SmokeALib
Platinum Member
- Nov 8, 2013
- 10,450
- 4,750
I love it when you libtard sheep defend that scraggly, lying old hag.prior to say 20 years ago would there be a case where emails were hacked? No, there would not be. The excuse for her crime that no one else was ever indicted is a piss poor one, but that is what we have come to expect from the liberal left.
People have done very similar things and have had their careers ruined and did jail time. Maybe no one else ever did what Hillary has done they didn't have the contempt for the system she does.
She put CIA agents lives in danger as Comey testified and the left just looked the other way. One Iranian spy might have actually been executed because of the information from Hillary's emails. That should be prosecuted.
We didn't even to start using emails in business until the late 1990's, so 20 years ago, email existed only amongst scientists and other nerds. I had one of the earliest Windows systems in 1991, and it was pretty slow and primitive. The lawyer I worked for didn't even I have a computer, and since he didn't know how to type, it would have been pretty useless for him to have one. Fax was the choice of business and government in the early 90's. Note that the Clintons and their staff didn't use email in the White House, but Bush and his staff did.
At the end of the 90's and early 2000's more people had email, but in law firms we were always cautioned about sending sensitive information such as passwords, or documents containing sensitive client discussions via email. You have no idea who is opening the emails, or how they're handled. Some banks and trust companies won't send client instructions via email to lawyers, because of the client confidentiality laws, and the fact that they cannot guarantee that email is secure. If I knew that in a big city law firm in the late 1990's, you can be sure the US government knew that, and so did everyone working there.
Comey DID NOT testify that Hillary put CIA lives in danger. He said that had she been hacked, she COULD have, put lives in danger. But he also said there was no evidence that her server had ever been hacked. Big difference. And since the hackers have been so quick to spread around the emails they DID hack, I somehow doubt they would have sat on them. And WikiLeaks went to great lengths to demonstrate that they acquired Hillary's emails through a FOI request.
The Iranian spy was known to the Iranians and was trying to go home because they threatened his family, to get him to go home so they could arrest him. Hillary did not get him killed. He returned to Iran knowing he would likely be arrested.
It never ceases to amaze me how quickly "what if" scenario's in these Hillary scandals quickly become the "facts" of her crimes. "If she had been hacked she could have endangered US lives", has become "she endangered US lives and got an Iranian spy killed". This is how these Republican scandals have always gone. The Clintons do something, which Republicans say "could" have been something else. Investigations always prove it wasn't what Republicans said it could have been at all. But it never ends.
Debate the issues, debate the platforms, but stop making false accusations against Hillary, because you've cried "Wolf" at least 20 times in the past 20 years. This is why liberals don't fucking care what you accuse her of anymore, because for 20 years you've been calling Hillary a criminal and there are no crimes, except in the minds of Republicans.