Dozens of House Republicans will stand up for Trump.

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Allegations of illegitimate elections, absent credible evidence, are indistinguishable from sore loser whining, and have no standing under law.

The Trump team has reams of evidence. The problem is no one can make corrupt judges pay attention to it.
Out of all the cases filed NOT ONCE has any judge ruled on the evidence and merits of the case itself.

Every time some flunky says Trump has no evidence he draws attention to the corrupt judges that
will not even mention that evidence for fear of highlighting it.

 

[the other mike]

 

[Richard-H]

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), the GOP leader of a plan to challenge Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, said that “dozens” of House members are going to sponsor a measure to object.

“There are dozens in the House of Representatives who have reached that conclusion that I have; we’re going to sponsor and co-sponsor objections to the Electoral College vote returns,” Brooks told Fox News on Monday morning.

‘Dozens’ of House Members to Challenge Electoral College Results, Rep. Brooks Says

www.theepochtimes.com

And as we know, all it takes is 1 Senator to decertify the EC vote, and there'll be more than 1 --you can count on it.

You're dead wrong about it taking just one Senator to decertify the EC.

But just hypothetically, if the EC was ruled invalid, you do know that Trump's term still ends on Jan. 20, and that without an elected President Nancy Pelosi would become the acting President.

 

[Richard-H]

Allegations of illegitimate elections, absent credible evidence, are indistinguishable from sore loser whining, and have no standing under law.

The Trump team has reams of evidence. The problem is no one can make corrupt judges pay attention to it.
Out of all the cases filed NOT ONCE has any judge ruled on the evidence and merits of the case itself.

Every time some flunky says Trump has no evidence he draws attention to the corrupt judges that
will not even mention that evidence for fear of highlighting it.

Since many of those judges were appointed by Trump, you're certainly implying that Trump is a flaming IDIOT!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Allegations of illegitimate elections, absent credible evidence, are indistinguishable from sore loser whining, and have no standing under law.

The Trump team has reams of evidence. The problem is no one can make corrupt judges pay attention to it.
Out of all the cases filed NOT ONCE has any judge ruled on the evidence and merits of the case itself.

Every time some flunky says Trump has no evidence he draws attention to the corrupt judges that
will not even mention that evidence for fear of highlighting it.

So all of those judges, many Republican and some appointed by Trump are corrupt and willing to screw Trump? Who do yu suppose is paying them.? Is Bill Barr also currupt. What about all of the election officials from both parties in every state saying that election was on the level?. How about that Trump appointed. Republican cyber security dude who got fired for saying there was no fraud. You people are living in an alt-reality. Get over it.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

You'll just have to accept that a majority of Americans, consistent with the relentless disapproval of him they registered in survey after survey throughout his tenure, voted to dump the trump.

Cry baby losers do not get to overthrow democracy because they don't like it.

That's exactly what
leftists are trying to do right now.

The "God Emperor" has been toppled by the will if the People.

IF the true will of the people were recognized Donald Trump would have a landslide victory.
It's taking a concerted Mark Zuckerberg financed and carefully planned out crime to keep him from
being president this very moment.
And even then Trump will gain the presidency despite the efforts of the seditious plotters and thieves.
Put that in your schmidlap.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Since many of those judges were appointed by Trump, you're certainly implying that Trump is a flaming IDIOT!

I guess you can insult Trump for not being omniscient and knowing which judges would turn to the dark side
and not though that's not exactly fair. But when have people like you cared about fairness.

 

[the other mike]

You're dead wrong about it taking just one Senator to decertify the EC.

Really ?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You'll just have to accept that a majority of Americans, consistent with the relentless disapproval of him they registered in survey after survey throughout his tenure, voted to dump the trump.

Cry baby losers do not get to overthrow democracy because they don't like it.

That's exactly what
leftists are trying to do right now.

The "God Emperor" has been toppled by the will if the People.

IF the true will of the people were recognized Donald Trump would have a landslide victory.
It's taking a concerted Mark Zuckerberg financed and carefully planned out crime to keep him from
being president this very moment.
And even then Trump will gain the presidency despite the efforts of the seditious plotters and thieves.
Put that in your schmidlap.

That is border line psychotic. ! So it was Zuckerberg who paid off all of those judges, election officials, Bill Barr and the cyber security expatrs? Not George Soros or Bill Gates?? Maybe the illuminate was involved. Or space aliens who want to save the earth so that they can one day inhabit it..
A
nd HOW exactly will Trump "gain the presidency"? You need to let
go of that Qanon horseshit.

 

[skews13]

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), the GOP leader of a plan to challenge Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, said that “dozens” of House members are going to sponsor a measure to object.

“There are dozens in the House of Representatives who have reached that conclusion that I have; we’re going to sponsor and co-sponsor objections to the Electoral College vote returns,” Brooks told Fox News on Monday morning.

‘Dozens’ of House Members to Challenge Electoral College Results, Rep. Brooks Says

www.theepochtimes.com

And as we know, all it takes is 1 Senator to decertify the EC vote, and there'll be more than 1 --you can count on it.

And after Nancy Pelosi gets through laughing, she will reject a house vote, the prank will be over, Mike Pence will exercise his 12th Amendment responsibility, and Joe Biden will be sworn in on January 20th at noon. You can count on it.

 

[colfax_m]

Out of all the cases filed NOT ONCE has any judge ruled on the evidence and merits of the case itself.

Except that’s not true. Many have ruled that the evidence is insufficient.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

And after Nancy Pelosi gets through laughing, she will reject a house vote, the prank will be over, Mike Pence will exercise his 12th Amendment responsibility, and Joe Biden will be sworn in on January 20th at noon. You can count on it.

These are Constitutionally prescribed matters. Pelosi can no more ignore and do away with them than she
can just ignore the Second Amendment.

What you DON'T know about the Constitution is frightening. Article one, Section two.

 

[colfax_m]

Really ?

Yes; really. A senator (along with a member of the house) can raise an objection.

But an objection doesn’t decertify anything. That would require a majority vote in both houses after the objection is raised.

And that ain’t happening.

 

[schmidlap]

IF the true will of the people were recognized Donald Trump would have a landslide victory.

We are a nation of laws and not of men - not even of failed casino operators turned cult leaders with fanatical followers.

Republican governors, Republican secretaries of state, Republican attorneys general, and other Republican election officials have scrutinized the elections, conducted multiple recounts and audits, certified the results, and been sustained by Republican judges across the land in dozens of meritless challenges by the Cry Baby Sore Loser's minions.

Your outlandish fantasy that most Americans, inexplicably, voted for the faded reality-tv performer after registering their relentless disapproval of him in survey after survey throughout his tenure, is monumentally irrational.

Upon what judicial ruling do you base your self-serving dogma in demanding that the will of the People, in the most secure election in U.S. history, be overthrown because you don't like the democratic verdict?

 

[Richard-H]

And after Nancy Pelosi gets through laughing, she will reject a house vote, the prank will be over, Mike Pence will exercise his 12th Amendment responsibility, and Joe Biden will be sworn in on January 20th at noon. You can count on it.

These are Constitutionally prescribed matters. Pelosi can no more ignore and do away with them than she
can just ignore the Second Amendment.

What you DON'T know about the Constitution is frightening.

The Constitution doesn't specify the procedure for the Electoral college.

Those are specified in the 1887 Electoral count act. (see below).

So apparently you don't know much about what the Constitution says!

Electoral Count Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

.

 

[Richard-H]

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), the GOP leader of a plan to challenge Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, said that “dozens” of House members are going to sponsor a measure to object.

“There are dozens in the House of Representatives who have reached that conclusion that I have; we’re going to sponsor and co-sponsor objections to the Electoral College vote returns,” Brooks told Fox News on Monday morning.

‘Dozens’ of House Members to Challenge Electoral College Results, Rep. Brooks Says

www.theepochtimes.com

And as we know, all it takes is 1 Senator to decertify the EC vote, and there'll be more than 1 --you can count on it.

Yes, "Dozens of House Republicans will stand up for Trump"

And hundreds of millions of Americans will ignore them!

 

[the other mike]

 

[the other mike]

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Rudy Giuliani kills it! Look at the videos. Listen to the testimony. No one with a since ounce of honesty can
deny the blatant corruption in Georgia. It's shocking!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The Constitution doesn't specify the procedure for the Electoral college.

Those are specified in the 1887 Electoral count act. (see below).

So apparently you don't know much about what the Constitution says!

You aren't even in the same ball park. I'm specifically pointing out how the Constitution gives state legislatures the authority to over ride electoral delegates if they deem it necessary.
Pull your head out, for God's sake.