FBI Leaks: Why Comey Didn't Charge Hillary

[BluesLegend]

If you people thought Obama was bad, he's a rank amateur compared to the Clinton crime family. If she wins you better hold onto your hat people.

Guy, I would LOVE to have the Clinton Years of the 1990's back, where my property values doubled, my salary doubled, we weren't at war with anyone and the worst thing we had to worry about was whether or not Clinton lied about getting a blow job.

So you want the GOP in charge of congress, got it. Clinton fought the GOP every step of the way, fortunately for you the GOP won.

 

[gipper]

If Hillary were an R, she would be a nobody.

 

[nat4900]

Lynch and Obama made it clear to Comey that if he pressed for an indictment, he would be taking the Democrat nominee for president out of the election. If he failed to get a conviction he would be facing charges of tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal election, to which he would be facing the rest of his life in prison, and Obama and Lynch, as well as others, would see to it that he did.
Now you know why he presented his case the way he did and why it was so obvious he was reluctant to not press for an indictment.

....and ALL of the above is indisputable and provable???? Or did it come out from one of your orifices when you squatted and grimaced for a while???

 

[Dragonlady]

Hope this guys life insurance is paid up...but with that said I suspect Hillary's ass just puckered.

Meet The Prosecutor That Could Take Down The Clinton Foundation

Preet Bharara, dubbed ‘The Showman’ in The New Yorker for his penchant for theatrics and wisecracks, runs the U.S. Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York and has racked up an impressive number of corruption convictions — from Wall Street bankers, hedge funds, and New York organized crime to prominent politicians.

The FBI has enlisted Bharara’s office (along with others) in part for his prosecutorial aggressiveness that career DOJ attorneys may lack.


Meet The Prosecutor That Could Take Down The Clinton Foundation

"Taking Down the Clinton Foundation" would require the Clinton Foundation be breaking the law in the first place, and there is no evidence that they did, and a great deal of evidence that this is a highly successful and well respected charity doing important work in Third World countries.

Conservatives are so obsessed with the idea that Clinton is a criminal, in spite of a preponderance of evidence that she's not. No one has faced more false investigations than the Clintons. And Republicans are absolutely frothing at the idea that she's getting away with something. For someone who is constantly under microscopic observation of her every move, I have to wonder where, in everything that she's doing in an assortment of countries around the world, to try to make things better, she finds the time to be this all-out criminal and cover her tracks so cleverly.

Enough with the BULLSHIT INVESTIGATIONS. Run against Hillary on the facts. On the PROVEN record, and stop with the gossip, the lies, and the attempts to derail this woman, and fight her ideas, her ideals, and her intentions.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Hope this guys life insurance is paid up...but with that said I suspect Hillary's ass just puckered.

Meet The Prosecutor That Could Take Down The Clinton Foundation

Preet Bharara, dubbed ‘The Showman’ in The New Yorker for his penchant for theatrics and wisecracks, runs the U.S. Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York and has racked up an impressive number of corruption convictions — from Wall Street bankers, hedge funds, and New York organized crime to prominent politicians.

The FBI has enlisted Bharara’s office (along with others) in part for his prosecutorial aggressiveness that career DOJ attorneys may lack.


Meet The Prosecutor That Could Take Down The Clinton Foundation

"Taking Down the Clinton Foundation" would require the Clinton Foundation be breaking the law in the first place, and there is no evidence that they did, and a great deal of evidence that this is a highly successful and well respected charity doing important work in Third World countries.

Conservatives are so obsessed with the idea that Clinton is a criminal, in spite of a preponderance of evidence that she's not. No one has faced more false investigations than the Clintons. And Republicans are absolutely frothing at the idea that she's getting away with something. For someone who is constantly under microscopic observation of her every move, I have to wonder where, in everything that she's doing in an assortment of countries around the world, to try to make things better, she finds the time to be this all-out criminal and cover her tracks so cleverly.

Enough with the BULLSHIT INVESTIGATIONS. Run against Hillary on the facts. On the PROVEN record, and stop with the gossip, the lies, and the attempts to derail this woman, and fight her ideas, her ideals, and her intentions.

Blah blah blah....you may go now dembot

 

[nat4900]

Hope this guys life insurance is paid up...but with that said I suspect Hillary's ass just puckered.

Meet The Prosecutor That Could Take Down The Clinton Foundation

Preet Bharara, dubbed ‘The Showman’ in The New Yorker for his penchant for theatrics and wisecracks, runs the U.S. Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York and has racked up an impressive number of corruption convictions — from Wall Street bankers, hedge funds, and New York organized crime to prominent politicians.

The FBI has enlisted Bharara’s office (along with others) in part for his prosecutorial aggressiveness that career DOJ attorneys may lack.


Meet The Prosecutor That Could Take Down The Clinton Foundation

"Taking Down the Clinton Foundation" would require the Clinton Foundation be breaking the law in the first place, and there is no evidence that they did, and a great deal of evidence that this is a highly successful and well respected charity doing important work in Third World countries.

Conservatives are so obsessed with the idea that Clinton is a criminal, in spite of a preponderance of evidence that she's not. No one has faced more false investigations than the Clintons. And Republicans are absolutely frothing at the idea that she's getting away with something. For someone who is constantly under microscopic observation of her every move, I have to wonder where, in everything that she's doing in an assortment of countries around the world, to try to make things better, she finds the time to be this all-out criminal and cover her tracks so cleverly.

Enough with the BULLSHIT INVESTIGATIONS. Run against Hillary on the facts. On the PROVEN record, and stop with the gossip, the lies, and the attempts to derail this woman, and fight her ideas, her ideals, and her intentions.

Where is Ken Starr when you need him....correct, right wingers???? LOL

 

[nat4900]

- If he really felt that this was a horrible miscarriage of justice, he should have tendered his resignation in protest.

Does anyone else remember the "Saturday night Massacre" during the Watergate years???

 

[JoeB131]

So you want the GOP in charge of congress, got it. Clinton fought the GOP every step of the way, fortunately for you the GOP won.

Uh, no. Dole and Gingrich lost... which is why they left Congress involuntarily.

 

[JoeB131]

Blah blah blah....you may go now dembot

Duly noted you couldn't answer her point...

 

[gipper]

We must all learn that Democrats are never guilt of anything, but those MFing Rs are always guilty...so thinks the lib.

 

[Flash]

The reason that Crooked Hillary wasn't charged is very simple and really needs no analysis.

This jackass Obama (who the FBI reports to) was not going to indict the Democrat Presidential nominee and do significant damage to the party. That just wasn't going to happen because he (being morally deficient) put partisan pig politcs ahead of doing the right thing for the country.

He destroyed the credibility of the FBI and put them on the same level of partisan filth as the IRS, ATF, State Department, EPA, and Justice Department.

 

[gipper]

The reason that Crooked Hillary didn't charge is very simple and really needs no analysis.

This jackass Obama (who the FBI reports to) was not going to indict the Democrat Presidential nominee and do significant damage to the party. That just wasn't going to happen because he (being morally deficient) put partisan pig politcs ahead of doing the right thing for the country.

He destroyed the credibility of the FBI and put them on the same level of partisan filth as the IRS, ATF, State Department, EPA, and Justice Department.

...and apparently many Americans are fine with electing a criminal president.

Oh how far we have fallen, thanks to liberalism and statism.

 

[Flash]

[Q

...and apparently many Americans are fine with electing a criminal president.

Oh how far we have fallen, thanks to liberalism and statism.

There are a lot of stupid people in this country. They are probably driven by their greed to get something for nothing out of the government and Crooked Hillary is promising.

Jonathan Gruber called it correctly when he said there are stupid Americans who will believe anything they are told.

The idiots will flock to Crooked Hillary and she is the most dishonest, corrupt and incompetent piece of shit to ever run for President.

 

[Norman]

Hillary is the most corrupt, criminal person ever to run for presidency. It's incredible that people are willing to vote for her simple because she is willing throw some favors to media and WS.

 

[Dragonlady]

prior to say 20 years ago would there be a case where emails were hacked? No, there would not be. The excuse for her crime that no one else was ever indicted is a piss poor one, but that is what we have come to expect from the liberal left.

People have done very similar things and have had their careers ruined and did jail time. Maybe no one else ever did what Hillary has done they didn't have the contempt for the system she does.

She put CIA agents lives in danger as Comey testified and the left just looked the other way. One Iranian spy might have actually been executed because of the information from Hillary's emails. That should be prosecuted.

We didn't even to start using emails in business until the late 1990's, so 20 years ago, email existed only amongst scientists and other nerds. I had one of the earliest Windows systems in 1991, and it was pretty slow and primitive. The lawyer I worked for didn't even I have a computer, and since he didn't know how to type, it would have been pretty useless for him to have one. Fax was the choice of business and government in the early 90's. Note that the Clintons and their staff didn't use email in the White House, but Bush and his staff did.

At the end of the 90's and early 2000's more people had email, but in law firms we were always cautioned about sending sensitive information such as passwords, or documents containing sensitive client discussions via email. You have no idea who is opening the emails, or how they're handled. Some banks and trust companies won't send client instructions via email to lawyers, because of the client confidentiality laws, and the fact that they cannot guarantee that email is secure. If I knew that in a big city law firm in the late 1990's, you can be sure the US government knew that, and so did everyone working there.

Comey DID NOT testify that Hillary put CIA lives in danger. He said that had she been hacked, she COULD have, put lives in danger. But he also said there was no evidence that her server had ever been hacked. Big difference. And since the hackers have been so quick to spread around the emails they DID hack, I somehow doubt they would have sat on them. And WikiLeaks went to great lengths to demonstrate that they acquired Hillary's emails through a FOI request.

The Iranian spy was known to the Iranians and was trying to go home because they threatened his family, to get him to go home so they could arrest him. Hillary did not get him killed. He returned to Iran knowing he would likely be arrested.

It never ceases to amaze me how quickly "what if" scenario's in these Hillary scandals quickly become the "facts" of her crimes. "If she had been hacked she could have endangered US lives", has become "she endangered US lives and got an Iranian spy killed". This is how these Republican scandals have always gone. The Clintons do something, which Republicans say "could" have been something else. Investigations always prove it wasn't what Republicans said it could have been at all. But it never ends.

Debate the issues, debate the platforms, but stop making false accusations against Hillary, because you've cried "Wolf" at least 20 times in the past 20 years. This is why liberals don't fucking care what you accuse her of anymore, because for 20 years you've been calling Hillary a criminal and there are no crimes, except in the minds of Republicans.

 

[Iceweasel]

Enough with the BULLSHIT INVESTIGATIONS. Run against Hillary on the facts. On the PROVEN record, and stop with the gossip, the lies, and the attempts to derail this woman, and fight her ideas, her ideals, and her intentions.

How is it bullshit if they find out and report that she lied, was incompetent and put the nation at risk? You might not give a fuck but that doesn't make it go away.

 

[nat4900]

Jonathan Gruber called it correctly when he said there are stupid Americans who will believe anything they are told

Gruber stated THAT about voters concerning the ACA......Gruber is pissed off at the WH for not getting enough "credit" for his work (and a half million dollar check) in Obamacare.

 

[Iceweasel]

Debate the issues, debate the platforms, but stop making false accusations against Hillary, because you've cried "Wolf" at least 20 times in the past 20 years. This is why liberals don't fucking care what you accuse her of anymore, because for 20 years you've been calling Hillary a criminal and there are no crimes, except in the minds of Republicans.

People keep "disappearing" too. Just because the Dems won't prosecute doesn't mean no crime was committed. The influence peddling while secretary of state is something even they can't sweep under the rug. The fact that a liberal doesn't care is meaningless. Especially one that doesn't even live here. Go fuck up your own country!

 

[Freewill]

prior to say 20 years ago would there be a case where emails were hacked? No, there would not be. The excuse for her crime that no one else was ever indicted is a piss poor one, but that is what we have come to expect from the liberal left.

People have done very similar things and have had their careers ruined and did jail time. Maybe no one else ever did what Hillary has done they didn't have the contempt for the system she does.

She put CIA agents lives in danger as Comey testified and the left just looked the other way. One Iranian spy might have actually been executed because of the information from Hillary's emails. That should be prosecuted.

We didn't even to start using emails in business until the late 1990's, so 20 years ago, email existed only amongst scientists and other nerds. I had one of the earliest Windows systems in 1991, and it was pretty slow and primitive. The lawyer I worked for didn't even I have a computer, and since he didn't know how to type, it would have been pretty useless for him to have one. Fax was the choice of business and government in the early 90's. Note that the Clintons and their staff didn't use email in the White House, but Bush and his staff did.

At the end of the 90's and early 2000's more people had email, but in law firms we were always cautioned about sending sensitive information such as passwords, or documents containing sensitive client discussions via email. You have no idea who is opening the emails, or how they're handled. Some banks and trust companies won't send client instructions via email to lawyers, because of the client confidentiality laws, and the fact that they cannot guarantee that email is secure. If I knew that in a big city law firm in the late 1990's, you can be sure the US government knew that, and so did everyone working there.

Comey DID NOT testify that Hillary put CIA lives in danger. He said that had she been hacked, she COULD have, put lives in danger. But he also said there was no evidence that her server had ever been hacked. Big difference. And since the hackers have been so quick to spread around the emails they DID hack, I somehow doubt they would have sat on them. And WikiLeaks went to great lengths to demonstrate that they acquired Hillary's emails through a FOI request.

The Iranian spy was known to the Iranians and was trying to go home because they threatened his family, to get him to go home so they could arrest him. Hillary did not get him killed. He returned to Iran knowing he would likely be arrested.

It never ceases to amaze me how quickly "what if" scenario's in these Hillary scandals quickly become the "facts" of her crimes. "If she had been hacked she could have endangered US lives", has become "she endangered US lives and got an Iranian spy killed". This is how these Republican scandals have always gone. The Clintons do something, which Republicans say "could" have been something else. Investigations always prove it wasn't what Republicans said it could have been at all. But it never ends.

Debate the issues, debate the platforms, but stop making false accusations against Hillary, because you've cried "Wolf" at least 20 times in the past 20 years. This is why liberals don't fucking care what you accuse her of anymore, because for 20 years you've been calling Hillary a criminal and there are no crimes, except in the minds of Republicans.

Good analysis, anyone in this day and age has to know that email not on secure servers is vulnerable. But when a person is trying to avoid FOIA requests they will do anything as did Hillary.

Comey did say she put agents lives in danger:

 

[Dragonlady]

Enough with the BULLSHIT INVESTIGATIONS. Run against Hillary on the facts. On the PROVEN record, and stop with the gossip, the lies, and the attempts to derail this woman, and fight her ideas, her ideals, and her intentions.

How is it bullshit if they find out and report that she lied, was incompetent and put the nation at risk? You might not give a fuck but that doesn't make it go away.

Comey did not say she lied in his report. He said she did't turn over all her emails. From the beginning Hillary said she believed that emails sent to government servers didn't have to be turned over because the government already had copies on their servers, so no she didn't lie, and no she didn't turn over all her emails. The same with multiple devices. Yes she had access to multiple devices in her office, but all she used when travelling was her one device - her blackberry, and she travelled a lot. There is a difference between lying and what you believe to be true, being incorrect.

She was not called incompetent. She admits she could have done things better, and has learned from her mistakes for the future. She did NOT put the nation at risk. That's complete hyperbole.

You're seizing on this because it's all you've got. When you show the same level of outrage for the 50,000 emails W and his cronies deleted without turning over, I'll believe you're sincere.