EV's will save the planet (according to alarmists)

[percysunshine]

The planet does not need saved. It has been here for 4 billion years and will be around long after humans are gone.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Simple question. Do you prefer a world with no regulations on carbon emissions?

Try to stay on topic.

 

[EyeBRollin]

Try to stay on topic.

We are. Your answer?

 

[Manonthestreet]

We are. Your answer?

Topic is evs......

 

[EyeBRollin]

Topic is evs......

You don’t want to mandate them. Why?

 

[EyeBRollin]

The planet does not need saved. It has been here for 4 billion years and will be around long after humans are gone.

Conservative wishing for human extinction.

 

[Manonthestreet]

You don’t want to mandate them. Why?

A, it's not necessary. They've reached the point people will buy them cause they want em. Not all, and that's ok as IC will continue to get better.

 

[percysunshine]

Conservative wishing for human extinction.

The history of the earth and the solar system is well understood science.

The only thing to save us would be science fiction faster than light travel.

 

[EyeBRollin]

A, it's not necessary. They've reached the point people will buy them cause they want em. Not all, and that's ok as IC will continue to get better.

Conservative, you’re smarter than this. Desire is not why EVs are being mandated. Why do you disagree with reducing carbon emissions?

 

[EyeBRollin]

The history of the earth and the solar system is well understood science.

The only thing to save us would be science fiction faster than light travel.

Conservative wishing for human extinction.

 

[Captain Caveman]

The topic is the measly carbon benefit. Could you number crunch for meal please. What tonnage of co2 do humans produce per year, what percentage is down to transport and what percentage of that is down to vehicles on the road? Then you want to save 17% to 30% of that low figure??

So what tonnage of co2 do you feel needs reduced, what percentage will EV's contribute to that saving and what do you have in mind to recoup the rest of the percentage?

At the moment, alarmists are just screaming what they want, but there's no numbers. Sounds similar to Democrats v Economics tbh.

 

[percysunshine]

Conservative wishing for human extinction.

Moonbat wishing Santa, the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny were real.

 

[EyeBRollin]

The topic is the measly carbon benefit. Could you number crunch for meal please. What tonnage of co2 do humans produce per year, what percentage is down to transport and what percentage of that is down to vehicles on the road? Then you want to save 17% to 30% of that low figure??

So what tonnage of co2 do you feel needs reduced, what percentage will EV's contribute to that saving and what do you have in mind to recoup the rest of the percentage?

At the moment, alarmists are just screaming what they want, but there's no numbers. Sounds similar to Democrats v Economics tbh.

I’m not sure why your argument is that doing nothing is better than a 17-30% reduction.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Correct, they won't save anything, in fact, they're cause more harm.

The Green New Deal Is a Dead Man's Hand

Before the internal combustion engine, mankind suffered under plague after plague, millennium after millennium. "Pollution" a dishonest and biased word taken from pagan superstition, is antiseptic.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

You prefer the unfettered ability to emit as much carbon as possible for the indefinite future?

Nature Is a Crime Against Humanity

Natural air, which the decadent enemies of human progress call "Clean Air," is the most toxic of all atmospheres mankind has managed to stay alive in. The killer viruses can only survive in "Clean Air" or in Fauci air. His Lethal Lockdown has been the real killer.

 

[EyeBRollin]

Nature Is a Crime Against Humanity

Natural air, which the decadent enemies of human progress call "Clean Air," is the most toxic of all atmospheres mankind has managed to stay alive in. The killer viruses can only survive in "Clean Air" or in Fauci air. His Lethal Lockdown has been the real killer.

This is the worst conservative spin job I’ve seen yet on this entire forum.

 

[Captain Caveman]

I’m not sure why your argument is that doing nothing is better than a 17-30% reduction.

I did a quick Googling about. The USA produces 5.1 billion tons of co2. Transport accounts for 21% of this. Vehicles on the road account for 75% of the 21%. Suddenly going to EV's overnight will save 17% to 30% of 75% of 21% of 5.1 billion. Are you still with me?

So you are going to save a massive 2.67% to 2.82% of America's co2 total emissions by useless EV's

Can you tell me what you guys have in the pipeline to save the other 97+%?

 

[Manonthestreet]

Conservative, you’re smarter than this. Desire is not why EVs are being mandated. Why do you disagree with reducing carbon emissions?

It's doubtful EVs reduce anything..

 

[AZrailwhale]

Conservative wishing for human extinction.

Human extinction. Riiight, none of the projections, even the unrealistic ones come anywhere near extinction. The human race has survived far worse things than climate change with far less survival capability.

 

[JGalt]

It's a piece of the puzzle.

Life isn't either/or, one or the other, 100% or 0%.

Really. True story. No matter what Tucker says.

I don't know what Tucker says because I don't watch him. But I do pay very close attention to what your idiots in Washington are doing, so don't try to bullshit me.