- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,001
- 47,204
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #21
The FBI is who describes him as highly credible, dumbass. If the whistleblower that instigated the Trump impeachment was "credible," then why isn't the guy who filled out the 1023?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
FBI Told Delaware U.S. Attorney It Had Already Partially Corroborated Biden Bribery Claims, Source Says
- Thread starter bripat9643
- Start date
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,080
- 10,845
- 1,315
Where did the FBI make a statement to the creditability of the informant?The FBI is who describes him as highly credible, dumbass. If the whistleblower that instigated the Trump impeachment was "credible," then why isn't the guy who filled out the 1023?
Can you source it outside of the federalist opinion piece.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,001
- 47,204
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #23
I believe Senator Chuck Grassley is the one who said that multiple times.Where did the FBI make a statement to the creditability of the informant?
Can you source it outside of the federalist opinion piece.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,001
- 47,204
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #24
Source making bribery allegations against Biden is ‘highly credible’ according to reportWhere did the FBI make a statement to the creditability of the informant?
Can you source it outside of the federalist opinion piece.
Their report that the individual who blew the whistle on Biden’s alleged scheme was a “pre-existing” FBIT source used for “at least several years” prior to the existence of the document, dating back to Biden’s time as vice president during President Barack Obama’s administration. Further, the source was said to be “consistently reviewed by the FBI” and “found to be highly credible.”
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,080
- 10,845
- 1,315
This doesn't prove anything other than you sourcing another conservative outlet.Source making bribery allegations against Biden is ‘highly credible’ according to report
Their report that the individual who blew the whistle on Biden’s alleged scheme was a “pre-existing” FBIT source used for “at least several years” prior to the existence of the document, dating back to Biden’s time as vice president during President Barack Obama’s administration. Further, the source was said to be “consistently reviewed by the FBI” and “found to be highly credible.”
It doesn't have a statement from the FBI on the un-named source.
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,080
- 10,845
- 1,315
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,001
- 47,204
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #27
Of course, all you progs have an idiosyncratic definition of "prove."This doesn't prove anything other than you sourcing another conservative outlet.
It doesn't have a statement from the FBI on the un-named source.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,001
- 47,204
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #28
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,080
- 10,845
- 1,315
Where?Yes it does.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,001
- 47,204
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #30
Where?
Why Republicans are clashing with the FBI over a confidential Biden document
The Biden document was written up by a longtime FBI source that both Republicans and Democrats have described as credible.
airplanemechanic
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2014
- 17,995
- 13,099
- 2,415
Yes it does.
He still pissed on a hooker.
Christopher Steele: Yes, Trumpâs Pee Tape âProbablyâ Exists
The former British spy has given his first ever major interview to ABC News.
www.thedailybeast.com
Trump joked about having to explain the Steele dossier 'pee tape' allegations to his wife Melania
Trump talked about the infamous "pee tape" allegation in a speech at a Save America rally in Youngstown, Ohio, on Saturday
www.businessinsider.com
Last edited:
Are you still defending the obviously guilty Joe Biden? That is true loyaltyIt remains unverified.
And will remain so as it was just raw reporting on a form.
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,080
- 10,845
- 1,315
OrcAre you still defending the obviously guilty Joe Biden? That is true loyalty
Define obvious.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,001
- 47,204
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #34
Not even Trump's enemies make that claim, moron.He still pissed on a hooker.
Biden: I has no knowledge of my son’s business dealings.Orc
Define obvious.
Biden now: I met his associates but we didn’t discuss business.
10% for the big guy.
He was put in charge of Ukraine by gay Barack. He had no idea that his son sat on a board of a Ukrainian energy company? Really?
To me it’s obvious Joe is dirty. But you do you.
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,080
- 10,845
- 1,315
No one has provided evidence that Joe had any knowledge of Hunter's business dealings.Biden: I has no knowledge of my son’s business dealings.
Biden now: I met his associates but we didn’t discuss business.
10% for the big guy.
He was put in charge of Ukraine by gay Barack. He had no idea that his son sat on a board of a Ukrainian energy company? Really?
To me it’s obvious Joe is dirty. But you do you.
No one has provided evidence that Joe met with Hunters business associates and discussed anything related to business.
10% means nothing and no context has been offered.
Nobody from Burisma or devon archer has stated they spoke to Joe about anything related to the company.
So, how is anything obvious?
He met them. That’s undisputed. Did they discuss business? Only through Hunter. He did meet with the mayor of Moscow’s wife. She paid Hunter $3mil. Sanctions came down from gay Barack and she was spared and he DID have dinner with her.No one has provided evidence that Joe had any knowledge of Hunter's business dealings.
No one has provided evidence that Joe met with Hunters business associates and discussed anything related to business.
10% means nothing and no context has been offered.
Nobody from Burisma or devon archer has stated they spoke to Joe about anything related to the company.
So, how is anything obvious?
You choose to turn a blind eye. OK
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,080
- 10,845
- 1,315
What proof do you have?He met them. That’s undisputed. Did they discuss business? Only through Hunter. He did meet with the mayor of Moscow’s wife. She paid Hunter $3mil. Sanctions came down from gay Barack and she was spared and he DID have dinner with her.
You choose to turn a blind eye. OK
devon archer didn't offer any of what you claim.
tony blabblenski didn't offer any of what you claim.
Common sense. Bobulinski said he d take a lie detector test. Will Hunter? Bobulinski said he d testify under oath in front of Congress. Will Hunter?What proof do you have?
devon archer didn't offer any of what you claim.
tony blabblenski didn't offer any of what you claim.
Are you really playing coy here?
How Joe DINED with Russian oligarch with links to Putin and the MAFIA
Bombshell new bank records reveal that Russian billionaire Yelena Baturina gave millions to Biden-connected shell companies after dining with Hunter and then-Vice President Joe.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Sorry bout that,
1. The Biden's have run amiss.
2. Lets stop it now.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
1. The Biden's have run amiss.
2. Lets stop it now.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Similar threads
- Replies
- 28
- Views
- 496
- Replies
- 65
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 78
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 23
- Views
- 198
- Replies
- 189
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 1K
- Views
- 9K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8052
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-