Even with audio proof trump denies "Nasty" remark

[Mac1958]

The fact remains, Trump said what he said.

In the grand scheme of things, given the myriad childish, ignorant, rude, embarrassing things he has said, he's said worse.

But he really did say it. The fact that there is any pushback on this fact is just sad.
.

Oh boo hoo, pot stirrer.

Get over it

Yeah, that's what the Regressives say when their garbage is pointed out. "Too bad".

You folks really are in a race to the bottom when it comes to lowering standards.

How proud you must be, to be so much like those you hate.
.

I'd appreciate if you keep my belief system out of this, it's not the same. Thank you very much.

There are many, many similarities in the behaviors of the ends of the spectrum.
.

 

[Jitss617]

Trump denies he called Meghan Markle 'nasty' despite audio of remark

The Liar in Chief knows that most of his mindless cult will accept his latest lie as truth. He laughs at their ignorance daily.....

Tds

 

[peach174]

How many is the lie tree up to now? 2456?

Let's just say it was 200 The pos IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED

Did you whine when Ears lied? And he told some whoppers

Those were little white lies Trump tells real big lies Futures off implied open - 370

Yeah right you deluded hack.

And save your market crap. You're an amateur

LOL There are small lies large lies and damned lies Trump is a damn liar.....And I do damn well for an amateur Guess you're losing your panties, or pants if you're a guy

What did he lie about ,on this particular subject we are discussing?

 

[rightwinger]

The fact remains, Trump said what he said.

In the grand scheme of things, given the myriad childish, ignorant, rude, embarrassing things he has said, he's said worse.

But he really did say it. The fact that there is any pushback on this fact is just sad.
.

It amazes me with the arrogance of someone who can deny something that has been recorded

And his supporters will back him up

 

[HappyJoy]

The fact remains, Trump said what he said.

In the grand scheme of things, given the myriad childish, ignorant, rude, embarrassing things he has said, he's said worse.

But he really did say it. The fact that there is any pushback on this fact is just sad.
.

Oh boo hoo, pot stirrer.

Get over it

Yeah, that's what the Regressives say when their garbage is pointed out. "Too bad".

You folks really are in a race to the bottom when it comes to lowering standards.

How proud you must be, to be so much like those you hate.
.

I'd appreciate if you keep my belief system out of this, it's not the same. Thank you very much.

There are many, many similarities in the behaviors of the ends of the spectrum.
.

And in the middle, but this isn't how I roll, never have and I don't see too many liberals on this board who go out o there way to believe shit like this.

 

[Foxfyre]

She was nasty.

Not what she said was nasty.

So your excuse is Trump was just stupid.

You got it backwards, dave, but that's expected of the goons.

Funny chit but Trump aid she was nasty & you people are saying he didn't. He supposedly didn't because he meant to say something else.

She was nasty.

Not what she said was nasty.

So your excuse is Trump was just stupid.

You got it backwards, dave, but that's expected of the goons.

Funny chit but Trump aid she was nasty & you people are saying he didn't. He supposedly didn't because he meant to say something else.

She was nasty.

Not what she said was nasty.

So your excuse is Trump was just stupid.

You got it backwards, dave, but that's expected of the goons.

Funny chit but Trump aid she was nasty & you people are saying he didn't. He supposedly didn't because he meant to say something else.

Big difference between was nasty and is nasty.

You get it. Several others here get it. But I don't think the TDS syndrome crowd will ever get it.

One more time:

He did not call Meghan Markle nasty. I've watched and rewatched the full video in full context. In 2016 she insulted him as misogynistic and he said that insult was 'nasty' but he was not angry or critical when he did it and he went on to wish her all the best in her role as part of the royal family.

It is typical of the TDS leftist media and people on message boards to pull ONE WORD out of a full context and make that what his comments were all about.

That is wrong.
That is hateful.
That is intellectually dishonest.

Can you quote the part where Trump said the word 'nasty'? Just curious if you can do that one simple thing.

I'll have to hunt it up. I watched the complete video twice during the wee hours of the morning on TV this morning. It's probably somewhere out there on the internet though but Google is pretty good at suppressing evidence that doesn't mesh with the hate-everything-Trump theme.

This current blatantly issued talking point was no doubt to blunt the effect of the National Day of Prayer for the President that was organized for this weekend.

 

[Nosmo King]

He’s lying to you bold faced and with hard PROOF to the contrary; this should concern you greatly. Why is it so hard for you people? Baffles the mind

It's really earth shaking, isn't it?

Is Trump the only politician Conservatives excuse for lying?

Face facts. Trump is an asshole. No getting around that. And this slam on Meghan is just another link in the chain of Trump's assholishness.

Trump needs to be an asshole not some fag apologist like black jesus. Who incidentally was caught on video lying his traitor ass off in Brazil.

No mature person needs to be an asshole. Only the petulant, boorish and poorly raised are assholes. Suchmpeople are loathed, not celebrated.

Is the state of our society so rotten that such behavior is cheered? Dear God! If it wasn't for situational ethics, some folks would have no ethics at all. Do your children a favor and teach them that some behavior is unacceptable. Otherwise you would be hastening themarrival of tribal, childish and reckless comportment. And what's the virtue in that?

But you approve of all the democrats attacking him 24/7, being assholes in other words. You peoples hypocrisy knows no bounds.

There are political,attacks.

And then there is assholishness behavior.

 

[Mac1958]

It amazes me with the arrogance of someone who can deny something that has been recorded
And his supporters will back him up

The post-fact, post-reality era.
.

 

[HappyJoy]

You got it backwards, dave, but that's expected of the goons.

Funny chit but Trump aid she was nasty & you people are saying he didn't. He supposedly didn't because he meant to say something else.

You got it backwards, dave, but that's expected of the goons.

Funny chit but Trump aid she was nasty & you people are saying he didn't. He supposedly didn't because he meant to say something else.

You got it backwards, dave, but that's expected of the goons.

Funny chit but Trump aid she was nasty & you people are saying he didn't. He supposedly didn't because he meant to say something else.

Big difference between was nasty and is nasty.

You get it. Several others here get it. But I don't think the TDS syndrome crowd will ever get it.

One more time:

He did not call Meghan Markle nasty. I've watched and rewatched the full video in full context. In 2016 she insulted him as misogynistic and he said that insult was 'nasty' but he was not angry or critical when he did it and he went on to wish her all the best in her role as part of the royal family.

It is typical of the TDS leftist media and people on message boards to pull ONE WORD out of a full context and make that what his comments were all about.

That is wrong.
That is hateful.
That is intellectually dishonest.

Can you quote the part where Trump said the word 'nasty'? Just curious if you can do that one simple thing.

I'll have to hunt it up. I watched the complete video twice during the wee hours of the morning this morning. It's probably somewhere out there on the internet though but Google is pretty good at suppressing evidence that doesn't mesh with the hate-everything-Trump theme.

I just want you to type "I didn't know she was nasty" and then try to explain it.

 

[Mac1958]

The fact remains, Trump said what he said.

In the grand scheme of things, given the myriad childish, ignorant, rude, embarrassing things he has said, he's said worse.

But he really did say it. The fact that there is any pushback on this fact is just sad.
.

Oh boo hoo, pot stirrer.

Get over it

Yeah, that's what the Regressives say when their garbage is pointed out. "Too bad".

You folks really are in a race to the bottom when it comes to lowering standards.

How proud you must be, to be so much like those you hate.
.

I'd appreciate if you keep my belief system out of this, it's not the same. Thank you very much.

There are many, many similarities in the behaviors of the ends of the spectrum.
.

And in the middle, but this isn't how I roll, never have and I don't see too many liberals on this board who go out o there way to believe shit like this.

I agree with that. This alternate universe, deny-the-recording type of stuff is certainly more prevalent on the Right.
.

 

[Crixus]

Trump denies he called Meghan Markle 'nasty' despite audio of remark

The Liar in Chief knows that most of his mindless cult will accept his latest lie as truth. He laughs at their ignorance daily.....

Hmm, a woman who lets middle eastern trash run around raping everyone? Nasty was kind I’m thinking.

 

[BULLDOG]

I'd rather be a moron than a liberal.

Any true deplorable would.

Yes. All trump supporters hope to be morons.

Yes, it's a much better option than stooping to be liberals.

Then congratulations. You have reached your goal. You are a moron.

When you get to be as smart as a moron, we will welcome you into the club as well.

Though we're not holding our breath.

Now that's funny, I don't care who you are.

 

[Foxfyre]

Funny chit but Trump aid she was nasty & you people are saying he didn't. He supposedly didn't because he meant to say something else.

Funny chit but Trump aid she was nasty & you people are saying he didn't. He supposedly didn't because he meant to say something else.

Funny chit but Trump aid she was nasty & you people are saying he didn't. He supposedly didn't because he meant to say something else.

Big difference between was nasty and is nasty.

You get it. Several others here get it. But I don't think the TDS syndrome crowd will ever get it.

One more time:

He did not call Meghan Markle nasty. I've watched and rewatched the full video in full context. In 2016 she insulted him as misogynistic and he said that insult was 'nasty' but he was not angry or critical when he did it and he went on to wish her all the best in her role as part of the royal family.

It is typical of the TDS leftist media and people on message boards to pull ONE WORD out of a full context and make that what his comments were all about.

That is wrong.
That is hateful.
That is intellectually dishonest.

Can you quote the part where Trump said the word 'nasty'? Just curious if you can do that one simple thing.

I'll have to hunt it up. I watched the complete video twice during the wee hours of the morning this morning. It's probably somewhere out there on the internet though but Google is pretty good at suppressing evidence that doesn't mesh with the hate-everything-Trump theme.

I just want you to type "I didn't know she was nasty" and then try to explain it.

He was referring to the remarks that preceded that statement and followed it. And anybody hearing his tone, watching his demeanor, and hearing the full context clearly knows he was referring to what they were telling him that she said about him that he had been previously unaware of him.

The President generally speaks extemporaneously in incomplete sentences and phrases and in this case he clearly meant that he didn't know she had been nasty (toward him.) And then he went on to wish her well.

It was a typical tactic of an interviewer throwing a poison pill into what would otherwise have been a completely non controversial interview. They can't have that can they. They have to manufacture something they can use to trash the President. And the TDS crowd eagerly takes that bait every single time.

 

[HappyJoy]

Oh boo hoo, pot stirrer.

Get over it

Yeah, that's what the Regressives say when their garbage is pointed out. "Too bad".

You folks really are in a race to the bottom when it comes to lowering standards.

How proud you must be, to be so much like those you hate.
.

I'd appreciate if you keep my belief system out of this, it's not the same. Thank you very much.

There are many, many similarities in the behaviors of the ends of the spectrum.
.

And in the middle, but this isn't how I roll, never have and I don't see too many liberals on this board who go out o there way to believe shit like this.

I agree with that. This alternate universe, deny-the-recording type of stuff is certainly more prevalent on the Right.
.

Ok, common ground.

 

[edward37]

The fact remains, Trump said what he said.

In the grand scheme of things, given the myriad childish, ignorant, rude, embarrassing things he has said, he's said worse.

But he really did say it. The fact that there is any pushback on this fact is just sad.
.

Oh boo hoo, pot stirrer.

Get over it

Yeah, that's what the Regressives say when their garbage is pointed out. "Too bad".

You folks really are in a race to the bottom when it comes to lowering standards.

How proud you must be, to be so much like those you hate.
.

I think you're an idiot. Save it

From you I take it as a compliment

 

[HappyJoy]

Big difference between was nasty and is nasty.

You get it. Several others here get it. But I don't think the TDS syndrome crowd will ever get it.

One more time:

He did not call Meghan Markle nasty. I've watched and rewatched the full video in full context. In 2016 she insulted him as misogynistic and he said that insult was 'nasty' but he was not angry or critical when he did it and he went on to wish her all the best in her role as part of the royal family.

It is typical of the TDS leftist media and people on message boards to pull ONE WORD out of a full context and make that what his comments were all about.

That is wrong.
That is hateful.
That is intellectually dishonest.

Can you quote the part where Trump said the word 'nasty'? Just curious if you can do that one simple thing.

I'll have to hunt it up. I watched the complete video twice during the wee hours of the morning this morning. It's probably somewhere out there on the internet though but Google is pretty good at suppressing evidence that doesn't mesh with the hate-everything-Trump theme.

I just want you to type "I didn't know she was nasty" and then try to explain it.

He was referring to the remarks that preceded that statement and followed it. And anybody hearing his tone, watching his demeanor, and hearing the full context clearly knows he was referring to what they were telling him that she said about him that he had been previously unaware of him.

The President generally speaks extemporaneously in incomplete sentences and phrases and in this case he clearly meant that he didn't know she had been nasty (toward him.) And then he went on to wish her well.

Yes, she called him misogynistic and Trump called her 'nasty'. And no, he spoke with a very concise sentence. You're adding meaning to what he said and you're pulling it out of your ass.

 

[Foxfyre]

You get it. Several others here get it. But I don't think the TDS syndrome crowd will ever get it.

One more time:

He did not call Meghan Markle nasty. I've watched and rewatched the full video in full context. In 2016 she insulted him as misogynistic and he said that insult was 'nasty' but he was not angry or critical when he did it and he went on to wish her all the best in her role as part of the royal family.

It is typical of the TDS leftist media and people on message boards to pull ONE WORD out of a full context and make that what his comments were all about.

That is wrong.
That is hateful.
That is intellectually dishonest.

Can you quote the part where Trump said the word 'nasty'? Just curious if you can do that one simple thing.

I'll have to hunt it up. I watched the complete video twice during the wee hours of the morning this morning. It's probably somewhere out there on the internet though but Google is pretty good at suppressing evidence that doesn't mesh with the hate-everything-Trump theme.

I just want you to type "I didn't know she was nasty" and then try to explain it.

He was referring to the remarks that preceded that statement and followed it. And anybody hearing his tone, watching his demeanor, and hearing the full context clearly knows he was referring to what they were telling him that she said about him that he had been previously unaware of him.

The President generally speaks extemporaneously in incomplete sentences and phrases and in this case he clearly meant that he didn't know she had been nasty (toward him.) And then he went on to wish her well.

Yes, she called him misogynistic and Trump called her 'nasty'. And no, he spoke with a very concise sentence. You're adding meaning to what he said and you're pulling it out of your ass.

I don't think so. And I added an edit at the end of my post. It refers to what the left pulls out of their. . . .everyday.

 

[edward37]

Let's just say it was 200 The pos IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED

Did you whine when Ears lied? And he told some whoppers

Those were little white lies Trump tells real big lies Futures off implied open - 370

Yeah right you deluded hack.

And save your market crap. You're an amateur

LOL There are small lies large lies and damned lies Trump is a damn liar.....And I do damn well for an amateur Guess you're losing your panties, or pants if you're a guy

What did he lie about ,on this particular subject we are discussing?

Donald Trump Meghan Markle 'Nasty' Feud, Explained - Vulture

https://www.vulture.com/2019/.../donald-trump-meghan-markle-nasty-feud-explained.ht...
3 hours ago - Donald Trump called Meghan Markle “nasty” in a new interview, after he was told she was going to move to Canada if he was elected.
Missing: lied ‎| ‎Must include: ‎lied
Trump denies calling Meghan Markle 'nasty,' despite clear evidence ...

https://www.haaretz.com › U.S. News
8 hours ago - U.S. President Donald Trump denied calling Meghan Markle"nasty" in a Sunday morning tweet - despite the remark being on tape.
Missing: lied ‎| ‎Must include: ‎lied

 

[HappyJoy]

Can you quote the part where Trump said the word 'nasty'? Just curious if you can do that one simple thing.

I'll have to hunt it up. I watched the complete video twice during the wee hours of the morning this morning. It's probably somewhere out there on the internet though but Google is pretty good at suppressing evidence that doesn't mesh with the hate-everything-Trump theme.

I just want you to type "I didn't know she was nasty" and then try to explain it.

He was referring to the remarks that preceded that statement and followed it. And anybody hearing his tone, watching his demeanor, and hearing the full context clearly knows he was referring to what they were telling him that she said about him that he had been previously unaware of him.

The President generally speaks extemporaneously in incomplete sentences and phrases and in this case he clearly meant that he didn't know she had been nasty (toward him.) And then he went on to wish her well.

Yes, she called him misogynistic and Trump called her 'nasty'. And no, he spoke with a very concise sentence. You're adding meaning to what he said and you're pulling it out of your ass.

I don't think so. And I added an edit at the end of my post. It refers to what the left pulls out of their. . . .everyday.

What do you mean? He said "I didn't know she was nasty", that's pretty concise and there is nothing before or after that sentence that changes the context.

Here is the edited part you added to your post:

It was a typical tactic of an interviewer throwing a poison pill into what would otherwise have been a completely non controversial interview. They can't have that can they. They have to manufacture something they can use to trash the President. And the TDS crowd eagerly takes that bait every single time.

There was no poison pill here. The interviewer simply asked what Trump thought of her statement about him. I don't see anything wrong with Trump being asked what he thought of Markle making comments about him, especially on the eve of a trip to Britain. Kind of seems relevant.

 

[peach174]

You get it. Several others here get it. But I don't think the TDS syndrome crowd will ever get it.

One more time:

He did not call Meghan Markle nasty. I've watched and rewatched the full video in full context. In 2016 she insulted him as misogynistic and he said that insult was 'nasty' but he was not angry or critical when he did it and he went on to wish her all the best in her role as part of the royal family.

It is typical of the TDS leftist media and people on message boards to pull ONE WORD out of a full context and make that what his comments were all about.

That is wrong.
That is hateful.
That is intellectually dishonest.

Can you quote the part where Trump said the word 'nasty'? Just curious if you can do that one simple thing.

I'll have to hunt it up. I watched the complete video twice during the wee hours of the morning this morning. It's probably somewhere out there on the internet though but Google is pretty good at suppressing evidence that doesn't mesh with the hate-everything-Trump theme.

I just want you to type "I didn't know she was nasty" and then try to explain it.

He was referring to the remarks that preceded that statement and followed it. And anybody hearing his tone, watching his demeanor, and hearing the full context clearly knows he was referring to what they were telling him that she said about him that he had been previously unaware of him.

The President generally speaks extemporaneously in incomplete sentences and phrases and in this case he clearly meant that he didn't know she had been nasty (toward him.) And then he went on to wish her well.

Yes, she called him misogynistic and Trump called her 'nasty'. And no, he spoke with a very concise sentence. You're adding meaning to what he said and you're pulling it out of your ass.

We are using the meaning of the individual words.
Saying is means an insult to the person.
Saying was means what the person said or did.