- Banned
- #501
There's a difference between listening and understanding.
You lack understanding.
There's not a single fucking thing wrong with "ranting" about that dangerous schmuck in the Oval Office.
And you are either stupid or a fucking liar: What Mr. Levin said that day was (a) said in jocularity and only a pontificating asshat would even TRY to pretend otherwise. (B) it was very much on par with the old line about the old crow that told Winston Churchill, "if you were my husband, I would put poison in your tea," to which the venerable old man replied, "Madam, if I were married to you, I would drink it." (c) You heard nothing of the sort. The ACTUAL exchange was:
CALLER: I just wanna say, Obama is a lot smarter than you folks give him credit for. You guys were on a roll, I have to admit, with all those tea parties. Everything was rolling along, the Republicans were gaining momentum. And he managed to change your entire conversational focus. And you let those three hundred thousand people —
HOST: My God. He’s so smart. His own party voted against him on Guantanamo Bay. How stupid was that, Cindy? His own party refused to fund the closing of Guantanamo Bay.
CALLER. Yeah but you know he can just move those people over here anyway. He’s already doing it with the one guy.
HOST: Yeah, sure, he can do whatever he wants. Let me ask you a question. Why do you hate this country?
CALLER: No, I love this country.
HOST: (angrily shouting) I SAID WHY DO YOU HATE MY COUNTRY! WHY DO YOU HATE MY CONSTITUTION? WHY DO YOU HATE MY DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE?
You just said it. He can blow off Congress. He can do whatever he wants, right?
CALLER: Well, he seems to, he just moved (inaudible).
HOST: Answer me this, are you a married woman? Yes or no?
CALLER: Yes.
HOST: Well I don’t know why your husband doesn’t put a gun to his temple. Get the hell out of here.
Criticizing Glen Beck for his lack of SUBSTANCE is also perfectly valid. And Frum is a waffling dipstick. Jeez. What's wrong with you? Are you that unfamiliar with the concept of firm principles?
Your real problem with Mark Levin is that you lack the intellectual ability to honestly or effectively address his points. Unlike you, he knows what he's talking about.
OK, so let me see if I have this right:
Levin didn't tell the woman to kill herself...
Instead he said that she is such a horrible person for having a different viewpoint than his own that the people she most loves in the world should kill themselves rather than be near her.
Wow. And that's better how, exactly?
But of course, the fact that in spirit my criticism was correct, doesn't matter to you really, does it? It's all about finding holes in the details of the criticism for you folks, isn't it?
And in addition, what the FUCK kind of an answer to the woman's comments is:
HOST: (angrily shouting) I SAID WHY DO YOU HATE MY COUNTRY! WHY DO YOU HATE MY CONSTITUTION? WHY DO YOU HATE MY DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
Did he give that woman a chance to "to honestly or effectively address his points"? Whatever those "points" may have been?
Mark Levin doesn't have logical points to "intellectually address". He screams talking points and rants rationalizations for those talking points that have no basis in reality.
I find your assertion that Mark Levin has a greater intellectual capacity than me, or anyone else for that matter, to be utterly hilarious.
Last edited: