Never heard of LegalZoom?
Easy money, and really all I want to do is help you all shut down all these small sites since that is your end game.
Sure thing. Go for it. I expect your lawsuit to be filed by the end of next week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never heard of LegalZoom?
Easy money, and really all I want to do is help you all shut down all these small sites since that is your end game.
Sure, Porky."Many innocents were ruined by McCarthy, and you refuted nothing."
Many?
Let's see you name a single one.
Or.....we have proven you to be one more empty vessel filled with propaganda.
Speak up, Elmer.
The government cannot seize private property for public use without compensation or consent.It depends on permitted use.
Privately owned/maintained public space.Such as?
Take over?When can the public just take over private space?
Privately owned/maintained public space cannot legally restrict/censor free speech.Be specific.
Just stating facts.
The Democrats aren't remotely left - they're liberal, and liberals DESPISE the left.
Yes - I wish conservatives would.
Believing that Democrats are the left is like thinking the Nazis were Jewish.
There is no progressive left; progressives are liberals, not leftists.
The left has little power in most countries, and none in the United States.
Your comment is both irrelevant to this discussion and at least partially incorrect.The government cannot seize private property for public use without compensation or consent.
See above.Texas has neither in this case.
Privately owned/maintained public space.
Take over?
You're making a straw man argument.
Privately owned/maintained public space cannot legally restrict/censor free speech.
No.You are incorrect.
Not remotely.Progressives ARE leftists,
The libertarian left in the US will be quite surprised to learn this, as will the vast majority of US leftists.and leftists are statists
^ Projection.You are just rambling.
Privately owned/maintained public space is quite common, and free speech cannot legally be restricted/censored there with few and obvious exceptions.Of course they can except to note, privately owned space is not public space to start with.
Sure, Porky.
His own.
But you're derailing - start a thread about McCarthy & the many lives he ruined, and we can discuss it more there.
Thanks!
So common you can't name one that exists in real life.^ Projection.
Privately owned/maintained public space is quite common, and free speech cannot legally be restricted/censored there with few and obvious exceptions.
^ Projection.
Privately owned/maintained public space is quite common, and free speech cannot legally be restricted/censored there with few and obvious exceptions.
Your concession is noted.So we agree you were either lying or talking through your......hat.
Start a thread on the many lives McCarthy ruined; I won't again respond to your derailing flamebait on this one.Don't do it again: think before you post.
Yes, and you're usually a much better poster.Generalized rambling not saying anything.
It’s not irrelevant at all. It’s the fundamental difference between private and public property.Your comment is both irrelevant to this discussion and at least partially incorrect.
See above.
Yes, and you're usually a much better poster.
I look forward to your return to form.
Your concession is noted.
Start a thread on the many lives McCarthy ruined; I won't again respond to your derailing flamebait on this one.