Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The problem with this story, if you get the whole story, is that he chased the burglar down and shot him in the back OFF his property. THAT is why he was charged. The headline I got on the story was that he shot him in self defense. Then when they went into the details, you realize he was chased down the street and shot.
That's what I heard on 1010WINS.
In New York State, that's a crime.
Then he lives in the wrong State.
In Florida, if the burglar/robber has your personal property you are allowed to chase him and use whatever force is necessary to retrieve your property.
If I were chasing him and shot him, I PROMISE you, they would find my personal property on him.
See, people.... Even living in a dimocrap State is bad for you.
You need to think about that.
The story never said this. The story never mentioned him chasing him down the street. Unless you have a link to another side of the story.
Another liberal lie.
You are awfully quick with the "liberal lie" charge.
The brothers chased the alleged burglars from the porch, and Youssef fired, striking a 33-year-old man from Roosevelt in the back. That man, Jazzmen Bryant, later died of his wounds.
Now, almost seven months later, Youssef Abdel-Gawad has been indicted on manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide charges.
“This is not why our founding fathers developed the system,” Ramy Abdel-Gawad said. “This is absolutely absurd to see a district attorney defending criminals.”
The District Attorney’s office said the man who died was shot in a neighbor’s backyard as he ran away. A pellet gun was recovered from the group of alleged burglars.
LI Man Facing Manslaughter Charge For Shooting, Killing Alleged Armed Burglar « CBS New York
Police conducted a seven month investigation into this..
I've seen men get shot and continue to run for quite a distance.
Especially with a pussy-assed .38 and a hyped-up, frightened, adrenaline-filled young man.
Who's to say the good guy didn't shoot the dimocrap thief on his own property and the thief ran into the neighbor's yard?
I hope the defense Attorney has a brain.
Like I said, in Florida the worst the good guy would get is a $20 fine for littering.
You are awfully quick with the "liberal lie" charge.
Police conducted a seven month investigation into this..
I've seen men get shot and continue to run for quite a distance.
Especially with a pussy-assed .38 and a hyped-up, frightened, adrenaline-filled young man.
Who's to say the good guy didn't shoot the dimocrap thief on his own property and the thief ran into the neighbor's yard?
I hope the defense Attorney has a brain.
Like I said, in Florida the worst the good guy would get is a $20 fine for littering.
Hence why he is being charged and there will a trial where the evidence is laid out and then his peers will decide if he broke the law and is guilty of the charges, or if his story of self defense holds up in court.
Innocent until proven guilty.
My rebuttal is in the way these news stories in the OP leads to false assumptions and uses the lie of omission to stir people up about something not worth more than a casual conversation soundbite at best.
You are awfully quick with the "liberal lie" charge.
Police conducted a seven month investigation into this..
I've seen men get shot and continue to run for quite a distance.
Especially with a pussy-assed .38 and a hyped-up, frightened, adrenaline-filled young man.
Who's to say the good guy didn't shoot the dimocrap thief on his own property and the thief ran into the neighbor's yard?
I hope the defense Attorney has a brain.
Like I said, in Florida the worst the good guy would get is a $20 fine for littering.
Hence why he is being charged and there will a trial where the evidence is laid out and then his peers will decide if he broke the law and is guilty of the charges, or if his story of self defense holds up in court.
Innocent until proven guilty.
My rebuttal is in the way these news stories in the OP leads to false assumptions and uses the lie of omission to stir people up about something not worth more than a casual conversation soundbite at best.
I've seen men get shot and continue to run for quite a distance.
Especially with a pussy-assed .38 and a hyped-up, frightened, adrenaline-filled young man.
Who's to say the good guy didn't shoot the dimocrap thief on his own property and the thief ran into the neighbor's yard?
I hope the defense Attorney has a brain.
Like I said, in Florida the worst the good guy would get is a $20 fine for littering.
Hence why he is being charged and there will a trial where the evidence is laid out and then his peers will decide if he broke the law and is guilty of the charges, or if his story of self defense holds up in court.
Innocent until proven guilty.
My rebuttal is in the way these news stories in the OP leads to false assumptions and uses the lie of omission to stir people up about something not worth more than a casual conversation soundbite at best.
with a seven month investigation my guess would be that they have some good evidence to lock this guy up. There is no good reason IMHO to shot someone in the back as they run away.
shooting someone in the BACK is NOT self defense
shooting someone in the BACK is NOT self defense
That's what I heard on 1010WINS.
In New York State, that's a crime.
Then he lives in the wrong State.
In Florida, if the burglar/robber has your personal property you are allowed to chase him and use whatever force is necessary to retrieve your property.
If I were chasing him and shot him, I PROMISE you, they would find my personal property on him.
See, people.... Even living in a dimocrap State is bad for you.
You need to think about that.
There are reasons that a sane state like New York prohibits you from wildly firing at people running away.
1. They no longer pose a threat to you.
2. Recovering property is not a justification for killing a human being.
3. You may injure or kill people not at all involved in any crime.
shooting someone in the BACK is NOT self defense
one needs to consider the state of mind one would be in...after being shot at....your natural reaction is to return fire....return fire till the threat is down....
shooting someone in the BACK is NOT self defense
one needs to consider the state of mind one would be in...after being shot at....your natural reaction is to return fire....return fire till the threat is down....
You realize who you're talking to, right?
The normal 'Fight or Flight' reaction in a man would be triggered and we'd be pumping adrenaline like crazy and ready to rock 'n roll.
Your typical dimocrap would be hiding under the bed with his cat.
They don't get it
Surveillance video shows burglar has a gun, but the home owner still faces charges for firing back because one of the home invaders died.
Surveillance Video Shows Burglar Firing Into Home But Police Still Charge Resident For Shooting Back!
Depends on your state. Here in Missouri we have the Castle Amendment which allows shooting first to protect life, home, and property like your car. Don't have to give a warning or anything, someone breaks into your car, you can blow em away.
Then he lives in the wrong State.
In Florida, if the burglar/robber has your personal property you are allowed to chase him and use whatever force is necessary to retrieve your property.
If I were chasing him and shot him, I PROMISE you, they would find my personal property on him.
See, people.... Even living in a dimocrap State is bad for you.
You need to think about that.
There are reasons that a sane state like New York prohibits you from wildly firing at people running away.
1. They no longer pose a threat to you.
2. Recovering property is not a justification for killing a human being.
3. You may injure or kill people not at all involved in any crime.
Are you going to sit there and tell me that we were not told the whole story by the OP? I'm stunned.
Forced vacations (I was over my max hours at work) suck but they allow you to do some research into the topic. Dude was blasted away in a neighbor's yard. At the end of the day, I wish the prosecutors would have taken the 7 months between act and indictment and charged the guy with reckless endangerment or something like that. If he was a criminal trying to break into your house...he's a man that needed to be slaughtered IMHO. Manslaughter seems to be too much of a charge for the act.
How long did he pursue the attempted robber?
I understand it was in a neighbor's yard...was it an adjacent neighbor's yard?
If it was so cut and dried, why didn't police charge him the night of the shooting?
Sure reeks of political motivation on the part of the DA since they seem to have brought up the seemingly immaterial criminal record of the accused....why is it valid?
I guess we need to watch and wait.
one needs to consider the state of mind one would be in...after being shot at....your natural reaction is to return fire....return fire till the threat is down....
You realize who you're talking to, right?
The normal 'Fight or Flight' reaction in a man would be triggered and we'd be pumping adrenaline like crazy and ready to rock 'n roll.
Your typical dimocrap would be hiding under the bed with his cat.
They don't get it
fyi....i am a liberal democrat
shooting someone in the BACK is NOT self defense
one needs to consider the state of mind one would be in...after being shot at....your natural reaction is to return fire....return fire till the threat is down....
