Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your bigoted, hyper-partisan opinion is not supported by fact.
The double and triple votes and illegals of course affected the final tallies.Most people did not vote for Hillary.
And even less for Trump. Hardly the issue
Yet another bigoted, hyper-partisan opinion, unsupported by fact.Republicans only seem able to win when they can manipulate the EC. The "will of the people" be damned
Republicans only seem able to win when they can manipulate the EC. The "will of the people" be damned
Which of those states do you love in?Well, why don’t you change it? You do know what it takes to change an amendment?You're clearly confused.Na, not really
All of the people in the red areas would be displaced by just a few blue counties...
That is why this is supposed to be a republic not a shit eating democracy
Maybe ask your grandson to explain it to you.
I think voters who voted in Tlaib and Omar and AOC are idiots. May I vote against them?
Didn't you just said HERE that states don't matter?
'In 1992, Bill Clinton did not get a majority of the popular vote (only 43 percent) but he received 70 percent of the electoral votes.'
Where was the Democratic Party's tantrum and call to abolish the Electoral College in 1992 when Bill Clinton LOST the 'Popular Vote' Presidential Election?
Why We Shouldn’t Scrap the Electoral College | myHeritage
The frickin' "Democratic Party" has nothing to do with the EC question, Dumbass. 1992 was in fact when the "FairVote" project was launched, as noted earlier, from both sides of politics.
Time to grow the fuck up and shed the binary-bot shit.
As already noted earlier, other POTUSes who didn't win the PV include Bush (2000), Nixon (1968), Truman (1948), Wilson (1912), Harrison (1888), Hayes (1876), Lincoln (1860) and Quincy Adams (1824).
Your mal-characterization of GOP Presidential wins is false.What fact is in dispute.Your bigoted, hyper-partisan opinion is not supported by fact.
Half the Constitution is there to 'damn' the will of the people. It prevents them from bullying minorities willy nilly. That's a good thing.
Half the Constitution is there to 'damn' the will of the people. It prevents them from bullying minorities willy nilly. That's a good thing.
So how do we protect the majority from being bullied by the minority...which is what is happening now.
Your mal-characterization of GOP Presidential wins is false.
You are either unaware of this and speak from ignorance, or you -are- aware of this, and decided to lie.
Let us know which.
Why do you refuse to understand the US government is set up specifically so the majority does not always get its way?So how do we protect the majority from being bullied by the minority...which is what is happening now.Half the Constitution is there to 'damn' the will of the people. It prevents them from bullying minorities willy nilly. That's a good thing.
You don't, because the minority has very little power to bully.
Why do you refuse to understand the US government is set up specifically so the majority does not always get its way?
The supreme court should be at least 6 to 3 conservative. Cheating and sell outs have destroyed this nation as you will find out when total power achieved and not knowing what to do when you have it.You don't, because the minority has very little power to bully.
Nonsense. Obviously they do since even though in the minority...they chose the President in 2000 and in 2016...and because of that installed 4 (out of a total of only 9) SCOTUS Justices.
Your two 2 examples of 23 elections proves your characterization false .So Bush the Lesser and Trump won the popular vote in their first Presidential run?Your mal-characterization of GOP Presidential wins is false.
You are either unaware of this and speak from ignorance, or you -are- aware of this, and decided to lie.
Let us know which.
No. They did not
1: It doesn't bother you when it allows you to get your waywell it's currently being used by the MINORITY to get THEIR wayWhy do you refuse to understand the US government is set up specifically so the majority does not always get its way?
Which of those states do you love in?Well, why don’t you change it? You do know what it takes to change an amendment?You're clearly confused.
Maybe ask your grandson to explain it to you.
I think voters who voted in Tlaib and Omar and AOC are idiots. May I vote against them?
Didn't you just said HERE that states don't matter?
States SHOULDN'T matter. But they do. And it's skewed in how much they each matter.
Cali already wipes out those states with EC votes. Ca has 55... ND (3) SD(3) WY(3) MT(3) and ID(4) add up to 16. What’s else you got?Ok, Southern California Would displace five states in the northern plains, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana and Idaho.Explain why... these empty proclaimations are meaningless. I just put out some points. How about trying to respond to them or make some of your own. Something more than “it’s a slam dunk for progressives”. WHY? HOW?A pure popular vote is a slam dunk for progressives, It’s not even close.Exactly the point, he couldn’t win the state so he didn’t campaign there. But theres a ton of conservatives and republicans in California. Many farmers and blue collared industrial workers from rural areas. He could have pulled millions of votes. There are probability many with conservative views that don’t even bother to vote because they know which way the state is going to go. Think about it. A popular vote isn’t necessarily going to benefit the Left. If there really is a “forgotten man” then they could very well exist within these big blue states.Trump had no reason to campaign in a state that he had no chance at winning. Hillary didn't spend a lot of time in the swing states because the bag thought she had those states in the bag. She totally ignored flyover country.
There is no reason for rural America to even vote with a pure popular vote.
Which of those states do you love in?Well, why don’t you change it? You do know what it takes to change an amendment?
I think voters who voted in Tlaib and Omar and AOC are idiots. May I vote against them?
Didn't you just said HERE that states don't matter?
States SHOULDN'T matter. But they do. And it's skewed in how much they each matter.
Your posts are annoying and bring nothing to the conversation. Honestly, you need to get a life. States do matter. We are the UNITED STATES!