🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Even more than myself, many Veterans oppose the Bush WAR ON IRAQ

I've done a helluva lot, CSM. Lest you forget, I'm still doing a helluva lot. The brilliance as observed from the preceeding few posts here just have a take on their own insignificance. I can't help that.

Psychoblues

Here is the real info on Motor Mouth Murtha and his cut and run tour

http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=6465
AMERICA, MEET THE REAL JOHN MURTHA (D-PA)
Rep. Murtha Embarks On Democrat Cut-And-Run Tour Of America
_____________________________________________________________

REP. MURTHA EMBARKING ON 41 STOP CUT-AND-RUN CROSS-COUNTRY TOUR

Rep. Murtha Will Campaign In 41 Races This Cycle, A 100 Percent Increase From 2004:

"Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), Who Has Suspended His Race To Become Majority Leader In The Event That The Democrats Capture The House, Plans To Campaign In 41 Races Around The Country ... This Is A Dramatic Increase In Activity For Murtha, Who Did Not Campaign For House Candidates In 2004 ..." (Alexander Bolton, "To Raise Profile, Murtha Will Stump For 41 Dems," The Hill, 7/26/06)

REP. MURTHA WRONG ON WAR IN IRAQ

Murtha Supported The Use Of Force Against Saddam In 1991 And 2002:

Murtha Voted For The Use Of Force In Iraq In 1991. (H.J. Res. 77, CQ Vote #9: Passed 250-183: R 164-3; D 86-179; I 0-1, 1/12/91, Murtha Voted Yea)

Murtha Voted For The Use Of Force In Iraq In 2002. (H. J. Res. 114, CQ Vote #455: Passed 296-133: R 215-6; D 81-126; I 0-1, 10/10/02, Murtha Voted Yea)

After Committing Troops, Murtha Was One Of Two Members To Support Reinstating The Draft:

Murtha Was One Of Only Two Members of The House of Representatives To Vote To Reinstate The Draft. (H.R. 163, CQ Vote # 494: Rejected 2-402: R 0-215; D 2-186; I 0-1, 10/5/04, Murtha Voted Yea)

Then, Murtha Called For "Immediate Redeployment" Of Troops Out Of Iraq:

Murtha: "I believe before the Iraqi elections, scheduled for mid-December, the Iraqi people and the emerging government must be put on notice. The United States will immediately redeploy." (CNN's "Live Event," 11/17/05)

Later, Rep. Murtha Claimed "We Can't Win" And Need To Withdraw; Compared Americans To Saddam Hussein:

Rep. Murtha: "We can't win this." (Rep. John Murtha, Congressional Record, 6/15/06, p. H4028)

Rep. Murtha: "We are causing the problem." (Rep. John Murtha, Congressional Record, 6/15/06, p. H4028)



Rep. Murtha Claims Americans Are Driving Iraqis Out Of The Country, Just Like Saddam Hussein. Rep. Murtha: "Almost 900,000 people left when Saddam Hussein was there ... The time we have been there, 900,000 people have left the county." (Rep. John Murtha, Congressional Record, 6/15/06, p. H4027)



Rep. Murtha Is "Not Sure" American Troops Made A Difference In The Death Of Zarqawi. CNN's Elaine Quijano: "Is it fair to say that this, this attack and the death of Abu Masab al Zarqawi wouldn't have happened if U.S. troops were not on the ground?" Rep. Murtha: "Well, I'm not sure about that. I'm not sure they couldn't have done it from outside." (CNN's "Live Today," 6/8/06)
Rep. Murtha Has Promised Dems Will Cut-And-Run From Iraq If They Gain Control Of Congress:

Rep. Murtha Claimed Dems Will Withdraw From Iraq If They Take Over. MSNBC's Chris Matthews: "[A]re the Democrats going to seize the leadership of the Congress, win the votes, take over Congress and end the war? Are they going to do it?" ... Rep. Murtha: "We have to convince Democrats and Republicans that this war has to end." (MSNBC's "Hardball," 5/17/06)

Rep. Murtha: "My timetable is to immediately work and say to them, 'Look, you're going to have to take over yourself, this is your responsibility. And we're redeploying our force.' The sooner the better, as far as I'm concerned." (Rep. Jack Murtha, Press Conference, 5/17/06)
REP. MURTHA IS A JUST ANOTHER LIBERAL DEMOCRAT WHO SUPPORTS HIGHER TAXES

Rep. Murtha Has Repeatedly Voted For Higher Taxes:

In 1993, Rep. Murtha Voted For The Largest Tax Hike In American History, Which Raised Taxes $241 Billion. (H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #406: Adopted 218-216: R 0-175; D 217-41; I 1-0, 8/5/93, Murtha Voted Yea)

Rep. Murtha Voted Against 2001 And 2003 Bush Tax Cuts. (H.R. 1836, CQ Vote #149: Passed 240-154: R 211-0; D 28-153; I 1-1, 5/26/01, Murtha Voted Nay; H.R. 1836, CQ Vote #118: Passed 230-197: R 216-0; D 13-196; I 1-1, 5/16/01, Murtha Voted Nay; H.R. 2, CQ Vote #225: Passed 231-200: R 224-1; D 7-198; I 0-1, 5/23/03, Murtha Voted Nay; H.R. 2, CQ Vote #182: Passed 222-203: R 218-3; D 4-199; I 0-1, 5/9/03, Murtha Voted Nay)


Nearly 4.2 Million Taxpayers Benefiting From New 10-Percent Bracket;
More Than 1.1 Million Taxpayers Benefiting From Reduction In Top Income Tax Rates;
More Than 1.4 Million Married Couples Benefiting From The Reduction Of Marriage Penalty;
Nearly 1.2 Million Parents Benefiting From The Increase In Child Tax Credit;
More Than 1 Million Taxpayers Benefiting From Capital Gains And Corporate Dividend Tax Cuts. (U.S. Department Of The Treasury, Fact Sheet)
Rep. Murtha Voted At Least 5 Times For Higher Gas Taxes, Including A 4.3-Cent Per Gallon Increase In Gas Tax. (H.R. 3566, CQ Vote #338: Passed 343-83: R 101-61; D 241-22; I 1-0, 10/23/91, Murtha Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #199: Passed 219-213: R 0-175; D 218-38; I 1-0, 5/27/93, Murtha Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #406: Adopted 218-216: R 0-175; D 217-41; I 1-0, 8/5/93, Murtha Voted Yea; H.R. 3415, CQ Vote #182: Passed 301-108: R 208-15; D 92-93; I 1-0, 5/21/96, Murtha Voted Nay; H.R. 2400, CQ Vote #97: Rejected 98-318: R 82-138; D 16-179; I 0-1, 4/1/98, Murtha Voted Nay)

Rep. Murtha Voted Against Permanently Reducing The Death Tax. (H.R. 5638, CQ Vote #315: Passed 269-156: R 226-2; D 43-153; I 0-1, 6/22/06, Murtha Voted Nay)

Rep. Murtha Voted Against Capital Gains And Alternative Minimum Tax Relief. (H.R. 4297, CQ Vote #135: Adopted 244-185: R 229-2; D 15-182; I 0-1, 5/10/06, Murtha Voted Nay)

Third Parties Agree Rep. Murtha Is No Friend To Taxpayers:

Rep. Murtha Has A 13 Percent Lifetime Rating From National Taxpayers Union Foundation. (National Taxpayers Union Foundation Website, www.ntu.org, Accessed 7/27/06)

During 108th Congress, Rep. Murtha Only Has A 15 Percent Rating From Citizens Against Government Waste. (Citizens Against Government Waste Website, www.cagw.org, Accessed 7/27/06)

REP. MURTHA'S QUESTIONABLE ETHICS

In The 1980's Murtha Was A Named "Unindicted Co-Conspirator" In ABSCAM Bribery Sting:

"In The Early 1980s ... [Murtha] Was Himself Under Investigation For His Role In ABSCAM, The FBI Sting Operation Involving Bribes From Phony Arab Sheiks." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)

"Murtha Was Named An Unindicted Co-Conspirator In The Government's Case Against Two Fellow Congressmen, And He Testified In Their Trial." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)


"On The FBI's Undercover Videotapes, Murtha Is Seen Talking To Agents About A $50,000 Payoff For Providing Immigration Help For A Phony Arab Sheik. He Refused The Money, Although He Did Say He Might Be Interested After He Got To Know The Would-Be Givers Better." (Charles R. Babcock, "Abscam Attorney Quits Ethics Panel After Murtha Vote," The Washington Post, 7/30/81)
"The House Ethics Committee Continued To Deliberate On Murtha's Fate. However, The Committee Deadlocked On A Party-Line Vote And ... Charges Were Dropped." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)

"[E. Barrett Prettyman Jr.] The Special Counsel To The House Ethics Committee's Abscam Investigation Resigned In Protest ... After The Committee Rejected ... His Recommendation To File Misconduct Charge Against [Murtha]." (Charles R. Babcock, "Abscam Attorney Quits Ethics Panel After Murtha Vote," The Washington Post, 7/30/81)
In The 1990's Rep. Murtha Caught Up In The House Banking Scandal, Led Effort To Weaken House Ethics Rules:

Rep. Murtha Denied Being Part Of The Scandal, Said He Had Not Bounced Checks At House Bank. ("Reconciling The Congressional Checkbook," The Washington Post, 10/7/91)

Rep. Murtha Bounced 10 Checks At The House Bank. ("303 Who Wrote Overdrafts On House Accounts," USA Today, 4/17/92)
"[Murtha] Began Promoting A Controversial Plan To Require The Department Of Justice To Pay The Legal Bills Of Members Of Congress Who Are Charged But Never Convicted." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)

"[G]ary Ruskin, The Executive Director Of The Congressional Accountability Project, Who Calls The Legal Fee Payment An Unconscionable Perquisite That Is Unavailable To Ordinary Americans. ... [C]ongressional Watchdogs Say The Provision Will Be A Club That Members Of Congress Can Use To Intimidate The Justice Department From Bringing Charges." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)
"[T]he Murtha Amendments Would Make It Harder For The House Ethics Committee To Investigate Members Of Congress For Wrongdoing. One Would Require The Committee To Drop An Investigation If The Committee Is Deadlocked For Six Months. The Second Would Prevent ... Outside Groups ... From Filing Ethics Charges Without A Congressional Sponsor." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)
 
Here is the real info on Motor Mouth Murtha and his cut and run tour

http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=6465
AMERICA, MEET THE REAL JOHN MURTHA (D-PA)
Rep. Murtha Embarks On Democrat Cut-And-Run Tour Of America
_____________________________________________________________

REP. MURTHA EMBARKING ON 41 STOP CUT-AND-RUN CROSS-COUNTRY TOUR

Rep. Murtha Will Campaign In 41 Races This Cycle, A 100 Percent Increase From 2004:

"Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), Who Has Suspended His Race To Become Majority Leader In The Event That The Democrats Capture The House, Plans To Campaign In 41 Races Around The Country ... This Is A Dramatic Increase In Activity For Murtha, Who Did Not Campaign For House Candidates In 2004 ..." (Alexander Bolton, "To Raise Profile, Murtha Will Stump For 41 Dems," The Hill, 7/26/06)

REP. MURTHA WRONG ON WAR IN IRAQ

Murtha Supported The Use Of Force Against Saddam In 1991 And 2002:

Murtha Voted For The Use Of Force In Iraq In 1991. (H.J. Res. 77, CQ Vote #9: Passed 250-183: R 164-3; D 86-179; I 0-1, 1/12/91, Murtha Voted Yea)

Murtha Voted For The Use Of Force In Iraq In 2002. (H. J. Res. 114, CQ Vote #455: Passed 296-133: R 215-6; D 81-126; I 0-1, 10/10/02, Murtha Voted Yea)

After Committing Troops, Murtha Was One Of Two Members To Support Reinstating The Draft:

Murtha Was One Of Only Two Members of The House of Representatives To Vote To Reinstate The Draft. (H.R. 163, CQ Vote # 494: Rejected 2-402: R 0-215; D 2-186; I 0-1, 10/5/04, Murtha Voted Yea)

Then, Murtha Called For "Immediate Redeployment" Of Troops Out Of Iraq:

Murtha: "I believe before the Iraqi elections, scheduled for mid-December, the Iraqi people and the emerging government must be put on notice. The United States will immediately redeploy." (CNN's "Live Event," 11/17/05)

Later, Rep. Murtha Claimed "We Can't Win" And Need To Withdraw; Compared Americans To Saddam Hussein:

Rep. Murtha: "We can't win this." (Rep. John Murtha, Congressional Record, 6/15/06, p. H4028)

Rep. Murtha: "We are causing the problem." (Rep. John Murtha, Congressional Record, 6/15/06, p. H4028)



Rep. Murtha Claims Americans Are Driving Iraqis Out Of The Country, Just Like Saddam Hussein. Rep. Murtha: "Almost 900,000 people left when Saddam Hussein was there ... The time we have been there, 900,000 people have left the county." (Rep. John Murtha, Congressional Record, 6/15/06, p. H4027)



Rep. Murtha Is "Not Sure" American Troops Made A Difference In The Death Of Zarqawi. CNN's Elaine Quijano: "Is it fair to say that this, this attack and the death of Abu Masab al Zarqawi wouldn't have happened if U.S. troops were not on the ground?" Rep. Murtha: "Well, I'm not sure about that. I'm not sure they couldn't have done it from outside." (CNN's "Live Today," 6/8/06)
Rep. Murtha Has Promised Dems Will Cut-And-Run From Iraq If They Gain Control Of Congress:

Rep. Murtha Claimed Dems Will Withdraw From Iraq If They Take Over. MSNBC's Chris Matthews: "[A]re the Democrats going to seize the leadership of the Congress, win the votes, take over Congress and end the war? Are they going to do it?" ... Rep. Murtha: "We have to convince Democrats and Republicans that this war has to end." (MSNBC's "Hardball," 5/17/06)

Rep. Murtha: "My timetable is to immediately work and say to them, 'Look, you're going to have to take over yourself, this is your responsibility. And we're redeploying our force.' The sooner the better, as far as I'm concerned." (Rep. Jack Murtha, Press Conference, 5/17/06)
REP. MURTHA IS A JUST ANOTHER LIBERAL DEMOCRAT WHO SUPPORTS HIGHER TAXES

Rep. Murtha Has Repeatedly Voted For Higher Taxes:

In 1993, Rep. Murtha Voted For The Largest Tax Hike In American History, Which Raised Taxes $241 Billion. (H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #406: Adopted 218-216: R 0-175; D 217-41; I 1-0, 8/5/93, Murtha Voted Yea)

Rep. Murtha Voted Against 2001 And 2003 Bush Tax Cuts. (H.R. 1836, CQ Vote #149: Passed 240-154: R 211-0; D 28-153; I 1-1, 5/26/01, Murtha Voted Nay; H.R. 1836, CQ Vote #118: Passed 230-197: R 216-0; D 13-196; I 1-1, 5/16/01, Murtha Voted Nay; H.R. 2, CQ Vote #225: Passed 231-200: R 224-1; D 7-198; I 0-1, 5/23/03, Murtha Voted Nay; H.R. 2, CQ Vote #182: Passed 222-203: R 218-3; D 4-199; I 0-1, 5/9/03, Murtha Voted Nay)


Nearly 4.2 Million Taxpayers Benefiting From New 10-Percent Bracket;
More Than 1.1 Million Taxpayers Benefiting From Reduction In Top Income Tax Rates;
More Than 1.4 Million Married Couples Benefiting From The Reduction Of Marriage Penalty;
Nearly 1.2 Million Parents Benefiting From The Increase In Child Tax Credit;
More Than 1 Million Taxpayers Benefiting From Capital Gains And Corporate Dividend Tax Cuts. (U.S. Department Of The Treasury, Fact Sheet)
Rep. Murtha Voted At Least 5 Times For Higher Gas Taxes, Including A 4.3-Cent Per Gallon Increase In Gas Tax. (H.R. 3566, CQ Vote #338: Passed 343-83: R 101-61; D 241-22; I 1-0, 10/23/91, Murtha Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #199: Passed 219-213: R 0-175; D 218-38; I 1-0, 5/27/93, Murtha Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #406: Adopted 218-216: R 0-175; D 217-41; I 1-0, 8/5/93, Murtha Voted Yea; H.R. 3415, CQ Vote #182: Passed 301-108: R 208-15; D 92-93; I 1-0, 5/21/96, Murtha Voted Nay; H.R. 2400, CQ Vote #97: Rejected 98-318: R 82-138; D 16-179; I 0-1, 4/1/98, Murtha Voted Nay)

Rep. Murtha Voted Against Permanently Reducing The Death Tax. (H.R. 5638, CQ Vote #315: Passed 269-156: R 226-2; D 43-153; I 0-1, 6/22/06, Murtha Voted Nay)

Rep. Murtha Voted Against Capital Gains And Alternative Minimum Tax Relief. (H.R. 4297, CQ Vote #135: Adopted 244-185: R 229-2; D 15-182; I 0-1, 5/10/06, Murtha Voted Nay)

Third Parties Agree Rep. Murtha Is No Friend To Taxpayers:

Rep. Murtha Has A 13 Percent Lifetime Rating From National Taxpayers Union Foundation. (National Taxpayers Union Foundation Website, www.ntu.org, Accessed 7/27/06)

During 108th Congress, Rep. Murtha Only Has A 15 Percent Rating From Citizens Against Government Waste. (Citizens Against Government Waste Website, www.cagw.org, Accessed 7/27/06)

REP. MURTHA'S QUESTIONABLE ETHICS

In The 1980's Murtha Was A Named "Unindicted Co-Conspirator" In ABSCAM Bribery Sting:

"In The Early 1980s ... [Murtha] Was Himself Under Investigation For His Role In ABSCAM, The FBI Sting Operation Involving Bribes From Phony Arab Sheiks." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)

"Murtha Was Named An Unindicted Co-Conspirator In The Government's Case Against Two Fellow Congressmen, And He Testified In Their Trial." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)


"On The FBI's Undercover Videotapes, Murtha Is Seen Talking To Agents About A $50,000 Payoff For Providing Immigration Help For A Phony Arab Sheik. He Refused The Money, Although He Did Say He Might Be Interested After He Got To Know The Would-Be Givers Better." (Charles R. Babcock, "Abscam Attorney Quits Ethics Panel After Murtha Vote," The Washington Post, 7/30/81)
"The House Ethics Committee Continued To Deliberate On Murtha's Fate. However, The Committee Deadlocked On A Party-Line Vote And ... Charges Were Dropped." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)

"[E. Barrett Prettyman Jr.] The Special Counsel To The House Ethics Committee's Abscam Investigation Resigned In Protest ... After The Committee Rejected ... His Recommendation To File Misconduct Charge Against [Murtha]." (Charles R. Babcock, "Abscam Attorney Quits Ethics Panel After Murtha Vote," The Washington Post, 7/30/81)
In The 1990's Rep. Murtha Caught Up In The House Banking Scandal, Led Effort To Weaken House Ethics Rules:

Rep. Murtha Denied Being Part Of The Scandal, Said He Had Not Bounced Checks At House Bank. ("Reconciling The Congressional Checkbook," The Washington Post, 10/7/91)

Rep. Murtha Bounced 10 Checks At The House Bank. ("303 Who Wrote Overdrafts On House Accounts," USA Today, 4/17/92)
"[Murtha] Began Promoting A Controversial Plan To Require The Department Of Justice To Pay The Legal Bills Of Members Of Congress Who Are Charged But Never Convicted." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)

"[G]ary Ruskin, The Executive Director Of The Congressional Accountability Project, Who Calls The Legal Fee Payment An Unconscionable Perquisite That Is Unavailable To Ordinary Americans. ... [C]ongressional Watchdogs Say The Provision Will Be A Club That Members Of Congress Can Use To Intimidate The Justice Department From Bringing Charges." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)
"[T]he Murtha Amendments Would Make It Harder For The House Ethics Committee To Investigate Members Of Congress For Wrongdoing. One Would Require The Committee To Drop An Investigation If The Committee Is Deadlocked For Six Months. The Second Would Prevent ... Outside Groups ... From Filing Ethics Charges Without A Congressional Sponsor." (Jock Friedly, "Murtha's Ethics Crusade Draws Watchdog Ire," The Hill, 9/17/97)

Well gosh darn it Red States, there you go again mucking up the waters with the truth.:slap:

You know of course, that the dem's just hate that word, you know the one I'm talking about, TRUTH. It goes hand in hand with JUSTICE, and weather the dem's want to admit it or not, it IS the AMERICAN WAY.

Keep up the good work.:cheers2:
 
I've done a helluva lot, CSM. Lest you forget, I'm still doing a helluva lot. The brilliance as observed from the preceeding few posts here just have a take on their own insignificance. I can't help that.

Psychoblues

Dude, do you EVER come down to Earth?:bong420:
 
Dude, do you EVER come down to Earth?:bong420:



He is cut from the Chris Matthews mold...........



Chris Matthews: No Complaints About Murtha, Media Can't Be Wrong
Posted by Michael Rule on August 18, 2006 - 10:47.
As reported last night by Mark Finkelstein, Chris Matthews interviewed Congressman John Murtha’s Republican opponent, Diana Irey, in Pennsylvania’ 12th district on "Hardball". Part of the interview focused on the Haditha incident in Iraq and Congressman Murtha’s statement of condemnation of American troops surrounding the incident. Matthews challenged Irey, "...if you’re right about Murtha, you must be right about "Time" magazine and all the news publications" and claimed he had no complaints about Murtha’s Haditha comments:

"You know, I think, I think Murtha served in the military as a combat officer in Vietnam. I don't have any complaints, but you have a complaint, that's fine."

So being a combat officer in Vietnam excuses grossly irresponsible comments directed toward men and women currently serving in the armed services, particularly those serving in Iraq? Mr. Matthews has no complaints that Congressman Murtha has judged as guilty troops who have been accused of committing atrocities in Iraq before they have received their day in court.

As Ms. Irey had mentioned previously in the segment:

"...and his comment that we had marines that killed innocent Iraqi civilians in cold blood. You know, that was such a devastating blow to our military. What that did was it was a rush to judgment. It painted them all with a wide brush and it declared that they were guilty before innocent and that's not the way we do things here in America."

But apparently, since Congressman Murtha was a combat officer in Vietnam, it qualifies him to judge these marines as guilty, so Matthews has no complaints, even if Murtha’s statements violate the fundamental American principle of innocent until proven guilty. Matthews even goes on to presume that the accused marines will be convicted:

Matthews: "Would it be all right for him to say that after they were condemned?"

Irey: "If he wants to make comments."

Matthews: "I know, but is it all right to say that after they are convicted. Is it alright to say that?"

Why does Mr. Matthews presume they are going to be convicted? Has he seen all the evidence in the case. As Americans aren’t these troops entitled to the presumption of innocence?

Also in the interview, Ms. Irey noted that she has received communications from troops serving over seas who have informed her that Murtha’s statements on Haditha have emboldened the enemy:

"I receive emails and letters regularly from the soldiers on the ground in Iraq, and they are saying that what Mr. Murtha has said has emboldened our enemy. It has given the insurgents new energy in what they're doing against us."

So Murtha’s statements are not only violating the presumption of innocence principle, but also encourage the enemy. Mr. Matthews’ response may explain why he has judged the accused as guilty, without trial, and has no complaints about Congressman Murtha’s statements, and that is the media have come to the same conclusions:

"Well, the cover of ‘Time’ magazine and other publications have been filled with stories about that horror over there. Isn’t that also, if you're right about Murtha, you must be right about ‘Time’ magazine and all the news publications."

So, if Ms. Irey is correct about what she says about Congressman Murtha, it also undermines the press. It shows the media have been accomplices in endangering our troops and violating American principles, and Mr. Matthews can’t let that stand. After all, the media would never do anything to undermine national defenses, would they?
http://newsbusters.org/node/7052


and Chris does not want the world to know his brother is a - gasp - Republican.........

Matthews Irate at Irey: 'I Don't Need to Be Reminded' My Brother GOP Candidate
Posted by Mark Finkelstein on August 17, 2006 - 22:56.
If I ever knew that Chris Matthews' brother Jim Matthews is the Republican candidate for Lt. Governor of Pennsylvania, I had forgotten. Chris manifestly has not, and on this evening's Hardball peevishly berated a Republican guest who had the temerity to remind him of that fact.

After interviewing Dem Congressman Jack Murtha, Matthews had Murtha's Republican challenger Diana Irey on as a guest. Before getting into substance, Matthews testily alluded to the fact that Irey's campaign manager had sent Matthews a press release with proposed questions for Murtha. First on the list:

"How hard is it for you knowing that Jim Matthews just appeared two days ago with your opponent Diana Irey to cut the ribbon at her volunteer HQ in your hometown of Johnstown?"

Matthews lit into Irey over what the Hardball host clearly took as an affront:

"What relevance is that to anything here on this show?"
"What's the purpose of this question, to intimidate [Murtha] or what?"
"Do you think it was right for you to have your flack bring this up as part of a set-up for an interview with you?"
And then, flashing some real anger: "I love my brother. I don't need to be reminded he's the Republican candidate for Lt. Gov. in Pennsylvania."
Irey good-naturedly took Matthews' barbs in smiling stride.

Then, with a preview of the condescension that was later to reveal itself, Matthews said: "Let's move on to the substantive, grown-up stuff." Translation: this was a kid-stuff move on your part.

At the end of the interview, Irey, describing Iraqi children who regularly displayed their appreciation to US soldiers, expressed optimism for Iraq's future.

Retorted Matthews "I appreciate your coming on. You're a very delightful challenger." Very delightful? Code for 'young and attractive if not quite a heavyweight'? You sensed that it was only the fact that they were in different studios that prevented Matthews from patting Irey's hand. He ended by schooling his guest: "Let me tell you something. 50,000 Iraqis have been killed since we went in there. I don't think there's going to be a lot of flowers in there when we leave."

Had a conservative host treated a liberal woman candidate with the same condescending paternalism, NOW would have had a picket line organized before the show was over.

http://newsbusters.org/node/7043
 

Forum List

Back
Top