🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Fiona Hill Hearing: Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk Abou

Fiona Hill Hearing:
Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About




Fiona Hill Hearing: Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About
21 Nov 19 ~ By Matt Vespa
The final hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Trump is happening as we speak. Career diplomats and foreign affairs specialists Fiona Hill and David Holmes are testifying in what has been a week of hot air. We’ve had a lot of Democratic hyperbole and a lot of witnesses saying they don’t possess direct evidence of the so-called quid pro quo allegations that have been hurled at the Trump White House. It all stems from a whistleblower report that in July, President Trump threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine unless they opened a corruption probe into Hunter Biden’s position at Burisma, an energy company, despite having zero experience. Biden has been there since his father, Vice President Joe Biden, was in office. He recently left. It’s a total clown show. Some of the witnesses, like Marie Yovanovitch, were just career diplomats who disagreed with Trump on Ukraine policy. Her testimony was a therapy session Yet, one thing that is missed in all of these proceedings is that Ukraine did collude with the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 in a failed attempt to detail the Trump candidacy. Veteran investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson dredged this up from Politico. It’s right there in black and white: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire - POLITICO
Yes, but this is Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) kangaroo court, which is situated in the middle of the twilight zone.


Comment:
There's no reason that both the Ukraine and Russia could not have been both trying to meddle in our elections. From all that I have read it seems absurd to believe that the Ukraine did not attempt to meddle in the 2016 election and it is totally appropriate for our government to demand an investigation by them if they want our assistance.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat radicals are claiming if President Trump said words so he's guilty of something. In the real world, if President Trump did demand a corruption investigation (needed) into Biden & Son Influence Inc. it was prudent and what a real president should be doing everywhere. In fact the Mueller's Report investigation cites Ukraine 133 times as being at the epicenter.
It's quite obvious that the democrats have slime, mud, and grease all over their party as a result of the DNC's campaign efforts with Ukraine and Russia to derail Trump and grease the skids for their white queen, Hillary. Time and time again PMS/DSA Democrats, and the DNC foot prints have been exposed dealing with the oligarchs and corrupt criminal in the Ukraine. They're trying to use impeachment as a shower to wash the slime, mud, and grease off of themselves. However, Schiff and Pelosi are among the slimiest, greasiest, politicians we'll ever experience in our lifetimes. Impeachment will NOT cleanse them. Schiff is appearing slimier by the day.
Just as a reminder Sharyl Atkinson was a long standing Center Left reporter who had an epiphany after being harassed, attacked and illegally spied upon by Barrack Obama and many of the same Spy-Gate FBI DOJ insiders. She is now one of the few Investigative Journalists still doing her job.....Journalism not Propaganda
My impression of this womans opening statement was her laughable statement that the russians done it

All of it

Everything

Because they wanted to disrupt the US democratic process

Which thanks to swamp rats in the Deep State, lib media and the democrat party is succeeding beyond anything putin could have hoped for


I liked her opening -
Took the wind right out of Schiffs sail when she said the Russians wanted chaos - on both sides.

It will be up to the Republican questioners to lead her to the fact that the Democrats have perfected the chaos .

They are not going to get her to open up too much on the Shadow Government State Dept.
The Democrats proved bribery, corruption, witness intimidation, and campaign finance violations through a conspiracy to collude with a foreign government by Trump and his goons. They were all in the loop and Trump is the lead dog.

Republicans do not work for the government. Just themselves.
The dems proved nothing

All they presented was hearsay and rumors


They Proved that the State Department doesn't agree with the policy that the current admin. set.
For some- that's enough.
Thats a capital offense in lib la la land
 
Ambassadors and diplomats are professionals at talking jive, blowing smoke up peoples asses, speaking with forked tongue and playing both sides of the fence. The Democrat's strategy was to interview these type of people who can talk in circles and then let their propaganda wing, the MSM, spin the outcome to favor impeachment. But they blew it bad and now either way they vote will be a loser. Naturally Nancy will push for impeachment because that's what the radicals who make up the majority of her party wants. I notice that Schumer, Nadler and Hoyer are all in hiding. In the end, Pelosi will blame the whole thing on Schiff.
 
Ambassadors and diplomats are professionals at talking jive, blowing smoke up peoples asses, speaking with forked tongue and playing both sides of the fence. The Democrat's strategy was to interview these type of people who can talk in circles and then let their propaganda wing, the MSM, spin the outcome to favor impeachment. But they blew it bad and now either way they vote will be a loser. Naturally Nancy will push for impeachment because that's what the radicals who make up the majority of her party wants. I notice that Schumer, Nadler and Hoyer are all in hiding. In the end, Pelosi will blame the whole thing on Schiff.
Isn't it strange that all that circle talk by Democrats was met with no defense by the Republicans? They were a bunch of walking dead Sheep in a hearing they had no defense for.
 
Fiona Hill Hearing:
Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About




Fiona Hill Hearing: Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About
21 Nov 19 ~ By Matt Vespa
The final hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Trump is happening as we speak. Career diplomats and foreign affairs specialists Fiona Hill and David Holmes are testifying in what has been a week of hot air. We’ve had a lot of Democratic hyperbole and a lot of witnesses saying they don’t possess direct evidence of the so-called quid pro quo allegations that have been hurled at the Trump White House. It all stems from a whistleblower report that in July, President Trump threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine unless they opened a corruption probe into Hunter Biden’s position at Burisma, an energy company, despite having zero experience. Biden has been there since his father, Vice President Joe Biden, was in office. He recently left. It’s a total clown show. Some of the witnesses, like Marie Yovanovitch, were just career diplomats who disagreed with Trump on Ukraine policy. Her testimony was a therapy session Yet, one thing that is missed in all of these proceedings is that Ukraine did collude with the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 in a failed attempt to detail the Trump candidacy. Veteran investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson dredged this up from Politico. It’s right there in black and white: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire - POLITICO
Yes, but this is Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) kangaroo court, which is situated in the middle of the twilight zone.


Comment:
There's no reason that both the Ukraine and Russia could not have been both trying to meddle in our elections. From all that I have read it seems absurd to believe that the Ukraine did not attempt to meddle in the 2016 election and it is totally appropriate for our government to demand an investigation by them if they want our assistance.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat radicals are claiming if President Trump said words so he's guilty of something. In the real world, if President Trump did demand a corruption investigation (needed) into Biden & Son Influence Inc. it was prudent and what a real president should be doing everywhere. In fact the Mueller's Report investigation cites Ukraine 133 times as being at the epicenter.
It's quite obvious that the democrats have slime, mud, and grease all over their party as a result of the DNC's campaign efforts with Ukraine and Russia to derail Trump and grease the skids for their white queen, Hillary. Time and time again PMS/DSA Democrats, and the DNC foot prints have been exposed dealing with the oligarchs and corrupt criminal in the Ukraine. They're trying to use impeachment as a shower to wash the slime, mud, and grease off of themselves. However, Schiff and Pelosi are among the slimiest, greasiest, politicians we'll ever experience in our lifetimes. Impeachment will NOT cleanse them. Schiff is appearing slimier by the day.
Just as a reminder Sharyl Atkinson was a long standing Center Left reporter who had an epiphany after being harassed, attacked and illegally spied upon by Barrack Obama and many of the same Spy-Gate FBI DOJ insiders. She is now one of the few Investigative Journalists still doing her job.....Journalism not Propaganda
My impression of this womans opening statement was her laughable statement that the russians done it

All of it

Everything

Because they wanted to disrupt the US democratic process

Which thanks to swamp rats in the Deep State, lib media and the democrat party is succeeding beyond anything putin could have hoped for


I liked her opening -
Took the wind right out of Schiffs sail when she said the Russians wanted chaos - on both sides.

It will be up to the Republican questioners to lead her to the fact that the Democrats have perfected the chaos .

They are not going to get her to open up too much on the Shadow Government State Dept.
The Democrats proved bribery, corruption, witness intimidation, and campaign finance violations through a conspiracy to collude with a foreign government by Trump and his goons. They were all in the loop and Trump is the lead dog.

Republicans do not work for the government. Just themselves.
The dems proved nothing

All they presented was hearsay and rumors
Not when the witnesses have first hand evidence. Are you capable of knowing the difference?
 
I keep mentioning that
I mention that there were convictions in Ukraine for interfering on Hillary's behalf.
Politico had that
The Washington post
The New York times.

Yet it's called a debunked conspiracy theory.

The power of Democratics keeping their people stupid and controlled I guess.
Too bad there was never enough evidence to open an investigation. The Democrats beat them to the punch and proved Trump is the criminal in his own conspiracy to get dirt on Biden.


You're an idiot
And you're a loser.
 
Fiona Hill Hearing:
Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About




Fiona Hill Hearing: Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About
21 Nov 19 ~ By Matt Vespa
The final hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Trump is happening as we speak. Career diplomats and foreign affairs specialists Fiona Hill and David Holmes are testifying in what has been a week of hot air. We’ve had a lot of Democratic hyperbole and a lot of witnesses saying they don’t possess direct evidence of the so-called quid pro quo allegations that have been hurled at the Trump White House. It all stems from a whistleblower report that in July, President Trump threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine unless they opened a corruption probe into Hunter Biden’s position at Burisma, an energy company, despite having zero experience. Biden has been there since his father, Vice President Joe Biden, was in office. He recently left. It’s a total clown show. Some of the witnesses, like Marie Yovanovitch, were just career diplomats who disagreed with Trump on Ukraine policy. Her testimony was a therapy session Yet, one thing that is missed in all of these proceedings is that Ukraine did collude with the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 in a failed attempt to detail the Trump candidacy. Veteran investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson dredged this up from Politico. It’s right there in black and white: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire - POLITICO
Yes, but this is Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) kangaroo court, which is situated in the middle of the twilight zone.


Comment:
There's no reason that both the Ukraine and Russia could not have been both trying to meddle in our elections. From all that I have read it seems absurd to believe that the Ukraine did not attempt to meddle in the 2016 election and it is totally appropriate for our government to demand an investigation by them if they want our assistance.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat radicals are claiming if President Trump said words so he's guilty of something. In the real world, if President Trump did demand a corruption investigation (needed) into Biden & Son Influence Inc. it was prudent and what a real president should be doing everywhere. In fact the Mueller's Report investigation cites Ukraine 133 times as being at the epicenter.
It's quite obvious that the democrats have slime, mud, and grease all over their party as a result of the DNC's campaign efforts with Ukraine and Russia to derail Trump and grease the skids for their white queen, Hillary. Time and time again PMS/DSA Democrats, and the DNC foot prints have been exposed dealing with the oligarchs and corrupt criminal in the Ukraine. They're trying to use impeachment as a shower to wash the slime, mud, and grease off of themselves. However, Schiff and Pelosi are among the slimiest, greasiest, politicians we'll ever experience in our lifetimes. Impeachment will NOT cleanse them. Schiff is appearing slimier by the day.
Just as a reminder Sharyl Atkinson was a long standing Center Left reporter who had an epiphany after being harassed, attacked and illegally spied upon by Barrack Obama and many of the same Spy-Gate FBI DOJ insiders. She is now one of the few Investigative Journalists still doing her job.....Journalism not Propaganda
My impression of this womans opening statement was her laughable statement that the russians done it

All of it

Everything

Because they wanted to disrupt the US democratic process

Which thanks to swamp rats in the Deep State, lib media and the democrat party is succeeding beyond anything putin could have hoped for


I liked her opening -
Took the wind right out of Schiffs sail when she said the Russians wanted chaos - on both sides.

It will be up to the Republican questioners to lead her to the fact that the Democrats have perfected the chaos .

They are not going to get her to open up too much on the Shadow Government State Dept.
The Democrats proved bribery, corruption, witness intimidation, and campaign finance violations through a conspiracy to collude with a foreign government by Trump and his goons. They were all in the loop and Trump is the lead dog.

Republicans do not work for the government. Just themselves.
The dems proved nothing

All they presented was hearsay and rumors


They Proved that the State Department doesn't agree with the policy that the current admin. set.
For some- that's enough.
You cannot set federal campaign finance violations as a current administration policy no matter how hard you try. It's a current federal crime.
 
Fiona Hill Hearing:
Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About




Fiona Hill Hearing: Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About
21 Nov 19 ~ By Matt Vespa
The final hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Trump is happening as we speak. Career diplomats and foreign affairs specialists Fiona Hill and David Holmes are testifying in what has been a week of hot air. We’ve had a lot of Democratic hyperbole and a lot of witnesses saying they don’t possess direct evidence of the so-called quid pro quo allegations that have been hurled at the Trump White House. It all stems from a whistleblower report that in July, President Trump threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine unless they opened a corruption probe into Hunter Biden’s position at Burisma, an energy company, despite having zero experience. Biden has been there since his father, Vice President Joe Biden, was in office. He recently left. It’s a total clown show. Some of the witnesses, like Marie Yovanovitch, were just career diplomats who disagreed with Trump on Ukraine policy. Her testimony was a therapy session Yet, one thing that is missed in all of these proceedings is that Ukraine did collude with the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 in a failed attempt to detail the Trump candidacy. Veteran investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson dredged this up from Politico. It’s right there in black and white: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire - POLITICO
Yes, but this is Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) kangaroo court, which is situated in the middle of the twilight zone.


Comment:
There's no reason that both the Ukraine and Russia could not have been both trying to meddle in our elections. From all that I have read it seems absurd to believe that the Ukraine did not attempt to meddle in the 2016 election and it is totally appropriate for our government to demand an investigation by them if they want our assistance.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat radicals are claiming if President Trump said words so he's guilty of something. In the real world, if President Trump did demand a corruption investigation (needed) into Biden & Son Influence Inc. it was prudent and what a real president should be doing everywhere. In fact the Mueller's Report investigation cites Ukraine 133 times as being at the epicenter.
It's quite obvious that the democrats have slime, mud, and grease all over their party as a result of the DNC's campaign efforts with Ukraine and Russia to derail Trump and grease the skids for their white queen, Hillary. Time and time again PMS/DSA Democrats, and the DNC foot prints have been exposed dealing with the oligarchs and corrupt criminal in the Ukraine. They're trying to use impeachment as a shower to wash the slime, mud, and grease off of themselves. However, Schiff and Pelosi are among the slimiest, greasiest, politicians we'll ever experience in our lifetimes. Impeachment will NOT cleanse them. Schiff is appearing slimier by the day.
Just as a reminder Sharyl Atkinson was a long standing Center Left reporter who had an epiphany after being harassed, attacked and illegally spied upon by Barrack Obama and many of the same Spy-Gate FBI DOJ insiders. She is now one of the few Investigative Journalists still doing her job.....Journalism not Propaganda
My impression of this womans opening statement was her laughable statement that the russians done it

All of it

Everything

Because they wanted to disrupt the US democratic process

Which thanks to swamp rats in the Deep State, lib media and the democrat party is succeeding beyond anything putin could have hoped for


I liked her opening -
Took the wind right out of Schiffs sail when she said the Russians wanted chaos - on both sides.

It will be up to the Republican questioners to lead her to the fact that the Democrats have perfected the chaos .

They are not going to get her to open up too much on the Shadow Government State Dept.
The Democrats proved bribery, corruption, witness intimidation, and campaign finance violations through a conspiracy to collude with a foreign government by Trump and his goons. They were all in the loop and Trump is the lead dog.

Republicans do not work for the government. Just themselves.
The dems proved nothing

All they presented was hearsay and rumors
Not when the witnesses have first hand evidence. Are you capable of knowing the difference?
The democrat witnesses have only rumors, hearsay and personal opinion
 
My impression of this womans opening statement was her laughable statement that the russians done it

All of it

Everything

Because they wanted to disrupt the US democratic process

Which thanks to swamp rats in the Deep State, lib media and the democrat party is succeeding beyond anything putin could have hoped for


I liked her opening -
Took the wind right out of Schiffs sail when she said the Russians wanted chaos - on both sides.

It will be up to the Republican questioners to lead her to the fact that the Democrats have perfected the chaos .

They are not going to get her to open up too much on the Shadow Government State Dept.
The Democrats proved bribery, corruption, witness intimidation, and campaign finance violations through a conspiracy to collude with a foreign government by Trump and his goons. They were all in the loop and Trump is the lead dog.

Republicans do not work for the government. Just themselves.
The dems proved nothing

All they presented was hearsay and rumors
Not when the witnesses have first hand evidence. Are you capable of knowing the difference?
The democrat witnesses have only rumors, hearsay and personal opinion
Thanks! You don't have a clue between first hand facts and hearsay. What a joke.
 
I keep mentioning that
I mention that there were convictions in Ukraine for interfering on Hillary's behalf.
Politico had that
The Washington post
The New York times.

Yet it's called a debunked conspiracy theory.

The power of Democratics keeping their people stupid and controlled I guess.
No there weren't any convictions, brainwashed functional moron.
 
I liked her opening -
Took the wind right out of Schiffs sail when she said the Russians wanted chaos - on both sides.

It will be up to the Republican questioners to lead her to the fact that the Democrats have perfected the chaos .

They are not going to get her to open up too much on the Shadow Government State Dept.
The Democrats proved bribery, corruption, witness intimidation, and campaign finance violations through a conspiracy to collude with a foreign government by Trump and his goons. They were all in the loop and Trump is the lead dog.

Republicans do not work for the government. Just themselves.
The dems proved nothing

All they presented was hearsay and rumors
Not when the witnesses have first hand evidence. Are you capable of knowing the difference?
The democrat witnesses have only rumors, hearsay and personal opinion
Thanks! You don't have a clue between first hand facts and hearsay. What a joke.
There are no first hand facts against trump
 
The Democrats proved bribery, corruption, witness intimidation, and campaign finance violations through a conspiracy to collude with a foreign government by Trump and his goons. They were all in the loop and Trump is the lead dog.

Republicans do not work for the government. Just themselves.
The dems proved nothing

All they presented was hearsay and rumors
Not when the witnesses have first hand evidence. Are you capable of knowing the difference?
The democrat witnesses have only rumors, hearsay and personal opinion
Thanks! You don't have a clue between first hand facts and hearsay. What a joke.
There are no first hand facts against trump
You don't know what "first hand facts" actually mean, so take a hike.
 
Who's the lessor of your two evils forever and ever amen. Corruption is an american value.

Perfected by The Democratic Party.
Except the perfection of evidence against Republicans is what matters today.
You win the stupidest poster of the day award. Now, shut up.
The only idiots who got shut up were Trumps Sheep with no defense.
Lol, you got nothing, in fact if republicans in the Senate drag this impeachment thing till the election. Quite a few Democrat presidential candidates won't be able to go on the campaign trail. What a shame. Lol
 
Fiona Hill Hearing:
Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About




Fiona Hill Hearing: Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About
21 Nov 19 ~ By Matt Vespa
The final hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Trump is happening as we speak. Career diplomats and foreign affairs specialists Fiona Hill and David Holmes are testifying in what has been a week of hot air. We’ve had a lot of Democratic hyperbole and a lot of witnesses saying they don’t possess direct evidence of the so-called quid pro quo allegations that have been hurled at the Trump White House. It all stems from a whistleblower report that in July, President Trump threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine unless they opened a corruption probe into Hunter Biden’s position at Burisma, an energy company, despite having zero experience. Biden has been there since his father, Vice President Joe Biden, was in office. He recently left. It’s a total clown show. Some of the witnesses, like Marie Yovanovitch, were just career diplomats who disagreed with Trump on Ukraine policy. Her testimony was a therapy session Yet, one thing that is missed in all of these proceedings is that Ukraine did collude with the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 in a failed attempt to detail the Trump candidacy. Veteran investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson dredged this up from Politico. It’s right there in black and white: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire - POLITICO
Yes, but this is Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) kangaroo court, which is situated in the middle of the twilight zone.


Comment:
There's no reason that both the Ukraine and Russia could not have been both trying to meddle in our elections. From all that I have read it seems absurd to believe that the Ukraine did not attempt to meddle in the 2016 election and it is totally appropriate for our government to demand an investigation by them if they want our assistance.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat radicals are claiming if President Trump said words so he's guilty of something. In the real world, if President Trump did demand a corruption investigation (needed) into Biden & Son Influence Inc. it was prudent and what a real president should be doing everywhere. In fact the Mueller's Report investigation cites Ukraine 133 times as being at the epicenter.
It's quite obvious that the democrats have slime, mud, and grease all over their party as a result of the DNC's campaign efforts with Ukraine and Russia to derail Trump and grease the skids for their white queen, Hillary. Time and time again PMS/DSA Democrats, and the DNC foot prints have been exposed dealing with the oligarchs and corrupt criminal in the Ukraine. They're trying to use impeachment as a shower to wash the slime, mud, and grease off of themselves. However, Schiff and Pelosi are among the slimiest, greasiest, politicians we'll ever experience in our lifetimes. Impeachment will NOT cleanse them. Schiff is appearing slimier by the day.
Just as a reminder Sharyl Atkinson was a long standing Center Left reporter who had an epiphany after being harassed, attacked and illegally spied upon by Barrack Obama and many of the same Spy-Gate FBI DOJ insiders. She is now one of the few Investigative Journalists still doing her job.....Journalism not Propaganda

Reading the politico story- it is very clear that there were serious allegations against Paul Manafort receiving $12 million in kickbacks from Russia in the Ukraine.

Why, if Trump was calling Ukraine about Biden supposedly to fight corruption, didn't Trump also ask Ukraine to investigate Manafort?

Documents released by an independent Ukrainian government agency — and publicized by a parliamentarian — appeared to show $12.7 million in cash payments that were earmarked for Manafort by the Russia-aligned party of the deposed former president, Yanukovyc

“I believe and understand the basis of these payments are totally against the law — we have the proof from these books,” Leshchenko said during the news conference, which attracted international media coverage. “If Mr. Manafort denies any allegations, I think he has to be interrogated into this case and prove his position that he was not involved in any misconduct on the territory of Ukraine,” Leshchenko added.
 
What the Ukraine had done is to expose Paul Manafort's criminal actions which landed him in the slammer.

Wait you mean Paul Manafort- Trump campaign advisor- was involved in corruption in Ukraine?

I guess Trump asked Ukraine to investigate Manafort in a call we haven't heard about....
 
Fiona Hill Hearing:
Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About




Fiona Hill Hearing: Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About
21 Nov 19 ~ By Matt Vespa
The final hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Trump is happening as we speak. Career diplomats and foreign affairs specialists Fiona Hill and David Holmes are testifying in what has been a week of hot air. We’ve had a lot of Democratic hyperbole and a lot of witnesses saying they don’t possess direct evidence of the so-called quid pro quo allegations that have been hurled at the Trump White House. It all stems from a whistleblower report that in July, President Trump threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine unless they opened a corruption probe into Hunter Biden’s position at Burisma, an energy company, despite having zero experience. Biden has been there since his father, Vice President Joe Biden, was in office. He recently left. It’s a total clown show. Some of the witnesses, like Marie Yovanovitch, were just career diplomats who disagreed with Trump on Ukraine policy. Her testimony was a therapy session Yet, one thing that is missed in all of these proceedings is that Ukraine did collude with the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 in a failed attempt to detail the Trump candidacy. Veteran investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson dredged this up from Politico. It’s right there in black and white: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire - POLITICO
Yes, but this is Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) kangaroo court, which is situated in the middle of the twilight zone.


Comment:
There's no reason that both the Ukraine and Russia could not have been both trying to meddle in our elections. From all that I have read it seems absurd to believe that the Ukraine did not attempt to meddle in the 2016 election and it is totally appropriate for our government to demand an investigation by them if they want our assistance.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat radicals are claiming if President Trump said words so he's guilty of something. In the real world, if President Trump did demand a corruption investigation (needed) into Biden & Son Influence Inc. it was prudent and what a real president should be doing everywhere. In fact the Mueller's Report investigation cites Ukraine 133 times as being at the epicenter.
It's quite obvious that the democrats have slime, mud, and grease all over their party as a result of the DNC's campaign efforts with Ukraine and Russia to derail Trump and grease the skids for their white queen, Hillary. Time and time again PMS/DSA Democrats, and the DNC foot prints have been exposed dealing with the oligarchs and corrupt criminal in the Ukraine. They're trying to use impeachment as a shower to wash the slime, mud, and grease off of themselves. However, Schiff and Pelosi are among the slimiest, greasiest, politicians we'll ever experience in our lifetimes. Impeachment will NOT cleanse them. Schiff is appearing slimier by the day.
Just as a reminder Sharyl Atkinson was a long standing Center Left reporter who had an epiphany after being harassed, attacked and illegally spied upon by Barrack Obama and many of the same Spy-Gate FBI DOJ insiders. She is now one of the few Investigative Journalists still doing her job.....Journalism not Propaganda
My impression of this womans opening statement was her laughable statement that the russians done it

All of it

Everything

Because they wanted to disrupt the US democratic process

Which thanks to swamp rats in the Deep State, lib media and the democrat party is succeeding beyond anything putin could have hoped for


I liked her opening -
Took the wind right out of Schiffs sail when she said the Russians wanted chaos - on both sides.

It will be up to the Republican questioners to lead her to the fact that the Democrats have perfected the chaos .

They are not going to get her to open up too much on the Shadow Government State Dept.
The Democrats proved bribery, corruption, witness intimidation, and campaign finance violations through a conspiracy to collude with a foreign government by Trump and his goons. They were all in the loop and Trump is the lead dog.

Republicans do not work for the government. Just themselves.
They SAID they proved it.

They never got around to actually doing it.
 
Fiona Hill Hearing:
Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About




Fiona Hill Hearing: Sharyl Attkisson Dredges up the Ukraine Story Democrats Don't Want to Talk About
21 Nov 19 ~ By Matt Vespa
The final hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Trump is happening as we speak. Career diplomats and foreign affairs specialists Fiona Hill and David Holmes are testifying in what has been a week of hot air. We’ve had a lot of Democratic hyperbole and a lot of witnesses saying they don’t possess direct evidence of the so-called quid pro quo allegations that have been hurled at the Trump White House. It all stems from a whistleblower report that in July, President Trump threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine unless they opened a corruption probe into Hunter Biden’s position at Burisma, an energy company, despite having zero experience. Biden has been there since his father, Vice President Joe Biden, was in office. He recently left. It’s a total clown show. Some of the witnesses, like Marie Yovanovitch, were just career diplomats who disagreed with Trump on Ukraine policy. Her testimony was a therapy session Yet, one thing that is missed in all of these proceedings is that Ukraine did collude with the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 in a failed attempt to detail the Trump candidacy. Veteran investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson dredged this up from Politico. It’s right there in black and white: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire - POLITICO
Yes, but this is Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) kangaroo court, which is situated in the middle of the twilight zone.


Comment:
There's no reason that both the Ukraine and Russia could not have been both trying to meddle in our elections. From all that I have read it seems absurd to believe that the Ukraine did not attempt to meddle in the 2016 election and it is totally appropriate for our government to demand an investigation by them if they want our assistance.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat radicals are claiming if President Trump said words so he's guilty of something. In the real world, if President Trump did demand a corruption investigation (needed) into Biden & Son Influence Inc. it was prudent and what a real president should be doing everywhere. In fact the Mueller's Report investigation cites Ukraine 133 times as being at the epicenter.
It's quite obvious that the democrats have slime, mud, and grease all over their party as a result of the DNC's campaign efforts with Ukraine and Russia to derail Trump and grease the skids for their white queen, Hillary. Time and time again PMS/DSA Democrats, and the DNC foot prints have been exposed dealing with the oligarchs and corrupt criminal in the Ukraine. They're trying to use impeachment as a shower to wash the slime, mud, and grease off of themselves. However, Schiff and Pelosi are among the slimiest, greasiest, politicians we'll ever experience in our lifetimes. Impeachment will NOT cleanse them. Schiff is appearing slimier by the day.
Just as a reminder Sharyl Atkinson was a long standing Center Left reporter who had an epiphany after being harassed, attacked and illegally spied upon by Barrack Obama and many of the same Spy-Gate FBI DOJ insiders. She is now one of the few Investigative Journalists still doing her job.....Journalism not Propaganda
Here are a couple more, from the go-to sources for the moonbats...


Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Secret Ledger in Ukraine Lists Cash for Donald Trump’s Campaign Chief

Feel free to pass those around too...You're welcome.
 

Forum List

Back
Top