Zincwarrior
Platinum Member
- Nov 18, 2021
- 18,192
- 11,051
- 1,138
But you don't know who "they" are?It was through their public comments on the issue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But you don't know who "they" are?It was through their public comments on the issue.
They, Them.......(pronouns, you know) Comer, Grassley...and Wray's defiance kinda hits the nail on the head.But you don't know who "they" are?
Do you actual, factual, physical proof of this or are you just making shit up?
Again no proof. Meanwhile back at the ranch, Ivanka made millions off of her patents in China, after the Rapist and Traitor imposed tariffs....also the Rapist and Traitor still pays taxes in China. Next lie please.
You do not know the identity of the person, yes? So their veracity is nil. You have no recordings, no bank records showing funds inflows or untracked balances. There is no apparent basis to make a claim.They, Them.......(pronouns, you know) Comer, Grassley...and Wray's defiance kinda hits the nail on the head.
Again no proof.
You miss the boat, once again. It was Comer and Grassley, through the WB contacts that verified his track record.
The WB came to Comer and/or Grassley.
Comer and Grassley know the WB's identity, he came to them.
The WB told them of the 1023 and what was in it.
FBI fought tooth and nail to prevent any release of the 1023.
After several contempt threats, Wray let both Comer and Grassley view the unredacted 1023 in a FBI SCIF.
In viewing the 1023 in a SCIF, unredacted, it confirmed what the WB had told them.
Another threat of noncompliance, and Wray agreed to provide the 1023 to the rest of the committee in a SCIF. Wray complied, only this time, the 1023 was redacted, as was reported.
Grassely revealed, yesterday, on the Senate floor, the existence of some 17 odd tapes made by a high level Burisma offical as a CYA, of both the Biden's in question, revealed in the unredacted 1023, yet redacted in the viewing by the rest of the committee.
Grassley has vowed to release the unredacted 1023 to the public.
Denied.Please show Joe Biden's transfer documents showing the money or bank statements that reference more funds than Joe Biden obtained outside of legal means? Please cite the testimony of persons under oath who have attested to the such.
Why would I have recordings?You have no recordings, no bank records showing funds inflows or untracked balances. There is no apparent basis to make a claim.
Reported by the WB and was part of the info he supplied to Comer and/or Grassley.Even the existence of those 17 tapes is unverified.
Its your argument.Why would I have recordings?
They have been. Nothing has been produced by you guys.Bank records have and are being subpoenaed to track the cash flow.
SARs are standard and meaningless. Especially meaningless when its not JOE Biden. You know, JOE Biden. Not Hunter Biden.Guess you didn't hear of the SAR's generated by many questionable deposits by Hunter?
You've not supplied any paper trail to JOE Biden.No evidence you say? You don't get evidence without investigating the paper trail.
Under active investigation.If Hunter Biden did something illegal, prosecute him. If Joe Biden did something, prosecute him.
They have been. Nothing has been produced by you guys.
Investigating the paper trail of one SAR has revealed payments to 10 or 11 shell companies under Biden family names. Still under investigation....be patient.SARs are standard and meaningless. Especially meaningless when its not JOE Biden. You know, JOE Biden. Not Hunter Biden.
I'm not the one investigating. It will be in the news when the committees are ready.You've not supplied any paper trail to JOE Biden.
Reported by the WB and was part of the info he supplied to Comer and/or Grassley.
Will be hell if they get them......who's to say they or the FBI don't already have them?
FYI- I bet there are lots of other tapes regarding kickbacks on both sides of the aisle.....you see the seemingly endless trips to Ukraine by certain smiling ear to ear Pol's?
Probably why there isn't any great rush to audit monies given to Ukraine.
Yes LLCs. Protip, your average lawyer has two or three. If one is wealthy with assets to protect they would have multiple trusts and LLCs. By this logic all the Trumps would be under the jail.Under active investigation.
Investigating the paper trail of one SAR has revealed payments to 10 or 11 shell companies under Biden family names. Still under investigation....be patient.
COmmittees cannot prosecute a crime.I'm not the one investigating. It will be in the news when the committees are ready.
Not according to WB claims.No one says because no one knows. It's not known if the tapes really exist. Again, this all comes from an FD-1023, which means its contents are unverified.
Only one way to get to the bottom of possible foreign influence is a thorough investigation and a finding report to the American public.Yes LLCs. Protip, your average lawyer has two or three. If one is wealthy with assets to protect they would have multiple trusts and LLCs. By this logic all the Trumps would be under the jail.
You're kidding.COmmittees cannot prosecute a crime.
Congressional committees can prosecute crimes.You're kidding.
Not according to WB claims.
How do you know the contents weren't verified by FBI and sat on for something like three years now?
FBI obstruction of justice?
Congressional committees can prosecute crimes.