FBI apprehends Christian terror group on US soil

[Mac1958]

Yeah, the Methodists really crossed the line with those internet beheadings.
.

Ah, you mean like this?

Portrait of Will James. Circa 1907, Cairo, illinois. Gelatin silver print. James (alias) Froggie."

"Half- Burned Head of James on Pole" in Candee Park. November 11, 1909, Cairo, Illinois. Gelatin silver print. Real photo postcard. 3 1/2 x 5 1/2" ink inscription on reverse: "This Pole is in Candee Park. Enter section of Washington avenue and Elm st which have Will James (alia) Froggie half Burnt Head." Etched into negative, "Half Burned Head of James" and photographers name, "leBlock."

--- James was hung, riddled with bullets, dragged for a mile, then set afire in front of ten thousand spectators. (source)
​

You must have a special program to identify Methodists and Presbyterians. I don't see the distinction but that's me.

1907, 1909.

Over 100 years ago.

Weak, transparent deflection noted, thanks.

Wow.

Feel free to essplain how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another.

Oh this oughta be good.

Sure.

Cultures and societies change over time, unless you think we have not progressed in over 100 years. Ha ha.

And that doesn't explain your deflection, not that I would expect you to.

Deflection noted.
It says, and we quote, "essplain [sic] how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another".

Not "cultural mores", not "societlal standards" -- LAWS OF LOGIC.

IOW essplain how, say, Daesh (we don't use the Goddess' name any more, fuck them) acts on a religious basis in 2015, yet the Klan was not and is not acting on the same basis over the last century.

Klanners are still around btw -- do they get some kind of Platonic waiver?

Do you have a copy of the logic standards for every year? Do you know when next year's are coming out? Is it New Year's Day, or do they bring 'em out in the fall, like new cars?

Colossal failure...

Here's a hint -- there's no way to wiggle out of this. The wormhole is closed.

I must admit, I didn't pay much attention to the details of your post.

If you want to pretend that we have not progressed in 100+ years, that's fine with me. If you want to transparently try to equate modern-day Christianity with modern-day Islam, that's fine too. I've long been pointing out how it's a standard strategy of the Regressive Left.

I realize you have to deflect for the PC-protected religion. You've chosen your side. Enjoy.
.

 

[Tilly]

How do you know they claim to be Christians? This suggests not:

According to local human rights groups, a member can only leave a gang if he becomes a Christian and gives public evidence of his conversion, such as carrying a Bible at all times, going to church daily and becoming clean and sober but it stiil is no guarantee that his former gang will seek him out and kill him for abandoning
Anorak | In photos: the tattooed faces of MS-13 and 18th Street gang members

 

[RetiredGySgt]

After the American Civil War of 1861–1865, members of the Protestant-led[12] Ku Klux Klan (KKK) organization began engaging in arson, beatings, destruction of property, lynching, murder, rape, tar-and-feathering, whipping and intimidation via such means as cross burning. They targeted African Americans, Jews, Catholics, and other social or ethnic minorities.

Klan members had an explicitly Christian terrorist ideology, basing their beliefs in part on a "religious foundation" in Christianity.[13] The goals of the KKK included, from an early time onward, an intent to "reestablish Protestant Christian values in America by any means possible", and they believed that "Jesus was the first Klansman."[14] From 1915 onward, Klansmen conducted cross-burnings not only to intimidate targets, but also to demonstrate their respect and reverence for Jesus Christ, and the ritual of lighting crosses was steeped in Christian symbolism, including prayer and singing hymns.[15] Within Christianity the Klan directed hostilities against Catholics. Modern Klan organizations remain associated with acts of domestic terrorism in the US.[16] -- Wiki​

The KKK (second iteration, 1915) targeted not only blacks, Jews, Catholics and communists but drinkers (it was pro-Prohibition) adulterers and "loose women", in at least one case pulling a (white) woman out of her house and whipping her for the "crime" of "not going to church". It's why I call 'em the American Taliban. And as far as the "base of support" Special Pleading Fallacy somebody's bound to trot out as if it's an argument, at its peak an estimated one-third of the entire male population of Indiana was Klan.

But by all means, deniers, regale us with still yet more of yon pretentious platitudinal piffle of how terrorism is an "Islam" thing.

Shitforbrains now brings up what Democrats did in 1861.
What a pathetic worm.

That he is.

Tell me. Just what does all his bullshit have to do with Muslim terrorists??

I'm sure everyone would all like to know.

Shall we bring it home in a convenient capsule? Good, let's do that.

Comes down to this:
A terrorist claims to be acting on behalf of Jesus (Rudolph, McVeigh, the litany list in post 35), you wags go "he's a liar, he's an imposter, he's not a Christian!"
- Another terrorist claims to act on behalf of Allah, suddenly his word is absolute truth, pure as the driven snow because he's NEVER misrepresent that.

Double standard. QED.

Apparently y 'all would have us believe that Christians are liars and Muslims are always truthful.

That is, if you want to keep leaning on the blanket generalization crutch. No other conclusion is possible.

Wiggle out of that one, Fallacists.

Look dumb ass, the DIFFERENCE is that ISLAM TEACHES murder and slaughter and calls on its members to do so. Christians are NOT taught by the religion to kill and maim. You see dumb ass Christians about 700 years ago started to change the bent of the religion and began putting a stop to such activities. Remind me when Islam did so? Ohh wait, they HAVEN'T.

So STUPID the difference is one religion glorifies and encourages its members to murder none members while the other condemns and ostracizes anyone that does so in its name.

Doesn't it now?
This is conveniently lifted from a recent unrelated thread:

Deuteronomy 21:18-21
“If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

Leviticus 24:16
Whoever blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him. The sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death.

Acts 7:59-60
And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.” And falling to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” And when he had said this, he fell asleep.

Numbers 15:32-36
While the people of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man gathering sticks on the Sabbath day. And those who found him gathering sticks brought him to Moses and Aaron and to all the congregation. They put him in custody, because it had not been made clear what should be done to him. And the Lord said to Moses, “The man shall be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp.” And all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him to death with stones, as the Lord commanded Moses.

Leviticus 20:27
“A man or a woman who is a medium or a necromancer shall surely be put to death. They shall be stoned with stones; their blood shall be upon them.”

Deuteronomy 13:10
You shall stone him to death with stones, because he sought to draw you away from the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.

(all listed here)

--- and that was only specifically stonings, not the bits about bashing babies' heads. All that's in the Holey Babble -- right now.

As is plainly laid out in the post you quoted, sitting right above:

Comes down to this:
A terrorist claims to be acting on behalf of Jesus (Rudolph, McVeigh, the litany list in post 35), you wags go "he's a liar, he's an imposter, he's not a Christian!"
- Another terrorist claims to act on behalf of Allah, suddenly his word is absolute truth, pure as the driven snow because he's NEVER misrepresent that.

Double standard. QED.

Apparently y 'all would have us believe that Christians are liars and Muslims are always truthful.

That is, if you want to keep leaning on the blanket generalization crutch. No other conclusion is possible.

Wiggle out of that one, Fallacists.

The interpretation of those verses is not now what it once was. Since the enlightenment the Churches have worked to encourage love and acceptance. Which you know or should know. meanwhile there has been no enlightenment for Islam. Where Christian main stream churches ostracize and condemn violence from those claiming Religious favor the Islamic religion ENCOURAGES it.

 

[Weatherman2020]

After the American Civil War of 1861–1865, members of the Protestant-led[12] Ku Klux Klan (KKK) organization began engaging in arson, beatings, destruction of property, lynching, murder, rape, tar-and-feathering, whipping and intimidation via such means as cross burning. They targeted African Americans, Jews, Catholics, and other social or ethnic minorities.

Klan members had an explicitly Christian terrorist ideology, basing their beliefs in part on a "religious foundation" in Christianity.[13] The goals of the KKK included, from an early time onward, an intent to "reestablish Protestant Christian values in America by any means possible", and they believed that "Jesus was the first Klansman."[14] From 1915 onward, Klansmen conducted cross-burnings not only to intimidate targets, but also to demonstrate their respect and reverence for Jesus Christ, and the ritual of lighting crosses was steeped in Christian symbolism, including prayer and singing hymns.[15] Within Christianity the Klan directed hostilities against Catholics. Modern Klan organizations remain associated with acts of domestic terrorism in the US.[16] -- Wiki​

The KKK (second iteration, 1915) targeted not only blacks, Jews, Catholics and communists but drinkers (it was pro-Prohibition) adulterers and "loose women", in at least one case pulling a (white) woman out of her house and whipping her for the "crime" of "not going to church". It's why I call 'em the American Taliban. And as far as the "base of support" Special Pleading Fallacy somebody's bound to trot out as if it's an argument, at its peak an estimated one-third of the entire male population of Indiana was Klan.

But by all means, deniers, regale us with still yet more of yon pretentious platitudinal piffle of how terrorism is an "Islam" thing.

Shitforbrains now brings up what Democrats did in 1861.
What a pathetic worm.

That he is.

Tell me. Just what does all his bullshit have to do with Muslim terrorists??

I'm sure everyone would all like to know.

Shall we bring it home in a convenient capsule? Good, let's do that.

Comes down to this:
A terrorist claims to be acting on behalf of Jesus (Rudolph, McVeigh, the litany list in post 35), you wags go "he's a liar, he's an imposter, he's not a Christian!"
- Another terrorist claims to act on behalf of Allah, suddenly his word is absolute truth, pure as the driven snow because he's NEVER misrepresent that.

Double standard. QED.

Apparently y 'all would have us believe that Christians are liars and Muslims are always truthful.

That is, if you want to keep leaning on the blanket generalization crutch. No other conclusion is possible.

Wiggle out of that one, Fallacists.

Look dumb ass, the DIFFERENCE is that ISLAM TEACHES murder and slaughter and calls on its members to do so. Christians are NOT taught by the religion to kill and maim. You see dumb ass Christians about 700 years ago started to change the bent of the religion and began putting a stop to such activities. Remind me when Islam did so? Ohh wait, they HAVEN'T.

So STUPID the difference is one religion glorifies and encourages its members to murder none members while the other condemns and ostracizes anyone that does so in its name.

Doesn't it now?
This is conveniently lifted from a recent unrelated thread:

Deuteronomy 21:18-21
“If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

Leviticus 24:16
Whoever blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him. The sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death.

Acts 7:59-60
And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.” And falling to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” And when he had said this, he fell asleep.

Numbers 15:32-36
While the people of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man gathering sticks on the Sabbath day. And those who found him gathering sticks brought him to Moses and Aaron and to all the congregation. They put him in custody, because it had not been made clear what should be done to him. And the Lord said to Moses, “The man shall be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp.” And all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him to death with stones, as the Lord commanded Moses.

Leviticus 20:27
“A man or a woman who is a medium or a necromancer shall surely be put to death. They shall be stoned with stones; their blood shall be upon them.”

Deuteronomy 13:10
You shall stone him to death with stones, because he sought to draw you away from the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.

(all listed here)

--- and that was only specifically stonings, not the bits about bashing babies' heads. All that's in the Holey Babble -- right now.

As is plainly laid out in the post you quoted, sitting right above:

Comes down to this:
A terrorist claims to be acting on behalf of Jesus (Rudolph, McVeigh, the litany list in post 35), you wags go "he's a liar, he's an imposter, he's not a Christian!"
- Another terrorist claims to act on behalf of Allah, suddenly his word is absolute truth, pure as the driven snow because he's NEVER misrepresent that.

Double standard. QED.

Apparently y 'all would have us believe that Christians are liars and Muslims are always truthful.

That is, if you want to keep leaning on the blanket generalization crutch. No other conclusion is possible.

Wiggle out of that one, Fallacists.

“If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them,19 then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives,20 and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’21 Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear."

Actually displays the brilliance of what's in the Bible, thanks for bringing it up. A father AND mother must take him before the elders, the elders must all agree, then all the men of the town must agree.

Great threat to keep your teens in line.
And not one record in history of it ever being carried out.

 

[Tilly]

Islamic terrorism is, by definition, terrorist acts committed by Muslim groups or individuals who profess Islamic or Islamist motivations or goals. Islamic terrorists have relied on particular interpretations of the tenets of the Quranand the Hadith, citing these scriptures to justify violent tactics including mass murder, genocide, child-molestation and slavery.[1]

Can't find any reference for these criminal gangs doing anything of the kind. Anyone else? The only reference I have found that links them to Christianity is what I posted earlier - a statement that the only way out of the gang is to CONVERT to Christianity, carry a bible and attend church regularly - and that does not provide an absolute guarantee that they won't kill you for leaving. I don't see any evidence of a 'Christian terror group' as the title claims.

 

[Pogo]

Ah, you mean like this?

Portrait of Will James. Circa 1907, Cairo, illinois. Gelatin silver print. James (alias) Froggie."

"Half- Burned Head of James on Pole" in Candee Park. November 11, 1909, Cairo, Illinois. Gelatin silver print. Real photo postcard. 3 1/2 x 5 1/2" ink inscription on reverse: "This Pole is in Candee Park. Enter section of Washington avenue and Elm st which have Will James (alia) Froggie half Burnt Head." Etched into negative, "Half Burned Head of James" and photographers name, "leBlock."

--- James was hung, riddled with bullets, dragged for a mile, then set afire in front of ten thousand spectators. (source)
​

You must have a special program to identify Methodists and Presbyterians. I don't see the distinction but that's me.

1907, 1909.

Over 100 years ago.

Weak, transparent deflection noted, thanks.

Wow.

Feel free to essplain how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another.

Oh this oughta be good.

Sure.

Cultures and societies change over time, unless you think we have not progressed in over 100 years. Ha ha.

And that doesn't explain your deflection, not that I would expect you to.

Deflection noted.
It says, and we quote, "essplain [sic] how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another".

Not "cultural mores", not "societlal standards" -- LAWS OF LOGIC.

IOW essplain how, say, Daesh (we don't use the Goddess' name any more, fuck them) acts on a religious basis in 2015, yet the Klan was not and is not acting on the same basis over the last century.

Klanners are still around btw -- do they get some kind of Platonic waiver?

Do you have a copy of the logic standards for every year? Do you know when next year's are coming out? Is it New Year's Day, or do they bring 'em out in the fall, like new cars?

Colossal failure...

Here's a hint -- there's no way to wiggle out of this. The wormhole is closed.

I must admit, I didn't pay much attention to the details of your post.

If you want to pretend that we have not progressed in 100+ years, that's fine with me. If you want to transparently try to equate modern-day Christianity with modern-day Islam, that's fine too. I've long been pointing out how it's a standard strategy of the Regressive Left.

I realize you have to deflect for the PC-protected religion. You've chosen your side. Enjoy.

Still trying to run away??

What happened to those logic laws that get rewritten for every post then? Where did you demonstrate that the laws of logic somehow change over time when it's convenient?



Exactly. Didn't think so. Off you go.

Next .... keep the line moving please....

 

[Mac1958]

1907, 1909.

Over 100 years ago.

Weak, transparent deflection noted, thanks.

Wow.

Feel free to essplain how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another.

Oh this oughta be good.

Sure.

Cultures and societies change over time, unless you think we have not progressed in over 100 years. Ha ha.

And that doesn't explain your deflection, not that I would expect you to.

Deflection noted.
It says, and we quote, "essplain [sic] how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another".

Not "cultural mores", not "societlal standards" -- LAWS OF LOGIC.

IOW essplain how, say, Daesh (we don't use the Goddess' name any more, fuck them) acts on a religious basis in 2015, yet the Klan was not and is not acting on the same basis over the last century.

Klanners are still around btw -- do they get some kind of Platonic waiver?

Do you have a copy of the logic standards for every year? Do you know when next year's are coming out? Is it New Year's Day, or do they bring 'em out in the fall, like new cars?

Colossal failure...

Here's a hint -- there's no way to wiggle out of this. The wormhole is closed.

I must admit, I didn't pay much attention to the details of your post.

If you want to pretend that we have not progressed in 100+ years, that's fine with me. If you want to transparently try to equate modern-day Christianity with modern-day Islam, that's fine too. I've long been pointing out how it's a standard strategy of the Regressive Left.

I realize you have to deflect for the PC-protected religion. You've chosen your side. Enjoy.

Still trying to run away??

What happened to those logic laws that get rewritten for every post then? Where did you demonstrate that the laws of logic somehow change over time when it's convenient?



Exactly. Didn't think so. Off you go.

Hey, come on, tell us how bad Christianity is.

Anything to avoid talking about what is happening in your PC-Protected religion.

Come on, talk about the Crusades.
.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Sgt. Richard Valdemar | Fairly Civil

"Police have arrested three alleged members of the Latino gang MS-13 (Mara Salvatrucha) in connection with the murder. The “alleged” perpetrators are — but of course, leave us not rush to judgment — “innocent until proven guilty” under law. But the incident is a depressing echo of story after story of Latino gang violence that I document in my forthcoming book — No Boundaries: Transnational Latino Gangs and American Law Enforcement (University of Michigan Press, Spring 2009).

The two most violent transnational youth gangs — MS-13 and the 18th Street gang — are present today in almost every state in the union. Their virulent spread within the United States is a casebook study of “blowback,” the unintended bad consequence of what seems at the time like a good idea."


Should deny immigration to Christians, close churches, and label Christianity a terrorist religion.

Right?

Only if they are Muslims.

 

[Pogo]

Shitforbrains now brings up what Democrats did in 1861.
What a pathetic worm.

That he is.

Tell me. Just what does all his bullshit have to do with Muslim terrorists??

I'm sure everyone would all like to know.

Shall we bring it home in a convenient capsule? Good, let's do that.

Comes down to this:
A terrorist claims to be acting on behalf of Jesus (Rudolph, McVeigh, the litany list in post 35), you wags go "he's a liar, he's an imposter, he's not a Christian!"
- Another terrorist claims to act on behalf of Allah, suddenly his word is absolute truth, pure as the driven snow because he's NEVER misrepresent that.

Double standard. QED.

Apparently y 'all would have us believe that Christians are liars and Muslims are always truthful.

That is, if you want to keep leaning on the blanket generalization crutch. No other conclusion is possible.

Wiggle out of that one, Fallacists.

Look dumb ass, the DIFFERENCE is that ISLAM TEACHES murder and slaughter and calls on its members to do so. Christians are NOT taught by the religion to kill and maim. You see dumb ass Christians about 700 years ago started to change the bent of the religion and began putting a stop to such activities. Remind me when Islam did so? Ohh wait, they HAVEN'T.

So STUPID the difference is one religion glorifies and encourages its members to murder none members while the other condemns and ostracizes anyone that does so in its name.

Doesn't it now?
This is conveniently lifted from a recent unrelated thread:

Deuteronomy 21:18-21
“If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

Leviticus 24:16
Whoever blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him. The sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death.

Acts 7:59-60
And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.” And falling to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” And when he had said this, he fell asleep.

Numbers 15:32-36
While the people of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man gathering sticks on the Sabbath day. And those who found him gathering sticks brought him to Moses and Aaron and to all the congregation. They put him in custody, because it had not been made clear what should be done to him. And the Lord said to Moses, “The man shall be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp.” And all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him to death with stones, as the Lord commanded Moses.

Leviticus 20:27
“A man or a woman who is a medium or a necromancer shall surely be put to death. They shall be stoned with stones; their blood shall be upon them.”

Deuteronomy 13:10
You shall stone him to death with stones, because he sought to draw you away from the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.

(all listed here)

--- and that was only specifically stonings, not the bits about bashing babies' heads. All that's in the Holey Babble -- right now.

As is plainly laid out in the post you quoted, sitting right above:

Comes down to this:
A terrorist claims to be acting on behalf of Jesus (Rudolph, McVeigh, the litany list in post 35), you wags go "he's a liar, he's an imposter, he's not a Christian!"
- Another terrorist claims to act on behalf of Allah, suddenly his word is absolute truth, pure as the driven snow because he's NEVER misrepresent that.

Double standard. QED.

Apparently y 'all would have us believe that Christians are liars and Muslims are always truthful.

That is, if you want to keep leaning on the blanket generalization crutch. No other conclusion is possible.

Wiggle out of that one, Fallacists.

The interpretation of those verses is not now what it once was. Since the enlightenment the Churches have worked to encourage love and acceptance. Which you know or should know. meanwhile there has been no enlightenment for Islam. Where Christian main stream churches ostracize and condemn violence from those claiming Religious favor the Islamic religion ENCOURAGES it.

oooooh, the INTERPRETATION now is it? Funny, right above you said, and I quote,

"ISLAM TEACHES murder and slaughter and calls on its members to do so. Christians are NOT taught by the religion to kill and maim"

--- and as I demonstrated that's blatantly false. Now you wanna beg off to a special pleading of "interpretation".

Poster please. You're busted from here to Tanganyika.

 

[Pogo]

Feel free to essplain how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another.

Oh this oughta be good.

Sure.

Cultures and societies change over time, unless you think we have not progressed in over 100 years. Ha ha.

And that doesn't explain your deflection, not that I would expect you to.

Deflection noted.
It says, and we quote, "essplain [sic] how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another".

Not "cultural mores", not "societlal standards" -- LAWS OF LOGIC.

IOW essplain how, say, Daesh (we don't use the Goddess' name any more, fuck them) acts on a religious basis in 2015, yet the Klan was not and is not acting on the same basis over the last century.

Klanners are still around btw -- do they get some kind of Platonic waiver?

Do you have a copy of the logic standards for every year? Do you know when next year's are coming out? Is it New Year's Day, or do they bring 'em out in the fall, like new cars?

Colossal failure...

Here's a hint -- there's no way to wiggle out of this. The wormhole is closed.

I must admit, I didn't pay much attention to the details of your post.

If you want to pretend that we have not progressed in 100+ years, that's fine with me. If you want to transparently try to equate modern-day Christianity with modern-day Islam, that's fine too. I've long been pointing out how it's a standard strategy of the Regressive Left.

I realize you have to deflect for the PC-protected religion. You've chosen your side. Enjoy.

Still trying to run away??

What happened to those logic laws that get rewritten for every post then? Where did you demonstrate that the laws of logic somehow change over time when it's convenient?



Exactly. Didn't think so. Off you go.

Hey, come on, tell us how bad Christianity is.

Anything to avoid talking about what is happening in your PC-Protected religion.

Come on, talk about the Crusades.

Why would I do that? I've posted nothing about value judgments nor is that what I'm here for. I've posted about fallacious arguments. And you actually tried to float the turd idea that the laws of logic get rewritten from one year to the next.

That one never did get essplained, but it's definitely gonna leave a mark.

 

[Mac1958]

Sure.

Cultures and societies change over time, unless you think we have not progressed in over 100 years. Ha ha.

And that doesn't explain your deflection, not that I would expect you to.

Deflection noted.
It says, and we quote, "essplain [sic] how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another".

Not "cultural mores", not "societlal standards" -- LAWS OF LOGIC.

IOW essplain how, say, Daesh (we don't use the Goddess' name any more, fuck them) acts on a religious basis in 2015, yet the Klan was not and is not acting on the same basis over the last century.

Klanners are still around btw -- do they get some kind of Platonic waiver?

Do you have a copy of the logic standards for every year? Do you know when next year's are coming out? Is it New Year's Day, or do they bring 'em out in the fall, like new cars?

Colossal failure...

Here's a hint -- there's no way to wiggle out of this. The wormhole is closed.

I must admit, I didn't pay much attention to the details of your post.

If you want to pretend that we have not progressed in 100+ years, that's fine with me. If you want to transparently try to equate modern-day Christianity with modern-day Islam, that's fine too. I've long been pointing out how it's a standard strategy of the Regressive Left.

I realize you have to deflect for the PC-protected religion. You've chosen your side. Enjoy.

Still trying to run away??

What happened to those logic laws that get rewritten for every post then? Where did you demonstrate that the laws of logic somehow change over time when it's convenient?



Exactly. Didn't think so. Off you go.

Hey, come on, tell us how bad Christianity is.

Anything to avoid talking about what is happening in your PC-Protected religion.

Come on, talk about the Crusades.

Why would I do that? I've posted nothing about value judgments nor is that what I'm here for. I've posted about fallacious arguments. And you actually tried to float the turd idea that the laws of logic get rewritten from one year to the next.

That one never did get essplained, but it's definitely gonna leave a mark.

Oh good, a straw man. Always a good sign. You're the one playing this goofy "laws of logic" deflection game.

Come on. Tell us how bad Christianity is so we won't talk about your PC-protected religion.

Come on, knock it out of the park for us.


.

 

[Pogo]

Deflection noted.
It says, and we quote, "essplain [sic] how the laws of logic morph themselves from one year to another".

Not "cultural mores", not "societlal standards" -- LAWS OF LOGIC.

IOW essplain how, say, Daesh (we don't use the Goddess' name any more, fuck them) acts on a religious basis in 2015, yet the Klan was not and is not acting on the same basis over the last century.

Klanners are still around btw -- do they get some kind of Platonic waiver?

Do you have a copy of the logic standards for every year? Do you know when next year's are coming out? Is it New Year's Day, or do they bring 'em out in the fall, like new cars?

Colossal failure...

Here's a hint -- there's no way to wiggle out of this. The wormhole is closed.

I must admit, I didn't pay much attention to the details of your post.

If you want to pretend that we have not progressed in 100+ years, that's fine with me. If you want to transparently try to equate modern-day Christianity with modern-day Islam, that's fine too. I've long been pointing out how it's a standard strategy of the Regressive Left.

I realize you have to deflect for the PC-protected religion. You've chosen your side. Enjoy.

Still trying to run away??

What happened to those logic laws that get rewritten for every post then? Where did you demonstrate that the laws of logic somehow change over time when it's convenient?



Exactly. Didn't think so. Off you go.

Hey, come on, tell us how bad Christianity is.

Anything to avoid talking about what is happening in your PC-Protected religion.

Come on, talk about the Crusades.

Why would I do that? I've posted nothing about value judgments nor is that what I'm here for. I've posted about fallacious arguments. And you actually tried to float the turd idea that the laws of logic get rewritten from one year to the next.

That one never did get essplained, but it's definitely gonna leave a mark.

Oh good, a straw man. Always a good sign. You're the one playing this goofy "laws of logic" deflection game.

Come on. Tell us how bad Christianity is so we won't talk about your PC-protected religion.

Come on, knock it out of the park for us.

Pretty desperate to change the subject arenchya? Why might that be?

Begging is so.... noble. I could watch it all day.

 

[Mac1958]

I must admit, I didn't pay much attention to the details of your post.

If you want to pretend that we have not progressed in 100+ years, that's fine with me. If you want to transparently try to equate modern-day Christianity with modern-day Islam, that's fine too. I've long been pointing out how it's a standard strategy of the Regressive Left.

I realize you have to deflect for the PC-protected religion. You've chosen your side. Enjoy.

Still trying to run away??

What happened to those logic laws that get rewritten for every post then? Where did you demonstrate that the laws of logic somehow change over time when it's convenient?



Exactly. Didn't think so. Off you go.

Hey, come on, tell us how bad Christianity is.

Anything to avoid talking about what is happening in your PC-Protected religion.

Come on, talk about the Crusades.

Why would I do that? I've posted nothing about value judgments nor is that what I'm here for. I've posted about fallacious arguments. And you actually tried to float the turd idea that the laws of logic get rewritten from one year to the next.

That one never did get essplained, but it's definitely gonna leave a mark.

Oh good, a straw man. Always a good sign. You're the one playing this goofy "laws of logic" deflection game.

Come on. Tell us how bad Christianity is so we won't talk about your PC-protected religion.

Come on, knock it out of the park for us.

Pretty desperate to change the subject arenchya? Why might that be?

Begging is so.... noble. I could watch it all day.

Still humping my leg. You Regressive Leftists are horny little liars!

The thread is about Christianity, liar. So tell us how it's just as bad as Islam. Keep deflecting for the PC-protected religion.

Quit running or go away.


.

 

[Pogo]

Still trying to run away??

What happened to those logic laws that get rewritten for every post then? Where did you demonstrate that the laws of logic somehow change over time when it's convenient?



Exactly. Didn't think so. Off you go.

Hey, come on, tell us how bad Christianity is.

Anything to avoid talking about what is happening in your PC-Protected religion.

Come on, talk about the Crusades.

Why would I do that? I've posted nothing about value judgments nor is that what I'm here for. I've posted about fallacious arguments. And you actually tried to float the turd idea that the laws of logic get rewritten from one year to the next.

That one never did get essplained, but it's definitely gonna leave a mark.

Oh good, a straw man. Always a good sign. You're the one playing this goofy "laws of logic" deflection game.

Come on. Tell us how bad Christianity is so we won't talk about your PC-protected religion.

Come on, knock it out of the park for us.

Pretty desperate to change the subject arenchya? Why might that be?

Begging is so.... noble. I could watch it all day.

Still humping my leg. You Regressive Leftists are horny little liars!

The thread is about Christianity, liar. So tell us how it's just as bad as Islam. Keep deflecting for the PC-protected religion.

Quit running or go away.

What flies blissfully over your head here is this inconvenience ----

I haven't posted a damn thing about how any religion is "good" or "bad". That's actually my opposition posting that.

Did that simple fact evade you? Go ahead. Find one. I'll wait.





Oh and while we're waiting, no this thread isn't about Christianism; it's about terrorism.



How's that search comin'?

 

[Mac1958]

How do you know they claim to be Christians?

Doesn't matter.

The Regressive Left has chosen sides, and now they can live with it.
.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Look dumb ass, the DIFFERENCE is that ISLAM TEACHES murder and slaughter and calls on its members to do so. Christians are NOT taught by the religion to kill and maim.

"Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks".

I have to agree, that is disgusting.

Oh wait -- Psalm 139:7

Oopsie.

2 Kings 8:12
"Why is my lord weeping?" asked Hazael. "Because I know the harm you will do to the Israelites," he answered. "You will set fire to their fortified places, kill their young men with the sword, dash their little children to the ground, and rip open their pregnant women."

Isaiah 13:16
Their infants will be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses will be looted and their wives violated.

Hosea 13:16
The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open."

Still want to pretend it isn't there?

Is that what Christians are taught?
Then we must be slow learners, not one example of it being followed in 2,000 years.

Or is it you're just a hate monger worshipper of your Islamo masters?

 

[Pogo]

Hey, come on, tell us how bad Christianity is.

Anything to avoid talking about what is happening in your PC-Protected religion.

Come on, talk about the Crusades.

Why would I do that? I've posted nothing about value judgments nor is that what I'm here for. I've posted about fallacious arguments. And you actually tried to float the turd idea that the laws of logic get rewritten from one year to the next.

That one never did get essplained, but it's definitely gonna leave a mark.

Oh good, a straw man. Always a good sign. You're the one playing this goofy "laws of logic" deflection game.

Come on. Tell us how bad Christianity is so we won't talk about your PC-protected religion.

Come on, knock it out of the park for us.

Pretty desperate to change the subject arenchya? Why might that be?

Begging is so.... noble. I could watch it all day.

Still humping my leg. You Regressive Leftists are horny little liars!

The thread is about Christianity, liar. So tell us how it's just as bad as Islam. Keep deflecting for the PC-protected religion.

Quit running or go away.

What flies blissfully over your head here is this inconvenience ----

I haven't posted a damn thing about how any religion is "good" or "bad". That's actually my opposition posting that.

Did that simple fact evade you? Go ahead. Find one. I'll wait.





Oh and while we're waiting, no this thread isn't about Christianism; it's about terrorism.



How's that search comin'?

Couldn't find it huh?

I warned ya.

 

[Pogo]

Look dumb ass, the DIFFERENCE is that ISLAM TEACHES murder and slaughter and calls on its members to do so. Christians are NOT taught by the religion to kill and maim.

"Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks".

I have to agree, that is disgusting.

Oh wait -- Psalm 139:7

Oopsie.

2 Kings 8:12
"Why is my lord weeping?" asked Hazael. "Because I know the harm you will do to the Israelites," he answered. "You will set fire to their fortified places, kill their young men with the sword, dash their little children to the ground, and rip open their pregnant women."

Isaiah 13:16
Their infants will be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses will be looted and their wives violated.

Hosea 13:16
The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open."

Still want to pretend it isn't there?

Is that what Christians are taught?
Then we must be slow learners, not one example of it being followed in 2,000 years.

Or is it you're just a hate monger worshipper of your Islamo masters?

Again -- I don't have any "masters" in any organized religion anywhere.
My 'masters' here are Plato and Aristotle. And unlike the previous poster who tried to make the same bullshit point and FAILED -- I don't believe their laws of logic are malleable depending on what I wish they would have said.

You asshats are so predictable. Soon as you get your fallacious ass handed to you, in come the mythologies, and the incessant whining, and the hair-on-fire meltdowns.

 

[Mac1958]

Why would I do that? I've posted nothing about value judgments nor is that what I'm here for. I've posted about fallacious arguments. And you actually tried to float the turd idea that the laws of logic get rewritten from one year to the next.

That one never did get essplained, but it's definitely gonna leave a mark.

Oh good, a straw man. Always a good sign. You're the one playing this goofy "laws of logic" deflection game.

Come on. Tell us how bad Christianity is so we won't talk about your PC-protected religion.

Come on, knock it out of the park for us.

Pretty desperate to change the subject arenchya? Why might that be?

Begging is so.... noble. I could watch it all day.

Still humping my leg. You Regressive Leftists are horny little liars!

The thread is about Christianity, liar. So tell us how it's just as bad as Islam. Keep deflecting for the PC-protected religion.

Quit running or go away.

What flies blissfully over your head here is this inconvenience ----

I haven't posted a damn thing about how any religion is "good" or "bad". That's actually my opposition posting that.

Did that simple fact evade you? Go ahead. Find one. I'll wait.





Oh and while we're waiting, no this thread isn't about Christianism; it's about terrorism.



How's that search comin'?

Couldn't find it huh?

I warned ya.

Ah, still humping my leg.

Didn't read the post. You're just not that important, sorry.


.

 

[Pogo]

That's prolly your best bet at this point.