Fascism

[Dogmaphobe]

You complain about "dimocrat" and are still using the term, "Tea bagger"?

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans. It has already been established that the man who wrote it is no doctor which should lead any rational person to question why he is calling himself that, it has already been established that his claiming fascists use an overreaction to "terrorism" is awfully convenient considering the word was hardly used in the 30s, and that, in fact, it was whipped up specifically to apply to GWB. The entire list was even lifted from a site designed for utter lunatics. Despite this, the thread goes on and on with the fundamentalists of the far left clinging to their dogma.

Can you just imagine if a similarly puerile poster tried to foster the notion that Obama is a communist and used some unaccredited laundry list of supposed reasons why? The same leftist authoritarians in this thread who are all over the Trump is a fascist silliness would be mocking the very notion.

 

[kaz]

National SOcialism. He was certainly that. Very much hated by the NObility.

DEMOCRATIC People's REPUBLIC of North Korea

German DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC

People's REPUBLIC of China

So, according to you, North Korea, East Germany and China are Democratic and Republics. Interesting, but disagreed. Yeah, same goes for the fucking Nazis.

I always have to laugh when they drag out the "national socialism" - and think about NK.

The Nazi's STARTED as a socialist party, but Hitler was nothing if not pragmatic and socialism was rapidly abandoned.

What the fuck? You think Nazi Germany wasn't a centrally planned economy?



You just can't see through the fog of Democrat programming. That's the most ignorant thing I've seen you say, and there's some pretty stiff competition for that title

 

[Mac1958]

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans..

It certainly isn't getting any better, either.

I see stuff here that is so ridiculous and over-the-top that there is simply no way of knowing what is even remotely serious and honest, and what is meant to just annoy.

But it gets much worse. This is just an internet message board, or a political TV show is just a bunch of partisans yakking. No big deal. What concerns me is that this behavior has clearly seeped into our very culture, even popular culture, and everyday discourse with people on the street.

Now that is different.
.

 

[Correll]

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans..

It certainly isn't getting any better, either.

I see stuff here that is so ridiculous and over-the-top that there is simply no way of knowing what is even remotely serious and honest, and what is meant to just annoy.

But it gets much worse. This is just an internet message board, or a political TV show is just a bunch of partisans yakking. No big deal. What concerns me is that this behavior has clearly seeped into our very culture, even popular culture, and everyday discourse with people on the street.

Now that is different.
.

Not to mention from our would be leaders.

 

[owebo]

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans..

It certainly isn't getting any better, either.

I see stuff here that is so ridiculous and over-the-top that there is simply no way of knowing what is even remotely serious and honest, and what is meant to just annoy.

But it gets much worse. This is just an internet message board, or a political TV show is just a bunch of partisans yakking. No big deal. What concerns me is that this behavior has clearly seeped into our very culture, even popular culture, and everyday discourse with people on the street.

Now that is different.
.

Truth is treason in an empire of lies.....

 

[Dogmaphobe]

[QUOTE="Mac1958, post: 16199901, member: 34298] It certainly isn't getting any better, either.

I see stuff here that is so ridiculous and over-the-top that there is simply no way of knowing what is even remotely serious and honest, and what is meant to just annoy.

But it gets much worse. This is just an internet message board, or a political TV show is just a bunch of partisans yakking. No big deal. What concerns me is that this behavior has clearly seeped into our very culture, even popular culture, and everyday discourse with people on the street.

Now that is different.
[/QUOTE]

Yep -- It's almost as if there are dozens of posters who are pretending to be the most ridiculous example of their opposite they can possible imagine.

I think the internet has contributed to many decays, not the least of which being akin to boiling lobsters when it comes to the expression of outre ideas. As people become more and more extreme in their views, the slightly less extreme become more palatable to people. What was once considered laughable is then given consideration simply because it isn't quite as extreme.

Goodness, if you had told me 40 years ago that it would be left acting as the chief defenders of a political ideology so utterly opposed to liberal vales as Islamism, I would have thought you nuts. It didn't happen overnight, though, as certain notions began to infect the discussion, grew and were made easier to digest as some people went to greater and greater lengths in their rhetoric so as to legitimize that which would have once been anathema.

 

[Wry Catcher]

You complain about "dimocrat" and are still using the term, "Tea bagger"?

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans. It has already been established that he man who wrote it is no doctor which should lead any rational person to question why he is calling himself that, it has already been established that his claiming fascists use an overreaction to "terrorism" is awfully convenient considering the word was hardly used in the 30s, and that, in fact, it was whipped up specifically to apply to GWB. The entire list was even lifted from a site designed for utter lunatics. Despite this, the thread goes on and on with the fundamentalists of the far left clinging to their dogma.

Can you just imagine if a similarly puerile poster tried to foster the notion that Obama is a communist and used some unaccredited laundry list of supposed reasons why? The same leftist authoritarians in this thread who are all over the Trump is a fascist silliness would be mocking the very notion.

I give what I get dogshit. You have no clue as to the academic and historical meaning of the terms you toss around - leftist, liberal, progressive, conservative, authoritarian and you even to fail to understand the use of irony as a rhetorical device. Rational and reasonable posters can expect a rational and reasonable response from me, I'm not always correct, have offered Mea Culpas when I'm proved wrong, but given the opposition that is rarely necessary.

As a piece of dogshit you have proved to be nothing but a pedestrian member of the echo chamber; someday offer your opinions on real issues: Abortion, sex ed. in schools, gun control, voting qualifications, border security, foreign and domestic policy, the UN, taxes, minimum wage, labor unions and the national debt.

I have on each of these and many more; the response from Trump supporters and Obama haters has been nothing substantive, and many times a phrase or single sentence which I call an Idiot-Gram. Putting more words on the page does not always prove to be substantive, as you've been able to prove several times.

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those who supported for the status quo. And that was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged, the infirm and the Middle Class. This is another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

 

[owebo]

You complain about "dimocrat" and are still using the term, "Tea bagger"?

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans. It has already been established that he man who wrote it is no doctor which should lead any rational person to question why he is calling himself that, it has already been established that his claiming fascists use an overreaction to "terrorism" is awfully convenient considering the word was hardly used in the 30s, and that, in fact, it was whipped up specifically to apply to GWB. The entire list was even lifted from a site designed for utter lunatics. Despite this, the thread goes on and on with the fundamentalists of the far left clinging to their dogma.

Can you just imagine if a similarly puerile poster tried to foster the notion that Obama is a communist and used some unaccredited laundry list of supposed reasons why? The same leftist authoritarians in this thread who are all over the Trump is a fascist silliness would be mocking the very notion.

I give what I get dogshit. You have no clue as to the academic and historical meaning of the terms you toss around - leftist, liberal, progressive, conservative, authoritarian and you even to fail to understand the use of irony as a rhetorical device. Rational and reasonable posters can expect a rational and reasonable response from me, I'm not always correct, have offered Mea Culpas when I'm proved wrong, but given the opposition that is rarely necessary.

As a piece of dogshit you have proved to be nothing but a pedestrian member of the echo chamber; someday offer your opinions on real issues: Abortion, sex ed. in schools, gun control, voting qualifications, border security, foreign and domestic policy, the UN, taxes, minimum wage, labor unions and the national debt.

I have on each of these and many more; the response from Trump supporters and Obama haters has been nothing substantive, and many times a phrase or single sentence which I call an Idiot-Gram. Putting more words on the page does not always prove to be substantive, as you've been able to prove several times.

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those whose support for the status quo. And, was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged and the infirm. Another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

Is it MMGW or CC? What do you fascists say?

 

[Mac1958]

Yep -- It's almost as if there are dozens of posters who are pretending to be the most ridiculous example of their opposite they can possible imagine.

I think the internet has contributed to many decays, not the least of which being akin to boiling lobsters when it comes to the expression of outre ideas. As people become more and more extreme in their views, the slightly less extreme become more palatable to people. What was once considered laughable is then given consideration simply because it isn't quite as extreme.

Goodness, if you had told me 40 years ago that it would be left acting as the chief defenders of a political ideology so utterly opposed to liberal vales as Islamism, I would have thought you nuts. It didn't happen overnight, though, as certain notions began to infect the discussion, grew and were made easier to digest as some people went to greater and greater lengths in their rhetoric so as to legitimize that which would have once been anathema.

Yeah, we've normalized crazy, so in order to be crazy in context, one must be over-the-top insane.

Not sure how this advances anything positive.
.

 

[owebo]

Yep -- It's almost as if there are dozens of posters who are pretending to be the most ridiculous example of their opposite they can possible imagine.

I think the internet has contributed to many decays, not the least of which being akin to boiling lobsters when it comes to the expression of outre ideas. As people become more and more extreme in their views, the slightly less extreme become more palatable to people. What was once considered laughable is then given consideration simply because it isn't quite as extreme.

Goodness, if you had told me 40 years ago that it would be left acting as the chief defenders of a political ideology so utterly opposed to liberal vales as Islamism, I would have thought you nuts. It didn't happen overnight, though, as certain notions began to infect the discussion, grew and were made easier to digest as some people went to greater and greater lengths in their rhetoric so as to legitimize that which would have once been anathema.

Yeah, we've normalized crazy, so in order to be crazy in context, one must be over-the-top insane.

Not sure how this advances anything positive.
.

No...the truth has been suppressed for so long, it looks odd to bystanders when patriots put it out there, then defend it....

 

[Correll]

...

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those whose support for the status quo. And, was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged and the infirm. Another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

The Tea Party was not ignorant nor callous, nor manipulated.

It was renamed because as normal Middle American types they were not up on homo-erotic slang and did not realize that "Tea Bagging" had a obscure secondary meaning that vile leftists would use to smear them.


That you are STILL using that term at this late date, completely undermines your attempt to present yourself as a reasonable human being and your judgements on those who disagree with you.

 

[Divine Wind]

My experience tells me you are what you hate.

A good reason not to hate. Anger blinds people. Hate is an emotional overreaction. Stop hating and you can see more clearly.

 

[Iceweasel]

My experience tells me you are what you hate.

A good reason not to hate. Anger blinds people. Hate is an emotional overreaction. Stop hating and you can see more clearly.

Since you invented my emotion for me in an attempt to look better that proves the emotion is all yours. The only one you fooled here is you.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You complain about "dimocrat" and are still using the term, "Tea bagger"?

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans. It has already been established that he man who wrote it is no doctor which should lead any rational person to question why he is calling himself that, it has already been established that his claiming fascists use an overreaction to "terrorism" is awfully convenient considering the word was hardly used in the 30s, and that, in fact, it was whipped up specifically to apply to GWB. The entire list was even lifted from a site designed for utter lunatics. Despite this, the thread goes on and on with the fundamentalists of the far left clinging to their dogma.

Can you just imagine if a similarly puerile poster tried to foster the notion that Obama is a communist and used some unaccredited laundry list of supposed reasons why? The same leftist authoritarians in this thread who are all over the Trump is a fascist silliness would be mocking the very notion.

I give what I get dogshit. You have no clue as to the academic and historical meaning of the terms you toss around - leftist, liberal, progressive, conservative, authoritarian and you even to fail to understand the use of irony as a rhetorical device. Rational and reasonable posters can expect a rational and reasonable response from me, I'm not always correct, have offered Mea Culpas when I'm proved wrong, but given the opposition that is rarely necessary.

As a piece of dogshit you have proved to be nothing but a pedestrian member of the echo chamber; someday offer your opinions on real issues: Abortion, sex ed. in schools, gun control, voting qualifications, border security, foreign and domestic policy, the UN, taxes, minimum wage, labor unions and the national debt.

I have on each of these and many more; the response from Trump supporters and Obama haters has been nothing substantive, and many times a phrase or single sentence which I call an Idiot-Gram. Putting more words on the page does not always prove to be substantive, as you've been able to prove several times.

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those who supported for the status quo. And that was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged, the infirm and the Middle Class. This is another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

I did not vote for Trump, child, and I took political science courses at a University you have absolutely no chance of ever attending.

It appears you have been reduced to incoherent blathering here in your desperation as you are now tossing out just about everything but the kitchen sink. Perhaps you might try learning to organize your thoughts some day instead of just letting the spittle fly in these little tantrums of yours.

 

[Wry Catcher]

...

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those whose support for the status quo. And, was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged and the infirm. Another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

The Tea Party was not ignorant nor callous, nor manipulated.

It was renamed because as normal Middle American types they were not up on homo-erotic slang and did not realize that "Tea Bagging" had a obscure secondary meaning that vile leftists would use to smear them.


That you are STILL using that term at this late date, completely undermines your attempt to present yourself as a reasonable human being and your judgements on those who disagree with you.

The term is a pejorative, used as dramatic irony, to describe how those "normal Middle class American types" dressed and behaved during the summer of 2010. That maybe a bit to abstract for you. Suffice it to say, these "normal Middle class American types" were manipulated by the propaganda (IT's SOCIALISM!!!) by those who benefited from the status quo, and Pol's who had been displaced during the 2008 election lusting for the power they lost.

 

[owebo]

My experience tells me you are what you hate.

You complain about "dimocrat" and are still using the term, "Tea bagger"?

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans. It has already been established that he man who wrote it is no doctor which should lead any rational person to question why he is calling himself that, it has already been established that his claiming fascists use an overreaction to "terrorism" is awfully convenient considering the word was hardly used in the 30s, and that, in fact, it was whipped up specifically to apply to GWB. The entire list was even lifted from a site designed for utter lunatics. Despite this, the thread goes on and on with the fundamentalists of the far left clinging to their dogma.

Can you just imagine if a similarly puerile poster tried to foster the notion that Obama is a communist and used some unaccredited laundry list of supposed reasons why? The same leftist authoritarians in this thread who are all over the Trump is a fascist silliness would be mocking the very notion.

I give what I get dogshit. You have no clue as to the academic and historical meaning of the terms you toss around - leftist, liberal, progressive, conservative, authoritarian and you even to fail to understand the use of irony as a rhetorical device. Rational and reasonable posters can expect a rational and reasonable response from me, I'm not always correct, have offered Mea Culpas when I'm proved wrong, but given the opposition that is rarely necessary.

As a piece of dogshit you have proved to be nothing but a pedestrian member of the echo chamber; someday offer your opinions on real issues: Abortion, sex ed. in schools, gun control, voting qualifications, border security, foreign and domestic policy, the UN, taxes, minimum wage, labor unions and the national debt.

I have on each of these and many more; the response from Trump supporters and Obama haters has been nothing substantive, and many times a phrase or single sentence which I call an Idiot-Gram. Putting more words on the page does not always prove to be substantive, as you've been able to prove several times.

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those who supported for the status quo. And that was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged, the infirm and the Middle Class. This is another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

I did not vote for Trump, child, and I took political science courses at a University you have absolutely no chance of ever attending.

It appears you have been reduced to incoherent blathering here in your desperation as you are now tossing out just about everything but the kitchen sink. Perhaps you might try learning to organize your thoughts some day instead of just letting the spittle fly in these little tantrums of yours.

How sad....a lot of people are a part of the problem.....

 

[owebo]

My experience tells me you are what you hate.

You complain about "dimocrat" and are still using the term, "Tea bagger"?

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans. It has already been established that he man who wrote it is no doctor which should lead any rational person to question why he is calling himself that, it has already been established that his claiming fascists use an overreaction to "terrorism" is awfully convenient considering the word was hardly used in the 30s, and that, in fact, it was whipped up specifically to apply to GWB. The entire list was even lifted from a site designed for utter lunatics. Despite this, the thread goes on and on with the fundamentalists of the far left clinging to their dogma.

Can you just imagine if a similarly puerile poster tried to foster the notion that Obama is a communist and used some unaccredited laundry list of supposed reasons why? The same leftist authoritarians in this thread who are all over the Trump is a fascist silliness would be mocking the very notion.

I give what I get dogshit. You have no clue as to the academic and historical meaning of the terms you toss around - leftist, liberal, progressive, conservative, authoritarian and you even to fail to understand the use of irony as a rhetorical device. Rational and reasonable posters can expect a rational and reasonable response from me, I'm not always correct, have offered Mea Culpas when I'm proved wrong, but given the opposition that is rarely necessary.

As a piece of dogshit you have proved to be nothing but a pedestrian member of the echo chamber; someday offer your opinions on real issues: Abortion, sex ed. in schools, gun control, voting qualifications, border security, foreign and domestic policy, the UN, taxes, minimum wage, labor unions and the national debt.

I have on each of these and many more; the response from Trump supporters and Obama haters has been nothing substantive, and many times a phrase or single sentence which I call an Idiot-Gram. Putting more words on the page does not always prove to be substantive, as you've been able to prove several times.

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those who supported for the status quo. And that was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged, the infirm and the Middle Class. This is another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

I did not vote for Trump, child, and I took political science courses at a University you have absolutely no chance of ever attending.

It appears you have been reduced to incoherent blathering here in your desperation as you are now tossing out just about everything but the kitchen sink. Perhaps you might try learning to organize your thoughts some day instead of just letting the spittle fly in these little tantrums of yours.

How sad....a lot of people are a part of the problem.....

And made a choice not to fix the problem.....

 

[Wry Catcher]

My experience tells me you are what you hate.

You complain about "dimocrat" and are still using the term, "Tea bagger"?

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans. It has already been established that he man who wrote it is no doctor which should lead any rational person to question why he is calling himself that, it has already been established that his claiming fascists use an overreaction to "terrorism" is awfully convenient considering the word was hardly used in the 30s, and that, in fact, it was whipped up specifically to apply to GWB. The entire list was even lifted from a site designed for utter lunatics. Despite this, the thread goes on and on with the fundamentalists of the far left clinging to their dogma.

Can you just imagine if a similarly puerile poster tried to foster the notion that Obama is a communist and used some unaccredited laundry list of supposed reasons why? The same leftist authoritarians in this thread who are all over the Trump is a fascist silliness would be mocking the very notion.

I give what I get dogshit. You have no clue as to the academic and historical meaning of the terms you toss around - leftist, liberal, progressive, conservative, authoritarian and you even to fail to understand the use of irony as a rhetorical device. Rational and reasonable posters can expect a rational and reasonable response from me, I'm not always correct, have offered Mea Culpas when I'm proved wrong, but given the opposition that is rarely necessary.

As a piece of dogshit you have proved to be nothing but a pedestrian member of the echo chamber; someday offer your opinions on real issues: Abortion, sex ed. in schools, gun control, voting qualifications, border security, foreign and domestic policy, the UN, taxes, minimum wage, labor unions and the national debt.

I have on each of these and many more; the response from Trump supporters and Obama haters has been nothing substantive, and many times a phrase or single sentence which I call an Idiot-Gram. Putting more words on the page does not always prove to be substantive, as you've been able to prove several times.

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those who supported for the status quo. And that was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged, the infirm and the Middle Class. This is another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

I did not vote for Trump, child, and I took political science courses at a University you have absolutely no chance of ever attending.

It appears you have been reduced to incoherent blathering here in your desperation as you are now tossing out just about everything but the kitchen sink. Perhaps you might try learning to organize your thoughts some day instead of just letting the spittle fly in these little tantrums of yours.

Gee, you took Poli Sci courses at the U. A U. you didn't ID.

My undergrad degrees, earned at CAL, were in Poli Sci and US History from Reconstruction until the election of 1960. Politics live - which I observed close at hand since during my time at CAL - 65 & 66, and 70-72 (I spent the middle years on AD in the Navy) were instructive because of the events during my time at CAL & in the Navy.

I also have a Master's Degree from SFSU. Do I now win the pissing contest, or does dogshit claim victory.?

 

[Iceweasel]

My experience tells me you are what you hate.

You complain about "dimocrat" and are still using the term, "Tea bagger"?

Proves that political partisans are hypocritical asshats regardless of political affiliation.

It's odd to me how certain truths are overlooked by these hyper partisans. It has already been established that he man who wrote it is no doctor which should lead any rational person to question why he is calling himself that, it has already been established that his claiming fascists use an overreaction to "terrorism" is awfully convenient considering the word was hardly used in the 30s, and that, in fact, it was whipped up specifically to apply to GWB. The entire list was even lifted from a site designed for utter lunatics. Despite this, the thread goes on and on with the fundamentalists of the far left clinging to their dogma.

Can you just imagine if a similarly puerile poster tried to foster the notion that Obama is a communist and used some unaccredited laundry list of supposed reasons why? The same leftist authoritarians in this thread who are all over the Trump is a fascist silliness would be mocking the very notion.

I give what I get dogshit. You have no clue as to the academic and historical meaning of the terms you toss around - leftist, liberal, progressive, conservative, authoritarian and you even to fail to understand the use of irony as a rhetorical device. Rational and reasonable posters can expect a rational and reasonable response from me, I'm not always correct, have offered Mea Culpas when I'm proved wrong, but given the opposition that is rarely necessary.

As a piece of dogshit you have proved to be nothing but a pedestrian member of the echo chamber; someday offer your opinions on real issues: Abortion, sex ed. in schools, gun control, voting qualifications, border security, foreign and domestic policy, the UN, taxes, minimum wage, labor unions and the national debt.

I have on each of these and many more; the response from Trump supporters and Obama haters has been nothing substantive, and many times a phrase or single sentence which I call an Idiot-Gram. Putting more words on the page does not always prove to be substantive, as you've been able to prove several times.

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those who supported for the status quo. And that was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged, the infirm and the Middle Class. This is another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

I did not vote for Trump, child, and I took political science courses at a University you have absolutely no chance of ever attending.

It appears you have been reduced to incoherent blathering here in your desperation as you are now tossing out just about everything but the kitchen sink. Perhaps you might try learning to organize your thoughts some day instead of just letting the spittle fly in these little tantrums of yours.

Hey, take me outa the quote willya?

 

[Iceweasel]

...

BTW, calling the tea party members "tea baggers" and that they've renamed their caucus the Freedom Caucus is another example of extremists using words and phrases inappropriately, for the Tea Party was nothing more than a group of ignorant and callous people manipulated by those whose support for the status quo. And, was an effort by the Medical Establishment & Wall Street to continue to reap profit from the poor, the aged and the infirm. Another issue on which I've commented and one which deserves actual debate, not echoes of propaganda and a phrase or single sentence of foolishness.

The Tea Party was not ignorant nor callous, nor manipulated.

It was renamed because as normal Middle American types they were not up on homo-erotic slang and did not realize that "Tea Bagging" had a obscure secondary meaning that vile leftists would use to smear them.


That you are STILL using that term at this late date, completely undermines your attempt to present yourself as a reasonable human being and your judgements on those who disagree with you.

The term is a pejorative, used as dramatic irony, to describe how those "normal Middle class American types" dressed and behaved during the summer of 2010. That maybe a bit to abstract for you. Suffice it to say, these "normal Middle class American types" were manipulated by the propaganda (IT's SOCIALISM!!!) by those who benefited from the status quo, and Pol's who had been displaced during the 2008 election lusting for the power they lost.

Yes, we know the left consists of arrogant condescending assholes. Thanks anyway.