Ecology and Racism.

[Unkotare]

Human caused global warming is probably the biggest danger to our planet. ....

Or not at all.

It is better to be safe than sorry. ....

No, it's not.

I have been from here to there. And that has to be one of the stupidest things I ever heard anybody say. Of course it is better to be safe than sorry.

You are apparently not familiar with human history.

 

[Unkotare]

Human racism is ghey

Even babies have been shown to be "bigoted." Do you suppose they are because they are "gay?" Also, "racism" wouldn't even exist if there wasn't an evolutionary necessity for it.

Children eventually grow up. Give it a try.

 

[Unkotare]

'
There is no logical reason there should be more than a hundred million hominids on this planet.
.

I'm not a monster. I would set the world population level at 3 billion.

I'm not a monster, either -- I just look like one .....

A hundred million people could all live like the rich for the rest of time -- and not trash the planet.

The same cannot be said for three billion people.
.

To live like a wealthy person, somebody else would have to do most of the work. As to whether or not 3 billion people could live sustainably is debatable. But I can guarantee you that 7+ billion people can't.

Your "guarantee" is nonsense.

No. My guarantee is a guarantee. Our current population level is unsustainable. In fact, it is already too high.

Wrong.

 

[Unkotare]

Like it or not, the population of White people isn't rising. In some places, it may even be going down a little. So what can White people do about this problem that they aren't contributing to without being called "racist." Well there is only one sane path to take. EMBRACE "RACISM!" If you are White and care anything at all about our ecological system, like it or not, you HAVE to embrace racism. It's the only way.

How is it that this portion of the OP has not garnered a single comment?

Krypto, why should we care what proportion of the world's population is made up of caucasians?

There are zillions of reasons. Probably none of which a non-white would agree with. But who gives a damn what they think. They are destroying the planet with a population explosion. White people aren't doing that. That is just one reason why you should care what percentage of the world's population is made up of Whites.

There is no "population explosion." It's an old false crisis.

 

[krypto]

I'm not a monster. I would set the world population level at 3 billion.

I'm not a monster, either -- I just look like one .....

A hundred million people could all live like the rich for the rest of time -- and not trash the planet.

The same cannot be said for three billion people.
.

To live like a wealthy person, somebody else would have to do most of the work. As to whether or not 3 billion people could live sustainably is debatable. But I can guarantee you that 7+ billion people can't.

Your "guarantee" is nonsense.

No. My guarantee is a guarantee. Our current population level is unsustainable. In fact, it is already too high.

Completely untrue but never let a murderous progressive actually pay attention to facts. The real facts are this. The carrying capacity of this planet is around 40 billion people. We will top out at around 9 billion and then slowly drop back to around 6 billion if we do nothing. Yet another progressive lie put forth as an excuse to commit mass murder. You scum are all the same.

If you are going to post me, I would appreciate it if you didn't sniff glue first. Let me guess, you also think that human caused global warming is a hoax. So I guess there's no point in pointing out that humans cause HCGW. Another point is that there are about 65 million people in the U.K. I have heard it estimated that if they all switched over to living an agrarian lifestyle, they could only produce enough food to feed 8 million people. So there alone, they are beyond their carrying capacity by 57 million people.

Also, what about all the environmental damage caused by humans. Then there are animals going extinct. Some even before they become known to science. And as things now stand, we are basically killing our oceans. You should check out a documentary called, "End of the line." Then, for what food is grown, there would be far less if we didn't manufacture fertalizer out of oil. Etc, etc, etc, etc.

And you think the earth could support 40 billion people!? But let's just say for argument's sake that it could. What makes you think the population would stop at 9 billion. Because when it comes to breeding, non-whites are no different from bacteria. White people used to be the same way. But the population levels of Whites isn't rising any more. Another thing is what is this magical thing that is supposed to drop the population from 9 billion to 6 billion. Whatever it is, you should use it to drop the world population of over 7 billion to 4 billion.

 

[krypto]

Like it or not, the population of White people isn't rising. In some places, it may even be going down a little. So what can White people do about this problem that they aren't contributing to without being called "racist." Well there is only one sane path to take. EMBRACE "RACISM!" If you are White and care anything at all about our ecological system, like it or not, you HAVE to embrace racism. It's the only way.

How is it that this portion of the OP has not garnered a single comment?

Krypto, why should we care what proportion of the world's population is made up of caucasians?

There are zillions of reasons. Probably none of which a non-white would agree with. But who gives a damn what they think. They are destroying the planet with a population explosion. White people aren't doing that. That is just one reason why you should care what percentage of the world's population is made up of Whites.

There is no "population explosion." It's an old false crisis.

Earlier I showed you a graph of human population growth. There is nothing false about it.

 

[Unkotare]

Panicky hysteria from yet another ignorant 'progressive' bobble-head.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Human caused global warming is probably the biggest danger to our planet. But there is another problem that is as bad. If in fact not worse. Overpopulation. Right now, like it or not, there are too many people on the planet for it to sustainably support. Like it or not, every single day there are about 228,000 more people on the planet than there was the day before. Like it or not, the population of White people isn't rising. In some places, it may even be going down a little. So what can White people do about this problem that they aren't contributing to without being called "racist." Well there is only one sane path to take. EMBRACE "RACISM!" If you are White and care anything at all about our ecological system, like it or not, you HAVE to embrace racism. It's the only way.

Boi, you are an idiot from every conceivable angle.

 

[Uncensored2008]

'
There is no logical reason there should be more than a hundred million hominids on this planet.
.

Well then make one less, scumbag.

 

[krypto]

Human caused global warming is probably the biggest danger to our planet. ....

Or not at all.

It is better to be safe than sorry. ....

No, it's not.

I have been from here to there. And that has to be one of the stupidest things I ever heard anybody say. Of course it is better to be safe than sorry.

You are apparently not familiar with human history.

The more that things change, the more they stay the same. No doubt in the past too, nobody really cared what happened. As long as it happened to someone else. But that doesn't diminish the fact that it is indeed better to be safe than sorry.

 

[krypto]

Human caused global warming is probably the biggest danger to our planet. But there is another problem that is as bad. If in fact not worse. Overpopulation. Right now, like it or not, there are too many people on the planet for it to sustainably support. Like it or not, every single day there are about 228,000 more people on the planet than there was the day before. Like it or not, the population of White people isn't rising. In some places, it may even be going down a little. So what can White people do about this problem that they aren't contributing to without being called "racist." Well there is only one sane path to take. EMBRACE "RACISM!" If you are White and care anything at all about our ecological system, like it or not, you HAVE to embrace racism. It's the only way.

Boi, you are an idiot from every conceivable angle.

If I said anything that is wrong, tell me what it is. We will see who the idiot is.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If I said anything that is wrong, tell me what it is. We will see who the idiot is.

We already see who the idiot is.

Loved the fake graph with Co2 and temperature tracking. Did you fabricate that yourself, or get it from some other lying pile of shit?

 

[westwall]

I'm not a monster, either -- I just look like one .....

A hundred million people could all live like the rich for the rest of time -- and not trash the planet.

The same cannot be said for three billion people.
.

To live like a wealthy person, somebody else would have to do most of the work. As to whether or not 3 billion people could live sustainably is debatable. But I can guarantee you that 7+ billion people can't.

Your "guarantee" is nonsense.

No. My guarantee is a guarantee. Our current population level is unsustainable. In fact, it is already too high.

Completely untrue but never let a murderous progressive actually pay attention to facts. The real facts are this. The carrying capacity of this planet is around 40 billion people. We will top out at around 9 billion and then slowly drop back to around 6 billion if we do nothing. Yet another progressive lie put forth as an excuse to commit mass murder. You scum are all the same.

If you are going to post me, I would appreciate it if you didn't sniff glue first. Let me guess, you also think that human caused global warming is a hoax. So I guess there's no point in pointing out that humans cause HCGW. Another point is that there are about 65 million people in the U.K. I have heard it estimated that if they all switched over to living an agrarian lifestyle, they could only produce enough food to feed 8 million people. So there alone, they are beyond their carrying capacity by 57 million people.

Also, what about all the environmental damage caused by humans. Then there are animals going extinct. Some even before they become known to science. And as things now stand, we are basically killing our oceans. You should check out a documentary called, "End of the line." Then, for what food is grown, there would be far less if we didn't manufacture fertalizer out of oil. Etc, etc, etc, etc.

And you think the earth could support 40 billion people!? But let's just say for argument's sake that it could. What makes you think the population would stop at 9 billion. Because when it comes to breeding, non-whites are no different from bacteria. White people used to be the same way. But the population levels of Whites isn't rising any more. Another thing is what is this magical thing that is supposed to drop the population from 9 billion to 6 billion. Whatever it is, you should use it to drop the world population of over 7 billion to 4 billion.

Yes. There is zero empirical data to support that now very failed "theory". The only people pushing that particular load of bull poo, are globalists who wish to use the supposed danger of global warming to push their socialist agenda.

 

[krypto]

If I said anything that is wrong, tell me what it is. We will see who the idiot is.

We already see who the idiot is.

Loved the fake graph with Co2 and temperature tracking. Did you fabricate that yourself, or get it from some other lying pile of shit?

It's what is called "science." It is something you should look into. For example, each year all the volcanoes on earth release about 200 million tons of CO2 into the biosphere. Each year, mankind is responsible for putting out 26.8 BILLION tons.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
It's what is called "science."

Oh? So "science" is deliberate fraud?

It is something you should look into. For example, each year all the volcanoes on earth release about 200 million tons of CO2 into the biosphere. Each year, mankind is responsible for putting out 26.8 BILLION tons.

And we can show causation that CO2 increases global temperatures, the way those graphs you posted did.

What is the formula? Temperature will increase on slope Y for R metric tons of CO2 along axis T. Give me the formula so I can run a linear regression. It will of course track perfectly to observed data, right?

 

[krypto]

To live like a wealthy person, somebody else would have to do most of the work. As to whether or not 3 billion people could live sustainably is debatable. But I can guarantee you that 7+ billion people can't.

Your "guarantee" is nonsense.

No. My guarantee is a guarantee. Our current population level is unsustainable. In fact, it is already too high.

Completely untrue but never let a murderous progressive actually pay attention to facts. The real facts are this. The carrying capacity of this planet is around 40 billion people. We will top out at around 9 billion and then slowly drop back to around 6 billion if we do nothing. Yet another progressive lie put forth as an excuse to commit mass murder. You scum are all the same.

If you are going to post me, I would appreciate it if you didn't sniff glue first. Let me guess, you also think that human caused global warming is a hoax. So I guess there's no point in pointing out that humans cause HCGW. Another point is that there are about 65 million people in the U.K. I have heard it estimated that if they all switched over to living an agrarian lifestyle, they could only produce enough food to feed 8 million people. So there alone, they are beyond their carrying capacity by 57 million people.

Also, what about all the environmental damage caused by humans. Then there are animals going extinct. Some even before they become known to science. And as things now stand, we are basically killing our oceans. You should check out a documentary called, "End of the line." Then, for what food is grown, there would be far less if we didn't manufacture fertalizer out of oil. Etc, etc, etc, etc.

And you think the earth could support 40 billion people!? But let's just say for argument's sake that it could. What makes you think the population would stop at 9 billion. Because when it comes to breeding, non-whites are no different from bacteria. White people used to be the same way. But the population levels of Whites isn't rising any more. Another thing is what is this magical thing that is supposed to drop the population from 9 billion to 6 billion. Whatever it is, you should use it to drop the world population of over 7 billion to 4 billion.

Yes. There is zero empirical data to support that now very failed "theory". The only people pushing that particular load of bull poo, are globalists who wish to use the supposed danger of global warming to push their socialist agenda.

If you took your blood pressure with one of those digital blood pressure monitors, would the readout it gave be a "theory?" The graphs I shoud came from actual measurements. Also, everybody want's more. Scientists are no different. But reality dissuades them. What is going on isn't a socialist agenda. It is a survival agenda.

 

[krypto]

[
It's what is called "science."

Oh? So "science" is deliberate fraud?

It is something you should look into. For example, each year all the volcanoes on earth release about 200 million tons of CO2 into the biosphere. Each year, mankind is responsible for putting out 26.8 BILLION tons.

And we can show causation that CO2 increases global temperatures, the way those graphs you posted did.

What is the formula? Temperature will increase on slope Y for R metric tons of CO2 along axis T. Give me the formula so I can run a linear regression. It will of course track perfectly to observed data, right?

The graphs came from scientists making measurments. Not me. If you want to debate them, look to the organizations who created them and take up the argument with them.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Looks pretty serious.
What is the current temperature of the planet?
What is the ideal temperature of the planet?

I'm not the best person to ask. But I would say the best global temperature would be what it was at about the beginning of the industrial revolution.

But I would say the best global temperature would be what it was at about the beginning of the industrial revolution.

Why?

Because it was what it was due to nature. Not humanity.

If nature did it, that's ideal?
In Chicago, it gets pretty cold in the winter.
The ideal temperature for me is much higher.

It is pretty much ideal. Because human technology and greed isn't the cause. Next, it can also get pretty hot in Chicago. In 1995, it caused 739 deaths. I don't think cold is as hard on people. I can handle cold. Because all I have to do is wear warmer clothing. But it wipes me out when it gets hot out. And apart from air conditioning, there isn't anything you can do about it.

It is pretty much ideal.

So you claim. With no back up.

Because human technology and greed isn't the cause.

Human technology allows us to live where the temperature is not your ideal.

Next, it can also get pretty hot in Chicago. In 1995, it caused 739 deaths. I don't think cold is as hard on people.

You're wrong. More people die from cold and its effects than from heat.

I can handle cold. Because all I have to do is wear warmer clothing.

And release CO2. Fossils fuels come in handy.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If you took your blood pressure with one of those digital blood pressure monitors, would the readout it gave be a "theory?" The graphs I shoud came from actual measurements.

No son, they sure didn't.

We are the wrong crowd to lie to.

Also, everybody want's more. Scientists are no different. But reality dissuades them. What is going on isn't a socialist agenda. It is a survival agenda.

No, it's a con.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'm not a monster, either -- I just look like one .....

A hundred million people could all live like the rich for the rest of time -- and not trash the planet.

The same cannot be said for three billion people.
.

To live like a wealthy person, somebody else would have to do most of the work. As to whether or not 3 billion people could live sustainably is debatable. But I can guarantee you that 7+ billion people can't.

Your "guarantee" is nonsense.

No. My guarantee is a guarantee. Our current population level is unsustainable. In fact, it is already too high.

Completely untrue but never let a murderous progressive actually pay attention to facts. The real facts are this. The carrying capacity of this planet is around 40 billion people. We will top out at around 9 billion and then slowly drop back to around 6 billion if we do nothing. Yet another progressive lie put forth as an excuse to commit mass murder. You scum are all the same.

If you are going to post me, I would appreciate it if you didn't sniff glue first. Let me guess, you also think that human caused global warming is a hoax. So I guess there's no point in pointing out that humans cause HCGW. Another point is that there are about 65 million people in the U.K. I have heard it estimated that if they all switched over to living an agrarian lifestyle, they could only produce enough food to feed 8 million people. So there alone, they are beyond their carrying capacity by 57 million people.

Also, what about all the environmental damage caused by humans. Then there are animals going extinct. Some even before they become known to science. And as things now stand, we are basically killing our oceans. You should check out a documentary called, "End of the line." Then, for what food is grown, there would be far less if we didn't manufacture fertalizer out of oil. Etc, etc, etc, etc.

And you think the earth could support 40 billion people!? But let's just say for argument's sake that it could. What makes you think the population would stop at 9 billion. Because when it comes to breeding, non-whites are no different from bacteria. White people used to be the same way. But the population levels of Whites isn't rising any more. Another thing is what is this magical thing that is supposed to drop the population from 9 billion to 6 billion. Whatever it is, you should use it to drop the world population of over 7 billion to 4 billion.

I have heard it estimated that if they all switched over to living an agrarian lifestyle, they could only produce enough food to feed 8 million people.

What is an "agrarian lifestyle" and why would they switch to one?