Finally, Conservatives Begin To Back Away From the Confederate Flag

[PoliticalChic]

The Confederate battle flag flew over the capitol dome in Columbia, S.C., from 1962, when the legislature hoisted it as a symbol of defiance against integration,


That backward state should be ostracized and boycotted

Finally Conservatives Begin To Back Away From the Confederate Flag Mother Jones

The "tradition" argument is so weak as to be transparent.

A "tradition" of what?

Slavery?

Who in their right minds wants to uphold the "tradition" of slavery in a nation that fought a bloody civil war that cost 600,000 lives to eliminate?

Only the most popular elected Democrat, the racist-rapist Bill Clinton

1. . Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:
   
   (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.
   
   (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]
   
   (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
   
   Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
   Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit

Hillary Clinton s Confederacy Hypocrisy - The Gateway Pundit

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

The Confederate battle flag flew over the capitol dome in Columbia, S.C., from 1962, when the legislature hoisted it as a symbol of defiance against integration,


That backward state should be ostracized and boycotted

Finally Conservatives Begin To Back Away From the Confederate Flag Mother Jones

The "tradition" argument is so weak as to be transparent.

A "tradition" of what?

Slavery?

Who in their right minds wants to uphold the "tradition" of slavery in a nation that fought a bloody civil war that cost 600,000 lives to eliminate?

Only the most popular elected Democrat, the racist-rapist Bill Clinton

1. . Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:
   
   (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.
   
   (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]
   
   (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
   
   Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
   Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit

Hillary Clinton s Confederacy Hypocrisy - The Gateway Pundit

 

[Derideo_Te]

Pete7469

This country was founded for free white people.


Naturalization Act of 1790 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free white persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians,indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and Asians.

Subsequently rendered null and void by the 14th Amendment.

But as usual, I was right and this country needs to return to the founders original intent to make it a better place.

So is it your intention to give up all of your beloved guns and go back only having a musket too?

After all that was the original intent of the 2nd Amendment.

Oh, another of the original laws required you to register your musket with the government.

How does that fit in with your desire to return to the founders original intentions?

No more than you would be willing to go back to newspaper and printing presses.

After all, that was the original intent of the 1st Amendment.

Here is a hint for you!

I am NOT the one who wants to turn back the clock.

You need to post your argument to racist Steve.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pete7469

This country was founded for free white people.


Naturalization Act of 1790 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free white persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians,indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and Asians.

Subsequently rendered null and void by the 14th Amendment.

But as usual, I was right and this country needs to return to the founders original intent to make it a better place.

So is it your intention to give up all of your beloved guns and go back only having a musket too?

After all that was the original intent of the 2nd Amendment.

Oh, another of the original laws required you to register your musket with the government.

How does that fit in with your desire to return to the founders original intentions?

No more than you would be willing to go back to newspaper and printing presses.

After all, that was the original intent of the 1st Amendment.

Here is a hint for you!

I am NOT the one who wants to turn back the clock.

You need to post your argument to racist Steve.

My post was specifically designed to eviscerate the fool who posted this:

"Slavery?

Who in their right minds wants to uphold the "tradition" of slavery in a nation that fought a bloody civil war that cost 600,000 lives to eliminate?"



Who was that fool?


Raise your paw.

 

[Auld Phart]

Pete7469

This country was founded for free white people.


Naturalization Act of 1790 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free white persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians,indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and Asians.

Subsequently rendered null and void by the 14th Amendment.

But as usual, I was right and this country needs to return to the founders original intent to make it a better place.

So is it your intention to give up all of your beloved guns and go back only having a musket too?

After all that was the original intent of the 2nd Amendment.

Oh, another of the original laws required you to register your musket with the government.

How does that fit in with your desire to return to the founders original intentions?

No more than you would be willing to go back to newspaper and printing presses.

After all, that was the original intent of the 1st Amendment.

Here is a hint for you!

I am NOT the one who wants to turn back the clock.

You need to post your argument to racist Steve.

Still going on about the country was set up for white persons?

He proved that with his link.

YOU claim the 14th nulled that.

Did the 14th go back in time almost 70 years, and somehow nullify the 1790 Act?

Or was the United States Naturalization Law in effect until 1868 and THEN nulled?

 

[Derideo_Te]

Subsequently rendered null and void by the 14th Amendment.

But as usual, I was right and this country needs to return to the founders original intent to make it a better place.

So is it your intention to give up all of your beloved guns and go back only having a musket too?

After all that was the original intent of the 2nd Amendment.

Oh, another of the original laws required you to register your musket with the government.

How does that fit in with your desire to return to the founders original intentions?

No more than you would be willing to go back to newspaper and printing presses.

After all, that was the original intent of the 1st Amendment.

Here is a hint for you!

I am NOT the one who wants to turn back the clock.

You need to post your argument to racist Steve.

My post was specifically designed to eviscerate the fool who posted this:

"Slavery?

Who in their right minds wants to uphold the "tradition" of slavery in a nation that fought a bloody civil war that cost 600,000 lives to eliminate?"



Who was that fool?


Raise your paw.

Did you just learn a new trick, PoliticalSpice?

Can you now shake hands as well as roll over and play brain dead?

Good doggie!!!

 

[BullKurtz]

Guano and the rest of these weakling homos think banning the Stars and Bars will fix 50 years of dimocRAT policy failures and race-baiting. They elect a total moron to sit stuttering in the WH while the country falls apart yet think some symbol of the old Dixie is the cause of the problems. Why are progs allowed to vote or be allowed to live in the USA?

 

[Derideo_Te]

Did the 14th go back in time almost 70 years, and somehow nullify the 1790 Act?

Given your appalling ignorance I recommend that you apply to your local community college to take Adult Remedial Social Studies classes.

Oh, and don't forget to ask for a refund on your "hom skewlin" fees. They obviously shortchanged you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

But as usual, I was right and this country needs to return to the founders original intent to make it a better place.

So is it your intention to give up all of your beloved guns and go back only having a musket too?

After all that was the original intent of the 2nd Amendment.

Oh, another of the original laws required you to register your musket with the government.

How does that fit in with your desire to return to the founders original intentions?

No more than you would be willing to go back to newspaper and printing presses.

After all, that was the original intent of the 1st Amendment.

Here is a hint for you!

I am NOT the one who wants to turn back the clock.

You need to post your argument to racist Steve.

My post was specifically designed to eviscerate the fool who posted this:

"Slavery?

Who in their right minds wants to uphold the "tradition" of slavery in a nation that fought a bloody civil war that cost 600,000 lives to eliminate?"



Who was that fool?


Raise your paw.

Did you just learn a new trick, PoliticalSpice?

Can you now shake hands as well as roll over and play brain dead?

Good doggie!!!

That was fun, smashing that pie in your kisser, and watching you squirm trying to change the subject!


That was fun!

 

[Auld Phart]

Did the 14th go back in time almost 70 years, and somehow nullify the 1790 Act?

Given your appalling ignorance I recommend that you apply to your local community college to take Adult Remedial Social Studies classes.

Oh, and don't forget to ask for a refund on your "hom skewlin" fees. They obviously shortchanged you.

Suggest you take your own advice.

the United States Naturalization Law of 1790 was in effect for nearly 70 years before the 14th was enacted.

It could only NULLIFY the United States Naturalization Law at that time.

NOT before it was created.

I didn't even need Logic 101 to figure that out.

 

[BullKurtz]

Given your appalling ignorance I recommend that you apply to your local community college to take Adult Remedial Social Studies classes.

Oh, and don't forget to ask for a refund on your "hom skewlin" fees. They obviously shortchanged you.

Little doubt the public schools helped turn you into the gutless pig we see here day after day.

 

[Derideo_Te]

the United States Naturalization Law of 1790 was in effect for nearly 70 years before the 14th was enacted.

It could only NULLIFY the United States Naturalization Law at that time.

You really should have quit while you were only lagging behind the short bus kids.

Naturalization Act of 1790 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802.

Major changes to the definition of citizenship were ratified in the nineteenth century following the American Civil War. The Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 granted citizenship to people born within the United States and subject to its jurisdiction regardless of their parents' race, citizenship, or place of birth, but it excluded untaxed Indians (those living on reservations).
​

So the Act of 1790 was de facto nullified just 5 years later.

That is how the system works.

Too bad you really are clueless when it comes to Social Studies 101.

 

[Unkotare]

Given your appalling ignorance I recommend that you apply to your local community college to take Adult Remedial Social Studies classes.

Oh, and don't forget to ask for a refund on your "hom skewlin" fees. They obviously shortchanged you.

Little doubt the public schools helped turn you into the gutless pig we see here day after day.

The low-life scum who pretends to be a Marine calling someone else "gutless"?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The Confederate battle flag flew over the capitol dome in Columbia, S.C., from 1962, when the legislature hoisted it as a symbol of defiance against integration,


That backward state should be ostracized and boycotted

Finally Conservatives Begin To Back Away From the Confederate Flag Mother Jones

The "tradition" argument is so weak as to be transparent.

A "tradition" of what?

Slavery?

Who in their right minds wants to uphold the "tradition" of slavery in a nation that fought a bloody civil war that cost 600,000 lives to eliminate?

The American flag also represents a history of slave ownership. You nazis gonna burn that book, too?

The American flag stands for overturning slavery and granting rights to all people.

But you are selectively overlooking the one aspect that your ilk holds over the confederate flag exclusively. Hypocrisy deluxe.

 

[Auld Phart]

the United States Naturalization Law of 1790 was in effect for nearly 70 years before the 14th was enacted.

It could only NULLIFY the United States Naturalization Law at that time.

You really should have quit while you were only lagging behind the short bus kids.

Naturalization Act of 1790 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802.0

Major changes to the definition of citizenship were ratified in the nineteenth century following the American Civil War. The Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 granted citizenship to people born within the United States and subject to its jurisdiction regardless of their parents' race, citizenship, or place of birth, but it excluded untaxed Indians (those living on reservations).
​

That is how the system works.

Too bad you really are clueless when it comes to Social Studies 101.

Did you read your own post?

"So the Act of 1790 was de facto nullified just 5 years later."

FIVE years?

"The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802"

No wonder people laugh at you

 

[Steinlight]

the United States Naturalization Law of 1790 was in effect for nearly 70 years before the 14th was enacted.

It could only NULLIFY the United States Naturalization Law at that time.

You really should have quit while you were only lagging behind the short bus kids.

Naturalization Act of 1790 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802.

Major changes to the definition of citizenship were ratified in the nineteenth century following the American Civil War. The Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 granted citizenship to people born within the United States and subject to its jurisdiction regardless of their parents' race, citizenship, or place of birth, but it excluded untaxed Indians (those living on reservations).
​

So the Act of 1790 was de facto nullified just 5 years later.

That is how the system works.

Too bad you really are clueless when it comes to Social Studies 101.

Up until 1965, immigration was restricted by quotas for each nation to preserve the western european ethnic character of the country. See the immigration act of 1924. Immigration was primarily restricted to Western European nations, with stricter quotas on southern and eastern Europe and who were entering the country in large numbers at the time. No where in the 14th Amendment does it prohibit restrictions immigration based on nationality. And never was the 1924 law ever struck down in court. Our founders and leaders up until 1965 and LBJ intended to keep America a white country.

 

[Steinlight]

the United States Naturalization Law of 1790 was in effect for nearly 70 years before the 14th was enacted.

It could only NULLIFY the United States Naturalization Law at that time.

You really should have quit while you were only lagging behind the short bus kids.

Naturalization Act of 1790 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802.0

Major changes to the definition of citizenship were ratified in the nineteenth century following the American Civil War. The Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 granted citizenship to people born within the United States and subject to its jurisdiction regardless of their parents' race, citizenship, or place of birth, but it excluded untaxed Indians (those living on reservations).
​

That is how the system works.

Too bad you really are clueless when it comes to Social Studies 101.

Did you read your own post?

"So the Act of 1790 was de facto nullified just 5 years later."

FIVE years?

"The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802"

No wonder people laugh at you

I don't see why he is bringing up the 1802 act as though it "nullifies" prior immigration law. The 1802 law restricted immigration to free white persons as well

Proceedings - Google Books

 

[Auld Phart]

For some reason, he thinks 1802-1790=5.

History is not his only failed course.

 

[Derideo_Te]

the United States Naturalization Law of 1790 was in effect for nearly 70 years before the 14th was enacted.

It could only NULLIFY the United States Naturalization Law at that time.

You really should have quit while you were only lagging behind the short bus kids.

Naturalization Act of 1790 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802.0

Major changes to the definition of citizenship were ratified in the nineteenth century following the American Civil War. The Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 granted citizenship to people born within the United States and subject to its jurisdiction regardless of their parents' race, citizenship, or place of birth, but it excluded untaxed Indians (those living on reservations).
​

That is how the system works.

Too bad you really are clueless when it comes to Social Studies 101.

Did you read your own post?

"So the Act of 1790 was de facto nullified just 5 years later."

FIVE years?

"The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802"

No wonder people laugh at you

Your ignorance over basic terminology like "superseded" is why I am laughing at you.

 

[Auld Phart]

the United States Naturalization Law of 1790 was in effect for nearly 70 years before the 14th was enacted.

It could only NULLIFY the United States Naturalization Law at that time.

You really should have quit while you were only lagging behind the short bus kids.

Naturalization Act of 1790 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802.0

Major changes to the definition of citizenship were ratified in the nineteenth century following the American Civil War. The Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 granted citizenship to people born within the United States and subject to its jurisdiction regardless of their parents' race, citizenship, or place of birth, but it excluded untaxed Indians (those living on reservations).
​

That is how the system works.

Too bad you really are clueless when it comes to Social Studies 101.

Did you read your own post?

"So the Act of 1790 was de facto nullified just 5 years later."

FIVE years?

"The Act of 1790 was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which extended the residence requirement to five years, and by the Naturalization Act of 1798, which extended it to 14 years. The 1798 act was repealed by theNaturalization Law of 1802"

No wonder people laugh at you

Your ignorance over basic terminology like "superseded" is why I am laughing at you.

Read your post again.

Better yet, have someone that CAN read, explain it to you.