Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton

I didn't say you were voting for Clinton. You recommended voting for the libertarian and not Trump. That is a vote for Clinton because Trump needs every vote he can get. He can't lose votes to another candidate that does not have a snowball's chance in hell to win.
First of all - you might want to check out the #NeverHitlery movement sparky. The left is furious that their own party committed voter fraud against them.

Second - I haven't told a single "lie" about Hitlery. You're inability to accept the truth just proves what an ignorant partisan hack you are. I've backed up everything stated with links. Ask an adult for help in reading and understanding those articles.
 
Here are the facts about the current economy. All of the stuff that Barack Obama and the Democrats cover up with their propaganda
If they cover it up how do you know about those there facts that you think mean something?
Because people who are not blind, partisan hacks don't just accept whatever Barack Obama and Hitlery Clinton say in a press conference. They look at the indisputable data - like the fact that we have a record number of people who have dropped out of the work force.
 
The liberal war on the middle class continues. They desperately need to get the middle class into poverty and onto the government plantation - dependent on government for even their most basic needs. Makes people more likely to vote Dumbocrat...

 
P@triot, post: 14956428
They look at the indisputable data - like the fact that we have a record number of people who have dropped out of the work force.

Thank you. You've been caught in a lie. There is no cover up. It is disagreement on what the data means. It's a matter of interpretation. Why did you accuse them of covering the data up.

My daughter dropped out of the work force to finish her bachelors degree. She is now going to drop back in for a while to save up some cash and then pursue a post grad degree.

According to statistics the average American has one testacle and one mammary breast. Do you think that is the way it actually is?

All that data and Obama performed twice better than Romney said he could on unemployment. So the current situation is far from perfect but we are twice closer to getting it perfect than had Romney won and instituted Republican policies.

So be glad Romney lost if you care about unemployment as much as you say you do.

The Republican Bush disaster to start the century off was enough for the entire rest of the century. No need to try Republican failed policies again.
 
Thank you. You've been caught in a lie. There is no cover up. It is disagreement on what the data means. It's a matter of interpretation. Why did you accuse them of covering the data up.
It's hard to be "caught in a lie" when one never lies. The problem is your reading comprehension. You have the literacy of the average 4th grader. It makes it tough to discuss anything with you.

It's ok - we get it. You live off of government and thus are peeing down your own leg at the thought of your gravy train being pulled from you. A natural response for any parasite. But at the end of the day - you can't run from the facts. Time and time again the failed liberal ideology have collapsed economies. Unemployment under Barack Obama was higher than it ever was under George W. Bush (and Bush didn't recklessly throw around trillions of dollars trying to bail out his own failed policies). And we didn't have the record number of people out of the workforce now when Bush was in office.

One word for you cupcake: Detroit. Game over. Thanks for playing.
 
The liberal war on the middle class continues. They desperately need to get the middle class into poverty and onto the government plantation - dependent on government for even their most basic needs. Makes people more likely to vote Dumbocrat...
.

The liberal war on the middle class is a figment of RWer imagination.

Pukes wanted the American auto industry to go bankrupt in 2008. The worst hit on the middle class was the invasion of Iraq instead of letting UN inspections continue. Hillary was in favor of continued inspections. The Trillion wasted in Iraq to destabilize that region would have been better spent on American infrastructure.

That was the war on the middle class here. It increased our debt. It increased the interest on our debt. It is still having an economic impact not to mention all the needlessly killed.

Our auto industry remains the backbone of middle class working men and women.

Your side would let it die.

Stop your fantasies and convenient memory loss of 2008.
 
The liberal war on the middle class continues. They desperately need to get the middle class into poverty and onto the government plantation - dependent on government for even their most basic needs. Makes people more likely to vote Dumbocrat...

The worst hit on the middle class was the invasion of Iraq instead of letting UN inspections continue. Hillary was in favor of continued inspections.
As usual...you're lying. Hitlery voted for military action against Iraq. It's a documented fact you pathological liar.

No wonder you love the Clinton's. You lie just like they do.
 
The liberal war on the middle class continues. They desperately need to get the middle class into poverty and onto the government plantation - dependent on government for even their most basic needs. Makes people more likely to vote Dumbocrat...
.

The liberal war on the middle class is a figment of RWer imagination.

Pukes wanted the American auto industry to go bankrupt in 2008.
Gasp! You mean that conservatives wanted the free-market to operate flawlessly as it does when left alone? You mean we wanted bad companies to go out of business so that workers would have better jobs with stronger companies? Oh the humanity!!!! Dumb-ass, your economic views are so simplistic that even a 1st grader has a better grasp than you do. Here's an important hint for you stupid: actions do not occur in a vacuum. Now ask an adult for help.

By the way - isn't your side the side of whiny little bitches always crying about "corporate welfare"? And yet here you sit demanding corporate welfare. Watching you people contradict yourselves is fall down hilarious...
 
As much as I hate Donald Trump, this actually makes me want to vote for him. If 9/11 wasn't a reason to respond with our nuclear arsenal, then what the hell is?!? We dropped not one, but two nuclear bombs on Japan for far less. Pearl Harbor was nothing compared to 9/11. Had we used our nuclear arsenal the world would not be on fire right now. It would have sent a clear message to the world that the U.S. has a zero tolerance policy. Instead, we sent a message to the world that we'll spend decades playing cat & mouse.

Scarborough: Trump Asked Adviser Why U.S. Can’t Use Nuclear Weapons ‘Three Times’ in One-Hour Briefing
 
P@triot, post: 14957710
Gasp! You mean that conservatives wanted the free-market to operate flawlessly as it does when left alone?

Don't leave it alone if it is during the worst recession since the Great Depressionis and would hurt the middle class. And don't let the U.S. auto industry die when the free market can't fix it. And don't let a key component for our national defense die in case that need should ever arise again.

Ford was not going under but they testified in favor of the bailout because the big three rely on the same automotive supply chain.

Millions of jobs were at stake at the end of Bush's second term. Your conservative free market con job can go to hell.
 
Gasp! You mean that conservatives wanted the free-market to operate flawlessly as it does when left alone?
Your conservative free market con job can go to hell.
And that kind of astounding ignorance is why the economy continues to tank, why workers continue to toil for awful companies, and why liberalism delivers universal failure.

By the way cupcake - I thought you people hated "corporate welfare"?!? Having trouble getting your positions consistent are we, junior? :dunno:
 
And that kind of astounding ignorance is why the economy continues to tank, why workers continue to toil for awful companies, and why liberalism delivers universal failure.


I didn't say the free market economy should go to hell. Your CONSERVATIVE ideal to not allow the government intervene with a loan during a massive recession that led to a million lost jobs a month can go to hell. The auto industry is operating in the free market now and doing just fine. Conservative predictions of GM meaning 'Government Motors' were as nuts as conservatives themselves.

Are you saying GM Ford and Chrysler are awful companies?
 
And that kind of astounding ignorance is why the economy continues to tank, why workers continue to toil for awful companies, and why liberalism delivers universal failure.


I didn't say the free market economy should go to hell. Your CONSERVATIVE ideal to not allow the government intervene with a loan during a massive recession that led to a million lost jobs a month can go to hell. The auto industry is operating in the free market now and doing just fine. Conservative predictions of GM meaning 'Government Motors' were as nuts as conservatives themselves.

Are you saying GM Ford and Chrysler are awful companies?

Did they accept taxpayers money? Everybody else lost their savings and houses and jobs. What makes the auto industry so special?
 
Are you saying GM Ford and Chrysler are awful companies?
Well considering they were going out of business unless the government bailed them out - clearly yes - they are awful companies. Have you noticed that neither Apple nor Google have required a government bailout? Well run companies are swimming in billions of dollars. Poorly run companies need "bailouts" or file for bankruptcy (like Trump companies).
 
And that kind of astounding ignorance is why the economy continues to tank, why workers continue to toil for awful companies, and why liberalism delivers universal failure.
I didn't say the free market economy should go to hell. Your CONSERVATIVE ideal to not allow the government intervene with a loan during a massive recession that led to a million lost jobs a month can go to hell. The auto industry is operating in the free market now and doing just fine. Conservative predictions of GM meaning 'Government Motors' were as nuts as conservatives themselves.

Are you saying GM Ford and Chrysler are awful companies?
By the way - you keep ignoring the question (and editing it out so that nobody even sees it in your response). I thought you people hated "corporate welfare"?!? Now you're sitting here worshipping corporate welfare.

You can't get your position straight. Kind of makes you lose all credibility buddy.
 
And that kind of astounding ignorance is why the economy continues to tank, why workers continue to toil for awful companies, and why liberalism delivers universal failure.


I didn't say the free market economy should go to hell. Your CONSERVATIVE ideal to not allow the government intervene with a loan during a massive recession that led to a million lost jobs a month can go to hell. The auto industry is operating in the free market now and doing just fine. Conservative predictions of GM meaning 'Government Motors' were as nuts as conservatives themselves.

Are you saying GM Ford and Chrysler are awful companies?

Did they accept taxpayers money? Everybody else lost their savings and houses and jobs. What makes the auto industry so special?
:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

Well said Huggy...
 
P@triot, post: 14961548
Well considering they were going out of business unless the government bailed them out - clearly yes - they are awful companies. Have you noticed that neither Apple nor Google have required a government bailout? Well run companies are swimming in billions of dollars. Poorly run companies need "bailouts" or file for bankruptcy (like Trump companies).


You are not a patriot, more like a foreign agent. Our auto industry is more than just APPLE or GOOGLE. It is the heavy manufacturing backbone of the country I love. To lose that base of heavy manufacturing to foreign competition, much of which is government subsidized, to socialized manufacturing, would be a disgrace. It would weaken the U.S. status as a super power. It would be detrimental to our national security.

And besides Ford did not take bailout money but had the other two been left to die like Republicans like you would love to see, and because the Recession would have put them and all the American auto parts supply chain out of business, millions more laid off, your position on this is ignorant, uninformed and anti-American as can be.

Ford didn't take bailout money and my previous post told you that. Ignorance like that is the one of the prime mainstays of conservatism.
 
HUGGY, post: 14961533
Did they accept taxpayers money? Everybody else lost their savings and houses and jobs. What makes the auto industry so special?


You are not huggy - more like an America hater. Our auto industry is the heavy manufacturing backbone of the country I love. To lose that base of heavy manufacturing to foreign competition, much of which is government subsidized, to socialized manufacturing, would be a disgrace. It would weaken the U.S. status as a super power. It would be detrimental to our national security.

Loss of savings, houses and jobs was tragic enough, but P@triot's hate Anerica first position, that you shamefully applaud. Would have cost millions more losses of jobs houses and savings.

Ford did not take bailout money but had the other two been left to die like Republicans like you would love to see, and because the Recession would have put them and all the American auto parts supply chain out of business, millions more laid off, your position on this is ignorant, uninformed and anti-American as can be. That's not huggy, that is hatey.

Ford didn't take bailout money and my previous Informed conservative morons of that fact. The Great Bush recession abyss would have taken a well run company like Ford down as well. This unAmerican rant proves that one of the prime mainstays of conservatism is ignorance.
 

Forum List

Back
Top