Explosives found in World Trade Center dust

[Rat in the Hat]

Actually they have claimed that over 10 tons of “active thermetic material” that utilized “nano technology” has been found in the dust surrounding the world trade center.

Really, 10 tons? Ever seen thermite go off? I doubt there would be any left that hadn't been burned. Let alone 10 tons.

I'm not even 100% convinced there is such a thing as Nano thermite.

The really weird thing is that until recently there probably wasn't 10 tons of nano thermite available anywhere because it was to hard, and too expensive, to make in bulk.

Explosive Residues
Independent researchers have discovered a highly engineered explosive-incendiary material in several dust samples collected near the WTC site. In their paper, entitled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, nine researchers, led by chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen, conclude:

“[T]he red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

REFERENCES

Harrit, Farrer, Jones, Ryan, Legge, Farnsworth, Roberts, Gourley, Larsen, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” Bentham Open Access, 2009. http://buildingwhat.org/downloads/Full_Thermite_paper.pdf

 

[Robert_Stephens]

Hey everyone,

Check out my post above to this effect. I tried to clarify and did a quick re-visit to the various and numerous vids. of impacts and then checked my math and am baffled how anybody can think other than what we see, as to what happened. Odd, this.

Here is the formula equation for impact transfer of inherent mass for WTC 7 and same for WTC 1 and 2 (fuel load is included in the equation.)

V=volume
C=failure
H=heat
N=answer and sum

V/&#8776;(V´ø/*/><åx&#8721;^H)§x3.88392/¡¥-.23&#8776;&#8747;&#937;/H+=N Collapse time 1.0955, or, nearly 2 seconds form roof level to hit street level.

This can also be applied to WTC-1 and WTC 2 with impact coefficients of both jet airliners. No explosive is needed, since all 3 are upwards of 75% hollow by volume. Transfer energy was 440+ tons at 505 mph for both impact vehicles to WTC 1 and 2.

Hope this is again helpful, for those not on drugs, with a HS education, and interested, can formulate a premise and think logically.

Thank you,

Robert

 

[Terral]

Hi Robert:

Here is the formula equation for impact transfer of inherent mass for WTC 7 and same for WTC 1 and 2 (fuel load is included in the equation.) ... This can also be applied to WTC-1 and WTC 2 with impact coefficients of both jet airliners. No explosive is needed, since all 3 are upwards of 75% hollow by volume. Transfer energy was 440+ tons at 505 mph for both impact vehicles to WTC 1 and 2.

This nonsense borders on the most ridiculous excuse for the Official Cover Story LIE these eyes have ever seen. There is no amount of hydrocarbon fuel that is going to melt 2800-degree red-iron structural steel, because kerosene simply does not burn hot enough.

My WTC-7 Topic:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A"]WTC-7 Was Hit By No Jetliner[/ame]

This guy is trying to say this is a video of an overbuilt steel-framed skyscraper burning to the ground. :0) There is no sign of any jetliner or fire anywhere!

This skyscraper was transformed into this ...

... in 6.6 seconds. Look at the faces of the adjacent buildings to realize WTC-7 imploded into its own footprint by design. WTC-1 collapsed CD-style in 'pancaking' fashion straight down into its own footprint from 350 feet away, but Mr. Robert here will say that implosion somehow caused WTC-7 to fall down the same way. However, in that case, WTC-7 should have caused the collapse of surrounding buildings for his hypothesis to have merit, which DID NOT happen.

Let Mr. Robert explain how heat energy from any 'fire' was transported to the cooler areas of the steel-frame network FASTER than any single column or beam could reach melting points. No steel-frame skyscraper has burned down in history, except three that were controlled by Larry Silverstein and all three collapsed CD-style on 9/11 during this inside-job attack.

This Robert guy is a Govt shill cool sent here to push Official Cover Story STUPIDITY, as if 9/11 was planned and carried out by a bunch of these people:

GL,

Terral

 

[SFC Ollie]

Hi Robert:

Here is the formula equation for impact transfer of inherent mass for WTC 7 and same for WTC 1 and 2 (fuel load is included in the equation.) ... This can also be applied to WTC-1 and WTC 2 with impact coefficients of both jet airliners. No explosive is needed, since all 3 are upwards of 75% hollow by volume. Transfer energy was 440+ tons at 505 mph for both impact vehicles to WTC 1 and 2.

This nonsense borders on the most ridiculous excuse for the Official Cover Story LIE these eyes have ever seen. There is no amount of hydrocarbon fuel that is going to melt 2800-degree red-iron structural steel, because kerosene simply does not burn hot enough.

My WTC-7 Topic:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A"]WTC-7 Was Hit By No Jetliner[/ame]

This guy is trying to say this is a video of an overbuilt steel-framed skyscraper burning to the ground. :0) There is no sign of any jetliner or fire anywhere!

This skyscraper was transformed into this ...

... in 6.6 seconds. Look at the faces of the adjacent buildings to realize WTC-7 imploded into its own footprint by design. WTC-1 collapsed CD-style in 'pancaking' fashion straight down into its own footprint from 350 feet away, but Mr. Robert here will say that implosion somehow caused WTC-7 to fall down the same way. However, in that case, WTC-7 should have caused the collapse of surrounding buildings for his hypothesis to have merit, which DID NOT happen.

Let Mr. Robert explain how heat energy from any 'fire' was transported to the cooler areas of the steel-frame network FASTER than any single column or beam could reach melting points. No steel-frame skyscraper has burned down in history, except three that were controlled by Larry Silverstein and all three collapsed CD-style on 9/11 during this inside-job attack.

This Robert guy is a Govt shill cool sent here to push Official Cover Story STUPIDITY, as if 9/11 was planned and carried out by a bunch of these people:

GL,

Terral

You will always be wrong until you start counting the penthouse as part of the building.
Why is it truther videos always leave that part of the collapse off?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Dr. Harrit is the lead scientist of a European, nine-author, peer-reviewed study*, which found millions of microscopic red-gray chips in the World Trade Center dust. These chips, at first thought to be paint, were ignited and determined to be unburned nanothermite

Common Ground - February 2011

it must be true .. you found it on the internet(s)

 

[Robert_Stephens]

Tarral,

You are pathological liar and and a sociopath. You can't even formulate a premise, let along complete a coherent sentence. It has to be drugs or tourettes or both. I've not seen such dementia, publicly.

Robert

 

[eots]

No, Newton's law pertaining does not prove controlled demolition. You are a pathological liar. Here is the facts with physics and an easy differential equation proving you are in total, gross error.

V=volume
C=failure
H=heat
N=answer and sum

V/&#8776;(V´ø/*/><åx&#8721;^H)§x3.88392/¡¥-.23&#8776;&#8747;&#937;/H+=N Collapse time 1.0955, or, nearly 2 seconds form roof level to hit street level.

This can also be applied to WTC-1 and WTC 2 with impact coefficients of both jet airliners. No explosive is needed, since all 3 are upwards of 75% hollow by volume.

Robert

Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:


"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth.org


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,400 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition


Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.


Bio: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov








Larry L. Erickson, MS, PhD
No photo available


Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." AE911Truth.org


Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report



Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,400 Architects and Engineers:

 

[Obamerican]

No, Newton's law pertaining does not prove controlled demolition. You are a pathological liar. Here is the facts with physics and an easy differential equation proving you are in total, gross error.

V=volume
C=failure
H=heat
N=answer and sum

V/&#8776;(V´ø/*/><åx&#8721;^H)§x3.88392/¡¥-.23&#8776;&#8747;&#937;/H+=N Collapse time 1.0955, or, nearly 2 seconds form roof level to hit street level.

This can also be applied to WTC-1 and WTC 2 with impact coefficients of both jet airliners. No explosive is needed, since all 3 are upwards of 75% hollow by volume.

Robert

Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:


"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth.org


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,400 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition


Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.


Bio: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov








Larry L. Erickson, MS, PhD
No photo available


Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." AE911Truth.org


Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report



Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,400 Architects and Engineers:

Same old copy and paste from eots the idiot. YAWN!!!!!

 

[Robert_Stephens]

So many psychopaths, so little time.

Robert

 

[DiveCon]

So many psychopaths, so little time.

Robert

what is your opinion on Dwain Deets?

 

[Robert_Stephens]

So many psychopaths, so little time.

Robert

what is your opinion on Dwain Deets?

An extremely kind and talented man and a very astute asset to the NASA-USAF-EAFB team before he left. Great guy off topic as well. He also is a very astute grapser of orbital dynamics.

NASA - Dryden Flight Research Center - News Room: News Releases: Dwain Deets appointed as NASA Dryden Aerospace Projects Director

He left NASA before 911 so I do not know of his whereabouts and activities at current.

Robert

 

[DiveCon]

So many psychopaths, so little time.

Robert

what is your opinion on Dwain Deets?

An extremely kind and talented man and a very astute asset to the NASA-USAF-EAFB team before he left. Great guy off topic as well. He also is a very astute grapser of orbital dynamics.

NASA - Dryden Flight Research Center - News Room: News Releases: Dwain Deets appointed as NASA Dryden Aerospace Projects Director

He left NASA before 911 so I do not know of his whereabouts and activities at current.

Robert

strange such a man would sign onto this nonsense then

 

[Robert_Stephens]

what is your opinion on Dwain Deets?

An extremely kind and talented man and a very astute asset to the NASA-USAF-EAFB team before he left. Great guy off topic as well. He also is a very astute grapser of orbital dynamics.

NASA - Dryden Flight Research Center - News Room: News Releases: Dwain Deets appointed as NASA Dryden Aerospace Projects Director

He left NASA before 911 so I do not know of his whereabouts and activities at current.

Robert

strange such a man would sign onto this nonsense then

True. And many of us were confused when he began that silliness. He did have a mild aschemic stroke and that may have been cause, perhaps. Still, a very good man and kind as well.

Robert

 

[PhysicsExist]

9/11 Truth: The 9/11 Commission Was Set Up To Fail As Said by Commissioners Themselves.


This is a very brief clip from a question and answer session Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton gave at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. on 9/11/2006

 

[SFC Ollie]

Maybe if Eots could get 6% of the Architects and Engineers to sign on instead of the 0.01% that they have presently...

 

[LA RAM FAN]

9/11 Truth: The 9/11 Commission Was Set Up To Fail As Said by Commissioners Themselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzrv-e37Es8&feature=player_embedded
This is a very brief clip from a question and answer session Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton gave at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. on 9/11/2006

its always hysterical how the disinfo agents Ollie,candycorn,ect ignore this little tidbit. they expose themselves here constantly that they have NO INTEREST in the truth.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Maybe if Eots could get 6% of the Architects and Engineers to sign on instead of the 0.01% that they have presently...

Gomer will never admit that many of them are not brave enough to put their jobs on the line like the thousands that have and come out have and say explosives brought the towers down because they will lose contracts.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Interesting. Nanothermite mixed with Mono-mono-hydrazine (rocket fuel) and iron oxide celate is a metal, non-combustible, anti-rust preservative common in western countries that have high rise buildings near or next to salt water. It defeats normal salt brine airborne induced electrolysis.

Just a thought. Consider.

Robert

Independent researchers have discovered a highly engineered explosive-incendiary material in several dust samples collected near the WTC site. In their paper, entitled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, nine researchers, led by chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen, conclude:

“[T]he red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

Harrit, Farrer, Jones, Ryan, Legge, Farnsworth, Roberts, Gourley, Larsen, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” Bentham Open Access, 2009. http://buildingwhat.org/downloads/Full_Thermite_paper.pdf







FEMA AGREES:
The authors of Appendix C of the FEMA REPORT concluded by saying, “No clear explanation for the source of sulfur has been identified…A detailed study into the mechanisms of the phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires.”
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), “World Trade Center Building Performance Study,” Washington DC. May 1, 2002, Appendix C, p.1. FEMA: World Trade Center Building Performance Study


Take a look at the science and facts. Or can you........?

the OCTAS can only fling shit in defeat here over this post.notice that Physics? funny how hypocrite moron in the hat graps at straws saying look at the science in the facts when he wont do that himself.or listen to witness testimonys.

 

[candycorn]

9/11 Truth: The 9/11 Commission Was Set Up To Fail As Said by Commissioners Themselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzrv-e37Es8&feature=player_embedded
This is a very brief clip from a question and answer session Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton gave at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. on 9/11/2006

its always hysterical how the disinfo agents Ollie,candycorn,ect ignore this little tidbit. they expose themselves here constantly that they have NO INTEREST in the truth.

Its always hysterical how the cocksucking twoofers like you cannot point to a single inaccuracy in the report yet always swear it was a failure.

The truth is there; you're too scared to read it. Pity. But there is a certain justice that you're where you are at in the world; in the flyover states that nobody cares about; fits you just right.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

like i said,the troll can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey he is.