Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results point to Native American heritage

[tinydancer]

You people are insane to even cclaim the woman is first nations.

 

[Rustic]

This is what happens when a dishonest baby or punk loses a bet or challenge. Endless excuses and "but, but.....but.." are heard just like in this situation. Under certain situations, this behavior would warrant an ass kicking, or worse. Cheating and lying are OK with Trumpism. Immature baby behavior is OK with Trumpism.

this is what happens when a liberal can't prove what they say they're trying to prove. they just keep shouting I WIN I WIN YOU DA BABY and all the while have yet to prove what they say they're proving.

Nope, she took a DNA test and it showed native American ancestry. No caveats were made prior to the test. Those are all being made after the test.

you do realize that most Caucasians in this country have a higher ratio then she does, why don’t they claim to be Indian? You silly little fucker

 

[justoffal]

So, this was a real deep dive into her DNA. I imagine that the normal test showed 0% Indian DNA, so they had to do the deep dive to find a trace or possible Indian DNA 10 generations ago.

This was not a win for her. In fact she just made it worse than ever.....kinda dumb.
If she makes a POTUS run her campaign stops will be riddled with AI protesters ....
Believe it.

Jo

 

[boedicca]

Sorry to burst your bubble but if we go 6 to 10 Generations back nearly half of The Americans on this continent will come up with the same results.

She actually did herself more harm than good with this test.

Jo

Where did you get that "statistic" from? I don't actually believe it. I've seen lots of those results and Native American is not as common as European and Asian.

https://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(14)00476-5#secsectitle0135

Most people whose families have been in North America any length of time contain traces of a variety of races and ethnicities. Your average American who claims European descent actually is about .18% Native American, although that obviously fluctuates according to where the family is from. Melting pot, remember?

Indeed. That's why this identity politics b'loney is such...b'loney.

How in the hell did this country loop around back to the "just one drop" attitudes of Jim Crow? I feel like I just woke up in some Bizarro World 1950.

It's not ONE DROP, and it proves Warren's assertions. Not that she is a tribal member, but that she had an ancestor that was Native American. Why is it so friggin hard for people to accept that? Is it the end of the world that a Democrat told the truth one time? LOL

Virtually every white, black and latino person in the USA has more Native American DNA than does Warren.

She's an embarrassment to the Progs, but keep supporting her!

Trump 2020!!!!!

 

[Sunsettommy]

Elizabeth Warren has taken a DNA test.

The results show she wasn't lying.

trump and the republicans have been lying all this time.

The truth is that most American families that have been here for a long time have Native American Indian somewhere in the past in their families.

I do. Like Warren it was a long family story that many generations back someone married a Cherokee woman. I never believed it until I took a DNA test. There it was. Just like Warren, a very small part of my DNA has Native American Indian. Just like the family story, it's very small which means it's many generations back.

Just like most Americans.

So go ahead and call her names. You're only showing your hate and ignorance.

Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results point to Native American heritage

There are ZERO evidence that she has an Indian Ancestor back to the early 1800's

Her Genealogy records back to early 1800's shows ZERO evidence of an Indian Ancestor, plus she isn't recognized as a Cherokee by the Indian nations, thus NOT an Indian at all.

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 1

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 2

"Now we are seeing a very clear pattern develop. We are back to the great great grandparent generation, and Ms. Warren's ancestors are still only being found as white in the documents. On the other hand, Chief Baker's ancestors are found as Cherokee Indians. And notice that even though Sarah Harlin was born in 1834 and Indian, there are plenty of records to document both her existence and the fact she was Cherokee. We have 6 sources for her and all verify she is Cherokee even though many people wrongly assume records are harder to find if your ancestor was Indian/Cherokee.

Since the forced removal of the Cherokees was in 1838, we have gotten back to that time with both families. Preston H. Crawford was born approximately fourteen years before the forced removal and Sarah Harlin was born about four years before the removal.

The Crawford family was always listed as white in the records and remained in the east after the forced removal of the Cherokees. The Harlin family was always living among Cherokees and always listed as Indians. These two families are clearly found listed differently in the records.

In Elizabeth Warren's family, we have gotten to approximately 1824, fourteen years prior to the removal of the Cherokees from the east and there is no indication of Indian blood or association with the Cherokees through her Crawford line, the line she claims to be Cherokee through. That means we have gone back about 188 years and still not found a Cherokee. "​

More on Pocahontas. Ain't this a Hoot!
_______

It Gets Better… Average White Person in America Has DOUBLE THE AMOUNT of Native American DNA as Elizabeth Warren

It Gets Better... Average White Person in America Has DOUBLE THE AMOUNT of Native American DNA as Elizabeth Warren
______________________________

But, to be honest, this Bat-Shit Crazy Bitch doesn't deserve the time being spent to ridicule her.

She could NOT get elected to anything more than Dog Catcher outside of LoonLands like Massachusetts----might have a chance in Shitholia (Connecticut).

Wouldn't .098% be if she was only 1/1024th NA, instead of 1/32?
They're playing math tricks on ya, Macaulay.

_____________

Honestly, Old Lady, I don't think you can be educated....and in spite of your consistent embarrassing inanities posted too often on this board, I have left you alone for that reason.....and also out of sympathy for what is very likely much advanced age accompanied by some dementia.

But, here is a light math and genetics lesson.

If this lying goofy bitch had a full blooded Indian Great-Grandparent, she would have 1/8th Indian Blood, or .125 decimal interest (the same as 1.25 per cent). That is the MINIMUM amount of Indian Blood that will get you recognized by an Indian Tribe! Most require 1/4 Indian Blood---which would mean a full blooded Indian Grandparent--two generations up the chain of heredity.

Pocahantas flunks this test by a mile. She doesn't have a even Have a Great-Great-Great-Great-Grand Parent who was a full blooded Indian---that would make her 1/64 Indian (.015625 decimal interest)---her own specialist---who was probably a liar, as most Liberals are---said she wasn't even that close--- she was possibly up to the tenth generation or 1/1024 also called .000977 decimal interest.

Now that's her man's story and he wasn't even sure---and she went all over the country to find him, so there is rightful suspicion there....and an independent analysis would be required if anybody gave enough of a Shit--which I do not.

And it is now reported that the AVERAGE AMERICAN has more Indian Blood than Pocahantas's own bogus Sanford expert says he "thinks" she might have.

Her own privately, surreptitiously hired test man, a liberal tool from Sanford, said she might have no more than .000977 Indian Blood---the Cherokees would laugh her off the Reservation, as the American People will laugh her out of any race she runs outside of LoonLand in the NorthEast.

This was never about her being a Tribal member. She told us that family tradition said she had an ancestor back along the line who was Native American, and she has taken the test and it is true. She did. I don't remember anyone talking about specific percentages in that article which reported the results. You did that, basing it on your own guesses for what percentage she might be.
It doesn't matter. She was right; the DNA tests prove it, and Trump needs to cough up the one mil.
You can try to insult me all you want, but you're the one who is being either confused or dishonest here, not me.

So you believed in her unsupported assertions (family tales around a campfire) of an Indian ancestor while her own family history shows ZERO evidence of an Indian ancestor?

Anyone who has tried to unravel a thorny geneaological problem knows that the records can't always be 100% relied upon to tell the story. Men and women both married multiple times and children were frequently raised by a relative other than parents. Ancestors with the same last name were frequently confused. Generations were confused in family recitations of begats and copied by other family historians, gelling errors for hundreds of years. Lots of interesting stuff happens. So the fact that a record (was that record entirely based on primary sources and backed up by corroborating primary sources?) does not mention a woman of mixed Cherokee ancestry marrying (did they even marry?) does not mean she wasn't there. How much do we know about most of the women in our family lines anyway? It is mostly the men whose names and deeds are recorded.
So I guess my answer to you is, yeah, based on the DNA results and the strong family tradition of a Native American ancestor back down the line, I believe it. Only a political hack would try to disprove it, because she is a Democrat. How stupid, really, can you be?

Nice try, but you posted ZERO evidence that her Census records are bad or that she has actual Indians in her family past back to 1818, which is when her family history in America begins.

She claims to be a Cherokee, but ALL three Cherokee nations says she isn't, since she has NO evidence that she is an Indian by law and by Census. All of her claims have been shown to be without merit they all come from her mouth with no supporting evidence, you understand yet?

 

[Rustic]

I thought a lying politician was the standard for RW's -

All career politicians live up to being liars, They are pros at it.

 

[RealDave]

I know a young woman who is of Cherokee descent but she is not on a tribal role, and doesn't get payments from the tribe.

All she has to do with blood. is submit DNA. No big smurf. I have standing with Six Nations because I go back to the Beaver Head.


Not true for the Chrokee Nation

























+

 

[tinydancer]

Sorry to burst your bubble but if we go 6 to 10 Generations back nearly half of The Americans on this continent will come up with the same results.

She actually did herself more harm than good with this test.

Jo

Where did you get that "statistic" from? I don't actually believe it. I've seen lots of those results and Native American is not as common as European and Asian.

https://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(14)00476-5#secsectitle0135

Most people whose families have been in North America any length of time contain traces of a variety of races and ethnicities. Your average American who claims European descent actually is about .18% Native American, although that obviously fluctuates according to where the family is from. Melting pot, remember?

Indeed. That's why this identity politics b'loney is such...b'loney.

How in the hell did this country loop around back to the "just one drop" attitudes of Jim Crow? I feel like I just woke up in some Bizarro World 1950.

It's not ONE DROP, and it proves Warren's assertions. Not that she is a tribal member, but that she had an ancestor that was Native American. Why is it so friggin hard for people to accept that? Is it the end of the world that a Democrat told the truth one time? LOL

Oh what a fucking crock here.

You stop now or you really will become my first hit every time I roll into to this pathetic place.

 

[Rustic]

What a bunch of welching cheats and Liars Republicans are....

1/1024 is not American Indian

 

[OldLady]

This is what happens when a dishonest baby or punk loses a bet or challenge. Endless excuses and "but, but.....but.." are heard just like in this situation. Under certain situations, this behavior would warrant an ass kicking, or worse. Cheating and lying are OK with Trumpism. Immature baby behavior is OK with Trumpism.

this is what happens when a liberal can't prove what they say they're trying to prove. they just keep shouting I WIN I WIN YOU DA BABY and all the while have yet to prove what they say they're proving.

What better evidence than DNA? What would it take to "prove it" to you?

 

[Rustic]

More on Pocahontas. Ain't this a Hoot!
_______

It Gets Better… Average White Person in America Has DOUBLE THE AMOUNT of Native American DNA as Elizabeth Warren

It Gets Better... Average White Person in America Has DOUBLE THE AMOUNT of Native American DNA as Elizabeth Warren
______________________________

But, to be honest, this Bat-Shit Crazy Bitch doesn't deserve the time being spent to ridicule her.

She could NOT get elected to anything more than Dog Catcher outside of LoonLands like Massachusetts----might have a chance in Shitholia (Connecticut).

Wouldn't .098% be if she was only 1/1024th NA, instead of 1/32?
They're playing math tricks on ya, Macaulay.

_____________

Honestly, Old Lady, I don't think you can be educated....and in spite of your consistent embarrassing inanities posted too often on this board, I have left you alone for that reason.....and also out of sympathy for what is very likely much advanced age accompanied by some dementia.

But, here is a light math and genetics lesson.

If this lying goofy bitch had a full blooded Indian Great-Grandparent, she would have 1/8th Indian Blood, or .125 decimal interest (the same as 1.25 per cent). That is the MINIMUM amount of Indian Blood that will get you recognized by an Indian Tribe! Most require 1/4 Indian Blood---which would mean a full blooded Indian Grandparent--two generations up the chain of heredity.

Pocahantas flunks this test by a mile. She doesn't have a even Have a Great-Great-Great-Great-Grand Parent who was a full blooded Indian---that would make her 1/64 Indian (.015625 decimal interest)---her own specialist---who was probably a liar, as most Liberals are---said she wasn't even that close--- she was possibly up to the tenth generation or 1/1024 also called .000977 decimal interest.

Now that's her man's story and he wasn't even sure---and she went all over the country to find him, so there is rightful suspicion there....and an independent analysis would be required if anybody gave enough of a Shit--which I do not.

And it is now reported that the AVERAGE AMERICAN has more Indian Blood than Pocahantas's own bogus Sanford expert says he "thinks" she might have.

Her own privately, surreptitiously hired test man, a liberal tool from Sanford, said she might have no more than .000977 Indian Blood---the Cherokees would laugh her off the Reservation, as the American People will laugh her out of any race she runs outside of LoonLand in the NorthEast.

This was never about her being a Tribal member. She told us that family tradition said she had an ancestor back along the line who was Native American, and she has taken the test and it is true. She did. I don't remember anyone talking about specific percentages in that article which reported the results. You did that, basing it on your own guesses for what percentage she might be.
It doesn't matter. She was right; the DNA tests prove it, and Trump needs to cough up the one mil.
You can try to insult me all you want, but you're the one who is being either confused or dishonest here, not me.

Lol
1/1024 is not American Indian, Most Caucasians in this country have a better Ratio that. You don’t see them claiming they are Indian. You just need to shut the fuck up

 

[justoffal]

Sorry to burst your bubble but if we go 6 to 10 Generations back nearly half of The Americans on this continent will come up with the same results.

She actually did herself more harm than good with this test.

Jo

Where did you get that "statistic" from? I don't actually believe it. I've seen lots of those results and Native American is not as common as European and Asian.

https://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(14)00476-5#secsectitle0135

Most people whose families have been in North America any length of time contain traces of a variety of races and ethnicities. Your average American who claims European descent actually is about .18% Native American, although that obviously fluctuates according to where the family is from. Melting pot, remember?

Indeed. That's why this identity politics b'loney is such...b'loney.

How in the hell did this country loop around back to the "just one drop" attitudes of Jim Crow? I feel like I just woke up in some Bizarro World 1950.

It's not ONE DROP, and it proves Warren's assertions. Not that she is a tribal member, but that she had an ancestor that was Native American. Why is it so friggin hard for people to accept that? Is it the end of the world that a Democrat told the truth one time? LOL

It seems odd that she would bring it up considering that her portion of Native American is shared by roughly 50 million other Americans. There is a distinct impression that she hoped to gain some prominence and some advantage by mentioning it. Truth be told it's all fairly harmless until you consider it in the light of her plagiarized cook book named Pow Wow Chow, and in the light of several dozen speeches given by her where she speaks of herself as being Native American when in fact she is not.

It doesn't make her a bad person but it makes her one that's very stupid if she thinks that assertion will go unchallenged by the genuine American Indian Nation should she decide to make a run for president.

Nobody really cares one way or another except perhaps her apparently.

So it best she is 1 / 512 and probably even less than that.

It would be like any one of us getting up in front of a crowd and bragging about the fact that we belong to homo sapiens and expecting people to be impressed with that Claim.

The more concentrated Native American population are a very reactionary group it is highly unlikely that they will allow this to drop peacefully. She just picked the totally wrong issue to get sentimental about.


Jo

 

[RealDave]

Elizabeth Warren has taken a DNA test.

The results show she wasn't lying.

trump and the republicans have been lying all this time.

The truth is that most American families that have been here for a long time have Native American Indian somewhere in the past in their families.

I do. Like Warren it was a long family story that many generations back someone married a Cherokee woman. I never believed it until I took a DNA test. There it was. Just like Warren, a very small part of my DNA has Native American Indian. Just like the family story, it's very small which means it's many generations back.

Just like most Americans.

So go ahead and call her names. You're only showing your hate and ignorance.

Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results point to Native American heritage

There are ZERO evidence that she has an Indian Ancestor back to the early 1800's

Her Genealogy records back to early 1800's shows ZERO evidence of an Indian Ancestor, plus she isn't recognized as a Cherokee by the Indian nations, thus NOT an Indian at all.

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 1

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 2

"Now we are seeing a very clear pattern develop. We are back to the great great grandparent generation, and Ms. Warren's ancestors are still only being found as white in the documents. On the other hand, Chief Baker's ancestors are found as Cherokee Indians. And notice that even though Sarah Harlin was born in 1834 and Indian, there are plenty of records to document both her existence and the fact she was Cherokee. We have 6 sources for her and all verify she is Cherokee even though many people wrongly assume records are harder to find if your ancestor was Indian/Cherokee.

Since the forced removal of the Cherokees was in 1838, we have gotten back to that time with both families. Preston H. Crawford was born approximately fourteen years before the forced removal and Sarah Harlin was born about four years before the removal.

The Crawford family was always listed as white in the records and remained in the east after the forced removal of the Cherokees. The Harlin family was always living among Cherokees and always listed as Indians. These two families are clearly found listed differently in the records.

In Elizabeth Warren's family, we have gotten to approximately 1824, fourteen years prior to the removal of the Cherokees from the east and there is no indication of Indian blood or association with the Cherokees through her Crawford line, the line she claims to be Cherokee through. That means we have gone back about 188 years and still not found a Cherokee. "​

Wouldn't .098% be if she was only 1/1024th NA, instead of 1/32?
They're playing math tricks on ya, Macaulay.

_____________

Honestly, Old Lady, I don't think you can be educated....and in spite of your consistent embarrassing inanities posted too often on this board, I have left you alone for that reason.....and also out of sympathy for what is very likely much advanced age accompanied by some dementia.

But, here is a light math and genetics lesson.

If this lying goofy bitch had a full blooded Indian Great-Grandparent, she would have 1/8th Indian Blood, or .125 decimal interest (the same as 1.25 per cent). That is the MINIMUM amount of Indian Blood that will get you recognized by an Indian Tribe! Most require 1/4 Indian Blood---which would mean a full blooded Indian Grandparent--two generations up the chain of heredity.

Pocahantas flunks this test by a mile. She doesn't have a even Have a Great-Great-Great-Great-Grand Parent who was a full blooded Indian---that would make her 1/64 Indian (.015625 decimal interest)---her own specialist---who was probably a liar, as most Liberals are---said she wasn't even that close--- she was possibly up to the tenth generation or 1/1024 also called .000977 decimal interest.

Now that's her man's story and he wasn't even sure---and she went all over the country to find him, so there is rightful suspicion there....and an independent analysis would be required if anybody gave enough of a Shit--which I do not.

And it is now reported that the AVERAGE AMERICAN has more Indian Blood than Pocahantas's own bogus Sanford expert says he "thinks" she might have.

Her own privately, surreptitiously hired test man, a liberal tool from Sanford, said she might have no more than .000977 Indian Blood---the Cherokees would laugh her off the Reservation, as the American People will laugh her out of any race she runs outside of LoonLand in the NorthEast.

This was never about her being a Tribal member. She told us that family tradition said she had an ancestor back along the line who was Native American, and she has taken the test and it is true. She did. I don't remember anyone talking about specific percentages in that article which reported the results. You did that, basing it on your own guesses for what percentage she might be.
It doesn't matter. She was right; the DNA tests prove it, and Trump needs to cough up the one mil.
You can try to insult me all you want, but you're the one who is being either confused or dishonest here, not me.

So you believed in her unsupported assertions (family tales around a campfire) of an Indian ancestor while her own family history shows ZERO evidence of an Indian ancestor?

Anyone who has tried to unravel a thorny geneaological problem knows that the records can't always be 100% relied upon to tell the story. Men and women both married multiple times and children were frequently raised by a relative other than parents. Ancestors with the same last name were frequently confused. Generations were confused in family recitations of begats and copied by other family historians, gelling errors for hundreds of years. Lots of interesting stuff happens. So the fact that a record (was that record entirely based on primary sources and backed up by corroborating primary sources?) does not mention a woman of mixed Cherokee ancestry marrying (did they even marry?) does not mean she wasn't there. How much do we know about most of the women in our family lines anyway? It is mostly the men whose names and deeds are recorded.
So I guess my answer to you is, yeah, based on the DNA results and the strong family tradition of a Native American ancestor back down the line, I believe it. Only a political hack would try to disprove it, because she is a Democrat. How stupid, really, can you be?

Nice try, but you posted ZERO evidence that her Census records are bad or that she has actual Indians in her family past back to 1818, which is when her family history in America begins.

She claims to be a Cherokee, but ALL three Cherokee nations says she isn't, since she has NO evidence that she is an Indian by law and by Census. All of her claims have been shown to be without merit they all come from her mouth with no supporting evidence, you understand yet?

There is evidence from those who have made the effort to trace her lineage,

She never claimed to be a member of any tribe.

All she claimed was to have Native American blood in her. That's it. She did a DNA test & she does.

Do you get it???

 

[OldLady]

Where did you get that "statistic" from? I don't actually believe it. I've seen lots of those results and Native American is not as common as European and Asian.

https://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(14)00476-5#secsectitle0135

Most people whose families have been in North America any length of time contain traces of a variety of races and ethnicities. Your average American who claims European descent actually is about .18% Native American, although that obviously fluctuates according to where the family is from. Melting pot, remember?

Indeed. That's why this identity politics b'loney is such...b'loney.

How in the hell did this country loop around back to the "just one drop" attitudes of Jim Crow? I feel like I just woke up in some Bizarro World 1950.

It's not ONE DROP, and it proves Warren's assertions. Not that she is a tribal member, but that she had an ancestor that was Native American. Why is it so friggin hard for people to accept that? Is it the end of the world that a Democrat told the truth one time? LOL

Oh what a fucking crock here.

You stop now or you really will become my first hit every time I roll into to this pathetic place.

What is a fucking crock? The DNA evidence shows she's got a Native American ancestor, just like she has always claimed. I don't see the issue. I certainly don't see any fucking crock.

 

[Rustic]

I'll post it later, but, at best her DNA allegedly shows she has American Indian DNA 6 TO 10 GENERATIONS AGO! She has no business passing herself off as American Indian!

Bullshit. And Trump owes her $1 million dollars.

Alert the media. President Donald Trump has lied again.

Trump denied making a statement that he did, in fact, make -- despite knowing there is documentation to the contrary.

Trump denies that he ever said he’d donate $1 million to charity if she took a DNA test and it showed she had Native American ancestry.

The quote: “I will give you a million dollars to your favorite charity, paid for by Trump, if you take the test and it shows you’re an Indian”

Lol
Na, not really
1/1024 is not American Indian in any way...
You stupid ass motherfucker

 

[Rustic]

Elizabeth Warren has taken a DNA test.

The results show she wasn't lying.

trump and the republicans have been lying all this time.

The truth is that most American families that have been here for a long time have Native American Indian somewhere in the past in their families.

I do. Like Warren it was a long family story that many generations back someone married a Cherokee woman. I never believed it until I took a DNA test. There it was. Just like Warren, a very small part of my DNA has Native American Indian. Just like the family story, it's very small which means it's many generations back.

Just like most Americans.

So go ahead and call her names. You're only showing your hate and ignorance.

Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results point to Native American heritage

There are ZERO evidence that she has an Indian Ancestor back to the early 1800's

Her Genealogy records back to early 1800's shows ZERO evidence of an Indian Ancestor, plus she isn't recognized as a Cherokee by the Indian nations, thus NOT an Indian at all.

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 1

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 2

"Now we are seeing a very clear pattern develop. We are back to the great great grandparent generation, and Ms. Warren's ancestors are still only being found as white in the documents. On the other hand, Chief Baker's ancestors are found as Cherokee Indians. And notice that even though Sarah Harlin was born in 1834 and Indian, there are plenty of records to document both her existence and the fact she was Cherokee. We have 6 sources for her and all verify she is Cherokee even though many people wrongly assume records are harder to find if your ancestor was Indian/Cherokee.

Since the forced removal of the Cherokees was in 1838, we have gotten back to that time with both families. Preston H. Crawford was born approximately fourteen years before the forced removal and Sarah Harlin was born about four years before the removal.

The Crawford family was always listed as white in the records and remained in the east after the forced removal of the Cherokees. The Harlin family was always living among Cherokees and always listed as Indians. These two families are clearly found listed differently in the records.

In Elizabeth Warren's family, we have gotten to approximately 1824, fourteen years prior to the removal of the Cherokees from the east and there is no indication of Indian blood or association with the Cherokees through her Crawford line, the line she claims to be Cherokee through. That means we have gone back about 188 years and still not found a Cherokee. "​

_____________

Honestly, Old Lady, I don't think you can be educated....and in spite of your consistent embarrassing inanities posted too often on this board, I have left you alone for that reason.....and also out of sympathy for what is very likely much advanced age accompanied by some dementia.

But, here is a light math and genetics lesson.

If this lying goofy bitch had a full blooded Indian Great-Grandparent, she would have 1/8th Indian Blood, or .125 decimal interest (the same as 1.25 per cent). That is the MINIMUM amount of Indian Blood that will get you recognized by an Indian Tribe! Most require 1/4 Indian Blood---which would mean a full blooded Indian Grandparent--two generations up the chain of heredity.

Pocahantas flunks this test by a mile. She doesn't have a even Have a Great-Great-Great-Great-Grand Parent who was a full blooded Indian---that would make her 1/64 Indian (.015625 decimal interest)---her own specialist---who was probably a liar, as most Liberals are---said she wasn't even that close--- she was possibly up to the tenth generation or 1/1024 also called .000977 decimal interest.

Now that's her man's story and he wasn't even sure---and she went all over the country to find him, so there is rightful suspicion there....and an independent analysis would be required if anybody gave enough of a Shit--which I do not.

And it is now reported that the AVERAGE AMERICAN has more Indian Blood than Pocahantas's own bogus Sanford expert says he "thinks" she might have.

Her own privately, surreptitiously hired test man, a liberal tool from Sanford, said she might have no more than .000977 Indian Blood---the Cherokees would laugh her off the Reservation, as the American People will laugh her out of any race she runs outside of LoonLand in the NorthEast.

This was never about her being a Tribal member. She told us that family tradition said she had an ancestor back along the line who was Native American, and she has taken the test and it is true. She did. I don't remember anyone talking about specific percentages in that article which reported the results. You did that, basing it on your own guesses for what percentage she might be.
It doesn't matter. She was right; the DNA tests prove it, and Trump needs to cough up the one mil.
You can try to insult me all you want, but you're the one who is being either confused or dishonest here, not me.

So you believed in her unsupported assertions (family tales around a campfire) of an Indian ancestor while her own family history shows ZERO evidence of an Indian ancestor?

Anyone who has tried to unravel a thorny geneaological problem knows that the records can't always be 100% relied upon to tell the story. Men and women both married multiple times and children were frequently raised by a relative other than parents. Ancestors with the same last name were frequently confused. Generations were confused in family recitations of begats and copied by other family historians, gelling errors for hundreds of years. Lots of interesting stuff happens. So the fact that a record (was that record entirely based on primary sources and backed up by corroborating primary sources?) does not mention a woman of mixed Cherokee ancestry marrying (did they even marry?) does not mean she wasn't there. How much do we know about most of the women in our family lines anyway? It is mostly the men whose names and deeds are recorded.
So I guess my answer to you is, yeah, based on the DNA results and the strong family tradition of a Native American ancestor back down the line, I believe it. Only a political hack would try to disprove it, because she is a Democrat. How stupid, really, can you be?

Nice try, but you posted ZERO evidence that her Census records are bad or that she has actual Indians in her family past back to 1818, which is when her family history in America begins.

She claims to be a Cherokee, but ALL three Cherokee nations says she isn't, since she has NO evidence that she is an Indian by law and by Census. All of her claims have been shown to be without merit they all come from her mouth with no supporting evidence, you understand yet?

There is evidence from those who have made the effort to trace her lineage,

She never claimed to be a member of any tribe.

All she claimed was to have Native American blood in her. That's it. She did a DNA test & she does.

Do you get it???

1/1024 is not American Indian

 

[BULLDOG]

I do understand that many have a romantic notion of having some First Nations lineage and but when one uses a falsehood to receive a grant or a position thereby denying those to a true First Nations person, in my mind that is theft.

Can you point out when that happened?

She claimed A

Ethnicity not a factor in Elizabeth Warren’s rise in law - The Boston Globe

She does have Native American ancestry, and had every right to indicate that. What is your problem? I suspect you are so invested in the unfounded claim that she has no Native American ancestry till you find it hard to give up the lie that you have grown to love. This is very similar to the right's inability to accept Obama's birth certificate. You don't care about facts. You still want to hang on to your lie.

then we can all do it cause most people have twice the DNA she posted so we're all native american indians.

by YOUR OWN logic here.

I don't think it is statistically possible for most people to have twice the Native American DNA as she does, but if they do, they are certainly entitled to claim that. Sorry if another one of your favorite RWNJ lies crashed in flames, but you'll get over it if you have the integrity needed. It doesn't look good for you though.

 

[Cecilie1200]

no, i didnt read what he said about it.... do you have a link?

I was just repeating what I heard a congress critter say while being interviewed on the news...

heh, lord knows i can do that also. i just have learned to dig for myself.

Trump challenges 'Pocahontas' Warren to DNA test to prove she's Native American

Reviving his "Pocahontas" nickname for the Massachusetts Democrat, Trump asked his audience to imagine him on a debate stage challenging Warren to submit to genetic testing to prove that she has Native American ancestors.

"I will give you a million dollars to your favorite charity, paid for by Trump, if you take the test and it shows you're an Indian," he said. "I have a feeling she will say no."
----------
now it can also depend on how you read this, but as others have said in here, there is *no* native american to test for because they never opted into those genetics. also, the total amount shown for her is .097, which is 1/2 of what an average african american can also test for when it comes to NORTH AMERICAN (mexico, peru, and so forth) indian testing.

to me i read it as take the test during the debate and let's end it.

1/1024 is not American Indian
Because if it was most every Caucasian in this country would be Indian according to the Pocahontas standard

Most blacks and latinos would also be Native Americans per that standard.

Just sayin'.

yeah. I dunno really. Really, it's not a big deal. From Trump and his fellow travelers it is, but I think we know why.

With Warren, it seems most people in her family, and possibly a lot of folks in that neck of OK, figure it's just part of their family history. For some reason German Irish backgrounds were a big deal to my father's family. For his kids, we didn't care. And didn't stay in touch with cousins. But at least some Southerners make a big deal about descents who were confederates.

This makes me think of those Ancestry.com commercials where the person thinks he's Irish but find out he's German. We're all mutts.

Kinda the point of America, when you think about it. This nation was supposed to strive for the ideal of caring only about what kind of person you were, not what color.

 

[boedicca]

Ivory Soap used to advertise that it was 99.44% PURE! Warren is 99.9% NOT American Indian. So that makes her claim PURE BS.

 

[LaDexter]

those who have made the effort to trace her lineage

sounds like you did the DNA test, RealDave.

And I'm quite sure that to get the raw data from you, we'd have to go to court, just like with the "warmers"