Educating Democrats: Economics

Medical advancements are not part of health care and are an entirely different industry.

This statement is so outrageously absurd, it really doesn't require a comment. Lets just let this sit out there in the open simmering for a moment....

.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Ok.... now that everyone is done laughing, lets discuss how Dubya here believes that "medical advancements" come from union workers in the auto industry and or government
 
The system worked before Reagan removed that tax exempt status for health care insurers. I've had old Republicans remember that and they did see a change.

So again I have to ask - why not start your own insurance company and do it better? Give people better coverage, don't ever drop them, offer it cheaper, etc. At the same time, pay your workers incredible salaries along with cushy pensions and healthcare for them and their families?

You people cry and cry and cry like little bitches, but for some reason, you never do anything about it. Rather than asking government to put a gun to everyone's head (just like Adolf Hitler, Saddam Hussein, etc.), why not just use the great freedom this great nation affords us and build corporations with integrity that will put all of these other "evil" corporations out of business.

Seems to me you could easily kill two birds with one stone - you'll become incredibly wealthy and you can have the types of ethical businesses you keep screaming for government to create. It's a win-win. So what's the problem?

The health care insurance business is telling the world they can't continue as they have been, so shut the fuck up, fool!

You didn't answer the question.... why don't you start your own health insurance company and do it better?

Why the anger? Frustrated that I have you bent over in a corner like you're my bitch? You can't answer this, because you'd have to admit you are both stupid and lazy...

Game. Set. Match.
 
So again I have to ask - why not start your own insurance company and do it better? Give people better coverage, don't ever drop them, offer it cheaper, etc. At the same time, pay your workers incredible salaries along with cushy pensions and healthcare for them and their families?

You people cry and cry and cry like little bitches, but for some reason, you never do anything about it. Rather than asking government to put a gun to everyone's head (just like Adolf Hitler, Saddam Hussein, etc.), why not just use the great freedom this great nation affords us and build corporations with integrity that will put all of these other "evil" corporations out of business.

Seems to me you could easily kill two birds with one stone - you'll become incredibly wealthy and you can have the types of ethical businesses you keep screaming for government to create. It's a win-win. So what's the problem?

The health care insurance business is telling the world they can't continue as they have been, so shut the fuck up, fool!

You didn't answer the question.... why don't you start your own health insurance company and do it better?

Why the anger? Frustrated that I have you bent over in a corner like you're my bitch? You can't answer this, because you'd have to admit you are both stupid and lazy...

Game. Set. Match.

I don't think Dubya will be around anymore.
 
Same mindless trivial from the crowd that thinks the CEO's are like gods. When they finally figure out who is really taking them to the woodshed they cannot believe their eyes.
Let him have his little dream and pat himself on the back about what a wonderful worker and employe he is because his knees are calloused from being in front of his boss.

Continuing my series on educating liberals, today we cover their absolute weakest point - economics. Of course, part of this weakness stems from their greed. When you're crazed out of your mind with getting your hands on other people's money, you're not likely to stop and think about what that is doing to the economy. But who knows, maybe today some young liberal will actually read the facts listed below and become the first liberal in US history to actually THINK.

  • In 1968, there were 51 people employed full-time for every 1 person on disability.

  • In 1997, there were 24 people employed full-time for every 1 person on disability (less than HALF than 1968)

  • Today (2013), there are 13 people employed full-time for every 1 person on disability.

It is simply unsustainable. It cannot be denied. It cannot be debated. It cannot be ignored. It is unsustainable - and liberal policy of expecting the few to provide for the many (just like communist countries did) does not work. It's been tried by communists nations world wide and it has a 100% failure rate. It's more than just burdening the few. It's taking away the incentive for production, innovation, etc. When it doesn't matter how hard I work, because I'll get the same as everyone else, I stop working hard and put in the same effort as everyone else (it's just a reality that the utopian-based communist ideology refuses to take into account).

8,830,026: Americans on Disability Hits New Record for 192nd Straight Month | CNS News

It used to be that CEO's made 30 times the wage of the average worker. Now they make 300 to 400 times. If they are so good, where are the jobs? Republicans moving the wealth of the nation to the top 1% doesn't help the country.

You know what else doesn't help the country? Greedy liberal unions demanding that people with minimal skill sets make $28 per hour, plus Cadillac healthcare benefits for their entire family, plus pension for life of each and their spouse, plus 401k plans. Their total compensation damn near equals that of a top level executive from Harvard, when they are barely high school graduates who sweep floors in a GM plant or clean bathrooms in a Chrysler plant. Then the entire industry collapses and you "geniuses" sit there scratching your heads and wondering why you need a government bailout. When you can't figure it out, you realize it will just fit your agenda anyway to blame the wealthy CEO's and Republican's.
 
By definition a conservative scores low on individual freedom

too stupid of course!!! conservatives sign the pledge, not liberals, because conservatives want freedom from liberal government as our founders did!! See why we are positive a liberal will be slow???



and it's an illusion that big government means less freedom.

too stupid!! big government means big welfare. Are blacks more free because they get so much welfare and prison. Are the millions and millions who now get disability free of government? Big government means the freedom for some to leech off the hard work of others!!

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."- Thomas Jefferson

Duba, if you are not intelligent to be here why are you here??

Take a look at any quiz about political ideology and conservatives have to score low on individual freedom to be a conservative! Liberals and libertarians have to score high on individual freedom. Conservatives want economic freedom. It's the definition, fool, so why don't you post a political quiz or test and prove that wrong? How fucking smart does it make you, when you can't do that and you damn well know I can find quizzes at random that prove it? Can you read a chart, fool?

nolan_chart.png


Note: A true socialist is a statist.

I would debate the last point. Many hippie socialists are not the commies we hate. Human nature or failings do require the government to step in and defend the poor even with the patent office in our system though so trying to be a true small government socialist with human greed involed in practically impossible while ideologically possible.
 
By definition a conservative scores low on individual freedom and it's an illusion that big government means less freedom.

ROFL! To falsehoods in a single sentence. Of course, virtually everything you say is wrong, so that's no surprise.

If you want to bring up communist and conservative scores like a communist on individual freedom issues.

See?
 
Take a look at any quiz about political ideology and conservatives have to score low on individual freedom to be a conservative! Liberals and libertarians have to score high on individual freedom. Conservatives want economic freedom. It's the definition, fool, so why don't you post a political quiz or test and prove that wrong? How fucking smart does it make you, when you can't do that and you damn well know I can find quizzes at random that prove it? Can you read a chart, fool?.

Only a liberal moron would claim economic freedom isn't a kind of freedom, and it's a myth that liberals favor personal freedom. About the only personal freedom they favor is the ability to get an abortion on demand. However, when it comes to deciding what size soda to buy, whether to have salt in your food, what kind of car you buy or what kind of toilet or light bulb you can buy they are the ultimate authoritarians. There are a million ways liberals have limited our personal freedoms.
 
The system worked before Reagan removed that tax exempt status for health care insurers. I've had old Republicans remember that and they did see a change.

Reagan did no such thing. Turds like you are always trying to blame Reagan for everything.
 
Continuing my series on educating liberals, today we cover their absolute weakest point - economics. Of course, part of this weakness stems from their greed. When you're crazed out of your mind with getting your hands on other people's money, you're not likely to stop and think about what that is doing to the economy. But who knows, maybe today some young liberal will actually read the facts listed below and become the first liberal in US history to actually THINK.

  • In 1968, there were 51 people employed full-time for every 1 person on disability.

  • In 1997, there were 24 people employed full-time for every 1 person on disability (less than HALF than 1968)

  • Today (2013), there are 13 people employed full-time for every 1 person on disability.

It is simply unsustainable. It cannot be denied. It cannot be debated. It cannot be ignored. It is unsustainable - and liberal policy of expecting the few to provide for the many (just like communist countries did) does not work. It's been tried by communists nations world wide and it has a 100% failure rate. It's more than just burdening the few. It's taking away the incentive for production, innovation, etc. When it doesn't matter how hard I work, because I'll get the same as everyone else, I stop working hard and put in the same effort as everyone else (it's just a reality that the utopian-based communist ideology refuses to take into account).

8,830,026: Americans on Disability Hits New Record for 192nd Straight Month | CNS News

Pseudo-history, Crotchrott. You couldn't educate a starving dog how to attack a slice of beef.
 
The system worked before Reagan removed that tax exempt status for health care insurers. I've had old Republicans remember that and they did see a change.

Reagan did no such thing. Turds like you are always trying to blame Reagan for everything.

"The Great Socialist" or, "The Great Conservative" who acted like a socialist.

Did Reagan Raise Taxes? Let GOP Candidates Answer | RealClearPolitics

Reagan was a very conservative guys who hated liberal government but as president he was not emperor and so was not able get much done other than end the cold war, save the world from nuclear war, and free the people of Russia and China!!
 
Take a look at any quiz about political ideology and conservatives have to score low on individual freedom to be a conservative! Liberals and libertarians have to score high on individual freedom. Conservatives want economic freedom. It's the definition, fool, so why don't you post a political quiz or test and prove that wrong? How fucking smart does it make you, when you can't do that and you damn well know I can find quizzes at random that prove it? Can you read a chart, fool?.

Only a liberal moron would claim economic freedom isn't a kind of freedom, and it's a myth that liberals favor personal freedom. About the only personal freedom they favor is the ability to get an abortion on demand. However, when it comes to deciding what size soda to buy, whether to have salt in your food, what kind of car you buy or what kind of toilet or light bulb you can buy they are the ultimate authoritarians. There are a million ways liberals have limited our personal freedoms.

It's up to your dumbass to explain all those results from quizzes, fool! They aren't based on your bullshit, so you explain what they measure. Quote where I said economic freedom wasn't a freedom, or just prove yourself a liar for making it up that I did say it!

Conservatives can't score high in individual freedom or they aren't conservatives. That's reality, fool!
 
About the only personal freedom they favor is the ability to get an abortion on demand.

yes the freedom to kill a baby is big with them but they also want freedom from fear and want as FDR said. This means, in short, the freedom to collect lots of welfare from others.

Of course when you add it all up the government collects 50% of what we make. Its a little like slavery, and that does not mention that they have saddled each person with a $55,000 in debt. Does that make us free??
 
The system worked before Reagan removed that tax exempt status for health care insurers. I've had old Republicans remember that and they did see a change.

Reagan did no such thing. Turds like you are always trying to blame Reagan for everything.

You're a liar. The tax exempt status was removed from Blue Cross/Blue Shield during Reagan's tax changes to benefit the rich.
 
The system worked before Reagan removed that tax exempt status for health care insurers. I've had old Republicans remember that and they did see a change.

Reagan did no such thing. Turds like you are always trying to blame Reagan for everything.

You're a liar. The tax exempt status was removed from Blue Cross/Blue Shield during Reagan's tax changes to benefit the rich.

too stupid! How does it benefit the rich rather than just level
the playing field so all health insurers pay the same tax.

You lack the IQ to be here. I'm sorry!!
 
Duh... as studies progress and advocacy expands more and more people are diagnosed with disabilities. Thus a higher percentage of people with disabilities in the workforce.

i.e. the same number of people with disabilities existed in 1968 as do now, simply they weren't diagnosed.

So your stats are skewed.

I work in the field. I know this to be true and have had to wrestle people away from labeling someone with that diagnosis in the past.

I also think it's really cruel for you to advocate against people with disabilities being able to have work.

If someone doesn't know he has a disability, then he isn't disabled.
 
By definition a conservative scores low on individual freedom

By definition, you are truly an idiot. The entire conservative platform is nothing but constitutional personal freedom.

The problem is, being illiterate uneducated buffoons, liberals have no idea that there is not a constitutional right to their idea of personal "freedom":

  • Murder (liberal code name "pro-choice")

  • Narcotics (liberal code name "good time")

  • Rape (liberal code name "Occupy Wall Street")

and it's an illusion that big government means less freedom.

Um, no.... no it's not. Which is why you're completely incapable of citing even one example of how it's an "illusion". But I can give you an example of how big government means less freedom:

Obamcare! A new expansive government power, adding to the size and cost of government with the new bureaucrats required to run it, and which now leads me with LESS FREEDOM as I no longer have the freedom to decide for myself whether or not I want to carry health insurance.
 

Forum List

Back
Top