cut in 1991. After its initial article slamming the Times, the foundation’s magazine, Policy Review, came back in July 1997 with a second piece for its 20th anniversary issue: “Reagan Betrayed: Are Conservatives Fumbling His Legacy?”


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan

um2w1.jpg

Wholly shit what a tiny insignificant list. Can you imagine Obama's? Course Reagan was a great POUS while Obama represented weakness.


Sure cupcake

2e8e1e8b2d9431c3f5b0adc0f3033c7b.jpg
Big news tonight with Putin's Puppet giving back the Russians their two Russian embassies in NY and Maryland that Obama kicked them out of for hacking our election.
Hannity's show tonite: Hillary and Kathy Griffin bashing. He is shameless..
 
Last edited:
No question about it....He is also the first president to not have a vision outside of personal profit.

The guy doesn't give a shit about the future of this country.

On the contrary, I would argue he is precisely without need for personal wealth which makes him a major improvement over the standard politician. He had no need to do this job, certainly the pay wasn't the lure, he's not even taking the pay.

Ultimately he fought a different battle his entire life, I imagine many of these career politicians don't appreciate this and they will do their best to impede his success. Can you imagine if a non-politician runs the country better than us? All of the lobbyists and bagmen will lose all their influence.

Always consider these points before you go after him. He's certainly not perfect and definitely not diplomatic, but this is why he is supported. America needs a non-politician to get it back on track. I recall a certain actor became president, and will go down as one of the best leaders in world history not just U.S history.


THE FAILED ACTOR?



The presidency of Ronald Reagan in the United States was marked by multiple scandals, resulting in the investigation, indictment, or conviction of over 138 administration officials, the largest number for any U.S. president



The Iran–Contra affair, as it became known, did serious damage to the Reagan presidency. The investigations were effectively halted when President George H. W. Bush (Reagan's vice president) pardoned (AND 7 OTHER REAGAN GUYS) Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger before his trial began





1 Iran–Contra affair

2 Department of Housing and Urban Development grant rigging

3 Lobbying scandal

4 EPA scandals

5 Inslaw Affair 6 Savings & loan crisis

7 Operation Ill Wind (50 CONVICTIONS)

8 Wedtech Scandal



Reagan administration scandals - Wikipedia


reagan-fondling.jpg






How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan

With the Gipper's reputation flagging after Clinton, neoconservatives launched a stealthy campaign to remake him as a "great" president.




The myth of Ronald Reagan was already looming in the spring of 1997 — when a highly popular President Bill Clinton was launching his second-term, pre-Monica Lewinsky, and the Republican brand seemed at low ebb. But what neoconservative activist Grover Norquist and his allies proposed that spring was virtually unheard of — an active, mapped-out, audacious campaign to spread a distorted vision of Reagan’s legacy across America.


In a sense, some of the credit for triggering this may belong to those supposedly liberal editors at the New York Times, and their decision at the end of 1996 to publish that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. survey of the presidents. The below-average rating by the historians for Reagan, coming right on the heels of Clintons’ easy reelection victory, was a wake-up call for these people who came to Washington in the 1980s as the shock troops of a revolution and now saw everything slipping away. The first Reagan salvos came from the Heritage Foundation, the same conservative think tank that also had feted the 10th anniversary of the Reagan tax cut in 1991. After its initial article slamming the Times, the foundation’s magazine, Policy Review, came back in July 1997 with a second piece for its 20th anniversary issue: “Reagan Betrayed: Are Conservatives Fumbling His Legacy?”


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan

um2w1.jpg

Wholly shit what a tiny insignificant list. Can you imagine Obama's? Course Reagan was a great POUS while Obama represented weakness.


Sure cupcake

2e8e1e8b2d9431c3f5b0adc0f3033c7b.jpg

I guess we can start with fast and furious huh? ILMAO @ Obama suspended their nuclear program.
 
Donny is clueless and the most uneducated person to sit in the white house, his so called degrees were evidently bought and paid for by his father, with no effort on Donny's part, he acts as if the presidency is just like his TV show the apprentice



Donald Trump does not read — except in small doses and when his own name appears prominently. Prior to the presidency, his only activities were work and golf. He does not mingle with intellectuals, cultural trendsetters or artists. It should come as no surprise — and it has not — that he is sorely lacking in sophistication, knowledge of the world, understanding of government and a rudimentary grasp of economics.



Sitting atop arguably the great resource on the planet — the body of knowledge retained by American government experts on everything from economics to medicine to military history — he remains blissfully ignorant on a range of subjects. He surrounds himself with dim yes-men who know little more than he and, in any event, tremble at the prospect of correcting their "Dear Leader." But sometimes you wonder whether Trump is just, well, dumb.




Donald Trump might be the dimmest president ever
He's not dim. He's a 70 year old real est developer who has never answered to a board of directors or shareholders. He's less equipped than a Jack Welch or Lee Ioccoca would have been.
 
Would you hire Trump to:
baby sit your children
To take your savings to the bank
to educate your kids
to make up names for women
to run a small government agency
solve a problem without going to court
to be president of the United States?
 
At least until the next Republican since every republican has always been the dumbest one ever.

You know, you might be onto something there, except HW was the exception to the rule :)

Not at the time. At the time the Democrats insisted that HW was the dumbest Republican ever. Then Dole was the dumbest Republican ever. For my entire life every single Republican has been the dumbest ever.

Look. That has been used and overused to the point of stupidity.

Seriously cupcake? People called HW, the CIA guy dumb? Dole? Sorry Cupcake, I think you are full of it, Ronnie, Mr Potat(o)a Head, Dubya, Cheeto, sure...
 
No question about it....He is also the first president to not have a vision outside of personal profit.

The guy doesn't give a shit about the future of this country.

On the contrary, I would argue he is precisely without need for personal wealth which makes him a major improvement over the standard politician. He had no need to do this job, certainly the pay wasn't the lure, he's not even taking the pay.

Ultimately he fought a different battle his entire life, I imagine many of these career politicians don't appreciate this and they will do their best to impede his success. Can you imagine if a non-politician runs the country better than us? All of the lobbyists and bagmen will lose all their influence.

Always consider these points before you go after him. He's certainly not perfect and definitely not diplomatic, but this is why he is supported. America needs a non-politician to get it back on track. I recall a certain actor became president, and will go down as one of the best leaders in world history not just U.S history.


THE FAILED ACTOR?



The presidency of Ronald Reagan in the United States was marked by multiple scandals, resulting in the investigation, indictment, or conviction of over 138 administration officials, the largest number for any U.S. president



The Iran–Contra affair, as it became known, did serious damage to the Reagan presidency. The investigations were effectively halted when President George H. W. Bush (Reagan's vice president) pardoned (AND 7 OTHER REAGAN GUYS) Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger before his trial began





1 Iran–Contra affair

2 Department of Housing and Urban Development grant rigging

3 Lobbying scandal

4 EPA scandals

5 Inslaw Affair 6 Savings & loan crisis

7 Operation Ill Wind (50 CONVICTIONS)

8 Wedtech Scandal



Reagan administration scandals - Wikipedia


reagan-fondling.jpg






How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan

With the Gipper's reputation flagging after Clinton, neoconservatives launched a stealthy campaign to remake him as a "great" president.




The myth of Ronald Reagan was already looming in the spring of 1997 — when a highly popular President Bill Clinton was launching his second-term, pre-Monica Lewinsky, and the Republican brand seemed at low ebb. But what neoconservative activist Grover Norquist and his allies proposed that spring was virtually unheard of — an active, mapped-out, audacious campaign to spread a distorted vision of Reagan’s legacy across America.


In a sense, some of the credit for triggering this may belong to those supposedly liberal editors at the New York Times, and their decision at the end of 1996 to publish that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. survey of the presidents. The below-average rating by the historians for Reagan, coming right on the heels of Clintons’ easy reelection victory, was a wake-up call for these people who came to Washington in the 1980s as the shock troops of a revolution and now saw everything slipping away. The first Reagan salvos came from the Heritage Foundation, the same conservative think tank that also had feted the 10th anniversary of the Reagan tax cut in 1991. After its initial article slamming the Times, the foundation’s magazine, Policy Review, came back in July 1997 with a second piece for its 20th anniversary issue: “Reagan Betrayed: Are Conservatives Fumbling His Legacy?”


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan

um2w1.jpg

Wholly shit what a tiny insignificant list. Can you imagine Obama's? Course Reagan was a great POUS while Obama represented weakness.


Sure cupcake

2e8e1e8b2d9431c3f5b0adc0f3033c7b.jpg

I guess we can start with fast and furious huh? ILMAO @ Obama suspended their nuclear program.


Convictions cupcake?


Want to compare Dubya's thing to Ronnie? Not even close cupcake


"Gunwalking", or "letting guns walk", was a tactic of the Arizona Field Office of the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), which ran a series of sting operations between 2006 and 2011 in the Tucson and Phoenix area where the ATF "purposely allowed licensed firearms dealers to sell weapons to illegal straw buyers, hoping to track the guns to Mexican drug cartel leaders and arrest them"


g1453132158827172953.jpg
 
More left wing hate speech based on nothing but hatred. How did that Kathi Griffin thing work out?
 
Donny is clueless and the most uneducated person to sit in the white house, his so called degrees were evidently bought and paid for by his father, with no effort on Donny's part, he acts as if the presidency is just like his TV show the apprentice



Donald Trump does not read — except in small doses and when his own name appears prominently. Prior to the presidency, his only activities were work and golf. He does not mingle with intellectuals, cultural trendsetters or artists. It should come as no surprise — and it has not — that he is sorely lacking in sophistication, knowledge of the world, understanding of government and a rudimentary grasp of economics.



Sitting atop arguably the great resource on the planet — the body of knowledge retained by American government experts on everything from economics to medicine to military history — he remains blissfully ignorant on a range of subjects. He surrounds himself with dim yes-men who know little more than he and, in any event, tremble at the prospect of correcting their "Dear Leader." But sometimes you wonder whether Trump is just, well, dumb.




Donald Trump might be the dimmest president ever
Wow...another sore loser butt hurt personal attack thread...because they can't find any evidence to back their false accusations.

This thread equates to the loser of an argument (or election) pouting while declaring, "Oh yeah...well...Hillary won the popular vote!"

Bwuhahahaha!
 
Donny is clueless and the most uneducated person to sit in the white house, his so called degrees were evidently bought and paid for by his father, with no effort on Donny's part, he acts as if the presidency is just like his TV show the apprentice



Donald Trump does not read — except in small doses and when his own name appears prominently. Prior to the presidency, his only activities were work and golf. He does not mingle with intellectuals, cultural trendsetters or artists. It should come as no surprise — and it has not — that he is sorely lacking in sophistication, knowledge of the world, understanding of government and a rudimentary grasp of economics.



Sitting atop arguably the great resource on the planet — the body of knowledge retained by American government experts on everything from economics to medicine to military history — he remains blissfully ignorant on a range of subjects. He surrounds himself with dim yes-men who know little more than he and, in any event, tremble at the prospect of correcting their "Dear Leader." But sometimes you wonder whether Trump is just, well, dumb.




Donald Trump might be the dimmest president ever
Wow...another sore loser butt hurt personal attack thread...because they can't find any evidence to back their false accusations.

This thread equates to the loser of an argument (or election) pouting while declaring, "Oh yeah...well...Hillary won the popular vote!"

Bwuhahahaha!
Hillary did win the popular vote. That's her participation trophy.
 
Donny is clueless and the most uneducated person to sit in the white house, his so called degrees were evidently bought and paid for by his father, with no effort on Donny's part, he acts as if the presidency is just like his TV show the apprentice



Donald Trump does not read — except in small doses and when his own name appears prominently. Prior to the presidency, his only activities were work and golf. He does not mingle with intellectuals, cultural trendsetters or artists. It should come as no surprise — and it has not — that he is sorely lacking in sophistication, knowledge of the world, understanding of government and a rudimentary grasp of economics.



Sitting atop arguably the great resource on the planet — the body of knowledge retained by American government experts on everything from economics to medicine to military history — he remains blissfully ignorant on a range of subjects. He surrounds himself with dim yes-men who know little more than he and, in any event, tremble at the prospect of correcting their "Dear Leader." But sometimes you wonder whether Trump is just, well, dumb.




Donald Trump might be the dimmest president ever

The brown buffoon left office back in january.
 
No question about it....He is also the first president to not have a vision outside of personal profit.

The guy doesn't give a shit about the future of this country.

On the contrary, I would argue he is precisely without need for personal wealth which makes him a major improvement over the standard politician. He had no need to do this job, certainly the pay wasn't the lure, he's not even taking the pay.

Ultimately he fought a different battle his entire life, I imagine many of these career politicians don't appreciate this and they will do their best to impede his success. Can you imagine if a non-politician runs the country better than us? All of the lobbyists and bagmen will lose all their influence.

Always consider these points before you go after him. He's certainly not perfect and definitely not diplomatic, but this is why he is supported. America needs a non-politician to get it back on track. I recall a certain actor became president, and will go down as one of the best leaders in world history not just U.S history.

For Trump is there isn't enough money in the world to satisfy his greed. Or his revenge in US bankers for refusing to lend to him.

He's already made America the laughingstock of the world. Soon you'll be like North Korea - starving the poor to pay for your military.
 
No question about it....He is also the first president to not have a vision outside of personal profit.

The guy doesn't give a shit about the future of this country.

On the contrary, I would argue he is precisely without need for personal wealth which makes him a major improvement over the standard politician. He had no need to do this job, certainly the pay wasn't the lure, he's not even taking the pay.

Ultimately he fought a different battle his entire life, I imagine many of these career politicians don't appreciate this and they will do their best to impede his success. Can you imagine if a non-politician runs the country better than us? All of the lobbyists and bagmen will lose all their influence.

Always consider these points before you go after him. He's certainly not perfect and definitely not diplomatic, but this is why he is supported. America needs a non-politician to get it back on track. I recall a certain actor became president, and will go down as one of the best leaders in world history not just U.S history.

For Trump is there isn't enough money in the world to satisfy his greed. Or his revenge in US bankers for refusing to lend to him.

He's already made America the laughingstock of the world. Soon you'll be like North Korea - starving the poor to pay for your military.


Nope, the brown buffoon before trump made us the world laugher.
 
No question about it....He is also the first president to not have a vision outside of personal profit.

The guy doesn't give a shit about the future of this country.

On the contrary, I would argue he is precisely without need for personal wealth which makes him a major improvement over the standard politician. He had no need to do this job, certainly the pay wasn't the lure, he's not even taking the pay.

Ultimately he fought a different battle his entire life, I imagine many of these career politicians don't appreciate this and they will do their best to impede his success. Can you imagine if a non-politician runs the country better than us? All of the lobbyists and bagmen will lose all their influence.

Always consider these points before you go after him. He's certainly not perfect and definitely not diplomatic, but this is why he is supported. America needs a non-politician to get it back on track. I recall a certain actor became president, and will go down as one of the best leaders in world history not just U.S history.

For Trump is there isn't enough money in the world to satisfy his greed. Or his revenge in US bankers for refusing to lend to him.

He's already made America the laughingstock of the world. Soon you'll be like North Korea - starving the poor to pay for your military.


Nope, the brown buffoon before trump made us the world laugher.
The last rating of presidents by historians rated Obama as 12th. best president.
 
No question about it....He is also the first president to not have a vision outside of personal profit.

The guy doesn't give a shit about the future of this country.

On the contrary, I would argue he is precisely without need for personal wealth which makes him a major improvement over the standard politician. He had no need to do this job, certainly the pay wasn't the lure, he's not even taking the pay.

Ultimately he fought a different battle his entire life, I imagine many of these career politicians don't appreciate this and they will do their best to impede his success. Can you imagine if a non-politician runs the country better than us? All of the lobbyists and bagmen will lose all their influence.

Always consider these points before you go after him. He's certainly not perfect and definitely not diplomatic, but this is why he is supported. America needs a non-politician to get it back on track. I recall a certain actor became president, and will go down as one of the best leaders in world history not just U.S history.

Trump is not a non-politician. He regularly bought off politicians such Hillary Clinton, Charles Schumer, and Mitch McConnell to name a few. Other Presidents had no active business interests. Every time Trump goes to his resort in Florida, the Secret Service pays to rent rooms to protect Trump. That goes in Trump's pockets. During the campaign, campaign money went into Trump entities.

The fact is that Trump's problems are of his own making. The fact is that there are differences between running a business and running the government. Trump believes he is omnipotent and no one should stand up to him.

The reason that he was elected was part luck. Trump got well under 50% of the primary vote. He was aided by the fact that no one could unite behind one candidate. He won the General because he was not Clinton. A recent Fox poll showed that only 16% support his tweets. He is around 40% in approvals.

You cannot compare Trump and Reagan. Reagan understood policy and was able to explain it in ways that people could understand. When he came into office, he had a tax plan ready to go. He also had definite plans for building up our military such as a 600 ship navy. He also had the decorum not to attack people personally. I have no doubt that Reagan would be appalled at Trump's tweets. All it took for Reagan to get the tax reform ball rolling in his second term was a address to the American people.
 
Donny is clueless and the most uneducated person to sit in the white house, his so called degrees were evidently bought and paid for by his father, with no effort on Donny's part, he acts as if the presidency is just like his TV show the apprentice



Donald Trump does not read — except in small doses and when his own name appears prominently. Prior to the presidency, his only activities were work and golf. He does not mingle with intellectuals, cultural trendsetters or artists. It should come as no surprise — and it has not — that he is sorely lacking in sophistication, knowledge of the world, understanding of government and a rudimentary grasp of economics.



Sitting atop arguably the great resource on the planet — the body of knowledge retained by American government experts on everything from economics to medicine to military history — he remains blissfully ignorant on a range of subjects. He surrounds himself with dim yes-men who know little more than he and, in any event, tremble at the prospect of correcting their "Dear Leader." But sometimes you wonder whether Trump is just, well, dumb.




Donald Trump might be the dimmest president ever
He's not your President.
You are not Our Citizen.

Do America and The World a Favor and quit exhaling CO2.
 

Forum List

Back
Top