🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Espionage On The Homefront

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
125,093
60,647
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. Monitoring foreign agents rather than Trump associates being the targets?
Perhaps...but while the intent is up for debate, we have learned that the fact of surveillance and monitoring and spying, is not.
Exactly what Trump said a month ago about the Obama Administration has been proven true.


2. Before Obama, the protocols were clear as far as revealing the names of American citizens who were monitored in these NSA tapings:

There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:

a. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.

b. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.

And far worse, leaks of classified data to the press just didn't occur before Obama.

Flynn was spied on without a warrant, without his knowledge, and his name was leaked to the press. We know that an Obama functionary described this as pro forma.
We no longer have a 4th amendment.

Evelyn Farkas:
'I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.


Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians– that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].'

...Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times reportwhich discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media."
UPDATE: President Obama’s Own Defense Deputy Admits Obama White House Spied on Candidate/President-Elect Trump…




3. The cat is out of the bag when the most watched Liberal cable outlet screams that nobody should have access to the story:

"CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you'"
CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you' • r/conspiracy



4. Lest any mistake purely natural functioning of the intelligence community, consider this: Hillary Clinton, her campaign, the Clinton Foundation, and every one associated with these spoke to all sorts of foreign officials.
Yet.....we have no intell leaks from that side.

"There is NO evidence that the same thing was done to Hillary Clinton or to her top campaign officials. ... the FBI wanted to look at the DNC servers to see if there was any foreign activity going on and the Democratic Party refused to allow them.

Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.

... what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama." Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon


Look carefully at those who rush to shield, excuse, and ignore that is clearly anti-American activities by the Left and their stooges.
 
PC the post-truther creates fictional pre-Trump standards for intelligence gathering protocols.
 
5. A medial review:

Obama increases agencies with access to raw intell data.....what reason other than to encourage leaks?


Ben Rhodes is one to whom this data is available....a man admitted to organizing media hordes to advance administration policies.


Evelyn Farcas, Obama appointee speaks of helping here 'colleagues' in raking up all sorts of anti-Trump data and passing it to Democrat politicians


Susan Rice has been exposed as lying to the public on many occasions, the latest in lots of unmasking of Trump associates on classified data.....and passing it on to multiple agencies


Sooo....this looks less and less like an accident and more like an enterprise.
 
6. Compare what we now know with the bogus 'Russian investigation' into Trump collusion with Russia.


Although Democrat politicians and their condottieri are all over cable tv claiming proof that Trump and Putin colluded to win the election.....not a single one can point to either any proof of same.....
....or even any statement by the intelligence heads of agencies saying that they have such proof.




Pay particular attention to the fake words used to imply 'proof' or 'evidence'...

Conclusions....judgment...confirmed....agree that....assess.....confident....
None of which mean 'proof.'

Educated persons recognize the language, and the reasons for same.
Government school grads, not so much.




"...the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment on alleged Russian “hacking” still lacks hard public evidence, a case of “trust-us” by politicized spy agencies,..."
US Report Still Lacks Proof on Russia 'Hack'
 
1. Monitoring foreign agents rather than Trump associates being the targets?
Perhaps...but while the intent is up for debate, we have learned that the fact of surveillance and monitoring and spying, is not.
Exactly what Trump said a month ago about the Obama Administration has been proven true.


2. Before Obama, the protocols were clear as far as revealing the names of American citizens who were monitored in these NSA tapings:

There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:

a. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.

b. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.

And far worse, leaks of classified data to the press just didn't occur before Obama.

Flynn was spied on without a warrant, without his knowledge, and his name was leaked to the press. We know that an Obama functionary described this as pro forma.
We no longer have a 4th amendment.

Evelyn Farkas:
'I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.


Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians– that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].'

...Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times reportwhich discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media."
UPDATE: President Obama’s Own Defense Deputy Admits Obama White House Spied on Candidate/President-Elect Trump…




3. The cat is out of the bag when the most watched Liberal cable outlet screams that nobody should have access to the story:

"CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you'"
CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you' • r/conspiracy



4. Lest any mistake purely natural functioning of the intelligence community, consider this: Hillary Clinton, her campaign, the Clinton Foundation, and every one associated with these spoke to all sorts of foreign officials.
Yet.....we have no intell leaks from that side.

"There is NO evidence that the same thing was done to Hillary Clinton or to her top campaign officials. ... the FBI wanted to look at the DNC servers to see if there was any foreign activity going on and the Democratic Party refused to allow them.

Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.

... what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama." Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon


Look carefully at those who rush to shield, excuse, and ignore that is clearly anti-American activities by the Left and their stooges.

Too much crap to address all of it, but I will ask how the acceptable reasons to request the names of citizens who were incidental in monitoring foreign agent's conversations has changed.
a. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.

b. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.

What is the new "C", or how were A and B changed?
 
1. Monitoring foreign agents rather than Trump associates being the targets?
Perhaps...but while the intent is up for debate, we have learned that the fact of surveillance and monitoring and spying, is not.
Exactly what Trump said a month ago about the Obama Administration has been proven true.


2. Before Obama, the protocols were clear as far as revealing the names of American citizens who were monitored in these NSA tapings:

There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:

a. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.

b. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.

And far worse, leaks of classified data to the press just didn't occur before Obama.

Flynn was spied on without a warrant, without his knowledge, and his name was leaked to the press. We know that an Obama functionary described this as pro forma.
We no longer have a 4th amendment.

Evelyn Farkas:
'I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.


Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians– that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].'

...Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times reportwhich discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media."
UPDATE: President Obama’s Own Defense Deputy Admits Obama White House Spied on Candidate/President-Elect Trump…




3. The cat is out of the bag when the most watched Liberal cable outlet screams that nobody should have access to the story:

"CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you'"
CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you' • r/conspiracy



4. Lest any mistake purely natural functioning of the intelligence community, consider this: Hillary Clinton, her campaign, the Clinton Foundation, and every one associated with these spoke to all sorts of foreign officials.
Yet.....we have no intell leaks from that side.

"There is NO evidence that the same thing was done to Hillary Clinton or to her top campaign officials. ... the FBI wanted to look at the DNC servers to see if there was any foreign activity going on and the Democratic Party refused to allow them.

Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.

... what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama." Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon


Look carefully at those who rush to shield, excuse, and ignore that is clearly anti-American activities by the Left and their stooges.
Now we see the results of the Patriot Act bear fruit; we, as a nation, have given up our essential liberties out of fear and for the illusion of security.

ehj7ee.jpg
 
1. Monitoring foreign agents rather than Trump associates being the targets?
Perhaps...but while the intent is up for debate, we have learned that the fact of surveillance and monitoring and spying, is not.
Exactly what Trump said a month ago about the Obama Administration has been proven true.


2. Before Obama, the protocols were clear as far as revealing the names of American citizens who were monitored in these NSA tapings:

There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:

a. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.

b. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.

And far worse, leaks of classified data to the press just didn't occur before Obama.

Flynn was spied on without a warrant, without his knowledge, and his name was leaked to the press. We know that an Obama functionary described this as pro forma.
We no longer have a 4th amendment.

Evelyn Farkas:
'I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.


Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians– that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].'

...Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times reportwhich discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media."
UPDATE: President Obama’s Own Defense Deputy Admits Obama White House Spied on Candidate/President-Elect Trump…




3. The cat is out of the bag when the most watched Liberal cable outlet screams that nobody should have access to the story:

"CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you'"
CNN Goes On Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers To Ignore Story - 'We will not aid and abet the people trying to misinform you' • r/conspiracy



4. Lest any mistake purely natural functioning of the intelligence community, consider this: Hillary Clinton, her campaign, the Clinton Foundation, and every one associated with these spoke to all sorts of foreign officials.
Yet.....we have no intell leaks from that side.

"There is NO evidence that the same thing was done to Hillary Clinton or to her top campaign officials. ... the FBI wanted to look at the DNC servers to see if there was any foreign activity going on and the Democratic Party refused to allow them.

Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.

... what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama." Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon


Look carefully at those who rush to shield, excuse, and ignore that is clearly anti-American activities by the Left and their stooges.
Now we see the results of the Patriot Act bear fruit; we, as a nation, have given up our essential liberties out of fear and for the illusion of security.

ehj7ee.jpg



The revelations expose the nexus of espionage and politicization.

It is the latter that moves the episode out of the 'national safety' realm.
 
"As Susan Rice faces growing calls to testify under oath, the former Obama administration official now accused of ordering the unmasking of Trump officials under surveillance is suggesting that she never did so for political purposes, and that it is sometimes "necessary" for investigative purposes.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a member of both the Senate Judiciary and Select Committee on Intelligence, suggested in a tweet earlier Tuesday that Rice "needs to testify under oath."
Susan Rice defiant amid growing calls for her to testify under oath



"....the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.
... what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama."
." Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon



The Left is sweating bullets!!

"MSNBC’s Matthews, Corn Meltdown, Claim Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Controversy Is Racist and Sexist"
MSNBC’s Matthews, Corn Meltdown, Claim Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Controversy Is Racist and Sexist
 
"As Susan Rice faces growing calls to testify under oath, the former Obama administration official now accused of ordering the unmasking of Trump officials under surveillance is suggesting that she never did so for political purposes, and that it is sometimes "necessary" for investigative purposes.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a member of both the Senate Judiciary and Select Committee on Intelligence, suggested in a tweet earlier Tuesday that Rice "needs to testify under oath."
Susan Rice defiant amid growing calls for her to testify under oath



"....the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.
... what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama."
." Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon



The Left is sweating bullets!!

"MSNBC’s Matthews, Corn Meltdown, Claim Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Controversy Is Racist and Sexist"
MSNBC’s Matthews, Corn Meltdown, Claim Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Controversy Is Racist and Sexist

And you do know that unmasking in it's self is not illegal.
 
And far worse, leaks of classified data to the press just didn't occur before Obama.
That is pure hoseshit, Chica! Maybe you're too bloody young or stupid or more likely ignorant to remember Deep Throat and Watergate just for one glaring example!

Shit I'm old enough and leaks were all over the place.


"S**t I'm old enough and leaks were all over the place."

Have you tried "Depends"?

upload_2017-4-5_11-35-49.jpeg
 
"As Susan Rice faces growing calls to testify under oath, the former Obama administration official now accused of ordering the unmasking of Trump officials under surveillance is suggesting that she never did so for political purposes, and that it is sometimes "necessary" for investigative purposes.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a member of both the Senate Judiciary and Select Committee on Intelligence, suggested in a tweet earlier Tuesday that Rice "needs to testify under oath."
Susan Rice defiant amid growing calls for her to testify under oath



"....the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.
... what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama."
." Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon



The Left is sweating bullets!!

"MSNBC’s Matthews, Corn Meltdown, Claim Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Controversy Is Racist and Sexist"
MSNBC’s Matthews, Corn Meltdown, Claim Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Controversy Is Racist and Sexist

And you do know that unmasking in it's self is not illegal.

There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:

a. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.

b. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.

And far worse, leaks of classified data to the press just didn't occur before Obama.

Flynn was spied on without a warrant, without his knowledge, and his name was leaked to the press. We know that an Obama functionary described this as pro forma.
We no longer have a 4th amendment.

Evelyn Farkas:
'I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.


Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians– that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].'

...Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times reportwhich discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media."
UPDATE: President Obama’s Own Defense Deputy Admits Obama White House Spied on Candidate/President-Elect Trump…




Obama increases agencies with access to raw intell data.....what reason other than to encourage leaks?



Ben Rhodes is one to whom this data is available....a man admitted to organizing media hordes to advance administration policies.



Evelyn Farcas, Obama appointee speaks of helping here 'colleagues' in raking up all sorts of anti-Trump data and passing it to Democrat politicians



Susan Rice has been exposed as lying to the public on many occasions, the latest in lots of unmasking of Trump associates on classified data.....and passing it on to multiple agencies



Sooo....this looks less and less like an accident and more like an enterprise.
 
DESPERATE ATTEMPT AT DIVERSION FROM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN'S RUSSIAN COMMUNICATIONS!
 
Hmmmm......danger, Leftists:

"52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"

52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™


Here's why:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The first Republican President


And this:
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance




Now....where are the 'investigations'?????
 
DESPERATE ATTEMPT AT DIVERSION FROM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN'S RUSSIAN COMMUNICATIONS!


Clearly a dunce like you doesn't understand what a diversion is.

Let me help:


"CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)"
CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)



Clearly CNN is afraid it might jar you into actually 'thinking.'

Tell them that isn't a possibility.
 
DESPERATE ATTEMPT AT DIVERSION FROM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN'S RUSSIAN COMMUNICATIONS!


Clearly a dunce like you doesn't understand what a diversion is.

Let me help:


"CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)"
CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)



Clearly CNN is afraid it might jar you into actually 'thinking.'

Tell them that isn't a possibility.


Seems you're on a mission. Why don't you make yourself a sign and trek down to D.C. and have your one person protest in front of the Capitol.
 
DESPERATE ATTEMPT AT DIVERSION FROM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN'S RUSSIAN COMMUNICATIONS!


Clearly a dunce like you doesn't understand what a diversion is.

Let me help:


"CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)"
CNN’s Don Lemon Comes Unglued Over Susan Rice: ‘We Will Not Aid and Abet People Trying to Misinform You’ (VIDEO)



Clearly CNN is afraid it might jar you into actually 'thinking.'

Tell them that isn't a possibility.


Seems you're on a mission. Why don't you make yourself a sign and trek down to D.C. and have your one person protest in front of the Capitol.


Seems like you've penned a post that attempts to hide your desire to dispute what I've posted.....

....but admits that you can't.

Hence....not well hidden at all.



I fervently desire you inserting that 'Dunce' in the middle of your avi, as it would provide information, and an amusing alliterative avi.
 

Forum List

Back
Top