Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the number in his claim is outrageously and laughably high, and because the scientific community does not appear to agree by every measure available. For starters.What makes you think that RAND PAUL is wrong?
Rand Paul said that natural immunity was over 99.99% effective.What makes you think that RAND PAUL is wrong?
I dont recall him saying that,,Rand Paul said that natural immunity was over 99.99% effective.
That's orders of magnitude beyond what is even theoretically provable.
It's a direct quote.I dont recall him saying that,,
I recall him saying that natural immunity was about the same as vaccinated,,It's a direct quote.
Why do you think I said it was outrageous.
paywall,,
Sen. Rand Paul ... he said natural immunity to COVID-19 was “99.9982% percent effective.”
Sen. Rand Paul called out his “haters” Wednesday after he drew social media criticism for saying that contracting COVID-19 led people to have greater immunity than a vaccine would.paywall,,
let me know when you have proof,,Sen. Rand Paul called out his “haters” Wednesday after he drew social media criticism for saying that contracting COVID-19 led people to have greater immunity than a vaccine would.
“Why does the left accept immune theory when it comes to vaccines, but not when discussing naturally acquired immunity?” Paul asked in a tweet Tuesday. The tweet was preceded by another social media post in which he said natural immunity to COVID-19 was “99.9982% percent effective.”
Critics of Paul’s remark pointed out that the vaccine wouldn’t present the same dangers as the virus itself. Coronavirus has now killed nearly 250,000 people in the United States. Paul explained Wednesday that he didn’t intend to argue against vaccines. Instead, he was saying COVID-19 patients should “celebrate immunity if lucky enough to survive.”
I recall him saying that natural immunity was about the same as vaccinated,,
let me know when you have proof,,
My apologiesSen. Rand Paul ... he said natural immunity to COVID-19 was “99.9982% percent effective.”
when you said he said it I thought you were talking about the questioning at the senate hearing not a tweet,,See previous post.
This silly tactic was already covered in the thread.when you said he said it I thought you were talking about the questioning at the senate hearing not a tweet,,
as for the proof,, do you have proof its not 99% effective??
The tweet was preceded by another social media post in which he said natural immunity to COVID-19 was “99.9982% percent effective.”
I posted the article.when you said he said it I thought you were talking about the questioning at the senate hearing not a tweet,,
as for the proof,, do you have proof its not 99% effective??
Without a vaccine at all the survival rate for COVID was 99.7%. Calm down you hysterical fucking drunk.First, you should have noted that Paul's claim of over 99.99% effectiveness is absurd on it's face. It's a lie that can't be defended from either a medical or statistical standpoint.
Second, even the Israeli study has proved Rand Paul was lying about natural immunity effectiveness. Since the Israeli study would have raised natural immunity plus the vaccine to an effectiveness of 99.9999%. Which isn't a number you can get had the entire Israeli population been infected.
Even if it was 100% effective. Statistics and medical ethics put an upward limit of around 99% on a data based estimation.as for the proof,, do you have proof its not 99% effective??
One thing I’ve learned over the years is most of the really scary studies about this and climate change come from scientific government funded and don’t want to lose that money fairies.All of them? Or just a few? Because it would really need to be just about all of them to make such a bold claim.
Why don't any of the major scientific societies agree with you? Or the universities? Or the major health research centers?
You DO know who performs the studies... Right? Do you think they are done by the study fairies?
