🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Fast-food workers strike, seeking $15 wage, political muscle

Why is it ok for ceos to keep getting raises for bad performance?

Because the raises are voluntarily given by the people who own the money.

You mean ceos give them to themswlves because they own the board.

No, I don't mean anything of the sort, because unlike you, I don't say stupid shit.

Well to believe ceo pay has gone up the way it has just because of the market you'd have to be a moron. That seems to be the case with you.

Well, to believe that I'm responsible for the argument you want to oppose about markets when I never said a word about markets, you'd have to be a moron . . . which we all KNOW is the case with you.

What I said was, "CEO pay is decided by the people who are paying the money, so it's no one else's business." See if you can wrap both your functioning brain cells around the concept of "none of your business".

So even you know it is a rigged game. Well that is good. But it is the business of every share holder. So that is actually a whole lot of people for most companies. Thanks for playing, you lose again.
 
I own stocks in those companies so yes it is my business.

It's a free country. Buy stocks in a company that you approve of.

Since I own them it is my business.

Your comment made absolutely no sense to what I posted. So let's try this again: if you don't approve of the way a company which you have stock in hires, promotes, or pays their executives, it's a free country and you can move your money to a company that conducts themselves to your liking. The same holds true if you don't like the pay scale for their starting jobs.

But I do own them so it is my business. Thank you.

You're really doing your best to not address the argument, aren't ya?

You know, you don't have to own any stocks at all. You can make other investments such as the commodities market or real estate. You can open up your own business or make small investments in private businesses not on the market.

It's all up to you. But don't come off with telling me that you own stock in companies that overpay CEO's and board members, but have no control over it.

I have a very diverse portfolio. And since I do own stock in these companies, it is my business. Thank you.

Heck many people on these boards with a retirement account probably own many of these companies. Your claim of none of your business is void for most everyone I would guess.
 
It's a free country. Buy stocks in a company that you approve of.

Since I own them it is my business.

Your comment made absolutely no sense to what I posted. So let's try this again: if you don't approve of the way a company which you have stock in hires, promotes, or pays their executives, it's a free country and you can move your money to a company that conducts themselves to your liking. The same holds true if you don't like the pay scale for their starting jobs.

But I do own them so it is my business. Thank you.

You're really doing your best to not address the argument, aren't ya?

You know, you don't have to own any stocks at all. You can make other investments such as the commodities market or real estate. You can open up your own business or make small investments in private businesses not on the market.

It's all up to you. But don't come off with telling me that you own stock in companies that overpay CEO's and board members, but have no control over it.

I have a very diverse portfolio. And since I do own stock in these companies, it is my business. Thank you.

Heck many people on these boards with a retirement account probably own many of these companies. Your claim of none of your business is void for most everyone I would guess.

Of course it's my business. That's why I have a choice on where I invest my money. I won't invest in Walmart and then complain about how much the Walton's make or how much they pay their floor sweepers.

If there is something about an investment I don't like, I dump the investment and get another one to my liking. If you're invested in companies that you disapprove of, then I think it's time you get out of buying stocks because you don't know how to manage them.
 
Since I own them it is my business.

Your comment made absolutely no sense to what I posted. So let's try this again: if you don't approve of the way a company which you have stock in hires, promotes, or pays their executives, it's a free country and you can move your money to a company that conducts themselves to your liking. The same holds true if you don't like the pay scale for their starting jobs.

But I do own them so it is my business. Thank you.

You're really doing your best to not address the argument, aren't ya?

You know, you don't have to own any stocks at all. You can make other investments such as the commodities market or real estate. You can open up your own business or make small investments in private businesses not on the market.

It's all up to you. But don't come off with telling me that you own stock in companies that overpay CEO's and board members, but have no control over it.

I have a very diverse portfolio. And since I do own stock in these companies, it is my business. Thank you.

Heck many people on these boards with a retirement account probably own many of these companies. Your claim of none of your business is void for most everyone I would guess.

Of course it's my business. That's why I have a choice on where I invest my money. I won't invest in Walmart and then complain about how much the Walton's make or how much they pay their floor sweepers.

If there is something about an investment I don't like, I dump the investment and get another one to my liking. If you're invested in companies that you disapprove of, then I think it's time you get out of buying stocks because you don't know how to manage them.

Good for you.
 
Sorry, but if companies are going to sell so much stock then it is the business of owners like me. Your little none of your business claim is void. Thanks for playing, you lose.
If you are a voting member you can vote but you don't get to call the shots. If you are dissatisfied you can sell your stock, that's how it works, assuming it's public.
 
Your comment made absolutely no sense to what I posted. So let's try this again: if you don't approve of the way a company which you have stock in hires, promotes, or pays their executives, it's a free country and you can move your money to a company that conducts themselves to your liking. The same holds true if you don't like the pay scale for their starting jobs.

But I do own them so it is my business. Thank you.

You're really doing your best to not address the argument, aren't ya?

You know, you don't have to own any stocks at all. You can make other investments such as the commodities market or real estate. You can open up your own business or make small investments in private businesses not on the market.

It's all up to you. But don't come off with telling me that you own stock in companies that overpay CEO's and board members, but have no control over it.

I have a very diverse portfolio. And since I do own stock in these companies, it is my business. Thank you.

Heck many people on these boards with a retirement account probably own many of these companies. Your claim of none of your business is void for most everyone I would guess.

Of course it's my business. That's why I have a choice on where I invest my money. I won't invest in Walmart and then complain about how much the Walton's make or how much they pay their floor sweepers.

If there is something about an investment I don't like, I dump the investment and get another one to my liking. If you're invested in companies that you disapprove of, then I think it's time you get out of buying stocks because you don't know how to manage them.

Good for you.
It would be good for you to understand instead of mindlessly repeating wrong headed theories.
 
Sorry, but if companies are going to sell so much stock then it is the business of owners like me. Your little none of your business claim is void. Thanks for playing, you lose.
If you are a voting member you can vote but you don't get to call the shots. If you are dissatisfied you can sell your stock, that's how it works, assuming it's public.

That's great. But as long as I do own stock it is my business.
 
Sorry, but if companies are going to sell so much stock then it is the business of owners like me. Your little none of your business claim is void. Thanks for playing, you lose.
If you are a voting member you can vote but you don't get to call the shots. If you are dissatisfied you can sell your stock, that's how it works, assuming it's public.
That's great. But as long as I do own stock it is my business.
So exactly what is the problem then? If they fail to pay $15/hr. you take your money elsewhere.
 
Sorry, but if companies are going to sell so much stock then it is the business of owners like me. Your little none of your business claim is void. Thanks for playing, you lose.
If you are a voting member you can vote but you don't get to call the shots. If you are dissatisfied you can sell your stock, that's how it works, assuming it's public.
That's great. But as long as I do own stock it is my business.
So exactly what is the problem then? If they fail to pay $15/hr. you take your money elsewhere.

As long as I own stock it is my business. Thanks.
 
Ceos actually get paid more for worse performance. That's ok though right?

The Highest-Paid CEOs Are The Worst Performers, New Study Says

Again, unless you're paying them, it's none of your business.

I own stocks in those companies so yes it is my business.

Arguments based on your own halfwitted delusions and unverifiable by anyone but your psychiatrists are useless.

I guess in your world owning stocks must seem unattainable.

No, the problem is that in YOUR world where you're a major stockholder in every corporation in America, there are also unicorns and leprechauns.
 
Ceos actually get paid more for worse performance. That's ok though right?

The Highest-Paid CEOs Are The Worst Performers, New Study Says

Again, unless you're paying them, it's none of your business.

I own stocks in those companies so yes it is my business.

Arguments based on your own halfwitted delusions and unverifiable by anyone but your psychiatrists are useless.

I guess in your world owning stocks must seem unattainable.

No, the problem is that in YOUR world where you're a major stockholder in every corporation in America, there are also unicorns and leprechauns.

Like I already said. Most people are probably owners of these big companies. They are all over retirement accounts. Sorry your weak it's none of your business defense works for about nobody. You will have to do better. Your ceos shouldn't have gone public and sold lots of stocks I guess.
 
Your ceos shouldn't have gone public and sold lots of stocks I guess.
Still trying to figure out your malfunction here. If the public has decided the direction of the company where's the problem?

It is the board and ceo. The public is not making these decisions, sorry.
Ah, so it isn't your business after all.

Yes every stock holder is an owner. Being an owner makes it their business. It's very simple really, why is it so hard for you to understand? I knew you were slow, but this is ridiculous.
 
Your ceos shouldn't have gone public and sold lots of stocks I guess.
Still trying to figure out your malfunction here. If the public has decided the direction of the company where's the problem?
It is the board and ceo. The public is not making these decisions, sorry.
Ah, so it isn't your business after all.
Yes every stock holder is an owner. Being an owner makes it their business. It's very simple really, why is it so hard for you to understand? I knew you were slow, but this is ridiculous.
How do you make it your business if you have no say in the matter? I don't get it.
 
Your ceos shouldn't have gone public and sold lots of stocks I guess.
Still trying to figure out your malfunction here. If the public has decided the direction of the company where's the problem?
It is the board and ceo. The public is not making these decisions, sorry.
Ah, so it isn't your business after all.
Yes every stock holder is an owner. Being an owner makes it their business. It's very simple really, why is it so hard for you to understand? I knew you were slow, but this is ridiculous.
How do you make it your business if you have no say in the matter? I don't get it.
Obviously. I'm sure there are many things you don't get. I guess you should to be on a political forum. You have no say in political decisions either.
 
Still trying to figure out your malfunction here. If the public has decided the direction of the company where's the problem?
It is the board and ceo. The public is not making these decisions, sorry.
Ah, so it isn't your business after all.
Yes every stock holder is an owner. Being an owner makes it their business. It's very simple really, why is it so hard for you to understand? I knew you were slow, but this is ridiculous.
How do you make it your business if you have no say in the matter? I don't get it.
Obviously. I'm sure there are many things you don't get. I guess you should to be on a political forum. You have no say in political decisions either.
What does 'you should to be on a political forum' mean in Brainsville? I do have a say in politics, we call it voting. That's why it's my business. If you have no vote you have to accept the cards that are dealt.
 
It is the board and ceo. The public is not making these decisions, sorry.
Ah, so it isn't your business after all.
Yes every stock holder is an owner. Being an owner makes it their business. It's very simple really, why is it so hard for you to understand? I knew you were slow, but this is ridiculous.
How do you make it your business if you have no say in the matter? I don't get it.
Obviously. I'm sure there are many things you don't get. I guess you should to be on a political forum. You have no say in political decisions either.
What does 'you should to be on a political forum' mean in Brainsville? I do have a say in politics, we call it voting. That's why it's my business. If you have no vote you have to accept the cards that are dealt.

Then I guess you are the reason we have obamacare. Good job.
 
Ah, so it isn't your business after all.
Yes every stock holder is an owner. Being an owner makes it their business. It's very simple really, why is it so hard for you to understand? I knew you were slow, but this is ridiculous.
How do you make it your business if you have no say in the matter? I don't get it.
Obviously. I'm sure there are many things you don't get. I guess you should to be on a political forum. You have no say in political decisions either.
What does 'you should to be on a political forum' mean in Brainsville? I do have a say in politics, we call it voting. That's why it's my business. If you have no vote you have to accept the cards that are dealt.
Then I guess you are the reason we have obamacare. Good job.
I didn't vote for the asshole.
 

Forum List

Back
Top