Elections deniers could be the death of our democracy

[Marener]

What has failed is the lie that there was no fraud. Next.

Trump was never able to show there was fraud. That's why he decided to attempt to take the election away from Biden by other means.

 

[Lastamender]

Trump was never able to show there was fraud. That's why he decided to attempt to take the election away from Biden by other means.

You cannot when you do not get an evidentiary hearing. How many times do I have to say that? Put down the stupid pills and back away.

 

[Marener]

You cannot when you do not get an evidentiary hearing. How many times do I have to say that? Put down the stupid pills and back away.

Trump's lawsuits failed to even make specific allegations of fraud. You don't an evidentiary hearing if you fail to make a claim, which is the most basic bar of any lawsuit that even he couldn't get over.

Trump was never able to show fraud because he had nothing to show.

 

[Lastamender]

Trump's lawsuits failed to even make specific allegations of fraud. You don't an evidentiary hearing if you fail to make a claim, which is the most basic bar of any lawsuit that even he couldn't get over.

Trump was never able to show fraud because he had nothing to show.

Again, we do not know that because he never got the chance. Your argument is as weak as your mind.

 

[JimH52]

Trump and his cadre went well beyond challenging it. After their challenges universally failed, they crossed into attempting to steal it.

They did exactly that! And now they are trying to steal all future elections by placing election deniers in positions of authority. They can fix the vote for their MAGA person and no one will know the difference.

 

[Marener]

Again, we do not know that because he never got the chance. Your argument is as weak as your mind.

He did get a chance. All of his lawsuits were seen before various judges who all dismissed them for exactly the reasons I stated. Failure to make a claim. Seriously. Look it up.

But only a minority of the lawsuits actually attempted to allege fraud. The vast majority were arguing process rules, which by the time the election was over was too late.

 

[Lastamender]

They did exactly that! And now they are trying to steal all future elections by placing election deniers in positions of authority. They can fix the vote for their MAGA person and no one will know the difference.

Our Congress is run by election deniers. Democrats.

 

[Lastamender]

He did get a chance. All of his lawsuits were seen before various judges who all dismissed them for exactly the reasons I stated. Failure to make a claim. Seriously. Look it up.

But only a minority of the lawsuits actually attempted to allege fraud. The vast majority were arguing process rules, which by the time the election was over was too late.

Listen closely dumbass. When a case is dismissed it is barred from getting an evidentiary hearing. Google it dummy.

 

[Marener]

Listen closely dumbass. When a case is dismissed it is barred from getting an evidentiary hearing. Google it dummy.

Every case is dismissed for a reason. You don't get an evidentiary hearing just because you ask nicely. You have to have a sufficient reason.

 

[Lastamender]

Every case is dismissed for a reason. You don't get an evidentiary hearing just because you ask nicely. You have to have a sufficient reason.

The reason was they knew that the evidence would prove fraud. Our courts were corrupt then and are corrupt now. Just the the way you fascists like them.

 

[Marener]

The reason was they knew that the evidence would prove fraud. Our courts were corrupt then and are corrupt now. Just the the way you fascists like them.

The reason is that Trump's claims were speculation, rumor and hearsay. You can't just say there was fraud, you have to say what actually was fraudulent and Trump simply could not and did not do so.

You have no evidence of corruption. Saying the judges are corrupt doesn't make it so.

 

[Lastamender]

The reason is that Trump's claims were speculation, rumor and hearsay. You can't just say there was fraud, you have to say what actually was fraudulent and Trump simply could not and did not do so.

You have no evidence of corruption. Saying the judges are corrupt doesn't make it so.

No evidence of corruption? Saying there was no fraud does not make it so either. You are a nitwit.

 

[Marener]

No evidence of corruption?

There isn't. Whining about "corruption" is just your coping mechanism to explain why Trump's lawsuits failed. You believe it because it's convenient, not because it's true.

Go ahead and show the evidence the judges involved were corrupt. If you need a specific name, you can start with Judge Stephanos Bibas, but any judge will do

 

[Lastamender]

There isn't. Whining about "corruption" is just your coping mechanism to explain why Trump's lawsuits failed. You believe it because it's convenient, not because it's true.

Go ahead and show the evidence the judges involved were corrupt. If you need a specific name, you can start with Judge Stephanos Bibas, but any judge will do

I am not going to waste my time arguing with a fool.

 

[Marener]

I am not going to waste my time arguing with a fool

You have nothing.

When Giuliani got before a judge, he was forced to admit they weren't even claiming fraud.

 

[Lastamender]

You have nothing.

When Giuliani got before a judge, he was forced to admit they weren't even claiming fraud.

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

 

[Marener]

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

Cute website, but what does it have to do with Trump's lawsuits?

Nothing.

 

[Lastamender]

Cute website, but what does it have to do with Trump's lawsuits?

Nothing.

Look at it and find out.

 

[Marener]

Look at it and find out.

I did which is how I know it has nothing to do with Trump's lawsuits.

 

[Lastamender]

I did which is how I know it has nothing to do with Trump's lawsuits.

What did it say about the GOP lawsuits?