Far Right? Proud Boys

That's part of it. But you're kidding yourself if you think the new fascism is somehow different ("It's different when we do it"). It's not. It's the same insidious mindset and it will rot our nation from the inside out, the same way it rots every nation that embraces it.
If you mean real honest to goodness fascism, I agree.
But if you mean the twin brother of that other leftist cliche, racism, then I disagree.

No, I mean the twin brother of the leftism I call "Trump Nationalism". You can tell yourself it's not "real fascism", and hide behind Godwin - but you're pushing our country toward ruin if you do.

Fascism is too often just a knee jerk thoughtless charge used to get someone to shut up and go away.
It's a gutless rhetorical bludgeon used by the left and just like racism, it has lost almost all of it's meaning.

This is, unfortunately, all too true. The leftists have undermined the word, and paved the way for a real return of fascism and nationalism.

If I was an actual fascist I would welcome that term being thrown around by keyboard warriors because it
deadens it's effects and makes such a charge boring and repetitious to the point of meaninglessness.

If?
 
Yep. I sure don't like it. Nationalism doesn't elevate us. It does the opposite.
And what does "elevate" us then?

You can really only do that yourself. Friends and community can help, but membership in a group isn't going to magically make you a better person.


The Proud Boys was founded to be a fraternal organization, to give young men "friends and community" and a couple of guidelines to make themselves better people.
 
You can really only do that yourself. Friends and community can help, but membership in a group isn't going to magically make you a better person.
That depends on the ideals of a nation. If they are good then nationalism can magnify that effect to a degree impossible for an individual to attain.

This is a fantasy. A sales pitch to inspire the uninspired.

I believe in the classic "liberal" ideals of America as expressed in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

If that were true, you wouldn't be promoting nationalism.
 
The Proud Boys was founded to be a fraternal organization, to give young men "friends and community" and a couple of guidelines to make themselves better people.

Sure. Just like the YMCA or the Rotary Club.
 
Penelope claimed that the Proud Boys support closing all prisons, legalizing drugs and shutting down the government.


I have admitted that if she can post a link to support that, that that would be "Far right".


Your smugness is blinding you.
No, they did not. That is a lie told by liars.
LOL...nope..it is the truth known and accepted by everyone except idiots with an agenda. I'll not bother, once again, posting the relevant history..as it would make no difference to you.

Got it. YOu know it, but can't back it up. Same as before. Thanks for your input.
Don't have to 'back it up'--it's history. Either you are intelligent enough to know this..or you are an idiot with an agenda. Yo seem to think that if you shout out a lie loud enough..people will reject the truth in your favor. I doubt it.

Rhetoric is no substitute for intelligence.


I've posted excepts and links to studies that show that the Myth of the Southern Strategy, is just that, a myth.


I've done so many times. The response I get from libs, is much like yours.


"Everyone knows, huh, huh, huh. Can't hear you"


Here if you want to read up on it.


The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’
Read it...it proves exactly the opposite of what you are trying to imply. The thrust of the article is that many people stayed with the Dems because of Economic issues and that the shift from L to R...in the South was due to demographic issues. OK..but the ideological basis of the Democratic party in the South...did shift..and the Republican party did embrace those former Dixiecrats.

The only myth is the one that says that the Democrats of 1860 are the Democrats of 2019.



The people that stayed for economic reasons were exactly the ones that the Myth claims flipped for racist reasons.
 
No, I mean the twin brother of the leftism I call "Trump Nationalism". You can tell yourself it's not "real fascism", and hide behind Godwin - but you're pushing our country toward ruin if you do.
Is Trump a fascist? I don't see it.
Interestingly, I don't think Trump is a fascist. He's a con-man. His followers, however, are all-too-often admitted nationalists and fascists.
 
If that were true, you wouldn't be promoting nationalism.
It is true and I do promote nationalism...a belief in American ideals and sovereignty.
If you find that evil then I wonder what is wrong with the Bill of Rights and preserving our borders and way of life.

Millions of people would give their arm to be part of it. I wonder if they know they are all "fascists" by your account?
 
The Proud Boys was founded to be a fraternal organization, to give young men "friends and community" and a couple of guidelines to make themselves better people.

Sure. Just like the YMCA or the Rotary Club.


Correct. But as another lib in this thread pointed out, such a move has become controversial.
 
Interestingly, I don't think Trump is a fascist. He's a con-man. His followers, however, are all-too-often admitted nationalists and fascists.
I gladly admit to being a nationalist as I have defined it. If you want to define it in a Howard Zinn type of way I in no way agree.
 
The Proud Boys was founded to be a fraternal organization, to give young men "friends and community" and a couple of guidelines to make themselves better people.

Sure. Just like the YMCA or the Rotary Club.


Correct. But as another lib in this thread pointed out, such a move has become controversial.
Its a bit ambitious of them to tell a bunch of wankers to give up wanking. No wonder they are always looking for a fight,
 
The Proud Boys was founded to be a fraternal organization, to give young men "friends and community" and a couple of guidelines to make themselves better people.

Sure. Just like the YMCA or the Rotary Club.


Correct. But as another lib in this thread pointed out, such a move has become controversial.
Its a bit ambitious of them to tell a bunch of wankers to give up wanking. No wonder they are always looking for a fight,


Very ambitious. And healthy for the young men involved.


You have noticed that they almost never START the fights, right?
 
Ahh.. you have your own "special" definition. I didn't realize. Nevermind then.
So you didn't read the part where I call for classic liberal American values and sovereignty? (#208)

You truly only see what you want to see then. It seems you are the one with a special definition of nationalism that allows you to tread on the country and it's populace.
You undoubtedly are a Howard Zinn clone or fan boy.
 
The Proud Boys was founded to be a fraternal organization, to give young men "friends and community" and a couple of guidelines to make themselves better people.

Sure. Just like the YMCA or the Rotary Club.


Correct. But as another lib in this thread pointed out, such a move has become controversial.
Its a bit ambitious of them to tell a bunch of wankers to give up wanking. No wonder they are always looking for a fight,


Very ambitious. And healthy for the young men involved.


You have noticed that they almost never START the fights, right?
How is wanking bad for your health ?
 
The Proud Boys was founded to be a fraternal organization, to give young men "friends and community" and a couple of guidelines to make themselves better people.

Sure. Just like the YMCA or the Rotary Club.


Correct. But as another lib in this thread pointed out, such a move has become controversial.
Its a bit ambitious of them to tell a bunch of wankers to give up wanking. No wonder they are always looking for a fight,


Very ambitious. And healthy for the young men involved.


You have noticed that they almost never START the fights, right?
How is wanking bad for your health ?


I've been hearing quite a bit about how online pornography is so much more effective and attractive to young men, that it is more and more, actually causing problems with forming real relationships.

Pornography addiction - Wikipedia
 
Ahh.. you have your own "special" definition. I didn't realize. Nevermind then.
So you didn't read the part where I call for classic liberal American values and sovereignty?

I ignored it. That's because, from the context of the rest of your posts, I don't think you have the slightest comprehension of classic liberal American values. If you did, you'd see that fascism is wholly incompatible.


It's interesting the way socialists and nationalists are playing the same game. Each group is trying to re-claim a term that has, for good reason, become a pejorative. And I have to wonder why.

If the socialism of Bernie Sanders and AOC isn't really socialism, or is supposed to be radically different than traditional perceptions of socialism, why call it "socialism"?

Likewise, if the nationalism Trump is selling has nothing to do with the nationalism that has caused so many problems historically, why use the word?

In both cases, the truth is that the "new" campaign (for nationalism or socialism) isn't any different that the previous round. Socialists want real socialism and nationalists want real nationalism. It's the same socialism and nationalism that we rejected previously. But by abusing the terms with constant equivocation, they're hoping to get people to accept them without consideration.
 
Ahh.. you have your own "special" definition. I didn't realize. Nevermind then.
So you didn't read the part where I call for classic liberal American values and sovereignty?

I ignored it. That's because, from the context of the rest of your posts, I don't think you have the slightest comprehension of classic liberal American values. If you did, you'd see that fascism is wholly incompatible.


It's interesting the way socialists and nationalists are playing the same game. Each group is trying to re-claim a term that has, for good reason, become a pejorative. And I have to wonder why.

If the socialism of Bernie Sanders and AOC isn't really socialism, or is supposed to be radically different than traditional perceptions of socialism, why call it "socialism"?

Likewise, if the nationalism Trump is selling has nothing to do with the nationalism that has caused so many problems historically, why use the word?

In both cases, the truth is that the "new" campaign (for nationalism or socialism) isn't any different that the previous round. Socialists want real socialism and nationalists want real nationalism. It's the same socialism and nationalism that we rejected previously. But by abusing the terms with constant equivocation, they're hoping to get people to accept them without consideration.


Nationalism as a word or an idea, was never "lost". It was not "nationalism" that caused so many problems.
 

Forum List

Back
Top