flacaltenn
Diamond Member
Neither of those are scientific silly boy. i thought you were interested in science and the scientific method. You see dear child, the scientific method was developed over centuries to educate religious fanatics such as yourself so that you would stop sacrificing virgins to the volcano God. Clearly you are still locked in the 600's.
It might take up to 50 (fifty) years, but how "scientific" do you think it will be when most of the life on earth is extinct.
it won't be. I suggest you do a little research. If you do, you will find that when it has been even warmer than it is today the plant and animal life has blossomed. The most recent species explosion occurred 55 million years ago during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum and other than some benthic forams that died in some very localized areas (most likely do to anoxic conditions) the rest of the flora and fauna exploded in both diversity and sheer numbers.
EVERY time you look at the paleo record the facts are clear, when it has been warmer it has been better. FAR better. The end is nigh BS that you idiots spew is just that, BS. There is ZERO empirical evidence to support a single one of the predictions that global warming will lead to mass extinction. It amazes me that supposedly thinking people can look at the billions of years of Earths history and ignore it in favor of predictions made by idiots who have never been correct.
Here's a fact for you.....did you know that the well known charlatan Sylvia Brown has a better predictive rate than your so called experts? And not just a little better, her hit rate is significantly better than ANY of your experts.
That's just sad. But, it just lends further proof that the cult of AGW is just that, a religious cult. You have no facts to back up one iota of your belief, but who needs facts when you have "faith"?
You must be insane. As it is now, there are areas of the planet where createurs that have been arouns sinse before dinosaurs existed that have to hide from the heat of the day. And you think it will be just fine and dandy if the planet got even hotter? Give me a break. Also, you are right about it having been far hotter in the distant past. So hot that methane was less likely to accumulate. Since then, our planet has generally been on a cooling trend. Under such conditions methane is more likely to accumulate. Such as in methane hydrate ice in the ocean and in tundra. As things now stand, I have seen videos of that ice melting and bubbling up to the surface. I have also seen people punch holes in the ice of some lake far up north and set the gas coming out on fire. As the planet warms, all of this is likely to increase and have an exponential effect.
Uh.. Time out. Sit down. You telling me that there are species who see a normal 30 or 40 deg swing in their NORMAL environment that are suffering because of a 1 degC in the past century or so??? The temperature swings DAILY in most environments far exceed 1degC..
I'm not talking about temperature swings. I'm talking about the heat they avoid right now. As in, things are already too hot for them. What do you think that will mean as the planet heats up more.
Hey.. The heat they "avoid" right now is only 1deg MORE than what their ancestors avoided in 1885. Think a bark beetle CARES about 1deg ???