FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Fizz]

The image you quote in your post proves the others you posted are NOT of the Twin towers.

bullshit.

you are talking out of your ass again.

 

[DiveCon]

The image you quote in your post proves the others you posted are NOT of the Twin towers.

it does not, you fucking moron
and
it shows the core as STEEL COLUMNS

dipshit

 

[DiveCon]

The image you quote in your post proves the others you posted are NOT of the Twin towers.

bullshit.

you are talking out of your ass again.

see why it is such a waste of time to find proof for these dipshits
nothing will change their delusional minds, they need serious professional help

 

[Fizz]

You imply I missed something relevant? What?

Absurd. I prove in the thread that you stand to misrepresent the core structure or conceal the true core design. I do that by showing the relevance you attach to the information you present is false because it is as tested by other, independently verified evidence which IS consistent with itself, and your info fails.

Here your misrepresentations are exposed with your spam.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092286-post4462.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092925-post4471.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092951-post4474.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092948-post4473.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092980-post4477.html

the only person "misrepresenting" is you. you are flat out lying. there was no concrete core.
the top photo PROVES BEYOND ANY DOUBT that you are lying. you are looking through the core and out the windows of the world trade center tower. this picture is IMPOSSIBLE with you concrete core.

Those interiors are not the Twins. In checking, with the below image, we find that the columns width and spacing between them is different from an image with an identifiable location of the Twins.

The columns are too wide for the spaces between them. This proves you don't know what you are talking about or that you are willing to misrepresent other buildings as the twins because you have no evidence of steel core columns.

further proof that those images are from the inside of the WTC towers. here is a screen capture from a documentary aired on the history channel. the video is here..
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xof1AjIVQY&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - World Trade Center (Part 1/8)[/ame]

at about 1:10 of the video you can clearly see that not only are the above pictures from the twin towers but also you can see the STEEL CORE COLUMNS ON THE LEFT!!!! no concrete core. you got owned. you are finished. stick a fork in your hoax cuz its done!!!

 

[DiveCon]

the only person "misrepresenting" is you. you are flat out lying. there was no concrete core.
the top photo PROVES BEYOND ANY DOUBT that you are lying. you are looking through the core and out the windows of the world trade center tower. this picture is IMPOSSIBLE with you concrete core.

Those interiors are not the Twins. In checking, with the below image, we find that the columns width and spacing between them is different from an image with an identifiable location of the Twins.

The columns are too wide for the spaces between them. This proves you don't know what you are talking about or that you are willing to misrepresent other buildings as the twins because you have no evidence of steel core columns.

further proof that those images are from the inside of the WTC towers. here is a screen capture from a documentary aired on the history channel. the video is here..
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xof1AjIVQY&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - World Trade Center (Part 1/8)[/ame]

at about 1:10 of the video you can clearly see that not only are the above pictures from the twin towers but also you can see the STEEL CORE COLUMNS ON THE LEFT!!!! no concrete core. you got owned. you are finished. stick a fork in your hoax cuz its done!!!

View attachment 9689

it wont matter, dipshits like him will just claim the video was faked

 

[Christophera]

Those interiors are not the Twins. In checking, with the below image, we find that the columns width and spacing between them is different from an image with an identifiable location of the Twins.

The columns are too wide for the spaces between them. This proves you don't know what you are talking about or that you are willing to misrepresent other buildings as the twins because you have no evidence of steel core columns.

further proof that those images are from the inside of the WTC towers. here is a screen capture from a documentary aired on the history channel. the video is here..
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xof1AjIVQY&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - World Trade Center (Part 1/8)[/ame]

at about 1:10 of the video you can clearly see that not only are the above pictures from the twin towers but also you can see the STEEL CORE COLUMNS ON THE LEFT!!!! no concrete core. you got owned. you are finished. stick a fork in your hoax cuz its done!!!

View attachment 9689

it wont matter, dipshits like him will just claim the video was faked

Your stills do not match the proportions of the columns and spaces the trusses in the top still are different from the bottom still. The video is too blurry to identify them.

Where is the image of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11?

Where are the official plans?

 

[Fizz]

further proof that those images are from the inside of the WTC towers. here is a screen capture from a documentary aired on the history channel. the video is here..
YouTube - World Trade Center (Part 1/8)

at about 1:10 of the video you can clearly see that not only are the above pictures from the twin towers but also you can see the STEEL CORE COLUMNS ON THE LEFT!!!! no concrete core. you got owned. you are finished. stick a fork in your hoax cuz its done!!!

View attachment 9689

it wont matter, dipshits like him will just claim the video was faked

Your stills do not match the proportions of the columns and spaces the trusses in the top still are different from the bottom still. The video is too blurry to identify them.

Where is the image of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11?

Where are the official plans?

your denials are pathetic.

 

[DiveCon]

further proof that those images are from the inside of the WTC towers. here is a screen capture from a documentary aired on the history channel. the video is here..
YouTube - World Trade Center (Part 1/8)

at about 1:10 of the video you can clearly see that not only are the above pictures from the twin towers but also you can see the STEEL CORE COLUMNS ON THE LEFT!!!! no concrete core. you got owned. you are finished. stick a fork in your hoax cuz its done!!!

View attachment 9689

it wont matter, dipshits like him will just claim the video was faked

Your stills do not match the proportions of the columns and spaces the trusses in the top still are different from the bottom still. The video is too blurry to identify them.

Where is the image of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11?

Where are the official plans?

do you have a fucking clue about anything?
the distance of the shots from the outer walls is why the spacing looks different, dipshit

 

[Fizz]

it wont matter, dipshits like him will just claim the video was faked

Your stills do not match the proportions of the columns and spaces the trusses in the top still are different from the bottom still. The video is too blurry to identify them.

Where is the image of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11?

Where are the official plans?

do you have a fucking clue about anything?
the distance of the shots from the outer walls is why the spacing looks different, dipshit

also the angle..... and the lense of the camera.

for instance, the more you look at an angle through the windows the thinner the windows appear and the thicker the columns would appear. if you were to look at the windows from an 80 degree angle you probably would only see columns.... much like on the right side of this picture. you see nothing but columnss but you know windows are there because of the light shining through onto the floor and the columns are very bright.

 

[DiveCon]

Your stills do not match the proportions of the columns and spaces the trusses in the top still are different from the bottom still. The video is too blurry to identify them.

Where is the image of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11?

Where are the official plans?

do you have a fucking clue about anything?
the distance of the shots from the outer walls is why the spacing looks different, dipshit

also the angle..... and the lense of the camera.

for instance, the more you look at an angle through the windows the thinner the windows appear and the thicker the columns would appear. if you were to look at the windows from an 80 degree angle you probably would only see columns.... much like on the right side of this picture. you see nothing but columnss but you know windows are there because of the light shining through onto the floor and the columns are very bright.

are you begining to understand why i dont waste my time with these dipshits, looking up and posting the facts
you might as well just insult them
both work the same

 

[slackjawed]

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7IU1bzZheWk&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7IU1bzZheWk&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[slackjawed]

youtube.com/watch#!v=7IU1bzZheWk

 

[Christophera]

Your stills do not match the proportions of the columns and spaces the trusses in the top still are different from the bottom still. The video is too blurry to identify them.

Where is the image of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11?

Where are the official plans?

do you have a fucking clue about anything?
the distance of the shots from the outer walls is why the spacing looks different, dipshit

also the angle..... and the lense of the camera.

for instance, the more you look at an angle through the windows the thinner the windows appear and the thicker the columns would appear. if you were to look at the windows from an 80 degree angle you probably would only see columns.... much like on the right side of this picture. you see nothing but columnss but you know windows are there because of the light shining through onto the floor and the columns are very bright.

Your frame of video does not prove steel core columns anyway. This image is definately not the Twins. The column is too wide for the space between them.

 

[Fizz]

do you have a fucking clue about anything?
the distance of the shots from the outer walls is why the spacing looks different, dipshit

also the angle..... and the lense of the camera.

for instance, the more you look at an angle through the windows the thinner the windows appear and the thicker the columns would appear. if you were to look at the windows from an 80 degree angle you probably would only see columns.... much like on the right side of this picture. you see nothing but columnss but you know windows are there because of the light shining through onto the floor and the columns are very bright.

Your frame of video does not prove steel core columns anyway. This image is definately not the Twins. The column is too wide for the space between them.

you are wrong. prove your claims.

 

[Christophera]

also the angle..... and the lense of the camera.

for instance, the more you look at an angle through the windows the thinner the windows appear and the thicker the columns would appear. if you were to look at the windows from an 80 degree angle you probably would only see columns.... much like on the right side of this picture. you see nothing but columnss but you know windows are there because of the light shining through onto the floor and the columns are very bright.

Your frame of video does not prove steel core columns anyway. This image is definately not the Twins. The column is too wide for the space between them.

you are wrong. prove your claims.

This is one of the Twins,

]

And the columns are too narrow to be the buildings in the images in question.

 

[Fizz]

This is one of the Twins,

]

And the columns are too narrow to be the buildings in the images in question.

the columns arent too narrow. where is your proof to back that up? once again you are just making shit up.

these images are of the WTC towers. your denials are absolutely hilarious!!!

 

[DiveCon]

This is one of the Twins,

]

And the columns are too narrow to be the buildings in the images in question.

hey dipshit, where is your concrete in THAT photo?

 

[Christophera]

This is one of the Twins,

]

And the columns are too narrow to be the buildings in the images in question.

hey dipshit, where is your concrete in THAT photo?

The steel went up to 7 floors over the top of the concrete in WTC 1 and perhaps as many as 12 floors in WTC 2.

guiliani took the WTC documents including 6000 files of photos, while the courts protect their hiding​

 

[DiveCon]

This is one of the Twins,

]

And the columns are too narrow to be the buildings in the images in question.

hey dipshit, where is your concrete in THAT photo?

The steel went up to 7 floors over the top of the concrete in WTC 1 and perhaps as many as 12 floors in WTC 2.

guiliani took the WTC documents including 6000 files of photos, while the courts protect their hiding​

BULLSHIT

why do you lie so much??
concrete goes up FIRST

 

[Christophera]

hey dipshit, where is your concrete in THAT photo?

The steel went up to 7 floors over the top of the concrete in WTC 1 and perhaps as many as 12 floors in WTC 2.

guiliani took the WTC documents including 6000 files of photos, while the courts protect their hiding​

BULLSHIT

why do you lie so much??
concrete goes up FIRST

Lying moron agents supporting secret methods of mass murder and treason.

WTC 7 was rebuilt with a concrete core.

STRUCTUREmag: Concrete Construction at 7 World Trade Center

Having chosen the system, Tishman Construction compared the pros and cons of constructing either the concrete core or structural steel first. An additional factor to be considered, as noted by Allan Paull, was the fact that the labor union in New York City does not allow concrete construction to be performed above steel workers. The steel-first approach was chosen based on the following advantages: expedited construction of the mechanical/electrical work, simplified building hoist, simplified crane logistics, expedited curtain wall construction, and a reduced overall construction schedule and cost.

​