Dossier, Dossier, Dossier

the Dossier provided by a foreign spy working with the Russians
working with the Russians? What does that even mean....?

give your details!


It means, you dunce, that Steele was a life-long communist and served as the conduit for Putin to slide the anti-Trump dossier to the DNC and their media servants.


Need me to smash another custard pie in your kisser?
Here it comes:


1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch


3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????

QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.



=====================================



CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH

1:15 PM 08/29/2018

Chuck Ross | Reporter

806

  • Dossier author Christopher Steele worked as a subcontractor for Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report
  • Steele facilitated a meeting in September 2015 between Deripaska and DOJ official Bruce Ohr, according to The Hill
  • Steele’s links to Deripaska have been one of the more puzzling aspects of the Trump-Russia probe
Christopher Steele, the author of the infamous Trump dossier, worked as a contractor for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and facilitated a meeting between the billionaire and Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr.

Deripaska’s law firm hired Steele’s private intelligence group, Orbis Business Intelligence, in 2012 to conduct research for Deripaska as part of a lawsuit against the billionaire, according to The Hill.

Steele, a former MI6 officer with experience in Moscow, also facilitated a meeting in September 2015 between Deripaska and Ohr, the Justice Department official whose wife worked for Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that hired Steele to compile the dossier.

FBI agents attended the meeting, which was aimed at getting Deripaska to provide information for organized crime investigations.

Steele’s relationship with Deripaska has remained a mystery for months, ever since Republican lawmakers hinted at a connection between the two. It has marked one of the stranger twists in the Trump-Russia saga given Steele’s work on the dossier, which alleges that the Kremlin conspired with President Donald Trump’s campaign to influence the 2016 election. (RELATED: Emails Show Christopher Steele Lobbied DOJ Official Bruce Ohr For Putin-Linked Oligarch’s Visa)

Deripaska, an aluminum magnate, is said to be a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The U.S. government also revoked his visa in 2006 because of suspected ties to Russian organized crime. Deripaska has traveled multiple times to the U.S. in recent years, The Hill reported.

Deripaska’s visa issues appear to have been a focus of Steele’s.

Steele emailed Ohr on Feb. 8, 2016 after the government had agreed to grant Deripaska a visa to travel to the U.S. later that month.

“As far as I’m concerned, this is good news all round although as before, it would be helpful if you could monitor it and let me know if any complications arise,” Steele wrote.

Ohr said that “to the extent I can I will keep an eye on the situation.”

Deripaska rarely dealt directly with Steele, according to The Hill’s sources. But Steele was on friendly terms with one of Deripaska’s attorneys.

At some point, Steele began meeting with Ohr to discuss a different matter — an investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government. Steele was hired by Fusion GPS in June 2016. He went on to compile 17 memos accusing various Trump campaign advisers of conspiring with the Kremlin.

The FBI used the unverified reports to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

FBI agents interviewed Deripaska in September 2016 about possible collusion, including whether former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was involved. Deripaska and Manafort had business ties stretching back more than a decade. During the campaign, they were locked in a legal battle over a failed cable TV company in Ukraine.

Deripaska’s links to Steele have generated speculation that Deripaska provided information that ended up in the dossier, either as a witting or unwitting source.

But Deripaska provided a statement to The Hill denying any involvement in the dossier.

“The latest reckless media chatter proposes that I had some unspecified involvement in the so-called dossier. Like most of the absurd fantasies and smears that ricochet across the internet, it is utterly false. I had absolutely nothing to do with this project, and I never had any knowledge of it until it was reported in the media and I certainly wasn’t involved in any activity related to it,” he told The Hill.

Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
you do know that the 50 million dollar mansion in Florida that Trump bought and sold a couple of years later, for $100 million dollars, in a DOWN TRENDING real estate market, was to Deripaska, don't you? Smells like money laundering for deripaska, by Trump to me....and anyone with a brain.

Was Steele working for Deripaska back then and ultimately partners with Trump as well?? :rolleyes:

Oh, an you know who handled the money laundering sale of the mansion, thru Cyprus Bank? Our newly appointed by Trump, Secretary of Commerce, Wilbur Ross.... my my, what a coincidence, eh?


So, your attempt to ignore the facts that Steele, an inveterate communist, was the path that the Kremlin used to insinuate the anti-Trump dossier into Hillary's hands, suggests you know it to be the truth.

Excellent.
 
actually Putin said himself in Helsinki, that he wanted Trump to win and instructed his staff to support trump over Hillary.
What did I say? What did I say about Counter-Intelligence being about deceit, false information / false statements being pushed to achieve the overall objective? Putin - who you snowflakes claim is the evil enemy NOW but was a friend when Obama made a joke about it when debating Romney but is now a friend again - declares he wanted Trump to win, and you snowflakes trip all over your johnsons to hail what the EX-KGB Agent publicly declared to be true. Dude, he has been playing these games before you were born and is an expert at manipulating idiots like you.
 
the Dossier provided by a foreign spy working with the Russians
working with the Russians? What does that even mean....?

give your details!


It means, you dunce, that Steele was a life-long communist and served as the conduit for Putin to slide the anti-Trump dossier to the DNC and their media servants.


Need me to smash another custard pie in your kisser?
Here it comes:


1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch


3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????

QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.



=====================================



CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH

1:15 PM 08/29/2018

Chuck Ross | Reporter

806

  • Dossier author Christopher Steele worked as a subcontractor for Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report
  • Steele facilitated a meeting in September 2015 between Deripaska and DOJ official Bruce Ohr, according to The Hill
  • Steele’s links to Deripaska have been one of the more puzzling aspects of the Trump-Russia probe
Christopher Steele, the author of the infamous Trump dossier, worked as a contractor for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and facilitated a meeting between the billionaire and Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr.

Deripaska’s law firm hired Steele’s private intelligence group, Orbis Business Intelligence, in 2012 to conduct research for Deripaska as part of a lawsuit against the billionaire, according to The Hill.

Steele, a former MI6 officer with experience in Moscow, also facilitated a meeting in September 2015 between Deripaska and Ohr, the Justice Department official whose wife worked for Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that hired Steele to compile the dossier.

FBI agents attended the meeting, which was aimed at getting Deripaska to provide information for organized crime investigations.

Steele’s relationship with Deripaska has remained a mystery for months, ever since Republican lawmakers hinted at a connection between the two. It has marked one of the stranger twists in the Trump-Russia saga given Steele’s work on the dossier, which alleges that the Kremlin conspired with President Donald Trump’s campaign to influence the 2016 election. (RELATED: Emails Show Christopher Steele Lobbied DOJ Official Bruce Ohr For Putin-Linked Oligarch’s Visa)

Deripaska, an aluminum magnate, is said to be a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The U.S. government also revoked his visa in 2006 because of suspected ties to Russian organized crime. Deripaska has traveled multiple times to the U.S. in recent years, The Hill reported.

Deripaska’s visa issues appear to have been a focus of Steele’s.

Steele emailed Ohr on Feb. 8, 2016 after the government had agreed to grant Deripaska a visa to travel to the U.S. later that month.

“As far as I’m concerned, this is good news all round although as before, it would be helpful if you could monitor it and let me know if any complications arise,” Steele wrote.

Ohr said that “to the extent I can I will keep an eye on the situation.”

Deripaska rarely dealt directly with Steele, according to The Hill’s sources. But Steele was on friendly terms with one of Deripaska’s attorneys.

At some point, Steele began meeting with Ohr to discuss a different matter — an investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government. Steele was hired by Fusion GPS in June 2016. He went on to compile 17 memos accusing various Trump campaign advisers of conspiring with the Kremlin.

The FBI used the unverified reports to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

FBI agents interviewed Deripaska in September 2016 about possible collusion, including whether former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was involved. Deripaska and Manafort had business ties stretching back more than a decade. During the campaign, they were locked in a legal battle over a failed cable TV company in Ukraine.

Deripaska’s links to Steele have generated speculation that Deripaska provided information that ended up in the dossier, either as a witting or unwitting source.

But Deripaska provided a statement to The Hill denying any involvement in the dossier.

“The latest reckless media chatter proposes that I had some unspecified involvement in the so-called dossier. Like most of the absurd fantasies and smears that ricochet across the internet, it is utterly false. I had absolutely nothing to do with this project, and I never had any knowledge of it until it was reported in the media and I certainly wasn’t involved in any activity related to it,” he told The Hill.

Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch

Ummm, OH BY THE WAY...it is now believed that Deripaska was the one who wrote the Dossier - as you pointed out.

Deripaska and Mueller are close pals.
- Back in the day FBI Director WENT TO HIS RUSSIAN PAL AND ASKED HIM TO FUND A RESCUE MISSION FOR A RETIRED FBI AGENT. (WTF?! WHY would a US FBI Director go to the RUSSIANS to fund a rescue mission for a retired US FBI Agent?)

So, again, you have Mueller connected to Comey, forming one helluva conflict of interest - Mueller was / is Comey's close buddy and Comey's Mentor.

You have Mueller working with Oher and Steele in early 2016, before he was appointed Special Counsel.

You have Mueller pals to the Russian suspected of authoring the Dossier.

Let's throw in the fact that Mueller has a history of withholding information and sending an innocent man to jail because he did not want to admit he was wrong and because he wanted to send the man to jail....and the fact that he broke the law by refusing to comply with a Congressional subpoena already in this case.

Mueller's integrity is already shot, he has broken the law, and evidence has him colluding / collaborating with Oher and Steele before being appointed Special Counsel.

Snowflakes be like

View attachment 217098



There's no getting around it.....whether directly or indirectly, the dossier was Russian attempt to win the election for the family they have a history of bribing, the Clintons.
 
Steele, as evidence shows, was also working FOR the FBI. So now you have the foreign spy, Steele, working FOR Fusion GPS, working FOR the FBI, and working FOR Hillary Clinton, as she paid him and the Russians for their help to win the 2016 election - the Dossier.
Who paid what Russians? there is absolutely no evidence to support such, NONE, ZIP, ZILCH, NADA, NIENTE, NOTHING

Did the Russians seek Steele out, or did Steele seek the Russian sources out, for information on the job he was hired for... opposition research on trump's business ventures in Russian and other Russian dealings?

And there is no proof that DNC/Clinton campaign knew that GPS hired Steele, and no proof that Steele knew the DNC/Clinton campaign were the clients, and under oath, GPS testified to that...

also Steele was only paid $160k, hardly a windfall..... if someone were being paid to make up a story, it would be a hell of a lot more than that... especially when the person's livelihood with his reputation at stake, a reputation of doing good gumshoe investigations... his whole business is at stake.... and creating a so called fake dossier, would kill his hard made Investigation Service Company....

Why didn't the Clinton Campaign or DNC RELEASE the Dossier in to the Public, if it was merely a made up, paid for, fake dossier to disrupt Trump's win? Why oh why oh why?


"Who paid what Russians? there is absolutely no evidence to support such, NONE, ZIP, ZILCH, NADA, NIENTE, NOTHING"


I'd suggest you stop lying....but then you'd be mute.





"Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier"
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier




You've really become quite a lying gutter-snipe.
One must conclude that the Mueller thing slipping away from you is having a deleterious effect on your mentality.
 
the Dossier provided by a foreign spy working with the Russians
working with the Russians? What does that even mean....?

give your details!


It means, you dunce, that Steele was a life-long communist and served as the conduit for Putin to slide the anti-Trump dossier to the DNC and their media servants.


Need me to smash another custard pie in your kisser?
Here it comes:


1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch


3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????

QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.



=====================================



CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH

1:15 PM 08/29/2018

Chuck Ross | Reporter

806

  • Dossier author Christopher Steele worked as a subcontractor for Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report
  • Steele facilitated a meeting in September 2015 between Deripaska and DOJ official Bruce Ohr, according to The Hill
  • Steele’s links to Deripaska have been one of the more puzzling aspects of the Trump-Russia probe
Christopher Steele, the author of the infamous Trump dossier, worked as a contractor for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and facilitated a meeting between the billionaire and Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr.

Deripaska’s law firm hired Steele’s private intelligence group, Orbis Business Intelligence, in 2012 to conduct research for Deripaska as part of a lawsuit against the billionaire, according to The Hill.

Steele, a former MI6 officer with experience in Moscow, also facilitated a meeting in September 2015 between Deripaska and Ohr, the Justice Department official whose wife worked for Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that hired Steele to compile the dossier.

FBI agents attended the meeting, which was aimed at getting Deripaska to provide information for organized crime investigations.

Steele’s relationship with Deripaska has remained a mystery for months, ever since Republican lawmakers hinted at a connection between the two. It has marked one of the stranger twists in the Trump-Russia saga given Steele’s work on the dossier, which alleges that the Kremlin conspired with President Donald Trump’s campaign to influence the 2016 election. (RELATED: Emails Show Christopher Steele Lobbied DOJ Official Bruce Ohr For Putin-Linked Oligarch’s Visa)

Deripaska, an aluminum magnate, is said to be a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The U.S. government also revoked his visa in 2006 because of suspected ties to Russian organized crime. Deripaska has traveled multiple times to the U.S. in recent years, The Hill reported.

Deripaska’s visa issues appear to have been a focus of Steele’s.

Steele emailed Ohr on Feb. 8, 2016 after the government had agreed to grant Deripaska a visa to travel to the U.S. later that month.

“As far as I’m concerned, this is good news all round although as before, it would be helpful if you could monitor it and let me know if any complications arise,” Steele wrote.

Ohr said that “to the extent I can I will keep an eye on the situation.”

Deripaska rarely dealt directly with Steele, according to The Hill’s sources. But Steele was on friendly terms with one of Deripaska’s attorneys.

At some point, Steele began meeting with Ohr to discuss a different matter — an investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government. Steele was hired by Fusion GPS in June 2016. He went on to compile 17 memos accusing various Trump campaign advisers of conspiring with the Kremlin.

The FBI used the unverified reports to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

FBI agents interviewed Deripaska in September 2016 about possible collusion, including whether former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was involved. Deripaska and Manafort had business ties stretching back more than a decade. During the campaign, they were locked in a legal battle over a failed cable TV company in Ukraine.

Deripaska’s links to Steele have generated speculation that Deripaska provided information that ended up in the dossier, either as a witting or unwitting source.

But Deripaska provided a statement to The Hill denying any involvement in the dossier.

“The latest reckless media chatter proposes that I had some unspecified involvement in the so-called dossier. Like most of the absurd fantasies and smears that ricochet across the internet, it is utterly false. I had absolutely nothing to do with this project, and I never had any knowledge of it until it was reported in the media and I certainly wasn’t involved in any activity related to it,” he told The Hill.

Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch

So now you claim that Putin was helping Clinton?



Claiming????


No....proving.



Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????

QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.


Get it, ReallyReallyDumb?????
 
the Dossier provided by a foreign spy working with the Russians
working with the Russians? What does that even mean....?

give your details!


It means, you dunce, that Steele was a life-long communist and served as the conduit for Putin to slide the anti-Trump dossier to the DNC and their media servants.


Need me to smash another custard pie in your kisser?
Here it comes:


1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch


3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????

QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.



=====================================



CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH

1:15 PM 08/29/2018

Chuck Ross | Reporter

806

  • Dossier author Christopher Steele worked as a subcontractor for Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report
  • Steele facilitated a meeting in September 2015 between Deripaska and DOJ official Bruce Ohr, according to The Hill
  • Steele’s links to Deripaska have been one of the more puzzling aspects of the Trump-Russia probe
Christopher Steele, the author of the infamous Trump dossier, worked as a contractor for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and facilitated a meeting between the billionaire and Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr.

Deripaska’s law firm hired Steele’s private intelligence group, Orbis Business Intelligence, in 2012 to conduct research for Deripaska as part of a lawsuit against the billionaire, according to The Hill.

Steele, a former MI6 officer with experience in Moscow, also facilitated a meeting in September 2015 between Deripaska and Ohr, the Justice Department official whose wife worked for Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that hired Steele to compile the dossier.

FBI agents attended the meeting, which was aimed at getting Deripaska to provide information for organized crime investigations.

Steele’s relationship with Deripaska has remained a mystery for months, ever since Republican lawmakers hinted at a connection between the two. It has marked one of the stranger twists in the Trump-Russia saga given Steele’s work on the dossier, which alleges that the Kremlin conspired with President Donald Trump’s campaign to influence the 2016 election. (RELATED: Emails Show Christopher Steele Lobbied DOJ Official Bruce Ohr For Putin-Linked Oligarch’s Visa)

Deripaska, an aluminum magnate, is said to be a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The U.S. government also revoked his visa in 2006 because of suspected ties to Russian organized crime. Deripaska has traveled multiple times to the U.S. in recent years, The Hill reported.

Deripaska’s visa issues appear to have been a focus of Steele’s.

Steele emailed Ohr on Feb. 8, 2016 after the government had agreed to grant Deripaska a visa to travel to the U.S. later that month.

“As far as I’m concerned, this is good news all round although as before, it would be helpful if you could monitor it and let me know if any complications arise,” Steele wrote.

Ohr said that “to the extent I can I will keep an eye on the situation.”

Deripaska rarely dealt directly with Steele, according to The Hill’s sources. But Steele was on friendly terms with one of Deripaska’s attorneys.

At some point, Steele began meeting with Ohr to discuss a different matter — an investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government. Steele was hired by Fusion GPS in June 2016. He went on to compile 17 memos accusing various Trump campaign advisers of conspiring with the Kremlin.

The FBI used the unverified reports to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

FBI agents interviewed Deripaska in September 2016 about possible collusion, including whether former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was involved. Deripaska and Manafort had business ties stretching back more than a decade. During the campaign, they were locked in a legal battle over a failed cable TV company in Ukraine.

Deripaska’s links to Steele have generated speculation that Deripaska provided information that ended up in the dossier, either as a witting or unwitting source.

But Deripaska provided a statement to The Hill denying any involvement in the dossier.

“The latest reckless media chatter proposes that I had some unspecified involvement in the so-called dossier. Like most of the absurd fantasies and smears that ricochet across the internet, it is utterly false. I had absolutely nothing to do with this project, and I never had any knowledge of it until it was reported in the media and I certainly wasn’t involved in any activity related to it,” he told The Hill.

Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch

So now you claim that Putin was helping Clinton?



Claiming????


No....proving.



Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????

QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.


Get it, ReallyReallyDumb?????

Damn you and your undeniable FACTS!

:p
 
5598-1537223043-69309785454626b510327859049d9be7.jpg

This was the request: I asked for 2 or 3, knowing that you couldn't cite formative volumes.

I asked for the books that informed your political outlook.

Clearly, you still can't.

You clearly have a skewed idea of what politics is. Politics is made up of a lot more than just books about the KGB or someone's political philosophies. There is only one person you need to know when understanding modern day politics, and that is Machiavelli. People set goals to remain in power, and they do whatever they feel is needed to do so, no matter what that cost might be at other's expense. This is something I didn't understand at a younger age, and I let my family and environment in which I lived push me to label myself as a Republican. Yet as I grew to pay more attention to politics and the world around me, I began to realize and understand what Machiavellianism is, and that it wasn't the type of person I wanted to be. I think we as a people should live like Gandhi spoke, that we MUST look at ourselves and judge our being based on not how much we have, or what kind of status we have, but based on how we treat the most vulnerable people in our society.


What I intended to prove, and have done so, is that you have no background nor basis for understanding geopolitics.

The books you provided are merely vocational texts.

You can't even seem to understand the question that was asked.



I gave you three that really would help you a great deal.

Study of same, it seems, is out of the question for you.

Oh yeah sure I don't. State crime and crimes of globalization have NOTHING to do with politics right? Jesus you are dumb.


Why sugar coat it....you are exactly the sort the Left needs to validate their views: woefully unprepared in your knowledge of the world and its history.

The American-wannabe, George Santayana, was speaking of folks like you when he commented on those who do not study.

What more is there to say?

What's more to say is, you continue to build on a strawman that you have been building for 4+ posts now. For someone that thinks they are so smart, one would think you'd know better than try to win an argument with such an obvious logical fallacy. :dunno:
 
This was the request: I asked for 2 or 3, knowing that you couldn't cite formative volumes.

I asked for the books that informed your political outlook.

Clearly, you still can't.

You clearly have a skewed idea of what politics is. Politics is made up of a lot more than just books about the KGB or someone's political philosophies. There is only one person you need to know when understanding modern day politics, and that is Machiavelli. People set goals to remain in power, and they do whatever they feel is needed to do so, no matter what that cost might be at other's expense. This is something I didn't understand at a younger age, and I let my family and environment in which I lived push me to label myself as a Republican. Yet as I grew to pay more attention to politics and the world around me, I began to realize and understand what Machiavellianism is, and that it wasn't the type of person I wanted to be. I think we as a people should live like Gandhi spoke, that we MUST look at ourselves and judge our being based on not how much we have, or what kind of status we have, but based on how we treat the most vulnerable people in our society.


What I intended to prove, and have done so, is that you have no background nor basis for understanding geopolitics.

The books you provided are merely vocational texts.

You can't even seem to understand the question that was asked.



I gave you three that really would help you a great deal.

Study of same, it seems, is out of the question for you.

Oh yeah sure I don't. State crime and crimes of globalization have NOTHING to do with politics right? Jesus you are dumb.


Why sugar coat it....you are exactly the sort the Left needs to validate their views: woefully unprepared in your knowledge of the world and its history.

The American-wannabe, George Santayana, was speaking of folks like you when he commented on those who do not study.

What more is there to say?

What's more to say is, you continue to build on a strawman that you have been building for 4+ posts now. For someone that thinks they are so smart, one would think you'd know better than try to win an argument with such an obvious logical fallacy. :dunno:


Be sure to get back to me when you've attained an education.
 
The dossier was Russian attempt to win the election for the family they have a history of bribing, the Clintons.

$145 million given to Hillary from the man who would later lead the KGB Bank's efforts to acquire Uranium One while Hillary was sitting on the committee tasked with approving or denying the sale of Uranium One to them was NOT a 'bribe'. Why would you say that?

It was a 'Donation'...because Russians are all about 'charity'.

:p
 
You clearly have a skewed idea of what politics is. Politics is made up of a lot more than just books about the KGB or someone's political philosophies. There is only one person you need to know when understanding modern day politics, and that is Machiavelli. People set goals to remain in power, and they do whatever they feel is needed to do so, no matter what that cost might be at other's expense. This is something I didn't understand at a younger age, and I let my family and environment in which I lived push me to label myself as a Republican. Yet as I grew to pay more attention to politics and the world around me, I began to realize and understand what Machiavellianism is, and that it wasn't the type of person I wanted to be. I think we as a people should live like Gandhi spoke, that we MUST look at ourselves and judge our being based on not how much we have, or what kind of status we have, but based on how we treat the most vulnerable people in our society.


What I intended to prove, and have done so, is that you have no background nor basis for understanding geopolitics.

The books you provided are merely vocational texts.

You can't even seem to understand the question that was asked.



I gave you three that really would help you a great deal.

Study of same, it seems, is out of the question for you.

Oh yeah sure I don't. State crime and crimes of globalization have NOTHING to do with politics right? Jesus you are dumb.


Why sugar coat it....you are exactly the sort the Left needs to validate their views: woefully unprepared in your knowledge of the world and its history.

The American-wannabe, George Santayana, was speaking of folks like you when he commented on those who do not study.

What more is there to say?

What's more to say is, you continue to build on a strawman that you have been building for 4+ posts now. For someone that thinks they are so smart, one would think you'd know better than try to win an argument with such an obvious logical fallacy. :dunno:


Be sure to get back to me when you've attained an education.


And you continue. I've proven my education through attainment, understanding, and application. You've done nothing but copy and paste the name of a few books. :abgg2q.jpg:
 
What I intended to prove, and have done so, is that you have no background nor basis for understanding geopolitics.

The books you provided are merely vocational texts.

You can't even seem to understand the question that was asked.



I gave you three that really would help you a great deal.

Study of same, it seems, is out of the question for you.

Oh yeah sure I don't. State crime and crimes of globalization have NOTHING to do with politics right? Jesus you are dumb.


Why sugar coat it....you are exactly the sort the Left needs to validate their views: woefully unprepared in your knowledge of the world and its history.

The American-wannabe, George Santayana, was speaking of folks like you when he commented on those who do not study.

What more is there to say?

What's more to say is, you continue to build on a strawman that you have been building for 4+ posts now. For someone that thinks they are so smart, one would think you'd know better than try to win an argument with such an obvious logical fallacy. :dunno:


Be sure to get back to me when you've attained an education.


And you continue. I've proven my education through attainment, understanding, and application. You've done nothing but copy and paste the name of a few books. :abgg2q.jpg:

Fail......just sayin'........
 
What I intended to prove, and have done so, is that you have no background nor basis for understanding geopolitics.

The books you provided are merely vocational texts.

You can't even seem to understand the question that was asked.



I gave you three that really would help you a great deal.

Study of same, it seems, is out of the question for you.

Oh yeah sure I don't. State crime and crimes of globalization have NOTHING to do with politics right? Jesus you are dumb.


Why sugar coat it....you are exactly the sort the Left needs to validate their views: woefully unprepared in your knowledge of the world and its history.

The American-wannabe, George Santayana, was speaking of folks like you when he commented on those who do not study.

What more is there to say?

What's more to say is, you continue to build on a strawman that you have been building for 4+ posts now. For someone that thinks they are so smart, one would think you'd know better than try to win an argument with such an obvious logical fallacy. :dunno:


Be sure to get back to me when you've attained an education.


And you continue. I've proven my education through attainment, understanding, and application. You've done nothing but copy and paste the name of a few books. :abgg2q.jpg:


I told you to drop back when you'd attained an education, presumably via the three books I suggested....

Gads, you must be a fast reader to have done so so quickly!!


Perhaps I should have included this bonus in the list:

414aX-0cJUL._SX330_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg




Pay special attention to the documentation.
 
Oh yeah sure I don't. State crime and crimes of globalization have NOTHING to do with politics right? Jesus you are dumb.


Why sugar coat it....you are exactly the sort the Left needs to validate their views: woefully unprepared in your knowledge of the world and its history.

The American-wannabe, George Santayana, was speaking of folks like you when he commented on those who do not study.

What more is there to say?

What's more to say is, you continue to build on a strawman that you have been building for 4+ posts now. For someone that thinks they are so smart, one would think you'd know better than try to win an argument with such an obvious logical fallacy. :dunno:


Be sure to get back to me when you've attained an education.


And you continue. I've proven my education through attainment, understanding, and application. You've done nothing but copy and paste the name of a few books. :abgg2q.jpg:

Fail......just sayin'........



Amazing how resistant they are to learning.
 
Oh yeah sure I don't. State crime and crimes of globalization have NOTHING to do with politics right? Jesus you are dumb.


Why sugar coat it....you are exactly the sort the Left needs to validate their views: woefully unprepared in your knowledge of the world and its history.

The American-wannabe, George Santayana, was speaking of folks like you when he commented on those who do not study.

What more is there to say?

What's more to say is, you continue to build on a strawman that you have been building for 4+ posts now. For someone that thinks they are so smart, one would think you'd know better than try to win an argument with such an obvious logical fallacy. :dunno:


Be sure to get back to me when you've attained an education.


And you continue. I've proven my education through attainment, understanding, and application. You've done nothing but copy and paste the name of a few books. :abgg2q.jpg:


I told you to drop back when you'd attained an education, presumably via the three books I suggested....

Gads, you must be a fast reader to have done so so quickly!!


Perhaps I should have included this bonus in the list:

414aX-0cJUL._SX330_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg




Pay special attention to the documentation.

You don't get it at all which isn't surprising. Having an education, a REAL education isn't about absorption and regurgitation. If you don't have the mental capacity to analyze what you are reading, be able to compare it to other sources, and then APPLY it, you haven't learned shit. Anyone on this forum not blatantly politically motivated can see you very rarely, if ever, understand what you are cut and pasting. If you knew what the authors were trying to say and how it applied to your argument, you'd be able to put it into your own words and reference how it supports your argument, none of which you ever do. :backpedal:
 
Does any one on the right understand how an investigation works?

If something can already be proven it doesn't need to be investigated.

Also... the Mueller investigation is not exclusively about collusion. The main focus is on Russian interference in the election. If collusion is a part of that, then it will be investigated.

so, Woodward is simultaneously a slanderous liar and a reliable source at the same time? Woodward wasnt in a position to see that.
Woodward isn't a prosecutor, and doesn't have subpoena power, search warrants, or the ability to extract plea deals.

legal insurrection is far right with mixed record on factual reporting.
Manafort is going to squeal.

You’re saying the FBI can just start spying and investigating on an AMERICAN for no reason until they find a crime? I don’t think it’s supposed to work that way.
You aren’t really that tupid are you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The FISA warrant consisted of more evidence than the dossier .

Have Trump release the whole thing if it’s all just lies !

Fun you should say that, Trump just declassified those, so we will see, but will you accept the proof, I will


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The FISA warrant consisted of more evidence than the dossier .

Have Trump release the whole thing if it’s all just lies !


Was there any FISA warrant without the dossier?

No?


Exactly.


Quit bitching about the fisa process that conservatives have defended/ expanded since 911.

Y’all didn’t mind the rubber stamp warrants when it was targeting brown people .

Why do y’all always bring race into everything, they weren’t brown people, they were possible terrorist.
Stop playing that dang race card, grow up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The FISA warrant consisted of more evidence than the dossier .

Have Trump release the whole thing if it’s all just lies !


Was there any FISA warrant without the dossier?

No?


Exactly.


Quit bitching about the fisa process that conservatives have defended/ expanded since 911.

Y’all didn’t mind the rubber stamp warrants when it was targeting brown people .

Why do y’all always bring race into everything, they weren’t brown people, they were possible terrorist.
Stop playing that dang race card, grow up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


It's not gonna happen....you're taking the only card in their deck.
 

Forum List

Back
Top